2014 CWS

Metro area and region sports discussion

Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss

lmdramos
Library Board
Posts: 315
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:26 pm
Location: New England

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by lmdramos »

Any idea why attendance is down so much this CWS?
User avatar
Greg S
City Council
Posts: 7440
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:46 am

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Greg S »

Kind of crazy, heard 13k down on 1620. They listed many reasons, US World Cup last night, threat of severe weather on a couple days, and lack of marquee teams.

Greg
MadMartin8
Planning Board
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by MadMartin8 »

lmdramos wrote:Any idea why attendance is down so much this CWS?

-Because the stadium is 3 inches too far to the left, and put at a 56 degree angle instead of a 54 degree angle and it's making no more home runs. Everyone needs home runs
-Because the elderly/middle aged/Rosenblatt forever crowd misses Rosenblatt too much, and is now refusing to go, or got lost on the way there and went to the old Rosenblatt site instead.
-Because the dudebros in the outfield with their dudebro girlfriends are now watching it all on their smart phones from their homes...or were paying too much attention to their smartphones and got lost and are now at the old Rosenblatt site.


Or it could just be a lull before it picks up in the later rounds :)
No posts exist for this topic
ricko
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1345
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:54 pm

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by ricko »

lmdramos wrote:Any idea why attendance is down so much this CWS?
I'm rooting for Virginia 'cuz I've lived here for so long. Was at a sports bar Sunday and I had to ask the bartender to put the CWS on one of the TVs. It's all about the World Cup here. I even work with a few people who are taking vacation days to host/attend World Cup parties. You'd think Virginians would at least be passably interested in how the Cavaliers are doing. Go figure. I also think the NBA finals played a part.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10376
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by iamjacobm »

Looooonnnnnggggg game tonight.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Coyote »

iamjacobm wrote:Looooonnnnnggggg game tonight.
Too bad for TCU, they had to use up a lot of arms and have to come back in a couple days.
Looking like an all V finals!
lmdramos
Library Board
Posts: 315
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:26 pm
Location: New England

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by lmdramos »

Go Hoos!! Always love coming back to Omaha.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Coyote »

Vanderbilt's Xavier Turner declared ineligible. Speculation is contact with agents? 63 game 3rd Base Starter.
lmdramos
Library Board
Posts: 315
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:26 pm
Location: New England

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by lmdramos »

Ole Miss-Virginia game postponed till 2pm tomorrow which is suppose to be the start time of Texas-Vanderbilt game. So I'm not really sure what they are doing.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Coyote »

lmdramos wrote:Ole Miss-Virginia game postponed till 2pm tomorrow which is suppose to be the start time of Texas-Vanderbilt game. So I'm not really sure what they are doing.
Vandy vs Tejas @ 7 tomorrow.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Coyote »

Virginia vs Vandy for a first time winner! 7:00 pm Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday (if necessary)
User avatar
BRoss
IT Director
Posts: 10002763
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: West Central Omaha

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by BRoss »

Coyote wrote:Virginia vs Vandy for a first time winner!
Nice! I love when teams who have never won before make it to the championship. And this year both teams are.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10376
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by iamjacobm »

Honestly first time I have seen someone suggest this.

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/28187765 ... 6c-_BzUooc
Home runs in college baseball are way, way down from past years.

‘‘In 2010, there was just under one home run per game in Division I,’’ Sports Illustrated wrote in this week’s issue. ‘‘Last season there were .36 home runs per game.’’

There were only three homers hit in 14 games at the College World Series last year. But in 1998, when metal bats were at their peak, before they were ratcheted down to more resemble wooden bats in 2011, there were 62 home runs hit in the same amount of games.

In this year’s College World Series, it took 115 innings of total play and 3,400 pitches before the first home run was hit. That one came off the bat of Texas shortstop C.J. Hinojosa, and it was the winning, and only, run in a 1-0 victory over UC-Irvine. ‘‘Four players fainted,’’ Texas coach Augie Garrido said afterward. A joke.

So what happened to all the dingers? New bats, new balls, and — for the College World Series — maybe the design of the stadium in downtown Omaha, some folks say.

But if the heyday of the long ball was 1998 for college baseball, I’m thinking of something else that sort of peaked right around then before heading downward. Stuff associated with monster major-league baseball sluggers like Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa and Rafael Palmeiro.

Uh, steroids.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Coyote »

iamjacobm wrote:Honestly first time I have seen someone suggest this.

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/28187765 ... 6c-_BzUooc
Same here.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Coyote »

Wednesday 7:00 pm, winner take all!
First game 3 at TDA
Today: 24,308
ricko
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1345
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:54 pm

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by ricko »

Hoos next!!
User avatar
Greg S
City Council
Posts: 7440
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:46 am

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Greg S »

Coyote wrote:Wednesday 7:00 pm, winner take all!
First game 3 at TDA
Today: 24,308
That's good news on the crowd. Did not look that big on TV.

Greg
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9134
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by skinzfan23 »

The attendance so far this year is 329,396 for 15 games, 21,960 avg. Although the avg is down, this is going to be a new all-time high for overall attendance (16 games played) after tonight. Looking to break the 350,000 barrier for the first time.
MadMartin8
Planning Board
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by MadMartin8 »

skinzfan23 wrote:The attendance so far this year is 329,396 for 15 games, 21,960 avg.  Although the avg is down, this is going to be a new all-time high for overall attendance (16 games played) after tonight. Looking to break the 350,000 barrier for the first time.
Where was Average attendance in past years? Is that a statistic that is possible to find?

Just curious how far down these numbers are.
No posts exist for this topic
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Coyote »

The old website had all the records. On a quick look at CWSomaha.com they are not listed...
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
Posts: 108875
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by nebugeater »

Can vouch for the accuracy but here are the numbers for the TDA years from Wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TD_Ameritrade_Park_Omaha" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The 2011 CWS, the first played at TD Ameritrade Park, consisted of 14 sessions with a total attendance of 321,684 for an average session attendance of 22,977. The 2011 total was both the highest since 2005 and 2,294 spectators more than the 2010 per-game average of 20,683.[16][17]
The 2013 CWS, also consisted of 14 sessions with a total attendance of 341,483 for an average session attendance of 24,392 (both all-time highs for the CWS).
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Coyote »

http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/baseball_ ... eneral.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Pgs 37, 38
Can't cut and padre on a iPad from this pdf
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
Posts: 108875
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by nebugeater »

Here is the Offical Ave Attendance for each year from 1947 - 2011

It is on Pg 36 of this PDF

http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/baseball_ ... eneral.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Following are the attendance figures for the years the College World Series
has been played in Omaha, plus the two years in Kalamazoo, Mich., and one
year in Wichita, Kan. The total attendance in the 65-year history of the CWS
is 7,886,517. The 62-year Omaha total is 7,864,373 spectators, an average of
126,845 per year. For the last fi ve years (2007-11) the average is 323,897.
Year Sessions Total Avg.
1947 .......................................................... 2 3,792 1,896
1948 .......................................................... 2 3,352 1,676
1949 .......................................................... 4 15,000 3,750
1950 .......................................................... 10 17,805 1,781
1951 .......................................................... 9 27,789 3,088
1952 .......................................................... 10 38,731 3,873
1953 .......................................................... 10 31,990 3,199
1954 .......................................................... 10 35,403 3,540
1955 .......................................................... 10 21,843 2,184
1956 .......................................................... 10 29,940 2,994
1957 .......................................................... 9 26,609 2,957
1958 .......................................................... 10 25,931 2,593
1959 .......................................................... 10 33,607 3,361
1960 .......................................................... 10 35,222 3,522
1961 .......................................................... 9 24,778 2,753
1962 .......................................................... 10 39,307 3,931
1963 .......................................................... 10 52,757 5,276
1964 .......................................................... 10 61,871 6,187
1965 .......................................................... 10 45,894 4,589
1966 .......................................................... 10 63,376 6,338
1967 .......................................................... 10 63,906 6,391
1968 .......................................................... 9 58,373 6,486
1969 .......................................................... 10 63,265 6,327
1970 .......................................................... 10 74,683 7,468
1971 .......................................................... 10 77,460 7,746
1972 .......................................................... 10 80,214 (1) 8,021
1973 .......................................................... 9 65,356 7,262
1974 .......................................................... 10 71,105 7,111
1975 .......................................................... 10 78,052 7,805
1976 .......................................................... 10 83,455 8,346
1977 .......................................................... 10 90,117 9,012
1978 .......................................................... 9 79,654 8,850
1979 .......................................................... 10 87,070 8,707
1980 .......................................................... 10 95,406 9,541
1981 .......................................................... 10 120,535 12,054
1982 .......................................................... 9 106,144 11,794
1983 .......................................................... 9 115,700 (2) 12,856
1984 .......................................................... 10 120,456 12,046
1985 .......................................................... 10 125,970 12,597
1986 .......................................................... 10 124,958 12,496
1987 .......................................................... 10 130,659 13,066
1988 .......................................................... 9 132,698 14,744
1989 .......................................................... 9 132,865 14,763
1990 .......................................................... 9 138,426 15,381
1991 .......................................................... 9 133,763 (3) 14,863
1992 .......................................................... 10 154,216 15,422
1993 .......................................................... 10 173,296 17,330
1994 .......................................................... 9 161,638 17,960
1995 .......................................................... 10 182,759 18,276
1996 .......................................................... 9 182,430 20,270
1997 .......................................................... 10 204,309 (4) 20,431
1998 .......................................................... 10 204,361 20,436
1999 .......................................................... 10 206,639 20,664
2000 .......................................................... 9 200,917 22,324
2001 .......................................................... 9 196,515 21,835
2002 .......................................................... 10 223,762 (5) 22,376
2003 .......................................................... 12 260,091 21,674
2004 .......................................................... 11 256,730 23,339
2005 .......................................................... 11 263,475 #23,952
2006 .......................................................... 14 310,609 (6) 22,186
2007 .......................................................... 13 300,702 23,131
2008 .......................................................... 16 330,099 20,631
2009 .......................................................... 15 +336,076 (7) 22,405
2010 .......................................................... 16 330,922 20,683
2011 .......................................................... 14 $321,684 22,977
(1) One millionth fan; (2) Two millionth fan; (3) Three millionth fan; (4) Four millionth fan;
(5) Five millionth fan; (6) Six millionth fan; (7) Seven millionth fan; #Average per session record
+Total attendance record; $TD Ameritrade Park Omaha
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
Posts: 108875
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by nebugeater »

Coyote wrote:http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/baseball_ ... eneral.pdf
Pgs 37, 38
Can't cut and padre on a iPad from this pdf
We were looking at the same thing at the same time!
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
Posts: 108875
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by nebugeater »

Single session attendance records from the same source


Session Record
Number Attendance Year Games Participants
1 24,711 2002 No. 1 Georgia Tech 11, South Carolina 0
No. 2 Clemson 11, Nebraska 10
2 25,521 2011 No. 2 Florida 8, Texas 4
3 24,273 2009 No. 3 Arizona St. 5, North Carolina 2
4 26,559 2007 No. 4 Oregon St. 3, Cal St. Fullerton 2
5 26,813 2005 No. 5 Arizona St. 4, Tennessee 2
No. 6 Florida 7, Nebraska 4
6 24,941 2005 No. 7 Baylor 4, Oregon St. 3 (10 inn.)
No. 8 Texas 5, Tulane 0
7 26,220 2005 No. 9 Arizona St. 8, Nebraska 7 (11 inn.)
No. 10 Baylor 8, Tulane 7
8 28,216 2004 No. 11 Texas 7, Georgia 6
No. 12 South Carolina 5, Cal St. Fullerton 3
9 29,034 2007 No. 9 North Carolina 3, Louisville 1
No. 10 UC Irvine 8, Arizona St. 7
10 30,553 2008 No. 11 North Carolina 7, LSU 3
11 22,344 2007 No. 13 North Carolina 7, Rice 4
12 25,882 2011 No. 12 South Carolina 3, Virginia 2
13 15,125 2008 No. 13 Fresno St. 6, North Carolina 1
14 12,593 2010 No. 14 South Carolina 4, Clemson 3
Championship Series
1 26,887 2007 No. 14 Oregon St. 11, North Carolina 4
2 26,721 2011 No. 14 South Carolina 5, Florida 2
3 19,986 2009 No. 15 LSU 11, Texas 4
Championship Game Only
26,721 2011 No. 14 South Carolina 5, Florida 2
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!
MadMartin8
Planning Board
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by MadMartin8 »

You guys rock.

So this year's average attendance isn't too astronomically worse than past years.
No posts exist for this topic
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9134
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by skinzfan23 »

If you add in 2012 and 2013 here are the numbers:
2012 .......................................................... 15 326,734 (8) 21,782
2013 .......................................................... 14 +341,483 #24,392
(1) One millionth fan; (2) Two millionth fan; (3) Three millionth fan; (4) Four millionth fan;
(5) Five millionth fan; (6) Six millionth fan; (7) Seven millionth fan; #Average per session record
+Total attendance record; $TD Ameritrade Park Omaha.
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9134
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by skinzfan23 »

From the 2014 Record Book:
http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/baseball_ ... eneral.pdf
pg 37-38.

Session Attendance Records
Session Record
Number Attendance Year Games Participants
1 24,711 2002 No. 1 Georgia Tech 11, South Carolina 0
No. 2 Clemson 11, Nebraska 10
2 27,122 2013 No. 2 Indiana 4, Louisville 0
3 24,273 2009 No. 3 Arizona St. 5, North Carolina 2
4 26,559 2007 No. 4 Oregon St. 3, Cal St. Fullerton 2
5 26,813 2005 No. 5 Arizona St. 4, Tennessee 2
No. 6 Florida 7, Nebraska 4
6 25,260 2013 No. 6 Mississippi St. 5, Indiana 4
7 26,220 2005 No. 9 Arizona St. 8, Nebraska 7 (11 inn.)
No. 10 Baylor 8, Tulane 7
8 28,216 2004 No. 11 Texas 7, Georgia 6
No. 12 South Carolina 5, Cal St. Fullerton 3
9 29,034 2007 No. 9 North Carolina 3, Louisville 1
No. 10 UC Irvine 8, Arizona St. 7
10 30,553 2008 No. 11 North Carolina 7, LSU 3
11 22,344 2007 No. 13 North Carolina 7, Rice 4
12 25,947 2013 No. 12 UCLA 4, North Carolina 1
13 22,184 2012 No. 13 South Carolina 3, Arkansas 2
14 12,593 2010 No. 14 South Carolina 4, Clemson 3

Championship Series
1 26,887 2007 No. 14 Oregon St. 11, North Carolina 4
2 27,127 2013 No. 14 UCLA 8, Mississippi St. 0
3 19,986 2009 No. 15 LSU 11, Texas 4

Championship Game Only
27,127 2013 No. 14 UCLA 8, Mississippi St. 0
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
Posts: 108875
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by nebugeater »

MadMartin8 wrote:You guys rock.

So this year's average attendance isn't too astronomically worse than past years.

Correct


They just got tired of talking about the lack of home runs and had to find a new topic to create stir.
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Coyote »

Also, they were talking about how UT and Ole Miss had mega reporters there, but when they were bounced the media room was full of crickets. Vanderbilt (Nashville) didn't even send reporters till just the other day...
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9134
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by skinzfan23 »

Who knew a home run would win the CWS....Vandy wins 3-2 over Virginia.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Coyote »

Yeah, Vandy on a HR. Who thunk it
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9134
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by skinzfan23 »

First national championship for Vandy in any sport.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32934
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Coyote »

Maybe I'm mixing teams up, but didn't Vandy win Women's bowling 2007?mor was that Virginia
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9134
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by skinzfan23 »

Coyote wrote:Maybe I'm mixing teams up, but didn't Vandy win Women's bowling 2007?mor was that Virginia
I think it may just be Vandy's men's teams first championship.
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033311
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Brad »

skinzfan23 wrote:
Coyote wrote:Maybe I'm mixing teams up, but didn't Vandy win Women's bowling 2007?mor was that Virginia
I think it may just be Vandy's men's teams first championship.
According to ESPN Sports Center, you are correct. First Men's...
User avatar
Greg S
City Council
Posts: 7440
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:46 am

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by Greg S »

nebugeater wrote:
MadMartin8 wrote:You guys rock.

So this year's average attendance isn't too astronomically worse than past years.

Correct


They just got tired of talking about the lack of home runs and had to find a new topic to create stir.
They finished down about 2500 per session, roughly 10%. Not huge but it is something you don't want to see continue. I did see someone post on eomaha's facebook page last night a crowd shot that showed a lot of empty seats. The final game in a best of 3 is a tough sell.

Greg
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9134
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by skinzfan23 »

Greg S wrote:
nebugeater wrote:
MadMartin8 wrote:You guys rock.

So this year's average attendance isn't too astronomically worse than past years.

Correct


They just got tired of talking about the lack of home runs and had to find a new topic to create stir.
They finished down about 2500 per session, roughly 10%.  Not huge but it is something you don't want to see continue.  I did see someone post  on eomaha's facebook page last night a crowd shot that showed a lot of empty seats.  The final game in a best of 3 is a tough sell.

Greg
The attendance was down about 10% from last year (last year was the largest attendance all-time though). This years attendance was comparable to 2012 and it was better than 2010 (the last year at Rosenblatt).

Definitely don't want to see that trend continue, but I think it was ok this year. With the world cup going on and the lack of some of the big name teams (outside of texas of course), I think the attendance was good. Still the largest overall attendance of all-time.
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9134
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by skinzfan23 »

Looks like the final attendance was a record 347,740. Thats an avg of 21,734 per game. Still not bad for a "down" year.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10376
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: 2014 CWS

Post by iamjacobm »

Omaha got some great exposure this year.

http://espnmediazone.com/us/press-relea ... ince-2011/
ESPN’s telecast of the third, and deciding game, of the College World Series Finals – Vanderbilt defeating Virginia 3-2 – averaged a 1.6 US HH rating and 2,388,000 viewers, making it the highest-rated and most-viewed College World Series game since 2009 when ESPN averaged a 1.7 US HH rating and 2,500,000 viewers for Game 1 of the CWS Finals.

In addition, ESPN’s 1.6 US HH rating for the final game of the college baseball season ranks as the third highest-rated baseball game – professional and college – across all cable and broadcast networks behind two of ESPN’s Sunday Night Baseball matchups.
Post Reply