Official: North Downtown Discussion

Downtown, Midtown, and all parts east of 72nd.

Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss

NovakOmaha
Planning Board
Posts: 2733
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by NovakOmaha »

East of 16th was pretty industrial. Plus, after the riots of the 60s the area was pretty rough. The Doubletree (which I believe was initially a Hilton) was built and/or financed by Brandeis in whole or in part, and they were looking at making the area from the Hilton to the Orpheum a semi self contained retail corridor. Now I could be wrong about this whole thing given my advanced age but I do remember the powers that be not really caring about anything north of the Hilton. If there was complaining at all it was ignored.

Bottom line: It didn't work and it did cut off North Downtown and North Omaha from downtown. AND those who pushed for it are dead now so they don't care.
User avatar
BRoss
IT Director
Posts: 10002757
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: West Central Omaha

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by BRoss »

So are they going to tear down the Doubletree someday and reconnect 16th St? That would be great!
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

HR Paperstacks wrote:So are they going to tear down the Doubletree someday and reconnect 16th St? That would be great!
Maybe 50 years from now, if we don't get sentimental over it.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
Louie
County Board
Posts: 3741
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:23 pm
Location: Dundee

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Louie »

RNcyanide wrote:
HR Paperstacks wrote:So are they going to tear down the Doubletree someday and reconnect 16th St? That would be great!
Maybe 50 years from now, if we don't get sentimental over it.
I think I remember reading in Vision 2025 or some similar study that a Doubletree demo could be on the plate as early as 2030. Trying to remember which one it was in...
NEDodger
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:19 am

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by NEDodger »

The assertion that the Hilton/First National complex was built over 16th to keep black people out is laughable. It's one street. Taking a right and then a left literally gets around this "wall" to take you to downtown. It's akin to saying that Creighton University's expansion was done to keep people from north Omaha out of downtown.
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

Louie wrote:
RNcyanide wrote:
HR Paperstacks wrote:So are they going to tear down the Doubletree someday and reconnect 16th St? That would be great!
Maybe 50 years from now, if we don't get sentimental over it.
I think I remember reading in Vision 2025 or some similar study that a Doubletree demo could be on the plate as early as 2030. Trying to remember which one it was in...

Vision 2025?
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10374
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

They poured $20 million into a renovation a couple years ago so it has plenty of life in it.
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7806
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by MTO »

Demo the Double Tree look how many lost their shįt over the three little buildings by Holland. Couldn't they just go under?
15-17, 26, 32
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

I'm assuming that there's something under there that's important structurally that would preclude hollowing out a part of the the hotel. I think it'd be too messy and expensive in the end and if they really wanted to reconnect 16th they should just demo the place when it outlives its usefulness. Maybe, when it's not as competitive as a hotel anymore, they could convert it to residential.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
daveoma
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1211
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 7:18 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by daveoma »

RNcyanide wrote:I'm assuming that there's something under there that's important structurally that would preclude hollowing out a part of the the hotel. I think it'd be too messy and expensive in the end and if they really wanted to reconnect 16th they should just demo the place when it outlives its usefulness. Maybe, when it's not as competitive as a hotel anymore, they could convert it to residential.
There is an underground tunnel that connects the first national data center with the first national center west of the doubletree. If 16th went below the hotel they would be destroying the tunnel.
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7806
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by MTO »

That tunnel is between the first national buildings and anyway you wouldn't even have to go down that far. I'm sure the hotel could be carved out at the base but it would cost millions.
15-17, 26, 32
User avatar
GetUrban
Planning Board
Posts: 2634
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by GetUrban »

The tunnels are below street level. The hotel lobby is at second floor level with a ramp up from 16th & Dodge, so 16th could run under the lobby if the ramp was removed, with tunnels intact below that. Might have a few columns in the way, but nothing that engineering and money couldn't fix.
Lopping off the east side of the hotel has also been mentioned in other threads.
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
Midwestern
Home Owners Association
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 2:08 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Midwestern »

Because of the renovations, the hotel probably has a good 15-20 years of use left, but after that my favorite plan would be to keep the western 2/3rd of the building and convert that to apartments or condos, and only tear down the part of the building that blocks 16th street.

I wish they hadn't done those renovations though, because I would really like to see 16th street re-connected once The Yard apartments, Lot B, and the Cass St. apartments + Tetrad (hopefully...) are all completed. 15th, 14th, and 13th streets are not good north-south connections because of the 480 ramps.

Elevated interstate highways where there are ramps are really bad barriers. No way 480 is going to be taken down anytime soon though. Thankfully at least the portion over 10th street is easy enough to cross under. But when that elevated portion of 480 reaches the end of its usability and would have to be re-built, I hope they strongly consider just taking it down and making it a boulevard.
Louie
County Board
Posts: 3741
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:23 pm
Location: Dundee

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Louie »

RNcyanide wrote:
Louie wrote:
RNcyanide wrote:
HR Paperstacks wrote:So are they going to tear down the Doubletree someday and reconnect 16th St? That would be great!
Maybe 50 years from now, if we don't get sentimental over it.
I think I remember reading in Vision 2025 or some similar study that a Doubletree demo could be on the plate as early as 2030. Trying to remember which one it was in...

Vision 2025?
You know what, that didn't look like the right year when I typed it but it sounded close. I was think of Heartland 2050 Vision. Just to lazy to google the legit name earlier haha.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10374
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

The gravel lot on 15th and Cuming looking to go surface parking. Referred to as Yard West.
User avatar
Busguy2010
County Board
Posts: 5265
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Busguy2010 »

iamjacobm wrote:The gravel lot on 15th and Cuming looking to go surface parking. Referred to as Yard West.
If they use the same theme of the old lot, no need to add West to the name. 99% won't notice it moved.
mattl181
Home Owners Association
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:28 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by mattl181 »

iamjacobm wrote:The gravel lot on 15th and Cuming looking to go surface parking. Referred to as Yard West.
I believe there was some sort of Nike Experience on this lot for the last CWS. I don't have a current problem with this, especially and because of the development of the Yard, but also because no buildings are being knocked down to make way for this lot (that I know of!)
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10374
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

Busguy2010 wrote:
iamjacobm wrote:The gravel lot on 15th and Cuming looking to go surface parking. Referred to as Yard West.
If they use the same theme of the old lot, no need to add West to the name. 99% won't notice it moved.
Thats just what the planning board document said. Probably just creating less confusion through that process, would make sense if they moved their signing and kiosks to this lot.
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7806
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by MTO »

iamjacobm wrote:
Busguy2010 wrote:
iamjacobm wrote:The gravel lot on 15th and Cuming looking to go surface parking. Referred to as Yard West.
If they use the same theme of the old lot, no need to add West to the name. 99% won't notice it moved.
Thats just what the planning board document said. Probably just creating less confusion through that process, would make sense if they moved their signing and kiosks to this lot.
Just skip the whole thing and RFP.
15-17, 26, 32
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10374
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

iamjacobm wrote:Looks like this building might be getting cleared out. A couple people were moving a lot of stuff out of the building into a storage container.
Image

Really cool potential for a building like this.
There must be a ton of stuff in there. Two 18 wheeler trailers sitting in front of it getting loaded.
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7806
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by MTO »

I'm hoping demo for a 5er with commercial bays.
15-17, 26, 32
mattl181
Home Owners Association
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:28 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by mattl181 »

MTO wrote:I'm hoping demo for a 5er with commercial bays.
I'm hoping it stays. It's got some potential as a building, with retail options, and so many others around this area have been knocked down. Heck, why not build 5 stories ON TOP of this one (like the Limelight downtown).
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10374
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

Of interest. Kiewit Infrastructure now owns that 1 story building along with the warehouse to the east. Would they have more plans for NDT? Do they need more parking than The Yard redevelopment is going to give them?
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10374
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

iamjacobm wrote:Of interest. Kiewit Infrastructure now owns that 1 story building along with the warehouse to the east. Would they have more plans for NDT? Do they need more parking than The Yard redevelopment is going to give them?
Lots more activity on those lots today. The lot w/ the warehouse has a fence around it now, wouldn't be surprised to see it come down soon.
daveoma
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1211
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 7:18 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by daveoma »

iamjacobm wrote:
iamjacobm wrote:Of interest. Kiewit Infrastructure now owns that 1 story building along with the warehouse to the east. Would they have more plans for NDT? Do they need more parking than The Yard redevelopment is going to give them?
Lots more activity on those lots today. The lot w/ the warehouse has a fence around it now, wouldn't be surprised to see it come down soon.
At which intersection is this?
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10374
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

On the south side of Burt between 15th and 16th are the two properties.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10374
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

Demo permit for this building.

Image

Noting on the building on 16th yet.
SaveOmaha
Home Owners Association
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 5:42 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by SaveOmaha »

Not heartbroken over this one, but the one on the corner is pretty nice.
User avatar
S33
County Board
Posts: 4441
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:15 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by S33 »

So Kiewit has purchased two adjoining lots near 15/16th streets downtown, has applied for a demo permit for at least 1 of those lots, is currently cramped into an old ten story building off Farnan, with office staff spread out across several states.

I'm no development expert, but if there was ever a company in Omaha I'd put my money on to build a new high rise headquarters (no, HDR's 14 story tower is not a high rise), I'd first day Mutual of Omaha insurance/bank, then Kiewit.

I doubt either happen, but interesting nonetheless.
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill
User avatar
OmahaJaysCU
Planning Board
Posts: 2164
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:00 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by OmahaJaysCU »

It's for a parking lot.
asherballa
New to the Neighborhood
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:24 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by asherballa »

OmahaJaysCU wrote:It's for a parking lot.
That's the spirit!
User avatar
S33
County Board
Posts: 4441
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:15 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by S33 »

I'm sure it is, and I'm too lazy to sort through the thread to confirm that, but I also think there could possibly be long-term possibilities for that site.

Between those two local fortune 500's, it's probably the last hope for any local corporation to build anything significant downtown/midtown.
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill
User avatar
OmahaJaysCU
Planning Board
Posts: 2164
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:00 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by OmahaJaysCU »

asherballa wrote:
OmahaJaysCU wrote:It's for a parking lot.
That's the spirit!
That wasn't a joke unfortunately
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10374
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

OmahaJaysCU wrote:
asherballa wrote:
OmahaJaysCU wrote:It's for a parking lot.
That's the spirit!
That wasn't a joke unfortunately
Two steps forward one step back. Lets hope Kiewit has long term plans for the lot beyond parking.
MadMartin8
Planning Board
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by MadMartin8 »

OmahaJaysCU wrote:
asherballa wrote:
OmahaJaysCU wrote:It's for a parking lot.
That's the spirit!
That wasn't a joke unfortunately
I just died a little on the inside.
No posts exist for this topic
User avatar
PotatoeEatsFish
Human Relations
Posts: 743
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 11:59 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by PotatoeEatsFish »

MadMartin8 wrote:
OmahaJaysCU wrote:
asherballa wrote:
OmahaJaysCU wrote:It's for a parking lot.
That's the spirit!
That wasn't a joke unfortunately
I just died a little on the inside.
I love the vision of this city. :clap:
#SaveTheUglyGrainSilos2024
User avatar
Linkin5
County Board
Posts: 4532
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:59 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Linkin5 »

NDT is getting demo'd at a pretty alarming rate.
User avatar
PotatoeEatsFish
Human Relations
Posts: 743
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 11:59 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by PotatoeEatsFish »

Is it to make way for the Crafts District?
#SaveTheUglyGrainSilos2024
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

Oh are they giving the future parking lots cutesy names now??
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
EricHaley
Human Relations
Posts: 550
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2016 8:16 pm
Location: Omaha
Contact:

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by EricHaley »

The thought of tearing down DoubleTree for better access isn't too far fetched. The city will eventually extend 16th street across the Missouri River where it will connect with I-680. I'd imagine Omaha wanting to turn 16th st into a major gateway to the city.
Post Reply