Missouri River Commons (Riverfront Development)

Downtown, Midtown, and all parts east of 72nd.

Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss

almighty_tuna
City Council
Posts: 105417
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:34 pm
Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado
Contact:

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by almighty_tuna »

Go big or go home on this site. It's the only way this will be a viable development, imo. lots of plans floating around.
User avatar
PotatoeEatsFish
Human Relations
Posts: 747
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 11:59 pm

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by PotatoeEatsFish »

almighty_tuna wrote:Go big or go home on this site. It's the only way this will be a viable development, imo. Lots of plans floating around.
Would the Almighty Tuna care to tell us peasants some inside news?
:D
#SaveTheUglyGrainSilos2024
almighty_tuna
City Council
Posts: 105417
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:34 pm
Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado
Contact:

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by almighty_tuna »

PotatoeEatsFish wrote:
almighty_tuna wrote:Go big or go home on this site. It's the only way this will be a viable development, imo. Lots of plans floating around.
Would the Almighty Tuna care to tell us peasants some inside news?
:D
I've heard a couple different things. can't speak to specifics. but look at what we've already tried. rick's isn't exactly a big investment though, right? So you polish a turd and make a half-assed effort and call it green space along the river with some food trucks and bs, or make it a destination. the parts are there; bridge extension to connect fahey dr. to the riverfront, blank slate along riverfront drive, potential redevelopment of the conagra space, old power plant apartments. just draw a line along the riverfront, add some dollars. could be great. or could be a continuation of ho-hum. i don't see a real middle ground here that also breeds success.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10376
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by iamjacobm »

Did the mayor even mention the timeframe for putting out the RFP?
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by Coyote »

iamjacobm wrote:Did the mayor even mention the timeframe for putting out the RFP?
Mayor Jean Stothert has said she expects to issue a request for proposals for the site after the building is demolished
User avatar
schumatt
Home Owners Association
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 7:44 pm
Location: Downtown Omaha
Contact:

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by schumatt »

Two words would make me incredibly happy for this site: Shake Shack
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7806
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by MTO »

Pink berry
15-17, 26, 32
User avatar
BRoss
IT Director
Posts: 10002763
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: West Central Omaha

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by BRoss »

MTO wrote:Pink berry
Member berry
omahahawk
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:16 pm

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by omahahawk »

iamjacobm wrote:I heard something really big is churning behind the scenes. Like 9 digit budget big.

I'd really like to know more about the 9 digits thing. If that's the case I have to admit I'd be really shocked, quite pleasantly shocked though. That would I mean assume fully gutting the area, doing it right, removing the lead to standards where some real re-development can happen. I'm 100 per cent with Tuna on this, go big or go home. Volleyball courts and food trucks = LAME. Do it right this time and make it a destination. I mean, even as the concrete jungle it is now I'm always surprised at the number of people down there at any given time. Connect the pedestrian bridge to Mike Fahey St., put in a destination attraction (Museum, etc.), more residential, sustainable smaller businesses, and trail connection u p Lauritzen Gardens/Henry Doorly and this thing is a grand slam. I believe the RPS were supposed to be in pretty soon. I think those were just for the Storz site. Hopefully words drops on that soon. Really hope some kind of word comes on the rest of the riverfront and the bigger plans for the area.
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7806
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by MTO »

HR Paperstacks wrote:
MTO wrote:Pink berry
Member berry
:D
15-17, 26, 32
User avatar
Garrett
Planning Board
Posts: 3487
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by Garrett »

HR Paperstacks wrote:
MTO wrote:Pink berry
Member berry
Member Streetcars?
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
BRoss
IT Director
Posts: 10002763
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: West Central Omaha

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by BRoss »

Garrett wrote:
HR Paperstacks wrote:
MTO wrote:Pink berry
Member berry
Member Streetcars?
Ohh, member Jobbers Cannon?
choke
Human Relations
Posts: 696
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 8:46 am
Location: North Omaha

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by choke »

omahahawk wrote:
iamjacobm wrote:I heard something really big is churning behind the scenes. Like 9 digit budget big.

I'd really like to know more about the 9 digits thing. If that's the case I have to admit I'd be really shocked, quite pleasantly shocked though. That would I mean assume fully gutting the area, doing it right, removing the lead to standards where some real re-development can happen. I'm 100 per cent with Tuna on this, go big or go home. Volleyball courts and food trucks = LAME. Do it right this time and make it a destination. I mean, even as the concrete jungle it is now I'm always surprised at the number of people down there at any given time. Connect the pedestrian bridge to Mike Fahey St., put in a destination attraction (Museum, etc.), more residential, sustainable smaller businesses, and trail connection u p Lauritzen Gardens/Henry Doorly and this thing is a grand slam. I believe the RPS were supposed to be in pretty soon. I think those were just for the Storz site. Hopefully words drops on that soon. Really hope some kind of word comes on the rest of the riverfront and the bigger plans for the area.
Yeah. Council Bluffs is building an office park with housing and retail on their side of the river and Omaha is planning on a sand volleyball court and a food truck. Lead or no lead, Omaha better step it up.
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7806
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by MTO »

Yeah but Omaha's side already has a few high rises, a couple stadiums, convection center and has to deal with contaminated soil so..
15-17, 26, 32
MadMartin8
Planning Board
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by MadMartin8 »

MTO wrote:Yeah but Omaha's side already has a few high rises, a couple stadiums, convection center and has to deal with contaminated soil so..

Convection Center Omaha. A good place to cook your hot pockets. :D
No posts exist for this topic
User avatar
Omaha_Gabe
Human Relations
Posts: 731
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:22 pm
Location: Midtown Crossings

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by Omaha_Gabe »

I feel we lack in museums and exploration centers.
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7806
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by MTO »

According to Nebraska law; science is sorcery and art is the devil's pornography.
15-17, 26, 32
choke
Human Relations
Posts: 696
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 8:46 am
Location: North Omaha

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by choke »

MTO wrote:According to Nebraska law; science is sorcery and art is the devil's pornography.

Have to go across the state line to dance
bigredmed
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1897
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:45 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by bigredmed »

choke wrote:
MTO wrote:According to Nebraska law; science is sorcery and art is the devil's pornography.

Have to go across the state line to dance
You can dance in Nebraska as long as it's a polka. Anything else is the devil's work.
User avatar
nativeomahan
County Board
Posts: 5316
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Omaha and Puerto Vallarta

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by nativeomahan »

MadMartin8 wrote:
MTO wrote:Yeah but Omaha's side already has a few high rises, a couple stadiums, convection center and has to deal with contaminated soil so..

Convection Center Omaha. A good place to cook your hot pockets. :D

Well...they are converting an old meatpacking plant in South Omaha into a collection of startups, including a series of commercial kitchens for rent by anyone who needs to use them. Why not a convection center? Lord knows we already have enough convention centers.
choke
Human Relations
Posts: 696
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 8:46 am
Location: North Omaha

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by choke »

buildomaha
Human Relations
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 7:06 pm

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by buildomaha »

Does this mean something is actually going to happen or is this just the city looking to utilize what is currently on the riverfront?
#gohawks
nebraska90
New to the Neighborhood
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:06 am

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by nebraska90 »

I've heard from a inside source that the Heritage Services is planning to “restart” on their riverfront initiatives and rethink the opportunities along the Missouri Riverfront from a big-picture, conceptual, master planning standpoint. A new organization/business structure would be created to separate this new work from being solely attached to Heritage Services.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by Coyote »

Mayor Stothert was on Grow Omaha this morning and said everything we already know about this site, except, that she believes that Capitol Street should directly hook up with whatever is here.
User avatar
Stargazer
County Board
Posts: 4106
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:06 am
Location: Bennington

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by Stargazer »

It would be cool if we could some how tunnel the rail lines between Abbott and Riverfront Drive, open up the entire area for development (or even further south).
Shoot for the Moon... if you miss, you'll land among the stars.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by Coyote »

Stargazer wrote:It would be cool if we could some how tunnel the rail lines between Abbott and Riverfront Drive, open up the entire area for development (or even further south).
That has been a part of my dreams for a while now. Even if it is just to add more Green Space...
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7806
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by MTO »

All they'd need to do is a cut and cover and they already have the cut part done. Building over tracks has been is beeing don all over the country theres no reason why it can't be done here.
15-17, 26, 32
nebraska
Library Board
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:12 am
Location: Downtown
Contact:

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by nebraska »

Yeah, in NYC, they're building skyscrapers over their train tracks. It can be done.
User avatar
TitosBuritoBarn
Planning Board
Posts: 3035
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by TitosBuritoBarn »

Chicago has a lot of places downtown where buildings are on top of railroad tracks as well. In fact the bean is built over a rail yard.

I wonder how much land value affects the viability of a project like this. Downtown Omaha probably has a significantly lower price per acre compared to Chicago and definitely compared to New York. How much does this factor into a cap over the railroad being a viable use of city funds?
"Video game violence is not a new problem. Who could forget in the wake of SimCity how children everywhere took up urban planning." - Stephen Colbert
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7806
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by MTO »

TitosBuritoBarn wrote:Chicago has a lot of places downtown where buildings are on top of railroad tracks as well. In fact the bean is built over a rail yard.

I wonder how much land value affects the viability of a project like this. Downtown Omaha probably has a significantly lower price per acre compared to Chicago and definitely compared to New York. How much does this factor into a cap over the railroad being a viable use of city funds?

|expletive| I didn't know there were tracks under the bean, I guess that shouldn't surprise me given the extensive underground street network Batman uses.
15-17, 26, 32
choke
Human Relations
Posts: 696
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 8:46 am
Location: North Omaha

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by choke »

In addition, the panel strongly advocates for the streetcar system on 10th Street that will reduce the auto dependency of the riverfront and eventually allow for the removal of so much surface parking in the riverfront. More regionally, the panel advocates that future bus rapid transit routes cross the I-480 bridge to Council Bluffs and Playland Park. Such service would support transit use of the riverfront to complete trips and support transit-oriented development. Imagine visitors returning to Omaha on public transit after walking over the Bob Kerrey Pedestrian Bridge and visiting Playland.
Thought this was interesting also:
Moor a barge to the landing to provide additional space for kiosks and outdoor programmed events such as concerts, art fairs, and festivals.
Moor a hotel barge or riverboat to the landing during large events to provide additional rooms during periods of increased demand (Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting, College World Series, Olympic Swim Trials, etc.).
Attachments
SC.PNG
SC.PNG (183.97 KiB) Viewed 10263 times
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033311
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by Brad »

Coyote wrote:
Stargazer wrote:It would be cool if we could some how tunnel the rail lines between Abbott and Riverfront Drive, open up the entire area for development (or even further south).
That has been a part of my dreams for a while now. Even if it is just to add more Green Space...
I posted about this in 2004, but it never got much traction.
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=115

Then back in 2009 they proposed the Grand Lawn over the tracks and the connection to the riverfront area in the "Omaha 2030" Master Plan:
http://urbanplanning.cityofomaha.org/im ... 30_web.pdf

Hopefully by 2030 it will actually be a reality... :;):
guest2017
Home Owners Association
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 7:02 am

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by guest2017 »

Brad wrote:
Coyote wrote:
Stargazer wrote:It would be cool if we could some how tunnel the rail lines between Abbott and Riverfront Drive, open up the entire area for development (or even further south).
That has been a part of my dreams for a while now. Even if it is just to add more Green Space...
I posted about this in 2004, but it never got much traction.
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=115

Then back in 2009 they proposed the Grand Lawn over the tracks and the connection to the riverfront area in the "Omaha 2030" Master Plan:
http://urbanplanning.cityofomaha.org/im ... 30_web.pdf

Hopefully by 2030 it will actually be a reality... :;):
Omaha just put in a tunnel in this area. It's 3,500 feet long, 17-feet-wide and 70 foot deep (tunneling in this area is tricky because the riverfront). You need to go deep. At $21 million total project cost, that's $6,000 per linear foot. If you tunnel the tracks from Abbott/Riverfront to Dodge Street, near those surface lots, you're looking at roughly a mile, give or take a few hundred feet. Assuming the same cost per linear foot, you're looking at $31.68 million just to put the tunnel in. Granted, I believe a single-track rail line could be built in a smaller tunnel (minimum ~14 feet) but there is more to factor in (ventilation, etc) than the CSO tunnel requires. Safe to say tunneling this isn't an economical option.

The Grant Lawn idea is just a lid on top of what is there now. Been done before elsewhere. I wouldn't get my hopes up.
Joe_Sovereign
Library Board
Posts: 433
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:57 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by Joe_Sovereign »

Image

This is The Highline an abandoned freight rail line bridge in NY that was converted to a park. It wouldn't cost more to cap the railroad tracks than it would to build an equivalent length bridge to cap the rail line. Most likely it would be cheaper if the bridge is only going to have pedestrian traffic and not vehicle traffic.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033311
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by Brad »

I don't think any of use are expecting a full fledged "tunnel" I was thinking more along the lings of not touching the track, and building some poured Concrete walls for the sides and some sort of cover on top. May be like a smaller version of the Alameda Corridor, but with pedestrian accessible cover on big (or at least key) sections.

That track already sits on the lowest elevations along the riverfront. If they built the walls and piled dirt up on the sides, it would almost blend right in.
Photo from V. Alexander & Co., Inc wrote:Image
User avatar
Asten
Human Relations
Posts: 689
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:25 am
Location: Physically: Chicagoland. Historically: Omaha
Contact:

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by Asten »

MTO wrote:
|expletive| I didn't know there were tracks under the bean, I guess that shouldn't surprise me given the extensive underground street network Batman uses.
Apologies for going off topic, but as an Omahan stuck in Chicago, this whole area is fascinating.

Under the bean, it's not just tracks, there's an entire rail station under it. The whole area between the art institute and the river is fascinating from the gigantic S turn that they replaced in the 70s to Millennium park covering this gigantic rail area.

Rail yards then and now:
Image
Image


S curve - in the first photo you can see the old horrific curve with 2 90 degree turns to the right, and the replacement to the left.
Image
Image
guest2017
Home Owners Association
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 7:02 am

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by guest2017 »

Joe_Sovereign wrote:Image

This is The Highline an abandoned freight rail line bridge in NY that was converted to a park. It wouldn't cost more to cap the railroad tracks than it would to build an equivalent length bridge to cap the rail line. Most likely it would be cheaper if the bridge is only going to have pedestrian traffic and not vehicle traffic.
...the Downtown 2030 Plan (from HDR) is a lid - similar to the one below they built over SR 520 in Washington, not converting an already-existing bridge to a park. https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/F ... _4web1.jpg
guest2017
Home Owners Association
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 7:02 am

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by guest2017 »

Brad wrote:I don't think any of use are expecting a full fledged "tunnel" I was thinking more along the lings of not touching the track, and building some poured Concrete walls for the sides and some sort of cover on top. May be like a smaller version of the Alameda Corridor, but with pedestrian accessible cover on big (or at least key) sections.

That track already sits on the lowest elevations along the riverfront. If they built the walls and piled dirt up on the sides, it would almost blend right in.
Photo from V. Alexander & Co., Inc wrote:Image
My apologies, when people say "tunnel" I think "tunnel" (comes from working at an engineering firm - the one everyone seemingly hates on here :hammer: ). This is a solution that would work, and put a fairly expansive lid over the section nearest the CenturyLink/Rick's area. I honestly do not know who owns those tracks down there (want to say it's UP) and how do we get them to play nice AND foot the bill... :lol:
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033311
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)

Post by Brad »

guest2017 wrote:I honestly do not know who owns those tracks down there (want to say it's UP) and how do we get them to play nice AND foot the bill... :lol:
BNSF owns the south part and the UP owns the north part. They switch ownership around the 480 bridge. Back before Heartland of America park the UP had their own access to North Downtown, but after the re-development, they use the BNSF to access their tracks in North Downtown. Their original track ran right through where the lake is now.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033311
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Missouri River Commons (Riverfront Development)

Post by Brad »

Greater Omaha Chamber initiates riverfront development

http://www.wowt.com/content/news/Greate ... 45803.html
wowt.com wrote:Rachel Halbmaier is the new Director of the Missouri River Commons.

“Activating the riverfront is just going to drive traffic down to the area and to Omaha,” says Halbmaier. “It's just going to be good for everybody. That's why I'm really excited to be here.”
Missouri River Commons page on the Chamber's Website:
https://www.omahachamber.org/the-region ... r-commons/



.
Post Reply