Found this article on population density of Omaha. I constantly hear from out-of-towners that Omaha is a small city in terms on land. But in terms of population density, should land size really matter? Thought I would pass along...
https://www.sparefoot.com/self-storage/ ... n-density/
Omaha's Population Density vs Land Space
Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss
-
- Human Relations
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:53 pm
- Location: Central Florida
-
- City Council
- Posts: 9259
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
- Location: Omaha/Bellevue
Re: Omaha's Population Density vs Land Space
Thanks for sharing.
-
- IT Director
- Posts: 10002786
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:39 pm
- Location: West Central Omaha
Re: Omaha's Population Density vs Land Space
From the article:
-
- County Board
- Posts: 3543
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
- Location: New York City
Re: Omaha's Population Density vs Land Space
This reminds me... google maps really needs to fix the city limits of Omaha. It's like they took the annexation of Elkhorn has annexing the entire school district.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
-
- The Don
- Posts: 1013190
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:31 am
- Location: West Omaha
Re: Omaha's Population Density vs Land Spac
Yep. Omaha is a small city alright..Density? Shmensity.. LOL..
Thanks for posting that link Dusty ...
Ciao..LiO...Peace
Thanks for posting that link Dusty ...
Ciao..LiO...Peace
Go Cowboys!
-
- Library Board
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:54 am
- Location: Omaha, NE
Re: Omaha's Population Density vs Land Space
That's a bit of an unfair comparison, since San Francisco is just a small part of the greater San Fran metro area. Same thing with most of the cities mentioned.
When you account for the large swatch of suburbs we've annexed, Omaha's density doesn't seem very low.
When you account for the large swatch of suburbs we've annexed, Omaha's density doesn't seem very low.
-
- Human Relations
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 11:41 am
- Location: Country Club
Re: Omaha's Population Density vs Land Space
Definitely an interesting series of graphics. Like everyone is saying it does also illustrate how hard it is to compare cities with different annexation policies. It makes me wonder a little what Omaha would be like if Sarpy County had not been split out of Douglas County.
-
- County Board
- Posts: 3543
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
- Location: New York City
Re: Omaha's Population Density vs Land Space
It is possible to do this accurately. The Census bureau tabulates what it called "weight population density" which takes into account the suburbs without including vast swaths of undeveloped land. With this metric, Omaha was the 47th densest metro in 2010, around 1/3 as dense as Chicago, 1/4 as dense as LA and SF, and 1/10 as dense as New York.riceweb wrote:That's a bit of an unfair comparison, since San Francisco is just a small part of the greater San Fran metro area. Same thing with most of the cities mentioned.
When you account for the large swatch of suburbs we've annexed, Omaha's density doesn't seem very low.
http://www.austincontrarian.com/austinc ... nsity.html
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
-
- City Council
- Posts: 33299
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
- Location: Aksarben Village
-
- County Board
- Posts: 5345
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
- Location: North Central Omaha
Re: Omaha's Population Density vs Land Space
If these comparisons actually do take into account the whole metro, we could extrapolate how many more people need to move into a given area to necessitate a stellar transportation system.