Official: North Downtown Discussion

Downtown, Midtown, and all parts east of 72nd.

Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss

User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 3538
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Garrett »

Also, here's the land use

Image
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
MadMartin8
Planning Board
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by MadMartin8 »

Garrett wrote:Done! Could probably use a few edits and clarifications in places where I was unsure, but for the most part, it's set.

Image
Can we change the name of the owner of "The Yard's" to "Giant Turd Sandwich LLC" for taking up a prime lot and dooming it to only be parking?
No posts exist for this topic
User avatar
BRoss
IT Director
Posts: 10002786
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: West Central Omaha

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by BRoss »

Nice work Garrett!
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 33289
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Coyote »

Nice! :thumb: can't wait to see it on a computer (instead of my cell phone...)
User avatar
S33
County Board
Posts: 4441
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:15 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by S33 »

No kidding; nice work. Surprised how much space Creighton has acquired
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill
User avatar
GetUrban
Planning Board
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by GetUrban »

S33 wrote:No kidding; nice work. Surprised how much space Creighton has acquired
Creighton bought all of the former Modern Equipment Co. Property. They had acquired quite a large chunk. You may remember all of their buildings were painted beige with brown trim. They moved up to Abbott Dr. North of the airport into a new huge beige building with brown trim.

I have high hopes Creighton will do something more exciting with it eventually. But it might have had a better chance for quicker incremental development with multiple owners of smaller parcels.
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 33289
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Coyote »

Have we seen an updated CU master plan recently?
SaveOmaha
Home Owners Association
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 5:42 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by SaveOmaha »

It's my understanding that it isn't public. I'd like to see it myself.
Last edited by SaveOmaha on Thu Jul 21, 2022 8:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 3538
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Garrett »

Would someone mind telling me what LLCs are exactly? When I was categorizing I encountered a lot of them with vague names so I wasn't sure exactly what to make of them.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 33289
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Coyote »

Garrett wrote:Would someone mind telling me what LLCs are exactly? When I was categorizing I encountered a lot of them with vague names so I wasn't sure exactly what to make of them.
You mean explain more than just being a Limited Liability Company... a company formed so that your personal assets can't be involved in any legal actions concerning your LLC?
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 3538
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Garrett »

Coyote wrote:
Garrett wrote:Would someone mind telling me what LLCs are exactly? When I was categorizing I encountered a lot of them with vague names so I wasn't sure exactly what to make of them.
You mean explain more than just being a Limited Liability Company... a company formed so that your personal assets can't be involved in any legal actions concerning your LLC?
No I actually just don't know what they are haha
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033429
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Brad »

I heard there is a site somewhere that will actually tell you who the partners are in an LLC, but I don't know what it is.

As far as I know, if anyone wanted to by anything, they can can form an LLC to buy it and it would be its own entity.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 33289
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Coyote »

Garrett wrote:Also, here's the land use

Image
Wasn't Mordor supposed to be an Entertainment District?
User avatar
jessep28
Planning Board
Posts: 2761
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by jessep28 »

An LLC (and even an S-Corp) can pretty much be named anything. The Secretary of State doesn't care, as long as the proposed name hasn't been taken already.

LLC's serve a similar purpose to corporations in that they put the company assets and liabilities in a legal bubble. That way if the company say goes bankrupt, for instance, the creditors can't try and take the owner's house or car, as long as they aren't part of the company. LLC's are a little easier to organize and operate than S-Corps. The IRS treats LLC's as either sole proprietorships or partnerships for tax purposes, so depending on the type of income, the earnings could be subject to self employment tax.
Verbum Domini Manet in Aeternum
User avatar
Seth
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1437
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Ford Birthsite Neighborhood

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Seth »

Very nice map!
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 3538
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Garrett »

I really enjoyed making that map.... requests for other areas? hahaha
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7807
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by MTO »

Bravo, I'm going to use that as a reference for so many things.
15-17, 26, 32
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 33289
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Coyote »

Garrett wrote:I really enjoyed making that map.... requests for other areas? hahaha
I wonder if somehow you can piggy back on Stargazer's post of a truer population per mile radius of Omaha from City Hall...
User avatar
Linkin5
County Board
Posts: 4543
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:59 pm

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Linkin5 »

Garrett wrote:I really enjoyed making that map.... requests for other areas? hahaha
Really good map. Can you do the area around MofO?
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 3538
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Garrett »

Coyote wrote:
Garrett wrote:I really enjoyed making that map.... requests for other areas? hahaha
I wonder if somehow you can piggy back on Stargazer's post of a truer population per mile radius of Omaha from City Hall...
Meaning?
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 3538
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Garrett »

Linkin5 wrote:
Garrett wrote:I really enjoyed making that map.... requests for other areas? hahaha
Really good map.  Can you do the area around MofO?
On it.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 33289
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Coyote »

Garrett wrote:
Coyote wrote:
Garrett wrote:I really enjoyed making that map.... requests for other areas? hahaha
I wonder if somehow you can piggy back on Stargazer's post of a truer population per mile radius of Omaha from City Hall...
Meaning?
Population by precincts? Then add up within radius by 1 mile, 2 miles... from City Hall.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10391
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

Coyote wrote:
iamjacobm wrote:"Sporting News Grill" going into the retail bay in the Holiday Inn formerly occupied by Union Pizzeria and Sports Bar.
They are adding 1500 sq ft here and making a $300k remodel...
Looks like a pretty substantial expansion from the street. I actually think that will help make the restaurant space pop out of the hotel making it a lot more visible.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10391
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

ULI is back in town to work on plans for North Downtown.

http://uli.org/press-release/rose-cente ... rosecenter" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

iamjacobm wrote:ULI is back in town to work on plans for North Downtown.

http://uli.org/press-release/rose-cente ... rosecenter" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I can't wait to hear all the things that we already knew.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
User avatar
GetUrban
Planning Board
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by GetUrban »

iamjacobm wrote:ULI is back in town to work on plans for North Downtown.

http://uli.org/press-release/rose-cente ... rosecenter" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I wonder if they invited representatives from MECA and Creighton to attend. They seem to be the biggest players (impediments?) in the area.
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10391
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by iamjacobm »

GetUrban wrote:
iamjacobm wrote:ULI is back in town to work on plans for North Downtown.

http://uli.org/press-release/rose-cente ... rosecenter" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I wonder if they invited representatives from MECA and Creighton to attend. They seem to be the biggest players (impediments?) in the area.
I wish I could go to the public presentation this Thursday to see what they are looking at. I think it will be nice to get some outside eyes with a different perspective than we are used to into the city. Could help Omaha market itself toward out of town developers too.
User avatar
Greg S
City Council
Posts: 7528
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:46 am

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Greg S »

They bring up a lot of the points we've been talking about for years here:

http://www.omaha.com/seek-out-world-cla ... 953bb.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Greg
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033429
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Brad »

Greg S wrote:They bring up a lot of the points we've been talking about for years here:
Exactly...
Roseann Moring / World-Herald staff writer wrote:Murphy, the former Pittsburgh mayor, said the bridge is one of the best he’s seen, but added: “It’s a bridge that goes from nowhere to nowhere.”
Roseann Moring / World-Herald staff writer wrote:One longer-term focus should be parking, said John Hodgson, a developer based in Sacramento, California.
North downtown has lots of parking, he said, “but maybe not in the right places.”
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

It's nice to hear it from outsiders, but I'm sure it's nothing the people in charge don't already know at this point. It could be a nice push in the right direction, however.

A change of topic, but I drove by one of the suburban hotels down there and saw there was some draping and construction equipment around the first floor. I can't remember which hotel. Anyone know what they are doing down there? Hopefully offering something at street level?
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
NEDodger
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:19 am

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by NEDodger »

In regards to having some notable attractions in North Downtown, I always thought it was unfortunate that SAC didn't wait a few more years to build their Air and Space Museum. I think that would have been incredibly great situated somewhere next to CenturyLink.
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

NEDodger wrote:In regards to having some notable attractions in North Downtown, I always thought it was unfortunate that SAC didn't wait a few more years to build their Air and Space Museum.  I think that would have been incredibly great situated somewhere next to CenturyLink.
Oh lawds that would have been amazing... Maybe if they put it where CLC's parking lots are now - mixing outdoor exhibits with indoor exhibits, possibly putting the SR71 in the main concourse of the CLC. Holy cow.
Last edited by RNcyanide on Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
User avatar
GetUrban
Planning Board
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by GetUrban »

Greg S wrote:They bring up a lot of the points we've been talking about for years here:

http://www.omaha.com/seek-out-world-cla ... 953bb.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Greg
We can talk all we want, but is anyone listening? Many of these thoughts and ideas have also been brought up by architects and planners working on projects on the riverfront and north downtown areas for decades, but there seems to be a lack of cohesive vision everyone is working toward and strong leadership to pull it off.
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033429
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Brad »

GetUrban wrote:We can talk all we want, but is anyone listening? Many of these thoughts and ideas have also been brought up by architects and planners working on projects on the riverfront and north downtown areas for decades, but there seems to be a lack of cohesive vision everyone is working toward and strong leadership to pull it off.
Do you think it makes a difference that in the past, its mostly be local advocates of Omaha and this time its a peer group from around the country?
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

Brad wrote:
GetUrban wrote:We can talk all we want, but is anyone listening? Many of these thoughts and ideas have also been brought up by architects and planners working on projects on the riverfront and north downtown areas for decades, but there seems to be a lack of cohesive vision everyone is working toward and strong leadership to pull it off.
Do you think it makes a difference that in the past, its mostly be local advocates of Omaha and this time its a peer group from around the country?
Possibly. The 'bridge from nowhere to nowhere' comment is pretty sobering. Aside from the views, there's not a whole lot to go out of your way for to get to the bridge and cross it.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
User avatar
GetUrban
Planning Board
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by GetUrban »

Brad wrote:
GetUrban wrote:We can talk all we want, but is anyone listening? Many of these thoughts and ideas have also been brought up by architects and planners working on projects on the riverfront and north downtown areas for decades, but there seems to be a lack of cohesive vision everyone is working toward and strong leadership to pull it off.
Do you think it makes a difference that in the past, its mostly be local advocates of Omaha and this time its a peer group from around the country?
That's a good point. Hearing current input from elsewhere definitely helps. They can see things in a different light as an outsider.

There have been people brought in from elsewhere in the past, such as during the design phase of the pedestrian bridge, a group called Project for Public Spaces was brought in by Lively Omaha, (which became Omaha by Design) to make suggestions on how to develop the riverfront areas around the bridge. http://www.pps.org/ There was a national planning / landscape firm called EDAW from San Francisco/Denver who helped with the effort too. (they ended up designing the CLINK parking lots, for better or worse)

I think every time there is a new Mayoral administration there is a bit of a learning curve causing things get re-hashed & repeated. Each admin. tries to make its mark, like Daub/Quest(CLINK), Fahey/MRPB/TDAmeritrade, etc. Hopefully Stothert will make her mark in a positive way too. The big pieces are in place now with CLINK, MRPB, & TD, River's Edge, so the little pieces need to start filling things in now.
Last edited by GetUrban on Fri Feb 13, 2015 10:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 3538
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Garrett »

RNcyanide wrote:It's nice to hear it from outsiders, but I'm sure it's nothing the people in charge don't already know at this point. It could be a nice push in the right direction, however.

A change of topic, but I drove by one of the suburban hotels down there and saw there was some draping and construction equipment around the first floor. I can't remember which hotel. Anyone know what they are doing down there? Hopefully offering something at street level?
That's the... Holiday Inn right? I can't remember it's name either. But it used to have Union, and the new tenant is expanding the restaurant space to make it more visible. Right?
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

Garrett wrote:
RNcyanide wrote:It's nice to hear it from outsiders, but I'm sure it's nothing the people in charge don't already know at this point. It could be a nice push in the right direction, however.

A change of topic, but I drove by one of the suburban hotels down there and saw there was some draping and construction equipment around the first floor. I can't remember which hotel. Anyone know what they are doing down there? Hopefully offering something at street level?
That's the... Holiday Inn right? I can't remember it's name either. But it used to have Union, and the new tenant is expanding the restaurant space to make it more visible. Right?
Oh that'll be kinda nice. It'll make it look a lot better from street level.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
User avatar
Greg S
City Council
Posts: 7528
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:46 am

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by Greg S »

I would and have described development in that area as hap hazard. Nothing seems to be planned to fit long term. It's just bits and pieces thrown together. Wish he had one developer kind of running that show in the area, with more long term planning behind it.

Greg
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: North Downtown Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

Greg S wrote:I would and have described development in that area as hap hazard.  Nothing seems to be planned to fit long term.  It's just bits and pieces thrown together.  Wish he had one developer kind of running that show in the area, with more long term planning behind it.

Greg
Do you think anyone in the planning department or wherever looks at this thread from time to time and just feels awful about this development?
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
Post Reply