Page 2 of 2

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:45 pm
by bigredmed1
Uffda wrote:
bigredmed1 wrote:
nebugeater wrote:Now the OPS board is looking like they are going to cut ties with the search firm they hired.

Once again it looks like it is time to blame someone else. Were not nearly all the comments about why the three candidate that withdrew because of the board and issues there?


http://www.omaha.com/news/education/ops ... f5fcf.html

Firing these guys seems pretty obvious. Can't say that I have any hope for OPS till the board gets replaced with new non union owned members.


Just curious which ones are those you seem to have inside knowledge?


I would wager all who have been there for >2 terms and all who ran for school board without having 100k to spend on signs.

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 10:25 pm
by Uffda
bigredmed1 wrote:
Uffda wrote:
bigredmed1 wrote:
nebugeater wrote:Now the OPS board is looking like they are going to cut ties with the search firm they hired.

Once again it looks like it is time to blame someone else. Were not nearly all the comments about why the three candidate that withdrew because of the board and issues there?


http://www.omaha.com/news/education/ops ... f5fcf.html

Firing these guys seems pretty obvious. Can't say that I have any hope for OPS till the board gets replaced with new non union owned members.


Just curious which ones are those you seem to have inside knowledge?


I would wager all who have been there for >2 terms and all who ran for school board without having 100k to spend on signs.


So that means you speculate but really don't have a clue which one(s). :shock:

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:41 pm
by bigredmed1
Uffda wrote:
bigredmed1 wrote:
Uffda wrote:
bigredmed1 wrote:
nebugeater wrote:Now the OPS board is looking like they are going to cut ties with the search firm they hired.

Once again it looks like it is time to blame someone else. Were not nearly all the comments about why the three candidate that withdrew because of the board and issues there?


http://www.omaha.com/news/education/ops ... f5fcf.html

Firing these guys seems pretty obvious. Can't say that I have any hope for OPS till the board gets replaced with new non union owned members.


Just curious which ones are those you seem to have inside knowledge?


I would wager all who have been there for >2 terms and all who ran for school board without having 100k to spend on signs.


So that means you speculate but really don't have a clue which one(s). :shock:


Name me any that you trust not to be in the pocket of the teachers union. That you know for certain haven't taken money from them.

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:55 pm
by Uffda
bigredmed1 wrote:
Uffda wrote:
bigredmed1 wrote:
Uffda wrote:
bigredmed1 wrote:
nebugeater wrote:Now the OPS board is looking like they are going to cut ties with the search firm they hired.

Once again it looks like it is time to blame someone else. Were not nearly all the comments about why the three candidate that withdrew because of the board and issues there?


http://www.omaha.com/news/education/ops ... f5fcf.html

Firing these guys seems pretty obvious. Can't say that I have any hope for OPS till the board gets replaced with new non union owned members.


Just curious which ones are those you seem to have inside knowledge?


I would wager all who have been there for >2 terms and all who ran for school board without having 100k to spend on signs.


Sorry that isn't how this works - you brought it up I am just wanting to see your proof instead of your speculations.

So that means you speculate but really don't have a clue which one(s). :shock:


Name me any that you trust not to be in the pocket of the teachers union. That you know for certain haven't taken money from them.