High speed rail myths

Trains, Planes, and Automobiles (and Streetcars!).

Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss

Post Reply
User avatar
Big E
City Council
Posts: 8015
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:12 am

High speed rail myths

Post by Big E »

http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/13/ ... l?hpt=Sbin
Are proposed multibillion dollar high-speed railway projects in the United States a smart move or a huge waste of taxpayer dollars?

CNN.com users are challenging politicians, policymakers and each other about whether the Obama administration's push to build high-speed rail lines in the Midwest, West Coast and elsewhere is on the right track.

Many users want proof that high-speed rail can be a profitable, efficient job generator to help raise the sagging U.S. economy when compared with other types of transportation.

Experts -- including the two most powerful congressional lawmakers on rail issues, think-tank specialists and policymakers at the Department of Transportation -- have directly responded to CNN.com user comments.
Interesting (and long) read.
almighty_tuna
City Council
Posts: 105401
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:34 pm
Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado
Contact:

Post by almighty_tuna »

I read this yesterday.  Good stuff.
User avatar
Big E
City Council
Posts: 8015
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:12 am

Post by Big E »

almighty_tuna wrote:I read this yesterday.
Are you the reason China banned time travel?
Stable genius.
almighty_tuna
City Council
Posts: 105401
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:34 pm
Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado
Contact:

Post by almighty_tuna »

Sarah Connor is dead.  You can thank me later.
User avatar
Big E
City Council
Posts: 8015
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:12 am

Post by Big E »

I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.
Stable genius.
mrdwhsr
Library Board
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:51 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area

Post by mrdwhsr »

Worth reading. Thanks for posting E.

IMO - let's get the North East Corridor (Boston to Washington) up to 150+ MPH. The train is already time and price competitive New York to Washington and Boston to New York. If we could get Boston to Washington under 5-hours?
StreetsOfOmaha
City Council
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm

Post by StreetsOfOmaha »

I haven't had a chance to read this yet, but I certainly will.

My transportation class this semester is writing a 500-page white paper on high speed rail that will be submitted to policy-makers to aid in their decision-making processes.

I can certainly update people on our findings if anyone is interested after the semester.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
User avatar
Garrett
Planning Board
Posts: 3470
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Post by Garrett »

No offense man, but you expect them to read it? Half of them don't even read the laws they're voting on!

But I would definitely be interested in hearing about it.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
StreetsOfOmaha
City Council
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm

Post by StreetsOfOmaha »

We've already got a handful of eager readers lined up with the Transportation Research Board (transportation research advisers to the President and Congress) and Federal DOT.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
User avatar
Garrett
Planning Board
Posts: 3470
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Post by Garrett »

Ah ok people who actually do research and not anyone from the legislature ok well good luck to you.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
StreetsOfOmaha
City Council
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm

Post by StreetsOfOmaha »

:what:
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
StreetsOfOmaha
City Council
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm

Post by StreetsOfOmaha »

This is pretty awesome: tongue-in-cheek and funny, but drives home the message.

"How to sell high speed rail - Mad Men style"

http://www.good.is/post/how-to-sell-hig ... men-style/
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
User avatar
guy4omaha
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1199
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: The Big O

Re: High speed rail myths

Post by guy4omaha »

Saw this on the Internet today. Sounds like it is in the very early stages at best, but I thought some of you might find it interesting. Sounds like something to watch for here in the month of February.

"Japan, which has a consistent trade surplus with the U.S., is putting the finishing touches on a package that it claims will create 700,000 jobs in the U.S. and help create a $450-billion market, Reuters reported, citing government sources familiar with the plans.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and President Trump are expected to meet on Feb. 10. Major Japanese newspapers cited a draft of the proposal that calls for cooperation on building high-speed trains in the U.S. northeast, Texas and California. The two sides would also jointly develop artificial intelligence, robotics, space and Internet technology.

The Japanese may use money from its foreign exchange reserves to fund the package, Reuters reported."
My son got a 27 on his ACT. No this score is not as high as what Jeff's son achieved. But one has to remember the paternal gene-pool my son has to overcome. On a PGPAB [Paternal Gene-Pool Adjusted Basis], my son's score is a 37 and Jeff's son's PGPAB ACT score is 19.
bigredmed
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1897
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:45 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area

Re: High speed rail myths

Post by bigredmed »

guy4omaha wrote:Saw this on the Internet today. Sounds like it is in the very early stages at best, but I thought some of you might find it interesting. Sounds like something to watch for here in the month of February.

"Japan, which has a consistent trade surplus with the U.S., is putting the finishing touches on a package that it claims will create 700,000 jobs in the U.S. and help create a $450-billion market, Reuters reported, citing government sources familiar with the plans.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and President Trump are expected to meet on Feb. 10. Major Japanese newspapers cited a draft of the proposal that calls for cooperation on building high-speed trains in the U.S. northeast, Texas and California. The two sides would also jointly develop artificial intelligence, robotics, space and Internet technology.

The Japanese may use money from its foreign exchange reserves to fund the package, Reuters reported."
High speed trains from one end of the Dallas-FW metro to the airports and to the other end may well be profitable. Seattle to Portland? Don't know.
User avatar
Dundeemaha
Human Relations
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 11:41 am
Location: Country Club

Re: High speed rail myths

Post by Dundeemaha »

The Texas high speed rail line I've heard about is between Houston and Dallas/FW, which according to the company doing it has 50,000 daily commuters. http://www.texascentral.com/project/

The Northeast of course has the highest volume, highest speed, most profitable rail system in the US. So any improvements there only make sense.
User avatar
GetUrban
Planning Board
Posts: 2634
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: High speed rail myths

Post by GetUrban »

Dundeemaha wrote:The Texas high speed rail line I've heard about is between Houston and Dallas/FW, which according to the company doing it has 50,000 daily commuters. http://www.texascentral.com/project/

The Northeast of course has the highest volume, highest speed, most profitable rail system in the US. So any improvements there only make sense.
A Houston - Dallas/FW route would make a lot more sense for a high-speed rail line than a shorter route within the Dallas Metro to DFW. It probably wouldn't be able to utilize "high speed" (200 mph), even within a large Metro like Dallas/FW.

I'd like to see a Chicago-Denver route through Omaha.
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
buildomaha
Human Relations
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 7:06 pm

Re: High speed rail myths

Post by buildomaha »

GetUrban wrote:
Dundeemaha wrote:The Texas high speed rail line I've heard about is between Houston and Dallas/FW, which according to the company doing it has 50,000 daily commuters. http://www.texascentral.com/project/

The Northeast of course has the highest volume, highest speed, most profitable rail system in the US. So any improvements there only make sense.
A Houston - Dallas/FW route would make a lot more sense for a high-speed rail line than a shorter route within the Dallas Metro to DFW. It probably wouldn't be able to utilize "high speed" (200 mph), even within a large Metro like Dallas/FW.

I'd like to see a Chicago-Denver route through Omaha.
Wasn't this idea being thrown around at one point but Omaha opted out imediatlely or am I thinking do something else?
#gohawks
User avatar
Dundeemaha
Human Relations
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 11:41 am
Location: Country Club

Re: High speed rail myths

Post by Dundeemaha »

buildomaha wrote:
GetUrban wrote:
Dundeemaha wrote:The Texas high speed rail line I've heard about is between Houston and Dallas/FW, which according to the company doing it has 50,000 daily commuters. http://www.texascentral.com/project/

The Northeast of course has the highest volume, highest speed, most profitable rail system in the US. So any improvements there only make sense.
A Houston - Dallas/FW route would make a lot more sense for a high-speed rail line than a shorter route within the Dallas Metro to DFW. It probably wouldn't be able to utilize "high speed" (200 mph), even within a large Metro like Dallas/FW.

I'd like to see a Chicago-Denver route through Omaha.
Wasn't this idea being thrown around at one point but Omaha opted out imediatlely or am I thinking do something else?
Back before Obama had grey hair he outlined a plan for a nation wide rail network with higher speeds but Omaha never played a major role in it.

Image

Nebraska was one of the earliest states to say it would provide nothing toward the project though if I remember correctly.
Post Reply