Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:07 pm
Finishing up the second level and starting on the 3rd. This one's going up real quick!
Page 3 of 5
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:09 pm
The fisheye lens sort of threw me off for a minute.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:09 pm
Nice shots Matt!
Btw, were you at the Great Nebraska Brewfest at Werner? There was a drone camera there...
Btw, were you at the Great Nebraska Brewfest at Werner? There was a drone camera there...
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:52 pm
I was not, I actually don't own a drone hah. I live at Westbrook Tower and this is from the roof 
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 9:09 pm
Can't beat the pace here!
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 10:11 pm
My friend has a deep hatred for the look of Westbrook. I don't mind it but he goes crazy over it 
.
.Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 10:18 pm
The design of the building is definitely from another time, that's for sure.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 11:11 pm
Technically I don't think Drones are allowed anywhere in Downtown Omaha. A 5 mile radius of Eppley covers all of downtown... If you draw a line from the end of Eppley's runway towards downtown, the 5 mile radius extends all the way to the 80/480/JFK junction!Coyote wrote:Nice shots Matt!
Btw, were you at the Great Nebraska Brewfest at Werner? There was a drone camera there...
Speaking of Werner, the 5 Mile Radius of the Millard Airport covers Werner so there probably should not have been a drone there either.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:00 am
They're starting on the third floor. The miracle of prefabrication.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:27 am
Here is what 5 miles from the airports look like.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2015 12:23 pm
Saturday Photo Update:
1.
2.
1.
2.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 1:14 pm
It's amazing just how much these comparatively small infill projects change the ambiance of their surroundings. I opine for the next skyscraper as much as the next but in the meantime keep the infill coming.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:43 pm
Agreed, this kind of rapid redevelopment would have been unthinkable 15 years ago. I'm so happy it's happening. 
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:56 pm
$2.65 million in TIF for the project.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 7:23 pm
So they started before the TIF?
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 7:42 pm
Happens more than you think.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 11:09 pm
Perhaps they were confident the project would be successful even if they didn't get approved for TIF.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 11:34 pm
That defeats the entire purpose of the financing though.daveoma wrote:Perhaps they were confident the project would be successful even if they didn't get approved for TIF.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 11:43 pm
So they were quite confident they were going to be approved for TIF. So confident that they started construction before they were approved.iamjacobm wrote:That defeats the entire purpose of the financing though.daveoma wrote:Perhaps they were confident the project would be successful even if they didn't get approved for TIF.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 12:00 am
That is my assumption. I think TIF is pretty much rubber stamped so developers don't really worry about it too much.daveoma wrote:So they were quite confident they were going to be approved for TIF. So confident that they started construction before they were approved.iamjacobm wrote:That defeats the entire purpose of the financing though.daveoma wrote:Perhaps they were confident the project would be successful even if they didn't get approved for TIF.
Maybe they were assured that the TIF would be passed by the city so they could expedite the timeline. I always think it makes the precess not look very genuine though.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2015 7:03 pm
Greatfull as can be for this one butt I cannot wait to get that lane back it's a pita at times.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 12:31 pm
Living across the street from here, I cannot agree with this sentiment more.MTO wrote:Greatfull as can be for this one butt I cannot wait to get that lane back it's a pita at times.
Here's an updated (crappy) picuture. All of the windows and doors in the inner courtyard are in and they have begun putting brick on the building:
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:01 pm
Did you see if they dug a hole for the pool?
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:16 pm
My guess is that they will wait on the pool until spring. That is what the Corvina is doing as well.MTO wrote:Did you see if they dug a hole for the pool?
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 8:44 am
So the Corvina still isn't done, comical.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 8:53 am
I think it is mostly done, there might even be people living in there, but when I walked by 2 weeks ago they were still working on some outside stuff and the pool area was just dirt.MTO wrote:So the Corvina still isn't done, comical.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2015 10:43 pm
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 7:45 am
If you look just to the right, you can also see the hotel at 24th and Farnam.
Edit: didn't realize you highlighted that building in the Even Hotel thread.
Edit: didn't realize you highlighted that building in the Even Hotel thread.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 8:07 am
Windows are going in.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 8:43 am
Windows and doors have been going in for awhile here. They have a few of the decks up as well, on the inner courtyard area. I'll try to get a picture today when I can. This building looks a little, I don't know, bland and UNO dorm-ish to me, but I suppose it could all come together in the end. As others have mentioned, really nice to have some infill in this area, especially with ground level retail/restaurant/activity.MTO wrote:Windows are going in.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:22 am
mattl181 wrote:Windows and doors have been going in for awhile here. They have a few of the decks up as well, on the inner courtyard area. I'll try to get a picture today when I can. This building looks a little, I don't know, bland and UNO dorm-ish to me, but I suppose it could all come together in the end. As others have mentioned, really nice to have some infill in this area, especially with ground level retail/restaurant/activity.MTO wrote:Windows are going in.
There's ground level commerce in this one?
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 10:02 am
2K SF.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 10:09 am
Haven't seen it in person for a while but from the rendering it does look bland, and a lot like the UNO dorms.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 12:48 pm
I must of forgot, that's even better. So is it still getting the pool?iamjacobm wrote:2K SF.
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 8:24 pm
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 10:05 pm
Thanks for all the photo updates Coyote!
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:46 am
Great pics! !
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2015 3:25 pm
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:16 pm
Open House and Four Property Tour wrote:RSVP here to enter to win $500 off rent!
Be the first to see our BRAND NEW ADDITION of The Highline Apartments.
Tuesday, February 16
Tour begins at The Highline's NORTH entrance, 2223 Dodge St.
Come anytime between 3:00 & 6:00 PM.
We'll be going from The Highline Apartments and new addition to The Bank Apartments, The Wire Omaha, & Slate on 19th Apartments.
PIZZA will be served following the tour.
Be one of the early birds to join the WAITLIST for this summer!
See you there! Please SHARE this event with your friends!
Re: Highline 2.0
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:04 am
Anyone else think its odd that this courtyard opens to the street, and not the alley? Maybe they did this for the southern facing sunlight into the courtyard and balconies, but just seems backwards to me. From an urban planning perspective, flipping the building around would have put height right up at the street side, creating the feeling of density. Plus the courtyard would be much quieter/more private facing inwards...