Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Downtown, Midtown, and all parts east of 72nd.

Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss

User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by iamjacobm »

Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

http://www.omaha.com/article/20131203/N ... evelopment
Christopher Burbach / World-Herald staff writer wrote:Concerned about slow business growth in north downtown Omaha, the owners of a hotel in the neighborhood plan a bold step to quicken the pace of urban revival there.

They propose to spend $9.2 million to erect a five-story apartment building at 16th and Nicholas Streets, on an industrial corner not yet reached by the emerging entertainment, cultural and business district.

Nichol Flats would have 67 market-rate apartments above first-floor office and commercial space.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Post by iamjacobm »

Finally a little more momentum for North Downtown.  Plus this is really on a parcel that I didn't expect, still plenty of land to develop south of Cuming.
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Post by RNcyanide »

The first step of many to make north downtown worthwhile...
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9222
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Post by skinzfan23 »

iamjacobm wrote:Finally a little more momentum for North Downtown.  Plus this is really on a parcel that I didn't expect, still plenty of land to develop south of Cuming.
I agree, there is plenty of land available in all of north downtown for that matter.  The article hints at more development in the area.  Lets hope that it continues.  If some of those parcels of land are cleaned up and redeveloped similar to this proposal, then we are definitely headed in the right direction.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033403
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Post by Brad »

Great News!  Hopefully people see there is more potential up there than just surface parking.
User avatar
Linkin5
County Board
Posts: 4541
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:59 pm

Post by Linkin5 »

Finally!  Hopefully this will build some momentum for the area.  This should be a huge boost for foot traffic with the new residents and commercial space available.
User avatar
Toto
Home Owners Association
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:20 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by Toto »

Nichol Flats would have 67 market-rate apartments above first-floor office and commercial space.
Don't get me wrong, I love north downtown and want this project to do well, but what is market rate when your view includes a junk yard and a homeless shelter?
Toto
User avatar
TitosBuritoBarn
Planning Board
Posts: 3040
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by TitosBuritoBarn »

Toto wrote:
Nichol Flats would have 67 market-rate apartments above first-floor office and commercial space.
Don't get me wrong, I love north downtown and want this project to do well, but what is market rate when your view includes a junk yard and a homeless shelter?
I think the idea is that after a while those places will choose to sell their property and move.
"Video game violence is not a new problem. Who could forget in the wake of SimCity how children everywhere took up urban planning." - Stephen Colbert
6EQUJ5
New to the Neighborhood
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:25 am

Post by 6EQUJ5 »

I certainly don't blame these guys for wanting to accelerate investment and I salute them for taking the initiative. But I wonder exactly what is the trajectory supposed to look like in a city this size, could it be faster or is this average.. In my head I keep thinking the next project could be the tipping point that lights up the place. But maybe this is the optimum pace we can expect.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by iamjacobm »

TitosBuritoBarn wrote:
Toto wrote:
Nichol Flats would have 67 market-rate apartments above first-floor office and commercial space.
Don't get me wrong, I love north downtown and want this project to do well, but what is market rate when your view includes a junk yard and a homeless shelter?
I think the idea is that after a while those places will choose to sell their property and move.
Market rate also means different things at 16th and Nicholas than it does at 15th and Jackson.  This project will almost certainly be a couple hundred less than the new projects going in by the Old Market.  Helps get people that can't afford to spend $1000+ on rent get into the downtown scene.

67 is a really big addition for North Downtown, second largest apartment project behind TipTop in the area.  One unfortunate thing is I think they will follow the current North Downtown trend and have surface parking for the tenants.  That construction cost doesn't seem high enough to have structured parking like the projects in the core.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Post by iamjacobm »

6EQUJ5 wrote:I certainly don't blame these guys for wanting to accelerate investment and I salute them for taking the initiative. But I wonder exactly what is the trajectory supposed to look like in a city this size, could it be faster or is this average.. In my head I keep thinking the next project could be the tipping point that lights up the place. But maybe this is the optimum pace we can expect.
There are a lot of factors at play.  Omaha is redeveloping so many different areas right now that a lot of the possible tenants get spread out.  If we had let Benson rot or left the Aksarben area for run of the mill strip malls and suburban office buildings I think North Downtown would have more action right now.

As for a tipping point I think we are still $50+ million away from North Downtown being a real viable neighborhood instead of a spattering of apartment and entertainment options.
NovakOmaha
Planning Board
Posts: 2746
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

Post by NovakOmaha »

A while ago I posted a few pics of the original plan for North Downtown.  It is not anything like what was envisioned.  There were to be parking garages on the surface lots across the street from the arena with some retail on the first floor.  There were also multi use buildings envisioned for both sides of Cuming.

I maintain that Lincoln's Haymarket is a prototype for arena district development.  It is very impressive and there is no reason why Omaha couldn't have done something along those lines.
MadMartin8
Planning Board
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Post by MadMartin8 »

This is a very, very important project. I don't think a simple 5 story building has ever been potentially this powerful.
No posts exist for this topic
User avatar
guitarguy
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1292
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:39 am

Post by guitarguy »

NDT has for a while felt like the demand is there its just been held back by the lack of any company volunteering there capital to start building new buildings. If this is successful I think you'll see quite a few new apartments pop up quickly.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033403
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Post by Brad »

Hopefully this will spur on redevelopment of the old fire station next door!
ShawJ
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1553
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:58 pm

Post by ShawJ »

Brad wrote:Hopefully this will spur on redevelopment of the old fire station next door!
I was going to post the same thing. I'd love to see that building back in action.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Post by iamjacobm »

ShawJ wrote:
Brad wrote:Hopefully this will spur on redevelopment of the old fire station next door!
I was going to post the same thing. I'd love to see that building back in action.
Knowing Omaha someone will try to put a brewery in there.  That seems to be our fastest growing industry.  In reality though I think that would make a good office space for one of our growing tech companies.  That or I find a million bucks and get myself a personal residence in North Downtown 8) .
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033403
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Post by Brad »

iamjacobm wrote:
ShawJ wrote:
Brad wrote:Hopefully this will spur on redevelopment of the old fire station next door!
I was going to post the same thing. I'd love to see that building back in action.
Knowing Omaha someone will try to put a brewery in there.  That seems to be our fastest growing industry.
It's worked for the Upstream!
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 33201
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Post by Coyote »

I thought someone was going to put a brewery in the old OFD building. Seems like it was what 5 years ago this was mentioned?
Anyway, is this project more than the Diamond building, it would then only have the hotel to the east, and Tip Top (and Brewery) to the South:

Image

I can't believe the amount of truck traffic there is on Nicholas that turns south on 16th and then out from there...

Image

Image
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Post by iamjacobm »

Coyote wrote:I can't believe the amount of truck traffic there is on Nicholas that turns south on 16th and then out from there...
People have mentioned that those trucks are a detriment to investment in North Downtown and want to see the trucking routes changed.  Of course the folks using the trucks don't want to extend their routes and spend more on fuel.
User avatar
Uffda
County Board
Posts: 4509
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Land o Lakes, FL

Post by Uffda »

Coyote wrote:I thought someone was going to put a brewery in the old OFD building. Seems like it was what 5 years ago this was mentioned?
Anyway, is this project more than the Diamond building, it would then only have the hotel to the east, and Tip Top (and Brewery) to the South:

OmahaChef and I mentioned a few years ago.  I was compare it to the FireHouse Brewery in Downtown Rapid City

http://www.firehousebrewing.com

Image
Ben
Human Relations
Posts: 936
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:57 pm
Location: Westside

Post by Ben »

I love that firehouse too, but the reality is that its in really rough shape.  I mean barely still standing.  Its been a while since I've been past, but there was a huge shift in the bricks, creating a large crack on what I think I remember as the north side.  Not anything that could be fixed with some tuckpointing...
nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2023
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: 5280

Re: Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by nebport5 »

iamjacobm wrote:
TitosBuritoBarn wrote:
Toto wrote:
Nichol Flats would have 67 market-rate apartments above first-floor office and commercial space.
Don't get me wrong, I love north downtown and want this project to do well, but what is market rate when your view includes a junk yard and a homeless shelter?
I think the idea is that after a while those places will choose to sell their property and move.
Market rate also means different things at 16th and Nicholas than it does at 15th and Jackson.  This project will almost certainly be a couple hundred less than the new projects going in by the Old Market.  Helps get people that can't afford to spend $1000+ on rent get into the downtown scene.

67 is a really big addition for North Downtown, second largest apartment project behind TipTop in the area.  One unfortunate thing is I think they will follow the current North Downtown trend and have surface parking for the tenants.  That construction cost doesn't seem high enough to have structured parking like the projects in the core.

Does it really?...or should it?  I think we've seen what "market rate" means with downtown projects the last 5 years.  Consider the $1200 Junction Apts at 24th and Farnam.  

Quote from the article, "Jensen said the environment wouldn't be off-putting to the type of residents envisioned for the area — artists, small entrepreneurs and other creative people."  So do you really think "artists, small entrepreneurs and other creative people" will be the criteria for "market rate" here?  I guess we'll see.  In the meantime, even with the proximity of the Hot Shops, I bet more artists live in Bull Durham than the TipTop where rent apparently starts at $875.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by iamjacobm »

nebport5 wrote:
iamjacobm wrote:
TitosBuritoBarn wrote:
Toto wrote:
Nichol Flats would have 67 market-rate apartments above first-floor office and commercial space.
Don't get me wrong, I love north downtown and want this project to do well, but what is market rate when your view includes a junk yard and a homeless shelter?
I think the idea is that after a while those places will choose to sell their property and move.
Market rate also means different things at 16th and Nicholas than it does at 15th and Jackson.  This project will almost certainly be a couple hundred less than the new projects going in by the Old Market.  Helps get people that can't afford to spend $1000+ on rent get into the downtown scene.

67 is a really big addition for North Downtown, second largest apartment project behind TipTop in the area.  One unfortunate thing is I think they will follow the current North Downtown trend and have surface parking for the tenants.  That construction cost doesn't seem high enough to have structured parking like the projects in the core.

Does it really?...or should it?  I think we've seen what "market rate" means with downtown projects the last 5 years.  Consider the $1200 Junction Apts at 24th and Farnam.  

Quote from the article, "Jensen said the environment wouldn't be off-putting to the type of residents envisioned for the area — artists, small entrepreneurs and other creative people."  So do you really think "artists, small entrepreneurs and other creative people" will be the criteria for "market rate" here?  I guess we'll see.  In the meantime, even with the proximity of the Hot Shops, I bet more artists live in Bull Durham than the TipTop where rent apparently starts at $875.
I am just saying pick up this project and put it on the parking lot at 11th and Jackson and it would draw a higher rent than it will at 16th and Nicholas.  Location matters a lot and right now North Downtown isn't even close to the desirability or amenities that the Old Market has.

Also I think this place has a better chance to fill up with CU students than it does to fill up with artists.
User avatar
Dundeemaha
Human Relations
Posts: 556
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 11:41 am
Location: Country Club

Post by Dundeemaha »

While you're right that *this* building at 11th and Jackson makes more money. The article said they own a hotel in North downtown. If the apartment building encourages development as they hope. Then rates at the hotel, property values and rent goes up. Way more  potential upside. Also if the alternatives analysis results in anything there will be increased property values here.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Post by iamjacobm »

Dundeemaha wrote:While you're right that *this* building at 11th and Jackson makes more money. The article said they own a hotel in North downtown. If the apartment building encourages development as they hope. Then rates at the hotel, property values and rent goes up. Way more  potential upside. Also if the alternatives analysis results in anything there will be increased property values here.
I completely agree that there is a future revenue potential here, I am not suggesting that this is a poorly thought out project at all.  All I was responding to was that I think "Market Rate" is a different price in North Downtown than it is in the core.
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 3528
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Post by Garrett »

Does Omaha have renter's rights laws?
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
S33
County Board
Posts: 4441
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:15 pm

Post by S33 »

Axel wrote:Does Omaha have renter's rights laws?
lol. Do they...  Renters have ALL the rights. One of the most common misconceptions about getting into the landlord business, is that your investment works for you. Get the wrong renters, and they will rake you over the coals, and destroy your investment while they're at it.

However, most "renter's rights" are state law.
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 3528
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Post by Garrett »

I meant more along the line of how much a rent is allowed to increase per year.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
Dundeemaha
Human Relations
Posts: 556
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 11:41 am
Location: Country Club

Post by Dundeemaha »

Nebraska actually sides far more with the landlord than the tenant compared to most places. There's no limit to how much or how frequently rent can be increased, only a 60 day notice requirement on the increase.
User avatar
Seth
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1437
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Ford Birthsite Neighborhood

Post by Seth »

S33 wrote:
Axel wrote:Does Omaha have renter's rights laws?
lol. Do they...  Renters have ALL the rights. One of the most common misconceptions about getting into the landlord business, is that your investment works for you. Get the wrong renters, and they will rake you over the coals, and destroy your investment while they're at it.
I've seen that firsthand at a house in our neighborhood where delinqent renters refused to pay rent and ruthlessly vandalized the place before they were finally evicted by the Sherrif.  I don't understand people like that.
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Post by RNcyanide »

Seth wrote:
S33 wrote:
Axel wrote:Does Omaha have renter's rights laws?
lol. Do they...  Renters have ALL the rights. One of the most common misconceptions about getting into the landlord business, is that your investment works for you. Get the wrong renters, and they will rake you over the coals, and destroy your investment while they're at it.
I've seen that firsthand at a house in our neighborhood where delinqent renters refused to pay rent and ruthlessly vandalized the place before they were finally evicted by the Sherrif.  I don't understand people like that.
Seriously? Joke's on them because they'll never be able to rent a place again after delinquent rent payments, plus the vandalism.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033403
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Post by Brad »

RNcyanide wrote:Seriously? Joke's on them because they'll never be able to rent a place again after delinquent rent payments, plus the vandalism.
No, he is not joking at all.  It happens all the time.  There are lots and lots of small landlords in town...
nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2023
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: 5280

Re: Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by nebport5 »

iamjacobm wrote:
nebport5 wrote:
iamjacobm wrote:
TitosBuritoBarn wrote:
Toto wrote:
Nichol Flats would have 67 market-rate apartments above first-floor office and commercial space.
Don't get me wrong, I love north downtown and want this project to do well, but what is market rate when your view includes a junk yard and a homeless shelter?
I think the idea is that after a while those places will choose to sell their property and move.
Market rate also means different things at 16th and Nicholas than it does at 15th and Jackson.  This project will almost certainly be a couple hundred less than the new projects going in by the Old Market.  Helps get people that can't afford to spend $1000+ on rent get into the downtown scene.

67 is a really big addition for North Downtown, second largest apartment project behind TipTop in the area.  One unfortunate thing is I think they will follow the current North Downtown trend and have surface parking for the tenants.  That construction cost doesn't seem high enough to have structured parking like the projects in the core.

Does it really?...or should it?  I think we've seen what "market rate" means with downtown projects the last 5 years.  Consider the $1200 Junction Apts at 24th and Farnam.  

Quote from the article, "Jensen said the environment wouldn't be off-putting to the type of residents envisioned for the area — artists, small entrepreneurs and other creative people."  So do you really think "artists, small entrepreneurs and other creative people" will be the criteria for "market rate" here?  I guess we'll see.  In the meantime, even with the proximity of the Hot Shops, I bet more artists live in Bull Durham than the TipTop where rent apparently starts at $875.
I am just saying pick up this project and put it on the parking lot at 11th and Jackson and it would draw a higher rent than it will at 16th and Nicholas.  Location matters a lot and right now North Downtown isn't even close to the desirability or amenities that the Old Market has.

Also I think this place has a better chance to fill up with CU students than it does to fill up with artists.

I hear ya but I don't see much of a distinction between the Old Market and the rest of downtown(including NDT) for rent.  There are places in the 7-750's in the OM.  And I agree its more likely to fill up with CU kids, particularly because I suspect the rent will be out of range for most artists.
User avatar
S33
County Board
Posts: 4441
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:15 pm

Post by S33 »

RNcyanide wrote:
Seth wrote:
S33 wrote:
Axel wrote:Does Omaha have renter's rights laws?
lol. Do they...  Renters have ALL the rights. One of the most common misconceptions about getting into the landlord business, is that your investment works for you. Get the wrong renters, and they will rake you over the coals, and destroy your investment while they're at it.
I've seen that firsthand at a house in our neighborhood where delinqent renters refused to pay rent and ruthlessly vandalized the place before they were finally evicted by the Sherrif.  I don't understand people like that.
Seriously? Joke's on them because they'll never be able to rent a place again after delinquent rent payments, plus the vandalism.
There is no shortage of tenants in the Omaha area who disrespect the property, are delinquent on rent and other fees, who, basically, just move down the quality chain of rental options, sometimes until they are in government subsidized housing.

Will they be able to rent another quality property again? Not as likely, but they have other ways into properties, whether it's by having a false signer or whatnot. It's pathetic.
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Seth
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1437
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Ford Birthsite Neighborhood

Re: Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by Seth »

nebport5 wrote:
iamjacobm wrote:Also I think this place has a better chance to fill up with CU students than it does to fill up with artists.
I hear ya but I don't see much of a distinction between the Old Market and the rest of downtown(including NDT) for rent.  There are places in the 7-750's in the OM.  And I agree its more likely to fill up with CU kids, particularly because I suspect the rent will be out of range for most artists.
In the interest of keeping this thread on track, yeah, I also see this as mainly CU students.  I've also gotta wonder: how many "artists" does a city like Omaha have?  Or more importantly, who would want and afford to live in all the "artist" apartments lately?  I feel like it's a label applied just to attract people because they think it will be "so cool" to be neighbors with artists.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 33201
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by Coyote »

Image


Image


Image


Image


Image
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by iamjacobm »

$1.7 million TIF request in this week's agenda.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by iamjacobm »

Looks like there will be 8500SF of retail space as well.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Nichol Flats (16th and Nicholas St)

Post by iamjacobm »

iamjacobm wrote:$1.7 million TIF request in this week's agenda.
Mentioned again in yesterday's agenda.
Post Reply