METRO at CWS
Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss
- OmahaJaysCU
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:00 pm
METRO at CWS
I'm not sure how many of you all have been down to the CWS yet, but I've noticed an enormous presence of the METRO bus system. Â Their CWS circular routes and their buses that go to Westroads and Oakview, etc, seemed to be in high use. Â They all seemed to be their new buses too.
Anyone else notice this?
Just my two cents, but I feel that if METRO can make a positive impression on riders at the CWS this will help amplify public sentiment IN FAVOR of streetcars. Â Same goes for the Starskys/Barretts/etc shuttles.
Anyone else notice this?
Just my two cents, but I feel that if METRO can make a positive impression on riders at the CWS this will help amplify public sentiment IN FAVOR of streetcars. Â Same goes for the Starskys/Barretts/etc shuttles.
I saw them all lined up the other night on the west side of the stadium.
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
Used one for the 6 PM game last night. Â It was full and turning away passengers by the time it got to 16th and Harney or so.
Please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please continue this service after the CWS, particularly evenings and weekends.
Please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please continue this service after the CWS, particularly evenings and weekends.
Stable genius.
-
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:45 pm
- Location: Omaha Metro Area
Drove through downtown on Saturday morning while running errands. Â Noticed a bunch of metro buses. Â Agree that the circulator function would be great to continue on Friday and Saturday nights. Â
Don't agree with Street cars. Â I think most people get that these are infrastructure nightmares and don't really accomplish anymore than a competent bus system could with MUCH less infrastructure and at a lower cost. Â Also, most people get that buses can be redirected so routes that are really busy on Fridays, but not on Sundays don't have inadequate service on Friday or too much service on Sundays.
Don't agree with Street cars. Â I think most people get that these are infrastructure nightmares and don't really accomplish anymore than a competent bus system could with MUCH less infrastructure and at a lower cost. Â Also, most people get that buses can be redirected so routes that are really busy on Fridays, but not on Sundays don't have inadequate service on Friday or too much service on Sundays.
BigRed, I think most people get that developers don't build for bus lines. Portland saw $3.5B in development within 3 blocks of their streetcar in 11 years. Seattle has seen $2.4B in development within 3 blocks of its streetcar in 8 years. Streetcars bring developement dollars that bus routes don't, period.
As far as the buses, I completely support them continuing the circulator evenings and weekends in lieu of streetcars, for now.
As far as the buses, I completely support them continuing the circulator evenings and weekends in lieu of streetcars, for now.
Agreed on all. Â While there's certainly no guarantee that a streetcar will bring X-billion dollars in development, you can guarantee buses won't. Â The bus circulator would be great to service the existing developments, but it won't spur significant new. Â It might fill some empty bays on 16th, though.the1wags wrote:BigRed, I think most people get that developers don't build for bus lines. Portland saw $3.5B in development within 3 blocks of their streetcar in 11 years. Seattle has seen $2.4B in development within 3 blocks of its streetcar in 8 years. Streetcars bring developement dollars that bus routes don't, period.
As far as the buses, I completely support them continuing the circulator evenings and weekends in lieu of streetcars, for now.
Stable genius.
-
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:45 pm
- Location: Omaha Metro Area
Yes, but my arguments were that streetcars are infrastructure pigs. Â Streetcar lines make road and sewer repair more expensive by the need to either pave around them or moving them to get to pipes below them.Big E wrote:Agreed on all. While there's certainly no guarantee that a streetcar will bring X-billion dollars in development, you can guarantee buses won't. The bus circulator would be great to service the existing developments, but it won't spur significant new. It might fill some empty bays on 16th, though.the1wags wrote:BigRed, I think most people get that developers don't build for bus lines. Portland saw $3.5B in development within 3 blocks of their streetcar in 11 years. Seattle has seen $2.4B in development within 3 blocks of its streetcar in 8 years. Streetcars bring developement dollars that bus routes don't, period.
As far as the buses, I completely support them continuing the circulator evenings and weekends in lieu of streetcars, for now.
The "cool kids" neighborhood gets a sweet new street car line that the rest of the city ends up supporting directly through more taxes or indirectly through reduced services elsewhere. Â Streetcars are great for the neighborhoods that get them but suck for the rest of the city that doesn't. Â These systems end up costing so much to build and run (and rarely even break even, much less make profits) that transportation and other needs for neighborhoods that don't get support of such a system get the bills and they get less money available for their needs.
How many of the billions in development in Seattle and Portland came from TIF financing or other "government picks the winners-type" public financing models? Â How many of the developers billions actually came out of their pocket as new money and into their new business without government cash mingling into it? Â This is important in sorting out just how exciting these are. Â If we have to bleed an already cash-strapped city to build and subsidize the street car line, and then bleed it again to pay for the all the TIF-based developments, kindly let me know, so I can go long on U-hauls moving to Sarpy County.
Hello, its the ghost of St. Louis calling for you.
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6864
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
Re: METRO at CWS
That is awesome to hear! And I completely agree that it is a fantastic form of "outreach" to get many of the suburbanites who attend the game exposed to the possibilities.OmahaJaysCU wrote:I'm not sure how many of you all have been down to the CWS yet, but I've noticed an enormous presence of the METRO bus system. Their CWS circular routes and their buses that go to Westroads and Oakview, etc, seemed to be in high use. They all seemed to be their new buses too.
Anyone else notice this?
Just my two cents, but I feel that if METRO can make a positive impression on riders at the CWS this will help amplify public sentiment IN FAVOR of streetcars. Same goes for the Starskys/Barretts/etc shuttles.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
-
- Library Board
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 12:24 pm
- Location: West-central Omaha
Seth, I know what you're saying; but you're mistaken if you think "suburbanites" would ride the bus more, if only they knew how great it was... Cars are still the best way to get around from point to point, until some event like the CWS makes it more convenient to park and ride in a large group. Â We don't ride the bus because we don't want to ride the bus, not because we just haven't been enlightened.Seth wrote:People I work with have parked at Midtown Crossing and rode their shuttle to the CWS as well. I even overheard suburbanites from 180th-and-something recommending it to others.
These are great opportunities to correct the misconceptions about mass transit.
- Coyote
- City Council
- Posts: 33289
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
- Location: Aksarben Village
- Contact:
Fans hit home run with traffic
Bob Glissmann WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER wrote:Thousands of College World Series fans have been taking buses or shuttles to this year's games, making driving and parking downtown much easier. “It's been fantastic,” said Todd Pfitzer, the City of Omaha's traffic engineer. “The circulator has been hugely popular. They're packed. We never thought they'd be utilized to that level.”
- Seth
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Ford Birthsite Neighborhood
I think it's a little more complex than you describe. Â I agree that typical low-density, segregated-use suburban development is not attractive for public transit use. Â It's simply expensive and difficult to provide comprehensive public transit to these types of areas, not to mention inconvenient for users. Â Improving the popularity of more conventional urban development patterns (not even high-rises, but single-family homes on smaller lots, rowhouses, mixed-use apartments, etc) requires some acceptance of public transit, because it isn't as practical to provide the road capacity for every resident to move via single-occupancy passenger car.HuskerDave wrote:Seth, I know what you're saying; but you're mistaken if you think "suburbanites" would ride the bus more, if only they knew how great it was... Cars are still the best way to get around from point to point, until some event like the CWS makes it more convenient to park and ride in a large group. We don't ride the bus because we don't want to ride the bus, not because we just haven't been enlightened.Seth wrote:People I work with have parked at Midtown Crossing and rode their shuttle to the CWS as well. I even overheard suburbanites from 180th-and-something recommending it to others.
These are great opportunities to correct the misconceptions about mass transit.
I hope this doesn't come off as one of the pointless "urban vs suburban" flame wars. Â I see the Metro circulator as an experience for positive interaction with public transit for those perhaps unfamiliar with it. Â It might even improve his/her opinion of living in a city neighborhood where public transit is practical and convenient.
- Seth
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Ford Birthsite Neighborhood
Fans hit home run in traffic-congestion game by packing buses
http://www.omaha.com/article/20110622/CWS/706229780
http://www.omaha.com/article/20110622/CWS/706229780
They even have a component of BRT:Bob Glissmann - WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER wrote: Thousands of College World Series fans have been taking buses or shuttles to this year’s games, making driving and parking downtown much easier.
“It’s been fantastic,” said Todd Pfitzer, the City of Omaha’s traffic engineer. “The circulator has been hugely popular. They’re packed. We never thought they’d be utilized to that level.”
Bob Glissmann - WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER wrote: Omaha police have helped keep the circulator buses moving freely, Simon said, noting that officers will hold up traffic at green lights so that buses can get through.
-
- Library Board
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 12:24 pm
- Location: West-central Omaha
Ok...Seth wrote:I think it's a little more complex than you describe. I agree that typical low-density, segregated-use suburban development is not attractive for public transit use. It's simply expensive and difficult to provide comprehensive public transit to these types of areas, not to mention inconvenient for users. Improving the popularity of more conventional urban development patterns (not even high-rises, but single-family homes on smaller lots, rowhouses, mixed-use apartments, etc) requires some acceptance of public transit, because it isn't as practical to provide the road capacity for every resident to move via single-occupancy passenger car.HuskerDave wrote:Seth, I know what you're saying; but you're mistaken if you think "suburbanites" would ride the bus more, if only they knew how great it was... Cars are still the best way to get around from point to point, until some event like the CWS makes it more convenient to park and ride in a large group. We don't ride the bus because we don't want to ride the bus, not because we just haven't been enlightened.Seth wrote:People I work with have parked at Midtown Crossing and rode their shuttle to the CWS as well. I even overheard suburbanites from 180th-and-something recommending it to others.
These are great opportunities to correct the misconceptions about mass transit.
I hope this doesn't come off as one of the pointless "urban vs suburban" flame wars. I see the Metro circulator as an experience for positive interaction with public transit for those perhaps unfamiliar with it. It might even improve his/her opinion of living in a city neighborhood where public transit is practical and convenient.
we're good. Â :)