Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2015 7:01 pm
There were other renderings that looked better...like daytime.
A Discussion Site for Everything Omaha
https://eomahaforums.com/
I sometimes wonder about this as well. I think it would have set a precedent and created a different vibe away from the suburban looking hotels that were all built in North Downtown.RNcyanide wrote:I feel like it would have set an entirely different vibe in North Downtown. Buildings would be taller, more interesting things would be down there, the crappy suburban hotels would have been done differently, etc.Midwestern wrote:I'd still much rather have that than the Hilton though...
This horse is just as dead now as it was in 2003 but I've got to tilt at windmills one more time...Brad wrote:Capitol District last night from the Helicopter:
The Great Wall of Hilton annoys me to no end.NovakOmaha wrote:This horse is just as dead now as it was in 2003 but I've got to tilt at windmills one more time...Brad wrote:Capitol District last night from the Helicopter:
IF the hotel chosen by Hal Daub (the highrise) had been built look at all the land that could have been developed. Yes, yes, yes, it's also a height thing but take a look at the picture. The amount of land that the Hilton takes up is obscene. And 800 room hotel, or even the 525 room one that was proposed could have been 20-30 or more floors. And if the 525 room one was built and an expansion was warranted, as was the case, a shorter addition could have been built.
Just lamenting....
To lessen the burden on tax payers:Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
I seem to remember Fahey calling Hilton more "Union-friendly" than Mariott. I remember him using that as one of his deciding factors.Brad wrote:To lessen the burden on tax payers:Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.p ... it=Mariott
I want to say is was out of spite against Hal Daub. Also it was cheaper & of course that always plays into it. The proposed Marriot was 525 rooms & the wisdom was that 400 rooms would be just fine.edsas wrote:I seem to remember Fahey calling Hilton more "Union-friendly" than Mariott. I remember him using that as one of his deciding factors.Brad wrote:To lessen the burden on tax payers:Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.p ... it=Mariott
I want to say is was out of spite against Hal Daub. Also it was cheaper & of course that always plays into it. The proposed Marriot was 525 rooms & the wisdom was that 400 rooms would be just fine.edsas wrote:I seem to remember Fahey calling Hilton more "Union-friendly" than Mariott. I remember him using that as one of his deciding factors.Brad wrote:To lessen the burden on tax payers:Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.p ... it=Mariott
That pic looks like it came out of The Great Gatsby.NovakOmaha wrote:I want to say is was out of spite against Hal Daub. Also it was cheaper & of course that always plays into it. The proposed Marriot was 525 rooms & the wisdom was that 400 rooms would be just fine.edsas wrote:I seem to remember Fahey calling Hilton more "Union-friendly" than Mariott. I remember him using that as one of his deciding factors.Brad wrote:To lessen the burden on tax payers:Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.p ... it=Mariott
I found a picture from way back when. This would have made such a different vibe.
There are other renderings of this proposed hotel that make it look a bit more reserved than this one.. But indeed, it would have been an impressive development for Omaha.. Anyone who remembers my imput at the time from the old Omaha Chamber Forum (several years before this forum was created) back in 2001, will recall my profound disappointment when Fahey was elected and promptly shelved Daub's hotel..then proposed what we now know is the downtown Omaha Hilton.. But, friends, that was 15 years ago.. I've moved on. Certainly we've seen other highrise disappointments- The Wallstreet Tower debacle and recently, HDR pulling the plug on their downtown HQ's.. I agree with Novak that this Marriott, if built, would have given the area surrounding the arena and north downtown a different, perhaps more positive vibe..choke wrote:That pic looks like it came out of The Great Gatsby.NovakOmaha wrote:I want to say is was out of spite against Hal Daub. Also it was cheaper & of course that always plays into it. The proposed Marriot was 525 rooms & the wisdom was that 400 rooms would be just fine.edsas wrote:I seem to remember Fahey calling Hilton more "Union-friendly" than Mariott. I remember him using that as one of his deciding factors.Brad wrote:To lessen the burden on tax payers:Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.p ... it=Mariott
I found a picture from way back when. This would have made such a different vibe.
Whoa there, lay off the sane and rationalist propaganda! Let us lament!Omaha Cowboy wrote:
That said.. I've learned over the years, there is a HUGE difference between getting excited over a proposed development vs one which actually breaks ground with tower cranes in the air. At present, I'm thrilled with the Capitol District project and potentially what it will bring to downtown Omaha..as we know for certain, this project WILL become reality and completed in a little more than a year...
Ciao..LiO...Peace
LOL.. And to your point about a potential building, such as this, pulling the skyline out.. I completely agree ...Athomsfere wrote:Whoa there, lay off the sane and rationalist propaganda! Let us lament!Omaha Cowboy wrote:
That said.. I've learned over the years, there is a HUGE difference between getting excited over a proposed development vs one which actually breaks ground with tower cranes in the air. At present, I'm thrilled with the Capitol District project and potentially what it will bring to downtown Omaha..as we know for certain, this project WILL become reality and completed in a little more than a year...
Ciao..LiO...Peace
Jokes aside, agreed. But I think that rendering is gorgeous. I'd love to see it or something like it built North Downtown or south a bit to pull the skyline out. (and look like a sexy, sexy building from another city)
There would have still been a parking garage behind the Marriott. I don't know if you would have gotten more land back.NovakOmaha wrote:One other thing about this design. Think of the land that would have been free for other development rather the current design needing so much more land for rooms.
The Des Moines downtown Marriott packs 417 rooms and all the first class amenities into 33 floors with a parking garage and takes up a half block, approx 300X150. Tossing on a few more floors and a few more rooms per floor, with all the required amenities and a parking garage and you'd still have a huge part of that land for another high rise or pretty much any development.Joe_Sovereign wrote:There would have still been a parking garage behind the Marriott. I don't know if you would have gotten more land back.NovakOmaha wrote:One other thing about this design. Think of the land that would have been free for other development rather the current design needing so much more land for rooms.
I'd take waiting a few years to get something worth downtown space rather than midrises filling our downtown...HskrFanMike wrote:The main reason Fahey chose the smaller Hilton was cost; the Hilton was originally bid at $60 million for the 400 rooms versus over $90 million for the 528 room Marriott. The redesigns to the Hilton pushed the final cost of the Hilton to $71 million for 450 rooms. Pretty tough to justify spending the extra $20 million to add 78 rooms...especially when the Hilton added twice as many rooms (150) ten years later at $37 million. (Still a lower cost per room, especially when you consider that the expansion was built with 2011 money instead of 2002 money.)
The only reason people are still upset about this is the obsession by some people for height... the same height obsession that resulted in the dumb selection of the Wall Street Tower boondoggle instead of a midrise office building. Nearly a dozen years later, all we have to show for it is the remnants of a wiffle ball field.
I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.buildomaha wrote:I'd take waiting a few years to get something worth downtown space rather than midrises filling our downtown...HskrFanMike wrote:The main reason Fahey chose the smaller Hilton was cost; the Hilton was originally bid at $60 million for the 400 rooms versus over $90 million for the 528 room Marriott. The redesigns to the Hilton pushed the final cost of the Hilton to $71 million for 450 rooms. Pretty tough to justify spending the extra $20 million to add 78 rooms...especially when the Hilton added twice as many rooms (150) ten years later at $37 million. (Still a lower cost per room, especially when you consider that the expansion was built with 2011 money instead of 2002 money.)
The only reason people are still upset about this is the obsession by some people for height... the same height obsession that resulted in the dumb selection of the Wall Street Tower boondoggle instead of a midrise office building. Nearly a dozen years later, all we have to show for it is the remnants of a wiffle ball field.
Not too bad for a 200k city...:daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
MOB is on my short list for places to retire.Coyote wrote:Not too bad for a 200k city...:daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
damonhynes wrote:MOB is on my short list for places to retire.Coyote wrote:Not too bad for a 200k city...:daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
LOFL!nebugeater wrote:damonhynes wrote:MOB is on my short list for places to retire.Coyote wrote:Not too bad for a 200k city...:daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
Mall Of the Bluffs ?
I knew what you meant but you tee'ed it up all to well. And if that lottery commission doesn't come through you can still say you meet your original plan and use this alternate as a backup plan.damonhynes wrote:LOFL!nebugeater wrote:damonhynes wrote:MOB is on my short list for places to retire.Coyote wrote:Not too bad for a 200k city...:daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
Mall Of the Bluffs ?
I've got retirement narrowed down to Texoma, Mobile or Savannah. I'm in talks with the lottery commission...
(snort!)nebugeater wrote:I knew what you meant but you tee'ed it up all to well. And if that lottery commission doesn't come through you can still say you meet your original plan and use this alternate as a backup plan.damonhynes wrote:LOFL!nebugeater wrote:damonhynes wrote:MOB is on my short list for places to retire.Coyote wrote:Not too bad for a 200k city...:daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
Mall Of the Bluffs ?
I've got retirement narrowed down to Texoma, Mobile or Savannah. I'm in talks with the lottery commission...