Page 2 of 2

Re: Fort Calhoun Power plant

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:28 pm
by GRANDPASMUCKER
The plant is going to stop producing electricity in a month or two and its going to take 400 people another 2 or 3 years before they can let them go? :o
Just exactly what do you keep 400 people busy doing for 2 or 3 years at a power plant that isnt producing electricity? Those sound like some easy jobs working all day doing nothing and then we should feel sorry for them because they got told 3 years in advance they would lose their jobs. Oh those poor things!

Re: Fort Calhoun Power plant

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 9:25 am
by MadMartin8
GRANDPASMUCKER wrote:The plant is going to stop producing electricity in a month or two and its going to take 400 people another 2 or 3 years before they can let them go? :o
Just exactly what do you keep 400 people busy doing for 2 or 3 years at a power plant that isnt producing electricity? Those sound like some easy jobs working all day doing nothing and then we should feel sorry for them because they got told 3 years in advance they would lose their jobs. Oh those poor things!

There is a bit more to decommissioning a Nuclear Plant than simply throwing a switch. It takes time, and people who know what they are doing.

Re: Fort Calhoun Power plant

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:32 am
by Omaha_corn_burner
GRANDPASMUCKER wrote:The plant is going to stop producing electricity in a month or two and its going to take 400 people another 2 or 3 years before they can let them go? :o
Just exactly what do you keep 400 people busy doing for 2 or 3 years at a power plant that isnt producing electricity? Those sound like some easy jobs working all day doing nothing and then we should feel sorry for them because they got told 3 years in advance they would lose their jobs. Oh those poor things!
Security.

Re: Fort Calhoun Power plant

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 10:43 am
by jessep28
Not just security, but after the reactor is defueled, the fuel has to cool down for several years in a spent fuel pool before it can be placed into dry storage. You have to monitor and maintain the equipment for that process. Then it's a substantial activity to actually decommission the plant. There's plenty to do.

See: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-colle ... oning.html

Re: Fort Calhoun Power plant

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 12:50 pm
by MadMartin8
jessep28 wrote:Not just security, but after the reactor is defueled, the fuel has to cool down for several years in a spent fuel pool before it can be placed into dry storage. You have to monitor and maintain the equipment for that process. Then it's a substantial activity to actually decommission the plant. There's plenty to do.

See: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-colle ... oning.html

Correct

Re: Fort Calhoun Power plant

Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2022 11:17 am
by Coyote
State senator wants study on more nuclear energy generation



Study would look at advanced nuclear plants