The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)

West Omaha, Sarpy and Nebraska metro counties.

Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss

Post Reply
joeglow
Planning Board
Posts: 2655
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:04 pm

Post by joeglow »

Isn't corporate welfare bad?
User avatar
Big E
City Council
Posts: 8019
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:12 am

Post by Big E »

Never argued otherwise.

From the POV of the school districts, though, what do they think they're accomplishing here?
Stable genius.
User avatar
Greg S
City Council
Posts: 7503
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:46 am

Post by Greg S »

iamjacobm wrote:
Greg S wrote:
iamjacobm wrote:
Coyote wrote:Is it this bill:

TIF loss could put crimp in growth
Jeffrey Robb WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER wrote:A city tax incentive that has helped shape Omaha's skyline, boost major employers and develop popular shopping districts would be slowed, if not shut down, in the eastern part of the city under a legislative proposal.
That has to be it.  By the looks of it this would be a really bad thing for the future of Omaha, Lincoln and any city trying to progress itself.

Nope, they've already been approved for this.  This would only impact developments that have not been approved yet.

Greg
Like the Shamrock Development...
Exactly.  Crossroads has already been approved, this could impact all the ones going forward that have not been approved yet.

Greg
StreetsOfOmaha
City Council
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm

Post by StreetsOfOmaha »

The logic is definitely flawed. The point of TIF is that the assessed value of the property (and therefore the property tax) stays the same for several years while the increment of increased value is used to pay for aspects of the development.

If their aim is to cap TIF, they'll only be preventing economic development, not securing more tax revenue. The tax revenue will stay the same. Again, to get TIF the developer must show that he/she would not have developed the project without TIF.

I just don't get what the point of the bill is, and to be honest, I don't think State Senator Abbie Cornett does either.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
User avatar
Omaha_Gabe
Human Relations
Posts: 731
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:22 pm
Location: Midtown Crossings

Post by Omaha_Gabe »

TIF benefits defended

By Paul Hammel
WORLD-HERALD BUREAU

http://www.omaha.com/article/20120125/N ... s-defended
LINCOLN — An effort to water down cities' power to grant generous property-tax breaks to redevelopment projects appears headed for a watering down itself.
That was evident Tuesday after a string of representatives from municipalities and chambers of commerce across the state, including Omaha, argued against changes in the state's current laws governing tax-increment financing, or TIF.
Over and over, they told a state legislative committee that TIF has allowed cities large and small to attract dozens of new businesses and thousands of new jobs and to redevelop undesirable, blighted properties. Those benefits, they said, outweigh the property tax breaks for such projects that last up to 15 years.
"The old saying is, 'If it's not broke, don't fix it,'" said Ken Bunger, a former deputy Omaha city attorney who helped write the original TIF laws.

After the hearing before the Legislature's Urban Affairs Committee, State Sen. Abbie Cornett of Bellevue said she plans to amend her proposal, Legislative Bill 918, to focus more squarely on improving communications between taxing entities before a TIF project is approved.
StreetsOfOmaha
City Council
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm

Post by StreetsOfOmaha »

I'm glad Cornett is getting her |expletive| handed to her.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 33161
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Post by Coyote »

New TIF bill could have big effect in N. Platte
Andrew Bottrell of North Platte Telegraph wrote:North Platte Chamber of Commerce President Dan Mauk said that could hinder TIF use in North Platte, and most certainly would hinder TIF use in smaller cities. The definition of "substandard and blighted" land has also come under scrutiny from critics of TIF, and a proposed constitutional amendment introduced by Omaha Senator Heath Mello would change that language to "property in need of rehabilitation or redevelopment." That would most likely stop communities from using TIF on fields.
So - what are the benefits of this bill?
Ben
Human Relations
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:57 pm
Location: Westside

Post by Ben »

Coyote wrote:New TIF bill could have big effect in N. Platte
Andrew Bottrell of North Platte Telegraph wrote:North Platte Chamber of Commerce President Dan Mauk said that could hinder TIF use in North Platte, and most certainly would hinder TIF use in smaller cities. The definition of "substandard and blighted" land has also come under scrutiny from critics of TIF, and a proposed constitutional amendment introduced by Omaha Senator Heath Mello would change that language to "property in need of rehabilitation or redevelopment." That would most likely stop communities from using TIF on fields.
So - what are the benefits of this bill?
I'm all for the use of TIF, but I think the main argument against it is that the local school district (and govt) don't see the tax base increase for 10-15 years, due to the tax rebates back to the developer.  So, in a time where school districts are scraping for all available money, this type of tax incentive essentially locks them out of any increased valuations on TIF financed properties.  Not necessarily a problem if TIF financed properties are a small portion of total tax base, but it can become a huge issue if it is too widely used.  I believe that the debate that spurred this bill was the original area slated to be "blighted" for the Crossroads redevelopment area.  It originally encompassed something like 20% of all of Westide School District's commercial tax base.
User avatar
GetUrban
Planning Board
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Omaha

Post by GetUrban »

Ben wrote:
Coyote wrote:New TIF bill could have big effect in N. Platte
Andrew Bottrell of North Platte Telegraph wrote:North Platte Chamber of Commerce President Dan Mauk said that could hinder TIF use in North Platte, and most certainly would hinder TIF use in smaller cities. The definition of "substandard and blighted" land has also come under scrutiny from critics of TIF, and a proposed constitutional amendment introduced by Omaha Senator Heath Mello would change that language to "property in need of rehabilitation or redevelopment." That would most likely stop communities from using TIF on fields.
So - what are the benefits of this bill?
I'm all for the use of TIF, but I think the main argument against it is that the local school district (and govt) don't see the tax base increase for 10-15 years, due to the tax rebates back to the developer.  So, in a time where school districts are scraping for all available money, this type of tax incentive essentially locks them out of any increased valuations on TIF financed properties.  Not necessarily a problem if TIF financed properties are a small portion of total tax base, but it can become a huge issue if it is too widely used.  I believe that the debate that spurred this bill was the original area slated to be "blighted" for the Crossroads redevelopment area.  It originally encompassed something like 20% of all of Westide School District's commercial tax base.
I agree overuse of TIF financing is a potential danger, but many large new developments would never happen in the first place without TIF. So the tax base would continue to erode even further without it. The idea is the value of property in adjacent communities around the developments should increase enough to stop the decay of the tax base.
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
StreetsOfOmaha
City Council
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm

Post by StreetsOfOmaha »

the main argument against it is that the local school district (and govt) don't see the tax base increase for 10-15 years, due to the tax rebates back to the developer.
But, in theory, the tax base would not increase (i.e. there would be no development in the first place) without TIF.

And round and round we go.

That's why the argument against TIF is pretty much ridiculous.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
User avatar
Greg S
City Council
Posts: 7503
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:46 am

Post by Greg S »

I think TIF's are great, as long as they are used properly.  Not every development needs them or would not be built without them.  It obviously was needed at Crossroads.  I did listen to the Grow Omaha show on 1/21 and it kind of sounded like we are still possibly a year to two away from big work at Crossroads?  Did anybody else hear that?

Greg
User avatar
thenewguy
County Board
Posts: 3743
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: Council Bluffs

Post by thenewguy »

I'm not generally one to post rumors, but this would be big news (even though we've heard it before) and i figured i'd throw it out there if what i was told is true.

i was talking to someone that works at a law firm downtown that represents some corporate clients, and i had made mention of how they must be enjoying having TD Ameritrade and CLink near by to entertain visitors from out of town (small talk).  I had said how i thought it was a good thing about the outdoor hockey, music, baseball, etc, and he said, "wait until you see what they have in store for crossroads."  Naturally it perked my interest, so i asked what specifically he was talking about.  

He pre-empted it with 'well this isn't going to be officially announced for a couple months because they are still working out the details' but that macy's and nordstroms have signed on for this development at crossroads.  Also said that REI (outdoor sporting goods store) was coming and that target would be maintained as an anchor.  I asked him about sears remaining as an anchor, and he said that it was going to be gone after this project.  He said that with the financial issues they are having and it generally not fitting in, that they weren't going to stay.  It is expected to look completely different (obviously) and that macy's/nordstroms wanted to have a location together and that it was a good fit for them.  There were a few other stores named by i honestly don't remember what because they also are nothing that is from here and weren't the meat and potatoes of the development.

As a side-and-final note, i made a mention of of how long we have had macy's commercials here and if we were some sort of test market and he said there was originally supposed to have been a deal inked a few years ago, but conditions weren't right until now (again).  

I guess we'll see if it actually happens or if he just made a liar out of me.
Go Cubs Go
User avatar
BRoss
IT Director
Posts: 10002778
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: West Central Omaha

Post by BRoss »

:D Sweet! It sounds like this could really revive Crossroads.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Post by iamjacobm »

Macy's ehh.  Nordstrom's and REI are really big gets though.
Dusty
Human Relations
Posts: 552
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:53 pm
Location: Central Florida

Post by Dusty »

I'm glad Crossroads is getting redone, but I'm still not seeing any WOW factor. It just seems like a bunch of retail chain stores built in a suburban development. The drawings of make me think of village point with a target next to it. Can I say YUCK!

72nd and Dodge is one the busiest intersection in town. It should have lots of density. We should be putting the buildings close the sidewalk and building up! Instead, we see a development that is setback and restaurants randomly placed in the parking lot. This is the cookie cutter model for suburban shopping centers!

Instead of spending all this time trying to snag big chain stores, we should focus on a design that the citizens want first. Work more like Aksarben Village where you build the concept first and slowly build and fill in sections at a time. Personally, I would much rather see local businesses fill in retails bays instead of the chains stores. Omaha has a large number of small businesses here, but they are dwindling because this infatuation of "more big chains equals big city acceptance."
Dusty
Human Relations
Posts: 552
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:53 pm
Location: Central Florida

Post by Dusty »

I hope Sears gets torn down. Plus, we should be working with Best Buy, Toys R Us, etc about redevelopment options. Essentially, we need to level everything to 76th st.

Plus, I hope they save the double tents over the food court area. It doesn't have to be in this development.

Possible uses for it:
1. It could be used as a ceiling for an outdoor amphitheater
2. Install lights for visual shows like Fremont Street Experience in Las Vegas.
3. Used over the farnam or dodge st bridge crossing I-480. We need something to connect downtown and midtown crossing.

I say option 2 and 3 together!
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Post by iamjacobm »

Really?  I see some pretty new concepts for the city.

A new city library will be part of the development right in the middle of all the shops.
Apartments built on top of the former Dillard's building.
A transit center moved to the site.

Along with new to market retail which will make this a really important regional destination right in the heart of the city.
User avatar
S33
County Board
Posts: 4441
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:15 pm

Post by S33 »

Lol - I don't think any more Omaha developments need to be watered down with Best Buy and Toy "R" Us. University village seems to have a bit loftier goals than mirroring 132nd and L or Lake Manawa.
User avatar
Stargazer
County Board
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:06 am
Location: Bennington

Post by Stargazer »

I predict it just becomes another 'lifestyle' center, no extraordinary tenants... oh, and the 'tents' end up in the landfill.
Shoot for the Moon... if you miss, you'll land among the stars.
nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2019
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: 5280

Post by nebport5 »

Stargazer wrote:I predict it just becomes another 'lifestyle' center, no extraordinary tenants... oh, and the 'tents' end up in the landfill.
Image
User avatar
Greg S
City Council
Posts: 7503
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:46 am

Post by Greg S »

The one flaw in the law firm guy is that Macy's is not running commercials here locally, nor have they in the past.  I think that's where a lot of the Macy's rumors have come from.  Those are national commercials, they are not being targeted to the Omaha market.

Greg
User avatar
S33
County Board
Posts: 4441
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:15 pm

Post by S33 »

Greg S wrote:The one flaw in the law firm guy is that Macy's is not running commercials here locally, nor have they in the past.  I think that's where a lot of the Macy's rumors have come from.  Those are national commercials, they are not being targeted to the Omaha market.

Greg
[youtube][/youtube]
User avatar
thenewguy
County Board
Posts: 3743
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: Council Bluffs

Post by thenewguy »

Greg S wrote:The one flaw in the law firm guy is that Macy's is not running commercials here locally, nor have they in the past.  I think that's where a lot of the Macy's rumors have come from.  Those are national commercials, they are not being targeted to the Omaha market.

Greg
sorry, i should have been more specific.  my mention of the national ads to him and including it in my story was simply the seguay in the conversation that led him to tell me their aspirations to build here a while ago.  not that the ads were indicative of their attempts to guage popularity of their stores here that would ultimately decide their fate in the omaha market.  

they pay people to study and decide that without public consent :p
Go Cubs Go
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 33161
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Post by Coyote »

Tax breaks could bring Nordstrom, Macy's to Crossroads Mall
Paul Hammel WORLD-HERALD BUREAU wrote:That was the message delivered to a panel of state senators Monday during testimony on a last-minute proposal to provide "turnback" sales tax incentives — like those used to build Omaha's Qwest Center — to redevelopment projects such as Crossroads and the Nebraska Crossing outlet mall at Gretna.
User avatar
nativeomahan
County Board
Posts: 5362
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Omaha and Puerto Vallarta

Post by nativeomahan »

It sounds like the redevelopment of Crossroads is still far up in the air.  I doubt that any major new tax abatement plan will get out of the Unicameral this spring.
Dusty
Human Relations
Posts: 552
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:53 pm
Location: Central Florida

Post by Dusty »

It's kind of funny how they keep pushing for Nordstroms. In the next breath, they say the development will be designed for college students.

Hmmm...last time I checked college students tend to be poor and won't have the money to shop at Nordstroms.

It's obvious the developers are clueless about what young professionals and students want. They want to build a shopping district that has an outlet mall vibe. This may be a great pull for middle aged-women. But slapping university in the title doesn't make it hip or appealing for young people.

As a young professional, I want to see an entertainment district. Something like Power and Lights district in KC.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10389
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Post by iamjacobm »

I think the concept is fantastic.  Lets make some assumptions based on what we have heard might happen.

Nordstrom, REI, Macy's Target anchors is a pretty good shopping destination.  No matter what you think about Macy's being nothing more than Dillards people will drive past Westroads and Village Pointe to go to Macys.  Nordstroms and REI speak for themselves, regional draws right there.

Apartments above Dillards.  I know they mentioned 500 beds, but that seems like a lot.

New city library in the main drag of the development, pretty cool addition.  Transit center moving from 76th to here.

Throw in an "upscale" bowling alley and your average mall filler retail and maybe a handful of new to market chain restaurants.  If your lucky the city's 2nd locations for Apple and Trader Joe's end up in the area.

That would be a heck of a development.  Obviously we don't even know if they will turn dirt on this place let alone do all the things they have mentioned in articles.

The one thing I have thought was bad from day one is the name.  "University Village" just doesn't do it for me.  I get that they want to rebrand from Crossroads since that name probably has a stigma now, but University Village isn't going to give you any special kind of "brand" for the city IMO.
User avatar
Seth
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1437
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Ford Birthsite Neighborhood

Post by Seth »

iamjacobm wrote:The one thing I have thought was bad from day one is the name.  "University Village" just doesn't do it for me.  I get that they want to rebrand from Crossroads since that name probably has a stigma now, but University Village isn't going to give you any special kind of "brand" for the city IMO.
I agree.  "University Village" just sounds to me like a mediocre student apartment complex.
nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2019
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: 5280

Post by nebport5 »

Dusty wrote:It's kind of funny how they keep pushing for Nordstroms. In the next breath, they say the development will be designed for college students.

Hmmm...last time I checked college students tend to be poor and won't have the money to shop at Nordstroms.

It's obvious the developers are clueless about what young professionals and students want.


Disagree.  How many poor colleges students do you see running around in $200 Diesel Jeans and etc?  Still, you don't really think the developers are banking entirely on college students!?  Yes, it is a stupid name.  I think we have enough "Villages".
User avatar
nativeomahan
County Board
Posts: 5362
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Omaha and Puerto Vallarta

Post by nativeomahan »

I have said it before.  Whatever they build, they ought to build it right up to the corner of 72nd and Dodge.  Put in a movie theatre, bars and restaurants.  Omaha could have its own version of P&L and Time's Square.  Make the corner come alive!
MadMartin8
Planning Board
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Post by MadMartin8 »

Clearly all developments should have a "Village" title.

I myself can't wait for Shamrock Village, and The Village at the Yard to come to fruition. Also Playland Village Park in Council Bluffs!
User avatar
Linkin5
County Board
Posts: 4541
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:59 pm

Post by Linkin5 »

First National Village Tower.  It's got a nice ring to it.
Omahanerd
New to the Neighborhood
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:55 am
Location: Chicago via Omaha

Post by Omahanerd »

Regardless of the awful name, when can we see any progression on this project, or is it still pretty up in the air. Thanks!

-Nerd
MadMartin8
Planning Board
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Post by MadMartin8 »

Linkin5 wrote:First National Village Tower.  It's got a nice ring to it.

And TD Village Ameritrade Park.
Bugeater
Library Board
Posts: 342
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:50 pm
Location: Omaha

Post by Bugeater »

While we're on the subject (or off it actually), I think "City of Omaha" sounds rather bland as well, we should start referring to it as the "Village of Omaha".
Life is the sh*t that happens while we wait for moments that never come.
MadMartin8
Planning Board
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Post by MadMartin8 »

Bugeater wrote:While we're on the subject (or off it actually), I think "City of Omaha" sounds rather bland as well, we should start referring to it as the "Village of Omaha".
City of Omaha Village Towne Pointe?
User avatar
Seth
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1437
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Ford Birthsite Neighborhood

Post by Seth »

nativeomahan wrote:I have said it before.  Whatever they build, they ought to build it right up to the corner of 72nd and Dodge.  Put in a movie theatre, bars and restaurants.  Omaha could have its own version of P&L and Time's Square.  Make the corner come alive!
As others have said before, that's not going to happen unless Target is willing to give up their lucrative location and parking lot.  I don't see that happening.
User avatar
FrontlineOmaha
Home Owners Association
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:47 am
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Post by FrontlineOmaha »

MadMartin8 wrote:
Bugeater wrote:While we're on the subject (or off it actually), I think "City of Omaha" sounds rather bland as well, we should start referring to it as the "Village of Omaha".
City of Omaha Village Towne Pointe?
...center (or Centere as long as were adding Es to everything)
User avatar
BRoss
IT Director
Posts: 10002778
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: West Central Omaha

Post by BRoss »

FrontlineOmaha wrote:
MadMartin8 wrote:
Bugeater wrote:While we're on the subject (or off it actually), I think "City of Omaha" sounds rather bland as well, we should start referring to it as the "Village of Omaha".
City of Omaha Village Towne Pointe?
...center (or Centere as long as were adding Es to everything)
It's actually "Centre".
User avatar
Big E
City Council
Posts: 8019
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:12 am

Post by Big E »

This threade is the Epicentre of Sucke.

:;):
Stable genius.
Post Reply