Amazon HQ2

Kansas City, Denver, Minneapolis, and Coast to Coast

Moderators: Coyote, Omaha Cowboy, Brad, nebugeater, Candleshoe, the1wags

User avatar
TitosBuritoBarn
Planning Board
Posts: 2108
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Amazon HQ2

Postby TitosBuritoBarn » Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:42 am

Meh, it's still a long shot...

I'm mildly annoyed that the author believes New Orleans is in the midwest.
"Video game violence is not a new problem. Who could forget in the wake of SimCity how children everywhere took up urban planning." - Stephen Colbert

User avatar
Garrett
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1832
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Amazon HQ2

Postby Garrett » Fri Nov 24, 2017 11:24 pm

TitosBuritoBarn wrote:Meh, it's still a long shot...

I'm mildly annoyed that the author believes New Orleans is in the midwest.


I stopped reading at “New Orleans=Midwest”
From Omaha to Chicago
From Axel to Garrett

Still the same guy

User avatar
Uffda
Planning Board
Posts: 3101
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: Amazon HQ2

Postby Uffda » Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:05 am

Interesting article about Amazon's effect on Seattle

One walk through Seattle's 'Amazonia' neighborhood made me very uneasy for whatever city gets HQ2

http://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-h ... equences-6

User avatar
TitosBuritoBarn
Planning Board
Posts: 2108
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Amazon HQ2

Postby TitosBuritoBarn » Thu Jan 11, 2018 10:04 am

Uffda wrote:Interesting article about Amazon's effect on Seattle

One walk through Seattle's 'Amazonia' neighborhood made me very uneasy for whatever city gets HQ2

http://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-h ... equences-6


As much as I believe Business Insider is Buzzfeed for news, he makes a couple good points. First, it's never a good idea to let one company dominate the local economy and be responsible for the majority of jobs. Because when that company leaves or declines, and it almost certainly will, the city/region of the city goes with it.

Second is the issue with Amazon attempting to control everything. If true what he reports about Amazon requiring businesses to stay open at night, there will be a lot of turnover unless they balance out the daytime and nighttime activity. A substantially greater number of residents as well as cultural institutions are needed to achieve a proper daytime/nighttime balance. That's usually easy (but slow) to fix.

Many of the other issues are just products of growth and can become major positives (which he does allude to) when sorted out better. If there weren't problems to fix, I wouldn't have a job.

--

What I'm hoping they do is locate to a city that has fallen on hard times like St. Louis, Detroit that has the infrastructure for growth already in place and could handle the influx of a large new employer. In St. Louis, we have an entire airport terminal we don't use, a light-rail system that is rarely congested, an urban housing stock that is ripe for investment as much of it as abandoned or underutilized, and a downtown with enough building stock and vacant lots to absorb at least what Amazon is proposing.
"Video game violence is not a new problem. Who could forget in the wake of SimCity how children everywhere took up urban planning." - Stephen Colbert

User avatar
Uffda
Planning Board
Posts: 3101
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: Amazon HQ2

Postby Uffda » Thu Jan 11, 2018 11:19 am

TitosBuritoBarn wrote:
Uffda wrote:Interesting article about Amazon's effect on Seattle

One walk through Seattle's 'Amazonia' neighborhood made me very uneasy for whatever city gets HQ2

http://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-h ... equences-6


As much as I believe Business Insider is Buzzfeed for news, he makes a couple good points. First, it's never a good idea to let one company dominate the local economy and be responsible for the majority of jobs. Because when that company leaves or declines, and it almost certainly will, the city/region of the city goes with it.

Second is the issue with Amazon attempting to control everything. If true what he reports about Amazon requiring businesses to stay open at night, there will be a lot of turnover unless they balance out the daytime and nighttime activity. A substantially greater number of residents as well as cultural institutions are needed to achieve a proper daytime/nighttime balance. That's usually easy (but slow) to fix.

Many of the other issues are just products of growth and can become major positives (which he does allude to) when sorted out better. If there weren't problems to fix, I wouldn't have a job.

--

What I'm hoping they do is locate to a city that has fallen on hard times like St. Louis, Detroit that has the infrastructure for growth already in place and could handle the influx of a large new employer. In St. Louis, we have an entire airport terminal we don't use, a light-rail system that is rarely congested, an urban housing stock that is ripe for investment as much of it as abandoned or underutilized, and a downtown with enough building stock and vacant lots to absorb at least what Amazon is proposing.


I noticed within his article he had links to other articles. The author was kind of putting it all in one spot.

bigredmed1
Home Owners Association
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 10:16 pm

Re: Amazon HQ2

Postby bigredmed1 » Thu Jan 11, 2018 12:46 pm

Uffda wrote:
TitosBuritoBarn wrote:
Uffda wrote:Interesting article about Amazon's effect on Seattle

One walk through Seattle's 'Amazonia' neighborhood made me very uneasy for whatever city gets HQ2

http://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-h ... equences-6


As much as I believe Business Insider is Buzzfeed for news, he makes a couple good points. First, it's never a good idea to let one company dominate the local economy and be responsible for the majority of jobs. Because when that company leaves or declines, and it almost certainly will, the city/region of the city goes with it.

Second is the issue with Amazon attempting to control everything. If true what he reports about Amazon requiring businesses to stay open at night, there will be a lot of turnover unless they balance out the daytime and nighttime activity. A substantially greater number of residents as well as cultural institutions are needed to achieve a proper daytime/nighttime balance. That's usually easy (but slow) to fix.

Many of the other issues are just products of growth and can become major positives (which he does allude to) when sorted out better. If there weren't problems to fix, I wouldn't have a job.

--

What I'm hoping they do is locate to a city that has fallen on hard times like St. Louis, Detroit that has the infrastructure for growth already in place and could handle the influx of a large new employer. In St. Louis, we have an entire airport terminal we don't use, a light-rail system that is rarely congested, an urban housing stock that is ripe for investment as much of it as abandoned or underutilized, and a downtown with enough building stock and vacant lots to absorb at least what Amazon is proposing.


I noticed within his article he had links to other articles. The author was kind of putting it all in one spot.


STL would be a good space for that much development, but I think they will head to the cool kids club towns like Austin.

Professor Woland
Library Board
Posts: 335
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 8:28 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area

Re: Amazon HQ2

Postby Professor Woland » Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:29 pm

Boston.

damonhynes
Home Owners Association
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 7:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Amazon HQ2

Postby damonhynes » Tue Jan 16, 2018 3:36 pm

bigredmed1 wrote:STL would be a good space for that much development, but I think they will head to the cool kids club towns like Austin.


STL is the antithesis of cool, to be sure.

Albuquerque is the new Austin. Mark my words. :D
https://www.facebook.com/OmaNews/

bigredmed1
Home Owners Association
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 10:16 pm

Re: Amazon HQ2

Postby bigredmed1 » Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:17 pm

damonhynes wrote:
bigredmed1 wrote:STL would be a good space for that much development, but I think they will head to the cool kids club towns like Austin.


STL is the antithesis of cool, to be sure.

Albuquerque is the new Austin. Mark my words. :D

Used to live there in the 80s. It's always been better than Austin.


Return to “Elsewhere”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest