The Yard (15th & Cuming)
Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss
I'm not sure why you seem to think this is a bad thing Linkin. Â Granted, another Nines or 22 floors would be preferable and even the Saddle Creek guys went on record stating they preferred a permanent development. Â But do you really think it will still be just a courtyard in 5 years? For the time being it seems better than the empty lot it is now.
- TitosBuritoBarn
- Planning Board
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 7:08 pm
- Location: St. Louis
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6864
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
http://www.omaha.com/article/20101012/N ... or-go-slow
Residents and businesses are very concerned that this 10-year empty lot permit could derail the vision for North Downtown. And they are absolutely right to be concerned.
Any "temporary" permit given should be in two, maybe three year increments, so the city can reconsider market conditions and encourage the owner to develop.
NewStreet is a huge, corporate land developer. They are not thinking of what is best for the neighborhood. They are holding out to maximize their profits (at the neighborhood and City's expense) so their chief executives can line their pockets as much as possible.
Residents and businesses are very concerned that this 10-year empty lot permit could derail the vision for North Downtown. And they are absolutely right to be concerned.
Any "temporary" permit given should be in two, maybe three year increments, so the city can reconsider market conditions and encourage the owner to develop.
NewStreet is a huge, corporate land developer. They are not thinking of what is best for the neighborhood. They are holding out to maximize their profits (at the neighborhood and City's expense) so their chief executives can line their pockets as much as possible.
Last edited by StreetsOfOmaha on Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
I think it will be in place much longer than that. I work in North DT now and I really do not see the area changing much in the next decade. Many of the projects in the area now have been urban blunders on many levels, and this just sets further precedence. The Hilton is an atrocious waste of land as compared to the Marriott design. Not even considering the the height but much of hotels property is dedicated to little used surface parking. Removing commercial and retail space from the stadium was incredibly short sighted. It's not as if there is a shortage of parking in the area, but there are now that many fewer retail/commercial opportunities in NDT. The idiotic idea that a triangular lot is somehow "dead space", (but yet a prime location? ) only usable for a sweetheart deal for an ice cream shop, further shows no one in charge here is looking at the big picture of what NDT could have been. MECA seems to think they can never get rid of their surface lots. And now we'll have a "temporary" place holder with The Yard. Â I'm realistic about the economy's effect on development but I see the area floundering long term (at least as a true urban neighborhood) due to the lack of cohesive vision for the area. What it is now is a wanna-be OKC.omahahawk wrote:I'm not sure why you seem to think this is a bad thing Linkin. Granted, another Nines or 22 floors would be preferable and even the Saddle Creek guys went on record stating they preferred a permanent development. But do you really think it will still be just a courtyard in 5 years? For the time being it seems better than the empty lot it is now.
DTO
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6864
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
Wow. Well said, D'Shawn.
I agree there has been a complete lack of cohesive vision. I really wish the 2005 North Downtown Master plan was able to actually get the city to put into effect serious design and infill guidelines for the district. This also an example of how a revised tax code could work wonders - penalizing landowners who sit on vacant or surface parking lots and rewarding them for developing multi-story, mixed use projects.
This makes me think of Portland's Pearl District. Look at what has happened there in the span of a decade. Yes, it was different economic times, but I doubt that city's government would have granted a ten year open lot permit for a huge two-square block site.
I'm wondering how things would be different if we had the first or second phase of the streetcar in place or being built, which should have happened years ago.
Why are there such roadblocks to progress in Omaha?
I agree there has been a complete lack of cohesive vision. I really wish the 2005 North Downtown Master plan was able to actually get the city to put into effect serious design and infill guidelines for the district. This also an example of how a revised tax code could work wonders - penalizing landowners who sit on vacant or surface parking lots and rewarding them for developing multi-story, mixed use projects.
This makes me think of Portland's Pearl District. Look at what has happened there in the span of a decade. Yes, it was different economic times, but I doubt that city's government would have granted a ten year open lot permit for a huge two-square block site.
I'm wondering how things would be different if we had the first or second phase of the streetcar in place or being built, which should have happened years ago.
Why are there such roadblocks to progress in Omaha?
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
I agree 10 years is too many for a temporary permit, and any temporary permit should've been done on probably a 3-5 year basis.StreetsOfOmaha wrote:http://www.omaha.com/article/20101012/N ... or-go-slow
Residents and businesses are very concerned that this 10-year empty lot permit could derail the vision for North Downtown. And they are absolutely right to be concerned.
Any "temporary" permit given should be in two, maybe three year increments, so the city can reconsider market conditions and encourage the owner to develop.
NewStreet is a huge, corporate land developer. They are not thinking of what is best for the neighborhood. They are holding out to maximize their profits (at the neighborhood and City's expense) so their chief executives can line their pockets as much as possible.
I even agree that they're holding out to maximize their profits. My issue is I don't see what's wrong with that. I think anyone that goes in to business wants to make a living. They own the land outright, and notwithstanding the god awful Kelo decision, they should be free to develop the land at their leisure.
As much as people want to see growth, the points they make (god awful economy, huge gluts in the office space and condo markets, tight construction lending market, etc.) are all valid reasons to hold off.
Who would have ever thought that a business would aim to maximize it's profits with the assets it rightfully owns. I also do not seeing why an outdoor venue in North Downtown is such a problem. Summer time and baseball doesn't equal sitting in a booth in a bar a block away from the stadium. I think we and the north downtown neighborhood will live to see another sunrise with or without "The Yard."
Once again, this is another example of the unwillingness to compromise on ANYTHING from the "mixed-use" crowd.
So, when all else fails, let's just panic.
Once again, this is another example of the unwillingness to compromise on ANYTHING from the "mixed-use" crowd.
So, when all else fails, let's just panic.
Just be sure not to let anyone come around and tell you how to run your business and utilize your assets. Coming from a small business owner, reaping the benefits of an open, capitalistic market, I find many of your arguments ironic and contradicting to your own interests.Big E wrote:Compromise? So far that crowd has been completely and totally ignored in nearly every aspect of north downtown's development.S33 wrote:Once again, this is another example of the unwillingness to compromise on ANYTHING from the "mixed-use" crowd.
(if I am correct from previous conversations that you are, in fact, a business owner)
I'm a small business owner that doesn't live in a dreamworld that never has and never will exist, and wouldn't work anyway.
It's only a free market if everyone is playing by the same set of rules. Â Any unregulated free market will inevitably cease to exist once the major players get together and stifle competition - which always has and always will happen barring government regulation.
Frankly, I'd do it myself given the opportunity. Â This doesn't even take in to consideration the willingness to completely and totally |expletive| over any and all that get in the way of said goal.
Besides, this conversation is about development ordinances. Â Things like fire codes, plumbing, bathrooms, zoning, easements, etc.
Making the jump from this (which you seem to agree with in your own backyard) to fascism is a little extreme, don't you think?
It's only a free market if everyone is playing by the same set of rules. Â Any unregulated free market will inevitably cease to exist once the major players get together and stifle competition - which always has and always will happen barring government regulation.
Frankly, I'd do it myself given the opportunity. Â This doesn't even take in to consideration the willingness to completely and totally |expletive| over any and all that get in the way of said goal.
Besides, this conversation is about development ordinances. Â Things like fire codes, plumbing, bathrooms, zoning, easements, etc.
Making the jump from this (which you seem to agree with in your own backyard) to fascism is a little extreme, don't you think?
As I already said...Big E wrote:
Making the jump from this (which you seem to agree with in your own backyard) to fascism is a little extreme, don't you think?
s33 wrote:
BigE, had I known your original analogy was in response to OFace, I would not have responded. I didn't agree with his post and wasn't supporting that position.
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6864
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
I'm reinserting the following post because it should never have been removed as it in noway singles out or insults any group or individual and pertains directly to the topic at hand: land use in North Downtown:
The truth, though, is that nobody really owns land. We live in a country with a government. If you want to purchase a secluded island and own it outright, then you can start your own society and build whatever you want there.
Land use affects every aspect of life, and can affect quality of life profoundly. What one person does with "their" land can affect their neighbor and their entire community.
Also, Big E, great point about the zoning ordinances that suburbanites "benefit" from being government regulations that just happen to jive with their ideology. There is no retort to that, and regulating land use in North Downtown is no different.
For you suburbanites, think of it in terms of somebody buying the subdivided parcel right next to your home. They don't want to build anything on it right now, because they're going to wait until building prices go down so they can save some dollars. In the meantime, they are just going to camp in a tent on the lot indefinitely, possibly for years to come.
Does that sound healthy for your neighborhood?
The truth, though, is that nobody really owns land. We live in a country with a government. If you want to purchase a secluded island and own it outright, then you can start your own society and build whatever you want there.
Land use affects every aspect of life, and can affect quality of life profoundly. What one person does with "their" land can affect their neighbor and their entire community.
Also, Big E, great point about the zoning ordinances that suburbanites "benefit" from being government regulations that just happen to jive with their ideology. There is no retort to that, and regulating land use in North Downtown is no different.
For you suburbanites, think of it in terms of somebody buying the subdivided parcel right next to your home. They don't want to build anything on it right now, because they're going to wait until building prices go down so they can save some dollars. In the meantime, they are just going to camp in a tent on the lot indefinitely, possibly for years to come.
Does that sound healthy for your neighborhood?
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
- OmahaJaysCU
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:00 pm
I 100% agree. Â The retail for Phase 3 of the Bluestone development is completely leased (not finalized completely though). Â Demand for affordable (young professional type) housing in downtown is very high. Â I would bet that a few hundred units of apartments with retail on the ground level would be a huge seller. Â Like all developments right now, securing financing would be difficult. Â But I feel like the demand is there. ÂStreetsOfOmaha wrote:http://www.omaha.com/article/20101012/N ... or-go-slow
Residents and businesses are very concerned that this 10-year empty lot permit could derail the vision for North Downtown. And they are absolutely right to be concerned.
Any "temporary" permit given should be in two, maybe three year increments, so the city can reconsider market conditions and encourage the owner to develop.
NewStreet is a huge, corporate land developer. They are not thinking of what is best for the neighborhood. They are holding out to maximize their profits (at the neighborhood and City's expense) so their chief executives can line their pockets as much as possible.
The Yard won't ever turn into anything else. Â I would bet a ton of money on it. Â Beer revenues from the CWS would be massive. Â Costs to maintain the property for Newstreet would be very low. Â By next June, they could probably cover all of their losses on the property through just 1 CWS. Â This is exactly what the neighborhood does not need. Â I do think that there should be some type of public greenspace in NDT. Â But a giant fenced in area is not the answer.
- OmahaJaysCU
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:00 pm
To address NDT as a whole. Â I think the biggest hindrance to development right now is the diversity of ownership among all NDT properties. Â This gives an unfair advantage to current landowners. Â Developer X can try and buy parcels Y and Z, but the owner of land W now has the power to hold out and list the property at more than its worth. Â This property, given its common ownership, can be very attractive to potential investors. Â If Newstreet isn't going to do anything, they need to sell it.
If you really wanted to bet, go try to secure a loan and finance such a project yourself. If it's such a sure fire seller, I'm sure you'd have no problem obtaining financing.OmahaJaysCU wrote:Demand for affordable (young professional type) housing in downtown is very high. I would bet that a few hundred units of apartments with retail on the ground level would be a huge seller.
Or is this like most other "bets" on this forum, where people only want to bet other people's money?
Besides, I think Newstreet admitted that apartments would probably be in demand in the last fishwrap article. But they don't want to build an apartment building and deal with residential tenants rather than owners. Frankly, I don't blame them. I've lived in 3 different apartment complexes over the last 5 years, and in 2 of the 3 the tenants treat the building like ****.
Again, the question is demand for what.Like all developments right now, securing financing would be difficult. Â But I feel like the demand is there.
Sure you would. So long as it was other people's money.The Yard won't ever turn into anything else. I would bet a ton of money on it.
I remember looking a few years back - there ain't shyt, at least nothing worth the money they are charging. I know as of last year there were a couple developers toying with the idea of more affordable options, however, the locations weren't exactly "prime."OmahaJaysCU wrote:
And have you tried looking for affordable apartments that cater to young professionals in downtown? Because you won't find much. Meanwhile, projects like 22 Floors are sold out.
- OmahaJaysCU
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:00 pm
Honest question though to be devil's advocate, given the extreme lack of development in NDT, is 15th and Cuming a prime location?S33 wrote:I remember looking a few years back - there ain't shyt, at least nothing worth the money they are charging. I know as of last year there were a couple developers toying with the idea of more affordable options, however, the locations weren't exactly "prime."OmahaJaysCU wrote:
And have you tried looking for affordable apartments that cater to young professionals in downtown? Because you won't find much. Meanwhile, projects like 22 Floors are sold out.
Right now, I would say no. But I also have no idea what the occupancy rate is closer to the Old Market. If it's high enough, I would guess they could charge prime prices...OmahaJaysCU wrote:Honest question though to be devil's advocate, given the extreme lack of development in NDT, is 15th and Cuming a prime location?S33 wrote:I remember looking a few years back - there ain't shyt, at least nothing worth the money they are charging. I know as of last year there were a couple developers toying with the idea of more affordable options, however, the locations weren't exactly "prime."OmahaJaysCU wrote:
And have you tried looking for affordable apartments that cater to young professionals in downtown? Because you won't find much. Meanwhile, projects like 22 Floors are sold out.
Seeing as I am the pure definition of a young professional as a just-out-of-school lawyer, who until a few months ago lived within walking distance of downtown, yes, yes I did.OmahaJaysCU wrote:And have you tried looking for affordable apartments that cater to young professionals in downtown? Because you won't find much. Meanwhile, projects like 22 Floors, and Tip Top are sold out. In this climate its difficult to get projects financed period, regardless of how "sure things" they are.
And my point still stands, I don't blame people for not wanting to build "affordable apartments" even if the demand is there when they get trashed by their tenants - the TipTop, for instance, is really nothing but an off-campus dormitory for Creighton and it shows. My wife (then fiancee) and I paid more for a better apartment, and didn't regret it.
They voted on the yard today so now there will be a "re-vote" in December.
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
Total victory for the neighborhood, albeit far from the announcement of a 4-6 story mixed-use development. Sometime soon, I hope! Even so, glad someone is actually listening to the people who live and work in the area. Or is it just the strong-arms of MECA + NCAA? I'll take it either way.
Also, I obviously don't post much on these forums but have been enjoying them for years. This project in particular seems like it would get more "action," so to speak. What gives?
On that note, notice how "Cuming" is misspelled in the thread title? Naughty. :lol:
Also, I obviously don't post much on these forums but have been enjoying them for years. This project in particular seems like it would get more "action," so to speak. What gives?
On that note, notice how "Cuming" is misspelled in the thread title? Naughty. :lol:
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6864
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
Total victory!
From the OWH Article:
Meanwhile, NuStyle announces the development of 106 market rate apartments with ground floor retail Downtown...
From the OWH Article:
Yes, a placeholder until the economy can support a full mixed-use development...The developer says the project is a placeholder until the economy and north downtown can support a full development with offices, shops and housing.
Meanwhile, NuStyle announces the development of 106 market rate apartments with ground floor retail Downtown...
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
It's official!!! The Yard will now become The Parking Lot.
Prime Downtown Land To Become Parking Lot
http://www.ketv.com/news/25976540/detail.html
Well, at least this^^^ makes sense... water-headed morons.
Prime Downtown Land To Become Parking Lot
http://www.ketv.com/news/25976540/detail.html
OMAHA, Neb. -- A 2 square-block piece of prime, undeveloped land in north downtown Omaha that could have been a brick-walled, open-air entertainment pavilion will instead become a parking lot, officials said.
"Alcohol sales would not be allowed during the two-week College World Series, but would be allowed the rest of the year"Officials said the city and the developer agreed to a compromise that would transform it into a paved surface to park cars.
The developer said the site will still be called the yard and events will still be held there.
Officials told KETV that alcohol sales would not be allowed during the two-week College World Series, but would be allowed the rest of the year.
Members of the North Downtown business Association said they were satisfied with the design changes. They said they hoped the site would be further developed in the future.
Well, at least this^^^ makes sense... water-headed morons.
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6864
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
Funny how they made it seem like it was going to be this glorious, open-air entertainment pavilion... but in stead it will be a parking lot. When in reality, both options are virtually the same exact land use - which is the exact same land-use that exist right now, this very day, on that site.
Much ado about nothing.
Yes, iamjacobm, I remember when there was a master plan, too...
Much ado about nothing.
Yes, iamjacobm, I remember when there was a master plan, too...
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
They're just giving credit where it is due. Our planning department deserves an award. The next "big story" will be whether the parking stalls are striped with white paint or yellow.justnick wrote:Merely pointing out that our dear geniuses in Omaha News feel the need to do a story on how a parking lot is becoming a parking lot. Love them.S33 wrote:Nothing gets by you :)justnick wrote:It's already a parking lot. Does this just mean it's getting paved?
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
...and then they were gone.
LOL, I wondered about that too! Must have been a slow news day! The station we had on (forget which one) emphasized that there may be some entertainment in the parking lot as well.justnick wrote:Merely pointing out that our dear geniuses in Omaha News feel the need to do a story on how a parking lot is becoming a parking lot. Love them.
I have said it before, but I will say it again. Â I really want a 5 story mixed use development. Â
However until this economy turns around, The Yard was a much better option that what there now (85% grass field - 15% gravel "parking") or the proposed paved parking lot. Â Besides the tax revenue that just disappeared (which I mentioned in a previous post) we also just lost a bunch of jobs.
People Making Money from a parking lot:
Engineer
concrete worker
parking lot attendant
snow plow
People Making Money from the yard:
Engineer
Architect
concrete worker
parking lot attendant
snow plow
landscapers
planning and event coordinators
tent rental companies
bartenders/waitstaff
clothing vender's
catering companies
maintenance staff
security
and many more...
If they didn't want a permanent beer garden, which I do not either, then fine give "The Yard" a 4 or 5 year permit rather than the 10 they initially gave them. Â Omaha cant just throw money and upset off companies that have been great partners in the past.
However until this economy turns around, The Yard was a much better option that what there now (85% grass field - 15% gravel "parking") or the proposed paved parking lot. Â Besides the tax revenue that just disappeared (which I mentioned in a previous post) we also just lost a bunch of jobs.
People Making Money from a parking lot:
Engineer
concrete worker
parking lot attendant
snow plow
People Making Money from the yard:
Engineer
Architect
concrete worker
parking lot attendant
snow plow
landscapers
planning and event coordinators
tent rental companies
bartenders/waitstaff
clothing vender's
catering companies
maintenance staff
security
and many more...
If they didn't want a permanent beer garden, which I do not either, then fine give "The Yard" a 4 or 5 year permit rather than the 10 they initially gave them. Â Omaha cant just throw money and upset off companies that have been great partners in the past.
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6864
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
But Brad, it would seem to me that the more money that is being made with the property on a year-round basis, the more disincentive there is to develop it for its proper use in the hopefully near future.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Then blame the great partners because they refused to do the project without beer.Brad wrote:I have said it before, but I will say it again. I really want a 5 story mixed use development.
However until this economy turns around, The Yard was a much better option that what there now (85% grass field - 15% gravel "parking") or the proposed paved parking lot. Besides the tax revenue that just disappeared (which I mentioned in a previous post) we also just lost a bunch of jobs.
People Making Money from a parking lot:
Engineer
concrete worker
parking lot attendant
snow plow
People Making Money from the yard:
Engineer
Architect
concrete worker
parking lot attendant
snow plow
landscapers
planning and event coordinators
tent rental companies
bartenders/waitstaff
clothing vender's
catering companies
maintenance staff
security
and many more...
If they didn't want a permanent beer garden, which I do not either, then fine give "The Yard" a 4 or 5 year permit rather than the 10 they initially gave them. Omaha cant just throw money and upset off companies that have been great partners in the past.