Nebraska 2009 estimate: 1,796,619

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:36 am

After the annual (every year this decade) downward revision of previous estimates the state

Â Â 2009 Â Â Â 2008 Â Â Â Â Â 2007 Â Â Â Â 2006 Â Â Â Â 2005 Â Â Â Â 2004 Â Â Â Â 2003 Â Â Â Â Â 2002 Â Â Â Â Â 2001 2000 Estimates Base Census

1,796,619 1,781,949 1,769,912 1,760,435 1,751,721 1,742,184 1,733,680 1,725,083 1,717,948 1,713,345 1,711,265 1,711,263

Last decade they under-estimated our population by 30,000...

My guess is the next 3/4 year should reflect another 9,000 people to 1,805,000 and then tack on a 'minimum' of 20,000 for the usual undercounting and my guess is the state should be at 1,825,000.. Â with a max of 1,840,000.. Â I'm going to go with some-where between 1.825 - 1.832 million for the 2010 census..

Stargazer · Post by **Stargazer** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:36 am

Kind of sad when you consider that Phoenix added significantly more than our entire states population in the last 2 decades alone. Â Could be worse I guess... we could be North or South Dakota.

DTO Luv · Post by **DTO Luv** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:31 am

Without Omaha Nebraska is South Dakota without the tourist attraction and North Dakota without the cold.

thenewguy · Post by **thenewguy** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:10 am

Erik wrote:
After the annual (every year this decade) downward revision of previous estimates the state

2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Estimates Base Census

1,796,619 1,781,949 1,769,912 1,760,435 1,751,721 1,742,184 1,733,680 1,725,083 1,717,948 1,713,345 1,711,265 1,711,263
Last decade they under-estimated our population by 30,000...

My guess is the next 3/4 year should reflect another 9,000 people to 1,805,000 and then tack on a 'minimum' of 20,000 for the usual undercounting and my guess is the state should be at 1,825,000.. with a max of 1,840,000.. I'm going to go with some-where between 1.825 - 1.832 million for the 2010 census..

The population isn't growing because of your misleading signature photo. ;)

S33 · Post by **S33** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:49 am

thenewguy wrote:
Erik wrote:
After the annual (every year this decade) downward revision of previous estimates the state

2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Estimates Base Census

1,796,619 1,781,949 1,769,912 1,760,435 1,751,721 1,742,184 1,733,680 1,725,083 1,717,948 1,713,345 1,711,265 1,711,263
Last decade they under-estimated our population by 30,000...

My guess is the next 3/4 year should reflect another 9,000 people to 1,805,000 and then tack on a 'minimum' of 20,000 for the usual undercounting and my guess is the state should be at 1,825,000.. with a max of 1,840,000.. I'm going to go with some-where between 1.825 - 1.832 million for the 2010 census..

The population isn't growing because of your misleading signature photo. ;)

I've always wondered about that but was too lazy to ask...

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:41 pm

S33 wrote:
thenewguy wrote:The population isn't growing because of your misleading signature photo. ;)
I've always wondered about that but was too lazy to ask...

I've been wanting to change it as this photo was from 2 years ago, but I've been too lazy.. :D

S33 · Post by **S33** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:13 pm

Erik wrote:
S33 wrote:
thenewguy wrote:The population isn't growing because of your misleading signature photo. ;)
I've always wondered about that but was too lazy to ask...
I've been wanting to change it as this photo was from 2 years ago, but I've been too lazy.. :D

That's Indianapolis right?

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:02 pm

S33 wrote:
Erik wrote:
S33 wrote:
thenewguy wrote:The population isn't growing because of your misleading signature photo. ;)
I've always wondered about that but was too lazy to ask...
I've been wanting to change it as this photo was from 2 years ago, but I've been too lazy.. :D
That's Indianapolis right?

Yeah, I put it up at the time there was a very long, drawn-out debate.. I just haven't found a good replacement yet..

Candleshoe · Post by **Candleshoe** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 5:50 pm

DTO Luv wrote:Without Omaha Nebraska is South Dakota without the tourist attraction and North Dakota without the cold.

Following that logic, then couldn't also be said that without Nebraska, Omaha would have been destined to be a suburb of Council Bluffs? Â

Stargazer · Post by **Stargazer** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:29 am

Nah... we'd be Monaco on the Missouri.

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:04 pm

It's really sad to see how many people jump to the conclusion that our growth estimate is from illegal immigrants... Â :?

We had over 4,000 people migrate to nebraska internationally and I highly doubt that they are counting illegals.. (illegals rarely report their earnings nor do they buy houses.. etc...)..

Well, maybe the 11,000+ natural growth occurried illegally (out of wedlock? Â I'm sure that is illegal in most of the backwards counties in Nebraska)..

nativeomahan · Post by **nativeomahan** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:47 pm

Were there any figures broken down by county or metro area?

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:55 pm

nativeomahan wrote:Were there any figures broken down by county or metro area?

March is the month were they will release the county and metropolitan/micropolitan area figures..

Expect another big jump for both Omaha and Lincoln..

nativeomahan · Post by **nativeomahan** » Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:41 pm

I doubt it will be a very big "jump". Â More on the line of 1% or less.

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:40 pm

nativeomahan wrote:I doubt it will be a very big "jump". More on the line of 1% or less.

That would be very dissapointing if it were..

Garrett · Post by **Garrett** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:09 am

Erik wrote:
nativeomahan wrote:Were there any figures broken down by county or metro area?
March is the month were they will release the county and metropolitan/micropolitan area figures..

Expect another big jump for both Omaha and Lincoln..

What day are they going to do that?

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:41 pm

Axel wrote:
Erik wrote:
nativeomahan wrote:Were there any figures broken down by county or metro area?
March is the month were they will release the county and metropolitan/micropolitan area figures..

Expect another big jump for both Omaha and Lincoln..
What day are they going to do that?

They are saying that it will be late march at the latest.

TitosBuritoBarn · Post by **TitosBuritoBarn** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:29 pm

The results are in:

Omaha: 849,517 +1.2%
Lincoln: 298,012 +1.1%

Beatrice: 22,653 -0.9%
Columbus: 32,515 +1.6%
Fremont: 32,540 -0.1%
Grand Island: 71,596 +1.7%
Hastings: 39,529 +0.3%
Kearney: 52,274 +1.1%
Lexington: 26,920 +0.7%
Norfolk: 48,000 +0.7%
North Platte 36,890 -0.0%
Scottsbluff: 37,512 +0.6%

Kansas City: Â 2,067,585 +1.0%
St. Joseph: 126,644 +0.5%

Des Moines: Â 562,906 Â +1.6%
Sioux City: 144,360 +1.1%

Sioux Falls: 238,132 +1.9%

guitarguy · Post by **guitarguy** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 11:58 pm

not a bad year at all im convinced our csa will be over 900k after the census

-adam

Linkin5 · Post by **Linkin5** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:52 am

When is the CSA estimate coming out?

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:07 pm

Linkin5 wrote:When is the CSA estimate coming out?

It is already out.

Omaha-Council Bluffs-Fremont CSA: 885,157

Stargazer · Post by **Stargazer** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:05 pm

Fremont: 32,540 -0.1%

A testament to the role of illegal immigration in our recent growth. Â A suggestion for Fremont... EMBRACE THEM.

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:09 pm

Stargazer wrote:
Fremont: 32,540 -0.1%
A testament to the role of illegal immigration in our recent growth. A suggestion for Fremont... EMBRACE THEM.

LOL..

It's more like "Embrace them Fremont, you're leaving anyways!"..

Man, I grew to despise that city growing up..

Seth · Post by **Seth** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:48 pm

A friend of mine is interviewing for an internship at the pork processing plant in Fremont doing some sort of industrial maintenance (he's an Electrical Engineering student). Â He claims there are "epic" trailer parks there.

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:51 pm

Seth wrote:A friend of mine is interviewing for an internship at the pork processing plant in Fremont doing some sort of industrial maintenance (he's an Electrical Engineering student). He claims there are "epic" trailer parks there.

Fremont has several trailer parks around the city. Â And there are a couple of them that make you wonder the percentage of them that have meth labs, crack labs etc..

The city has a couple of nice neighborhoods, but it is they who run the town and the ones that chased out good industry for decades. Â They run the politics of the city and corruption is evident in that city. Â

I hope it changes if it hasn't already.

Post by **Brad** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:51 pm

Seth wrote:He claims there are "epic" trailer parks there.

Wasn't their strip club in a double wide?

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:54 pm

Brad wrote:
Seth wrote:He claims there are "epic" trailer parks there.
Wasn't their strip club in a double wide?

Wouldn't surprise me, lol..

Big E · Post by **Big E** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:38 pm

Brad wrote:
Seth wrote:He claims there are "epic" trailer parks there.
Wasn't their strip club in a double wide?

The Lariat on old 275 was a pre-fab steel warehouse. Â Now its a sports bar of some kind.

Not sure about the old Boomers. Â Long gone before I came around.

Seth · Post by **Seth** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Brad wrote:
Seth wrote:He claims there are "epic" trailer parks there.
Wasn't their strip club in a double wide?

Even the strip club here in Urbana is in an old auto repair garage. Â It's obvious because it's an old brick building, and they just framed in the service doors withs studs and plywood siding. Â Oh, then they painted the plywood bright green: very classy!

StuMondo · Post by **StuMondo** » Sun May 02, 2010 12:35 am

TitosBuritoBarn wrote:The results are in:

Omaha: 849,517 +1.2%
Lincoln: 298,012 +1.1%

Beatrice: 22,653 -0.9%
Columbus: 32,515 +1.6%
Fremont: 32,540 -0.1%
Grand Island: 71,596 +1.7%
Hastings: 39,529 +0.3%
Kearney: 52,274 +1.1%
Lexington: 26,920 +0.7%
Norfolk: 48,000 +0.7%
North Platte 36,890 -0.0%
Scottsbluff: 37,512 +0.6%

Kansas City: 2,067,585 +1.0%
St. Joseph: 126,644 +0.5%

Des Moines: 562,906 +1.6%
Sioux City: 144,360 +1.1%

Sioux Falls: 238,132 +1.9%

what are these?

MSA? Â

link?

TitosBuritoBarn · Post by **TitosBuritoBarn** » Sun May 02, 2010 7:21 pm

StuMondo wrote:
TitosBuritoBarn wrote:The results are in:

Omaha: 849,517 +1.2%
Lincoln: 298,012 +1.1%

Beatrice: 22,653 -0.9%
Columbus: 32,515 +1.6%
Fremont: 32,540 -0.1%
Grand Island: 71,596 +1.7%
Hastings: 39,529 +0.3%
Kearney: 52,274 +1.1%
Lexington: 26,920 +0.7%
Norfolk: 48,000 +0.7%
North Platte 36,890 -0.0%
Scottsbluff: 37,512 +0.6%

Kansas City: 2,067,585 +1.0%
St. Joseph: 126,644 +0.5%

Des Moines: 562,906 +1.6%
Sioux City: 144,360 +1.1%

Sioux Falls: 238,132 +1.9%
what are these?

MSAs and Micros

MSA?

..and Micros

link?

http://www.census.gov/popest/metro/metro.html

Omaha Forums

Nebraska 2009 estimate: 1,796,619

Nebraska 2009 estimate: 1,796,619

Re: Nebraska 2009 estimate: 1,796,619

Re: Nebraska 2009 estimate: 1,796,619

Re: Nebraska 2009 estimate: 1,796,619

Re: Nebraska 2009 estimate: 1,796,619

Re: Nebraska 2009 estimate: 1,796,619

..