Omaha Beltway Discussion

Trains, Planes, and Automobiles (and Streetcars!).

Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss

User avatar
Uffda
County Board
Posts: 4497
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Land o Lakes, FL

Re: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Uffda »

Need to get this thread back on track but look up stats for free and reduced lunch for those school districts and OPS.

Also glad to see you agree that that union doesn't have the school board in its back pocket. :D also it has been my experience over the past 35 years, that people give Ed unions a lot more power and influence than they in reality have.

As to a Beltway --- I don't feel there is a need for one. I live inside I-680 in the NW part and there isn't a lot of traffic using this route until you get past Maple. Also my feeling is if you build beltway you start bypassing the city where you want people to stop and spend money.
Last edited by Uffda on Mon Sep 07, 2015 1:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

Uffda wrote:Need to get this thread back on track but look up stats for free and reduced lunch for those school districts and OPS.

Also glad to see you agree that that union doesn't have the school board in its back pocket. :D also it has been my experience over the past 35 years, that people give Ed unions a lot more power and influence than they in reality have.

As to a Beltway --- I don't feel there is a need for one. I leave inside I-680 in the NW part and there isn't a lot of traffic using this route until you get past Maple. Also my feeling is if you build beltway you start bypassing the city where you want people to stop and spend money.
Good point. However, even if we did end up with a beltway, that doesn't mean businesses won't locate around it and have passers-by stop there.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
User avatar
Uffda
County Board
Posts: 4497
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Land o Lakes, FL

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Uffda »

But isn't that pulling out from the core. Also expanding means more infrastructure and Omaha si having problems paying for what it has now.
User avatar
Busguy2010
County Board
Posts: 5266
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Busguy2010 »

I still think the southern portion and the portion between I-680 and HWY 133 would be useful.

I could also see people using the portion from HWY 275 to I-80, though I think we would need A LOT more population north of Dodge before that would happen.

I don't see the portion west of HWY 133 and north of HWY 275 ever being built.
User avatar
mcarch
Library Board
Posts: 362
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Elkhorn

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by mcarch »

I don't see how the beltway would spur sprawl? I do see how gas stations, and maybe some shops would locate out there for Semi's, that wouldn't be using I-80. Maybe some industrial. With most of the land west of 275 being flood plain not much can be built out there... with the exception of expensive lake developments. A different story in Sarpy county of course, which might increase in sprawl, but the Springfield-Platteview School district stops that development. You can see this example by how Papillion is growing, and where development stops in Shadow Lake. The SE portion is the Springfield-Platteview School District. The same goes for 84th & Schram where there was an article on paving a 1/2 mile of street.
daveoma
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1211
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 7:18 pm

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by daveoma »

mcarch wrote:I don't see how the beltway would spur sprawl? I do see how gas stations, and maybe some shops would locate out there for Semi's, that wouldn't be using I-80. Maybe some industrial. With most of the land west of 275 being flood plain not much can be built out there... with the exception of expensive lake developments. A different story in Sarpy county of course, which might increase in sprawl, but the Springfield-Platteview School district stops that development. You can see this example by how Papillion is growing, and where development stops in Shadow Lake. The SE portion is the Springfield-Platteview School District. The same goes for 84th & Schram where there was an article on paving a 1/2 mile of street.
How is it that the Springfield-Platteview School district stops development?
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by RNcyanide »

mcarch wrote:I don't see how the beltway would spur sprawl? I do see how gas stations, and maybe some shops would locate out there for Semi's, that wouldn't be using I-80. Maybe some industrial. With most of the land west of 275 being flood plain not much can be built out there... with the exception of expensive lake developments. A different story in Sarpy county of course, which might increase in sprawl, but the Springfield-Platteview School district stops that development. You can see this example by how Papillion is growing, and where development stops in Shadow Lake. The SE portion is the Springfield-Platteview School District. The same goes for 84th & Schram where there was an article on paving a 1/2 mile of street.
It'll pull growth and resources away from the other parts of the city that need them. It's not all about downtown, midtown et al. There are streets all over that are riddled with potholes, parks that need to be maintained better, and former strip malls built in the 70's and 80's that are decaying and either need to be demolished or refurbished. A beltway would keep those things from happening. We need to focus on keep what we already have in good shape.

I've mentioned it before, but there are major streets on the periphery that don't have a ton of development around them which could be repurposed into limited-access highways a la West Dodge or 370.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
riceweb
Library Board
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:54 am
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by riceweb »

I went for a run south on Skyline Dr, and there's a massive luxury-home development (with a name like "The Preserves at the Farm") at F Street that seems like it's filling in one of the few places where a beltway could cut across the Elkhorn River. Even though there was very little political capital for a western beltway, I think we're rapidly approaching a point where a western beltway can't feasibly be built.

At least in terms of the western beltway, this is probably approaching "Never Built" status.
MTO
City Council
Posts: 7806
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Dundee

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by MTO »

Yeah at this point if there’s ever any belt it’ll have run on the other side of the Platte. I get this state doesn’t have any desires for infrastructure but at least think ahead and set aside some land.
15-17, 26, 32
User avatar
Garrett
Planning Board
Posts: 3470
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Garrett »

Beltways will only ever encourage more suburban growth and less of the infill most of us want. Transportation as a rule is "if you build it they will come"
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
Athomsfere
Planning Board
Posts: 2005
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:03 pm

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Athomsfere »

riceweb wrote: Fri Oct 01, 2021 1:03 pm I went for a run south on Skyline Dr, and there's a massive luxury-home development (with a name like "The Preserves at the Farm") at F Street that seems like it's filling in one of the few places where a beltway could cut across the Elkhorn River. Even though there was very little political capital for a western beltway, I think we're rapidly approaching a point where a western beltway can't feasibly be built.

At least in terms of the western beltway, this is probably approaching "Never Built" status.
I guess that's GREAT NEWS then.
User avatar
Busguy2010
County Board
Posts: 5266
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Busguy2010 »

I think the south portion is still in the plans, but they need to get on it and secure enough land, because development is fast approaching and they will miss on that plan too. I can see that portion as beneficial as a bypass. All of what was planned to be the western portion is far too developed to even consider now. They really needed to consider this in the 90's for to it to have gotten actually done. But, maybe for the better.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Brad »

Busguy2010 wrote: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:54 pm I think the south portion is still in the plans, but they need to get on it and secure enough land, because development is fast approaching and they will miss on that plan too. I can see that portion as beneficial as a bypass.
U.S. 75 to 108th Street is in the design phase. Completely changing the 84th and Platteview intersection. 108th to Highway 50 has a preliminary design with 3 alternate designs at Springfield. On would bypass Springfield to the north, one to the south, and one would keep the current alignment, but loose the freeway portion in Springfield itself. We haven't been able to get a hint which way it will go, but the rumors all say south.

Here is the first Pahse:
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/54 ... 6626d836f4

84th Interchange:
platteview.PNG
platteview.PNG (11.34 MiB) Viewed 2902 times
User avatar
Busguy2010
County Board
Posts: 5266
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Busguy2010 »

I like that they actually have a solid plan for going forward with that, thanks for sharing.
User avatar
GetUrban
Planning Board
Posts: 2634
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by GetUrban »

Garrett wrote: Fri Oct 01, 2021 2:57 pm Beltways will only ever encourage more suburban growth and less of the infill most of us want. Transportation as a rule is "if you build it they will come"
Looks like the rest of Sarpy county south to the Platte River will become suburbanized sooner rather then later, with that beltway.
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1330
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Erik »

Omaha is growing in the suburbs regardless.

If we want this city to grow, you have to grow up and out.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Brad »

GetUrban wrote: Sun Oct 03, 2021 11:17 pm Looks like the rest of Sarpy county south to the Platte River will become suburbanized sooner rather then later, with that beltway.
Not exactly, they still don't have sewer capacity.
ita
County Board
Posts: 4343
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 4:11 pm

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by ita »

Brad wrote: Mon Oct 04, 2021 8:55 am
GetUrban wrote: Sun Oct 03, 2021 11:17 pm Looks like the rest of Sarpy county south to the Platte River will become suburbanized sooner rather then later, with that beltway.
Not exactly, they still don't have sewer capacity.
if I am not mistaken, the City of Omaha entered into an interlocal agreement with Sarpy County to allow Sarpy County sewage to feed into the City of Omaha's Papillion Creek wastewater facility last fall. This was done with very little public comment, but will open up development one the infrastructure is put in place.
riceweb
Library Board
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:54 am
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by riceweb »

To be clear, I'm not advocating for the western beltway. I don't think there's a need for it, it would be massively expensive, and I think there are other transportation spending needs that are much higher up the list. Just pointing out that I think a western beltway will not happen at this point, and it's probably safe to assume that 204th St will also be allowed to fill in without worrying about maintaining highway speeds between Gretna and Elkhorn (they'll probably eventually lower the speed limit to <=45mph for the entire stretch between West Dodge Expressway and I-80).

I think the Southern Beltway will be more critically important; there's a large amount of truck traffic that will run thru Sarpy County with, for instance, all the fulfillment centers and light manufacturing that are moving that way. At some point, that beltway will be critical to ensuring continued growth of the metro.

One last thought on the Western Beltway: the Elkhorn and Platte have always been natural barriers to development, but now without a new highway running through the area, our city's westward expansion might come to a grinding halt in a few years. Will be really interesting to watch when we run out of developable land. We might quickly see housing prices increase and/or significant increases in density, even in new projects way out west. Could be the start of a fundamentally new era of city growth.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Brad »

ita wrote: Mon Oct 04, 2021 9:45 am
if I am not mistaken, the City of Omaha entered into an interlocal agreement with Sarpy County to allow Sarpy County sewage to feed into the City of Omaha's Papillion Creek wastewater facility last fall. This was done with very little public comment, but will open up development one the infrastructure is put in place.
Ture, but wasn't it a 2 decade long project?
ita
County Board
Posts: 4343
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 4:11 pm

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by ita »

Brad wrote: Mon Oct 04, 2021 10:21 am
ita wrote: Mon Oct 04, 2021 9:45 am
if I am not mistaken, the City of Omaha entered into an interlocal agreement with Sarpy County to allow Sarpy County sewage to feed into the City of Omaha's Papillion Creek wastewater facility last fall. This was done with very little public comment, but will open up development one the infrastructure is put in place.
Ture, but wasn't it a 2 decade long project?
Also true. Yeah, it is a mulitdecade hundreds of million dollar project.
daveoma
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1211
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 7:18 pm

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by daveoma »

riceweb wrote: Fri Oct 01, 2021 1:03 pm I went for a run south on Skyline Dr, and there's a massive luxury-home development (with a name like "The Preserves at the Farm") at F Street that seems like it's filling in one of the few places where a beltway could cut across the Elkhorn River. Even though there was very little political capital for a western beltway, I think we're rapidly approaching a point where a western beltway can't feasibly be built.

At least in terms of the western beltway, this is probably approaching "Never Built" status.
Thank goodness 😊
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Brad »

riceweb wrote: Fri Oct 01, 2021 1:03 pm I went for a run south on Skyline Dr, and there's a massive luxury-home development (with a name like "The Preserves at the Farm") at F Street that seems like it's filling in one of the few places where a beltway could cut across the Elkhorn River. Even though there was very little political capital for a western beltway, I think we're rapidly approaching a point where a western beltway can't feasibly be built.

At least in terms of the western beltway, this is probably approaching "Never Built" status.
Highway 275 is basically the start of a western beltway. I believe you could upgrade some of the existing roads and have a decent little beltway without too much trouble.

Extend Platteview Road all the way to highway 6.
Cross the Platte River at Linoma where highway 6 currently does.
Building a new bypass east of Ashland (by camp Ashland) to connect to existing Highway 66
Use existing Highway 66 until it turns west at county road 7
Upgrade county road 7 north to Yutan/Highway 92
Use existing 92 to connect back to 275.

Its not a perfect loop, but it would be a nice use of mostly existing right of way without blazing a new path through the countryside.
mrsticka
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1889
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 12:31 am
Location: Lincoln

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by mrsticka »

If the plan is to make Platteview Road an expressway, they may need to build a flyover ramp from US 75.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Brad »

mrsticka wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 12:21 am If the plan is to make Platteview Road an expressway, they may need to build a flyover ramp from US 75.
The built that several years ago.
platteview.PNG
platteview.PNG (9.46 MiB) Viewed 2256 times
mrsticka
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1889
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 12:31 am
Location: Lincoln

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by mrsticka »

Brad wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 2:32 pm
mrsticka wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 12:21 am If the plan is to make Platteview Road an expressway, they may need to build a flyover ramp from US 75.
The built that several years ago.

platteview.PNG
Where is it? I'm not being a smart @$$. I just don't see it anywhere on that map.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Brad »

mrsticka wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:08 pm
Brad wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 2:32 pm
mrsticka wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 12:21 am If the plan is to make Platteview Road an expressway, they may need to build a flyover ramp from US 75.
The built that several years ago.

platteview.PNG
Where is it? I'm not being a smart @$$. I just don't see it anywhere on that map.
Its south of the old platteview road intersection about 1/2 mile. Platteview/Highway 34 goes over highway 75.
User avatar
Busguy2010
County Board
Posts: 5266
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Busguy2010 »

That's not really a freeway to highway exit, though, especially if HWY 75 south from Fairview to 34 is ever to become a "freeway". They under-built it. At the very least it should have/should be like the one at HWY 34 and I-29, and even that one is under-built for a "freeway". At least IMO, if Platteview is ever actually going to be a freeway, a lot of what has already been done is under-built for it.
Last edited by Busguy2010 on Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Brad »

Busguy2010 wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:54 pm That's not really a highway to highway exit, though. They under-built it. At the very least it should have/should be like the one at HWY 34 and I-29, and even that one is under-built.
I believe there is enough room to add the additional lanes for that later. I don't think there will be too much traffic on Platteview until its joined up with something major out west.
mrsticka
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1889
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 12:31 am
Location: Lincoln

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by mrsticka »

And there are no flyover ramps there. A flyover ramp is a ramp that goes over an interchange. Kind of like what's at the I-80/I-480/US 75 interchange and the I-480/US 75 (North Freeway) interchange downtown.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Brad »

mrsticka wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 9:05 pm And there are no flyover ramps there. A flyover ramp is a ramp that goes over an interchange. Kind of like what's at the I-80/I-480/US 75 interchange and the I-480/US 75 (North Freeway) interchange downtown.
Ok, well I have never heard of a "flyover ramp", so I wasn't sure exactly what you were talking about. I have worked in the civil engineering field for almost 2 decades and never heard anyone use the term "flyover ramp", so I got curious. I pulled up the Nebraska Department of Transportation dictionary page for "Road Design and Construction Terms" and flyover ramp is not listed there. Then I looked through some plans on different projects and I it looks like the NDOT just calls them "bridges".

NDOT Road Design and Construction Terms:
https://dot.nebraska.gov/media/6744/ter ... ionary.pdf

Out if curiosity, I looked up the Iowa Department of Transportation "GLOSSARY TERMS" also, and they don't have a "Flyover Bridge" either.
https://iowadot.gov/glossary/#27998123-a
User avatar
Busguy2010
County Board
Posts: 5266
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Busguy2010 »

I can't believe you never heard of that. A quick google search shows you exactly what it is, and it appears to be a fairly universal term.
User avatar
Busguy2010
County Board
Posts: 5266
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Busguy2010 »

Brad wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:57 pm I believe there is enough room to add the additional lanes for that later.
I looked at the map and there is no additional room, at least to add cloverleafs, because the bridge over 75 is only wide enough for the 4 lanes that are currently on 75. Any upgrade to that exit looks like it would require it to be ripped out and rebuilt. I.e., take another 5 years like it did the first time.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Brad »

Busguy2010 wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:26 am I can't believe you never heard of that. A quick google search shows you exactly what it is, and it appears to be a fairly universal term.
It makes sense, just never heard it use.
Busguy2010 wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:34 am
Brad wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:57 pm I believe there is enough room to add the additional lanes for that later.
I looked at the map and there is no additional room, at least to add cloverleafs, because the bridge over 75 is only wide enough for the 4 lanes that are currently on 75. Any upgrade to that exit looks like it would require it to be ripped out and rebuilt. I.e., take another 5 years like it did the first time.
Whenever I drive down 75, It seems like there is a lot of extra room. That said, I am a little confused why it wasn't built differently in the first place. If they are going through all the trouble to make Platteview a freeway, why have intersections at 75.
User avatar
Busguy2010
County Board
Posts: 5266
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by Busguy2010 »

Brad wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:08 pm I am a little confused why it wasn't built differently in the first place. If they are going through all the trouble to make Platteview a freeway, why have intersections at 75.
Totally agreed. Honestly that underbuilding takes a bit of confidence from me that the South Beltway will actually become a freeway. Time will tell.
riceweb
Library Board
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:54 am
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by riceweb »

Busguy2010 wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:11 pm
Brad wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:08 pm I am a little confused why it wasn't built differently in the first place. If they are going through all the trouble to make Platteview a freeway, why have intersections at 75.
Totally agreed. Honestly that underbuilding takes a bit of confidence from me that the South Beltway will actually become a freeway. Time will tell.
I guess I'm not too worried, there's a ton of land available at the moment and probably will be for the next 10 years. Also, there are some freeway-to-freeway interchanges are not fully separated, like Summerlin Parkway and the 215 in Las Vegas. Compared to the Highway 75/34 interchange, there's already a large amount of traffic for that interchange in Vegas, and it'll only grow. Somehow they're ok with a stoplight there, so don't be surprised if it takes 20 years for this interchange to be upgraded.
SunMan
Home Owners Association
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 10:02 am
Location: Ralston

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by SunMan »

riceweb wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:29 am
Busguy2010 wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:11 pm
Brad wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:08 pm I am a little confused why it wasn't built differently in the first place. If they are going through all the trouble to make Platteview a freeway, why have intersections at 75.
Totally agreed. Honestly that underbuilding takes a bit of confidence from me that the South Beltway will actually become a freeway. Time will tell.
I guess I'm not too worried, there's a ton of land available at the moment and probably will be for the next 10 years. Also, there are some freeway-to-freeway interchanges are not fully separated, like Summerlin Parkway and the 215 in Las Vegas. Compared to the Highway 75/34 interchange, there's already a large amount of traffic for that interchange in Vegas, and it'll only grow. Somehow they're ok with a stoplight there, so don't be surprised if it takes 20 years for this interchange to be upgraded.
I agree. Another example is in Kansas City where the west end of Hwy 152 meets I-435.
User avatar
damonhynes
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1066
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 7:35 pm
Location: North Springfield, Nebraska
Contact:

Re: Official: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by damonhynes »

Busguy2010 wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:11 pm
Brad wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:08 pm I am a little confused why it wasn't built differently in the first place. If they are going through all the trouble to make Platteview a freeway, why have intersections at 75.
Totally agreed. Honestly that underbuilding takes a bit of confidence from me that the South Beltway will actually become a freeway. Time will tell.
if it takes less than five years for Platteview to be done betw. US-75 and 108th, I'll eat a bug. Therefore, I guess ten years for 108th to NE-50. By that time, the US-75/US-34/Platteview diamond will need to be rebuilt anyhow. Big issue will be if that intersection will be developed to the point that there's no space for a higher-volume interchange.

NDOT is backed into the same corner at I-80/NE-370 and I-80/NE-50, BTW.
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9089
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by skinzfan23 »

I think it will be a very long process for Platteview Rd. We live just north of it and they are currently doing a study to see which preferred route to have the new road take. Right now, it will go south where Hidden Valley Dr comes off of Hwy 75. There of course, has to be a lot of land acquisition before any construction can begin. I am thinking it will probably be 10-15 years before this section is done....hopefully I am wrong because it is needed very badly.
riceweb
Library Board
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:54 am
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: Omaha Beltway Discussion

Post by riceweb »

From the Street Widening post (viewtopic.php?f=15&t=16484&start=80):
HR Paperstacks wrote: Sat Feb 19, 2022 11:35 am 2023 TIP project requests were posted the other day. Some of the street widening ones include:
  • Platteview Road Expressway – 72nd to 99th - expressway
  • Platteview Road Expressway – US-75 to 57th - expressway
More details about each project[/list]
In the linked PDF, they even say that interchanges will be built at 27th and 36th Sts. So is this freeway really starting to happen?
Post Reply