Omaha Forums

bfcmoose wrote:They have dug a large whole behind the shops at legacy, is this going to be more apartments or I am hoping additional shopping.

Anyone know whats going on there?

Brad wrote:

bfcmoose wrote:They have dug a large whole behind the shops at legacy, is this going to be more apartments or I am hoping additional shopping.

Anyone know whats going on there?

They are mixed use apartments (As opposed to the traditional apartments next door.  These have underground parking and ground level retail.

Brad wrote:

bfcmoose wrote:They have dug a large whole behind the shops at legacy, is this going to be more apartments or I am hoping additional shopping.

Anyone know whats going on there?

They are mixed use apartments (As opposed to the traditional apartments next door.  These have underground parking and ground level retail.

bfcmoose wrote:Any commitments for the retail yet?

Axel wrote:There are 3 large elevator shafts in what I assume is the same plot. Any more details on this thing?

Axel wrote:Quite the big development. Do suburban apartments normally have elevators? And I estimate that they could be as tall as 5 stories, more likely around 4 though.

Brad wrote:Apparently Wake-N-Skate was raided today. Police, FBI, DEA, Etc...

Several law enforcement agencies served a warrant on a popular skate shop in west Omaha on Wednesday night.

Members of the Omaha Gang Unit, Drug Enforcement Agency and Douglas County Sheriff's Office served a warrant at Wake-N-Skate Boardhouse near 168th Street and West Center Road.

Prosecutors said a raid Wednesday night at a west Omaha skate shop resulted in the discovery of 18 pounds of marijuana.

TitosBuritoBarn wrote:Pot? Really? They raided a business for 18 pounds of pot?

Seth wrote:Am I the only one unsurprised by the fact that a place called "Wake'N'Skate" had 18lbs of pot on the premisis?

August 2012 - Seth wrote:

TitosBuritoBarn wrote:New websites up. Apparently they are part of a national apartment chain. They're the last nail in the coffin for what was supposed to be a cool new urbanist development.

{Admin edit - URL Link removed by request of cproperties.com}

I'm not trying to start another pointless urban vs. suburban argument, but I've never really understood the appeal of these kinds of developments.  I always think of the sad, bland setting of Office Space or Primer when I drive by them.  They generally have nothing but parking around them, and are (often deliberately) isolated from the surrounding community.

The alternative solution for us would be to submit a link
disavowal request to Google, which is something that may negatively impact Google’s
perception of your site.

Coyote wrote:

The alternative solution for us would be to submit a link
disavowal request to Google, which is something that may negatively impact Google’s
perception of your site.

Google wrote:PageRank is Google’s opinion of the importance of a page based on the incoming links from other sites. (PageRank is an important signal, but it’s one of more than 200 that we use to determine relevancy.) In general, a link from a site is regarded as a vote for the quality of your site.

Google works very hard to make sure that actions on third-party sites do not negatively affect a website. In some circumstances, incoming links can affect Google’s opinion of a page or site. For example, you or a search engine optimizer (SEO) you’ve hired may have built bad links to your site via paid links or other link schemes that violate our quality guidelines. First and foremost, we recommend that you remove as many spammy or low-quality links from the web as possible.

If you’ve done as much work as you can to remove spammy or low-quality links from the web, and are unable to make further progress on getting the links taken down, you can disavow the remaining links. In other words, you can ask Google not to take certain links into account when assessing your site.

This is an advanced feature and should only be used with caution. If used incorrectly, this feature can potentially harm your site’s performance in Google’s search results. We recommend that you disavow backlinks only if you believe you have a considerable number of spammy, artificial, or low-quality links pointing to your site, and if you are confident that the links are causing issues for you. In most cases, Google can assess which links to trust without additional guidance, so most normal or typical sites will not need to use this tool.

Garrett wrote:Links can't be copyrighted. Having a website on the open internet like that means anyone can link it if they want to. This is probably one of the pettiest things I have ever witnessed, and really makes me question this company if a year and a half old semi-negative post bothers them that much. I mean, |expletive|! Who are these people, the Chinese State Council?

jessep28 wrote:Also, nobody even think about searching for cache:http://eomahaforums.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1930 in Google.