Wallstreet is Dead aka: FOR SALE
Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss
Wallstreet is Dead aka: FOR SALE
Two separate business leaders are reporting that Townsend is trying to sell the land where wallstreet was going to be built.
And another historic building bites the dust for NOTHING!
I loved the Medical Arts building, but feel ok since First National replaced it with something of at least equal value (architecture, planning, visual, etc.). Â However, tearing down buildings without a solid game plan is unforgivable.
Maybe we should start farming crops downtown like Detroit - at least people would get food out of the deal. Â We could farm the old UP site, the old OWH site and that |expletive|-of-a-park with the bronze sculptures.
I loved the Medical Arts building, but feel ok since First National replaced it with something of at least equal value (architecture, planning, visual, etc.). Â However, tearing down buildings without a solid game plan is unforgivable.
Maybe we should start farming crops downtown like Detroit - at least people would get food out of the deal. Â We could farm the old UP site, the old OWH site and that |expletive|-of-a-park with the bronze sculptures.
- Bosco55David
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:25 am
- Location: Tampa, FL (formerly Omaha and Council Bluffs)
And not to forget (if I'm remembering correctly), the land was sold to Townsend for a give-away price. So, is the city of Omaha going to get into the habit of making these sweet deals anytime a developer comes in with "good idea" and when that train derails, allow them to re-sell the property at market price?Bosco55David wrote:I thought the sale contract had a clause that the property reverted to city ownership if construction didn't begin by a certain date, so how is Townsend going to be the one selling this?
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
...What I was thinking also.Bosco55David wrote:I thought the sale contract had a clause that the property reverted to city ownership if construction didn't begin by a certain date, so how is Townsend going to be the one selling this?
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
How does that work? Â The assessor shows Wallstreet as the owner so does the city have a lean on it? Â I don't how someone can own something but really not own something?
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
That's the thing, this is if Townsend "owns" the lot without lien. I just found it funny that the city would accept such a proposal (out of a number of other proposals) with such confidence in a developer that has NO experience in new construction and basically giving away 1 full city block of prime property without recourse in the event the project fails.Brad wrote:How does that work? The assessor shows Wallstreet as the owner so does the city have a lean on it? I don't how someone can own something but really not own something?
Of course, this is only true if our understanding of the deal is accurate.
-
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:59 pm
They could have left the 70s structure and refaced it with a new curtain wall. Â The property could have been listed in the National Register (even with the non-historic additions). Â By listing, the developer could have taken advantage of the historic tax credits for rehabilitation expenditures at the historic and non-historic portions of the property.. Â Townsend is doing a historic tax credit project at the Brandeis so these guys could have worked it out for their UP property. Â The property was also nationally significant so Townsend could have applied for Save America's Treasures grants. Â Now we are left with a hole - a hole that can only be filled by a project using local TIF funding (not augmeted/balanced by other non-local funding sources such as historic tax credits). Â If Julia Roberts would say, "Big mistake!"
Wallstreet Tower
Townsend is trying to sell everything they own. Â The banks must be all over them looking for cash. Â I am told they have more than 15,000,000.00 in debt on it so I would assume this turkey is headed back to the bank.
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
- OmahaJaysCU
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:00 pm
You almost can't help but to feel bad for Townsend now, having initially qualified for financing, invested heavily in demolishing the old UP, then building the new showrooms and every other marketing and overhead expense, only to have the economy tank and their financier keep raising the bar on them.
Talk about wrong place at the wrong time.
Talk about wrong place at the wrong time.
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
I'd feel sorry for him except that he seems like a total shyster. Seriously, check out videos of him talking - if you can find them.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
I've seen him (I assume you mean Jason Townsend) speak and also spoke with him several times, I've also spoken with a couple others at Townsend and never once got the impression any of them were "shysters."StreetsOfOmaha wrote:I'd feel sorry for him except that he seems like a total shyster. Seriously, check out videos of him talking - if you can find them.
Not sure what you mean there.
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
- Bosco55David
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:25 am
- Location: Tampa, FL (formerly Omaha and Council Bluffs)
Spoke to the guy that led the America First proposal for this site and it is his understanding that the City of Omaha absolutely has a lean on this property, or specific ownership rights to its development, and because Townsend didn't fulfill their end of the obligation, the City can take it back anytime - assuming they've "run" out of time on their contract.
He said that they (America First/Burlington Capitol) would be interested in the site again, but because they were relying on bringing a major corp into downtown (at the time TD Ameritrade was it) to occupy most of the space, they'd have to relocate another. Â Obviously, very hard to do right now.
He said that they (America First/Burlington Capitol) would be interested in the site again, but because they were relying on bringing a major corp into downtown (at the time TD Ameritrade was it) to occupy most of the space, they'd have to relocate another. Â Obviously, very hard to do right now.
-
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2738
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:00 pm
- Location: Metro Detroit Michigan
There were only two - Townsend and America First. Â Renderings are in the Wallstreet thread somewhere, good luck in finding them. Â Nearly everyone on here at the time was ga-ga over the Townsend proposal, as opposed to the America First proposal. Â As they say, be careful what you wish for.NovakOmaha wrote:Were there ever renderings of the other bidders?
"Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved."
--William Jennings Bryan
--William Jennings Bryan
Hindsight is definitely 20/20. Â Obviously we all assumed (as did the city) we were dealing with a viable project.
I think it would be pretty easy to make the right decision knowing what we know now.
Look at this way: everyone now gets to say "I told you so" because my West Dodge Ghettomaker predictions didn't come true.
I think it would be pretty easy to make the right decision knowing what we know now.
Look at this way: everyone now gets to say "I told you so" because my West Dodge Ghettomaker predictions didn't come true.
Yes, the City can likely get it back. Â If they can come up with the money to cover all the demo costs already sunk into it. Â This is not terribly likely at this point, but possible.psl25201 wrote:Spoke to the guy that led the America First proposal for this site and it is his understanding that the City of Omaha absolutely has a lean on this property, or specific ownership rights to its development, and because Townsend didn't fulfill their end of the obligation, the City can take it back anytime - assuming they've "run" out of time on their contract.
He said that they (America First/Burlington Capitol) would be interested in the site again, but because they were relying on bringing a major corp into downtown (at the time TD Ameritrade was it) to occupy most of the space, they'd have to relocate another. Obviously, very hard to do right now.
- Bosco55David
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:25 am
- Location: Tampa, FL (formerly Omaha and Council Bluffs)
Thanks for the clarification. Does this mean that TDAmeritrade had effectively agreed to move downtown but then pulled out presumably because of the delays? If so, that would mean that was the stake in the heart for this project, right? [/quote]psl25201 wrote:Couple things -
Maybe I wasn't completely clear in my first post, but it was never the plan to bring a new corporation to town. The foundation of the proposal was built on America First relocating a current Omaha corporation to downtown, that being TD Ameritrade. Now that they have their own campus, America First would have to find another company to relocate and because nearly all of the major corps in Omaha have built new buildings/campuses, they'd have to look out of state.
Anyone see late last week KETV had a little story about the fact that the city was starting to look at trying to take that land back. Â I couldn't find it online but they seemed to imply that something was going to start happening pretty soon, either a new project or probably green space, but that in fact city leaders are growing impatient. Â As a side note, and it probably should be in another thread, the same story indicated that the hotel spot in the Old Market supposedly had gotten new financiers and that an announcement on what will be going there and when should happen pretty soon.