Suttle talks about street cars.
Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss
Suttle talks about street cars.
In an interview with KMTV, Suttle called the streetcar the "O Line" and that that's what we ought to be calling it...but of course saying we need to address how to pay for it, but doesnt give any ideas
Expect him to mention here and there to give the impression its an issue he is even remotely entertaining, when in fact, I seriously doubt he is.justnick wrote:Can we drop the |expletive| "O!" meme already?
Seriously needs to die already.
As for Suttle, at least it's still being talked about no matter what the idjits sayin' I want my stupid streetcar.
Let's be honest, it doesn't matter who is in the Mayor's office, this won't fly until City revenues increase substantially and the City's bond rating gets back to AAA.
"Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved."
--William Jennings Bryan
--William Jennings Bryan
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
If you know who has the dough to plop down on this right now, I'm sure we'd all be very happy to write letters of encouragement to them to speed the process along.StreetsOfOmaha wrote:Oh, if you say so.
"Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved."
--William Jennings Bryan
--William Jennings Bryan
-
- City Council
- Posts: 105418
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:34 pm
- Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado
- Contact:
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
Look at all the big family names on cultural institutions in Omaha; Holland, Lauritzen, Lied, Scott, etc. Did these philanthropists expect a return on their investment? No. They knew that their contributions would create an asset for the entire community.
I'm not saying it will happen.
Anyway, it's not like there isn't historical precedent. Most streetcar lines in this country used to be operated by for profit companies. Same with railways and airlines.
I'm not saying it will happen.
Anyway, it's not like there isn't historical precedent. Most streetcar lines in this country used to be operated by for profit companies. Same with railways and airlines.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
    Historically public transit, street-car and bus, were operated by private for-profit companies (just like airlines, railroads). Some companies made a profit, some went bankrupt (like the airlines). There were a few exceptions: San Francisco, Fort Collins Colorado. Government operation of public transit did not become the rule until after 1960...when working and middle class families were buying a 2nd car, shopping moved from downtown to the suburban mall (like Crossroads  :) ) and nobody was left to ride the bus or streetcar except during rush-hour. As transit fares dropped, the private companies cut costs. When there were no more costs to be cut it was a choice of no-transit or government run transit with "subsidies". ÂAnonymous wrote:How many privately funding street car lines are there anyway??
I cannot imagine any kind of decent ROI on such a venture... unless the investors already owned the surrounding property as well. Projects like this are reserved for public dollars... you know, the type which don't make money.
There were other contributions to the end of privately owned / profit oriented public transit (surly bus drivers who didn't like kids...), the 'hidden' subsidies for the automobile (the gas tax did not pave city streets, pavement on many streets was paid for by the streetcar company), but by and large privately owned public transit ended with the two-car family.
BTW - many government transit agencies contract with private companies for operations and maintenance.
- UNOstudent
- Human Relations
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:27 pm
Found this interesting note in an article about the bond agencies liking the tax hike. Â Could it possibly be?.....................
http://omaha.com/article/20090924/NEWS01/709249870
On Monday, the city plans to gauge investor interest in $18.6 million of general obligation bonds, according to the mayor's statement. Neither the release nor city officials specified what those bonds would cover.
http://omaha.com/article/20090924/NEWS01/709249870
Lol, cover a budget shortfall with a bond? We should just lend the city our credit cards...OSRC wrote:Thats not nearly enough to start anything significant...more likely to cover the $11 million shortfall that's expected for the rest of the year plus extra just in case
....unless they want to do another study
omahahawk wrote:Found this interesting note in an article about the bond agencies liking the tax hike. Could it possibly be?.....................
On Monday, the city plans to gauge investor interest in $18.6 million of general obligation bonds, according to the mayor's statement. Neither the release nor city officials specified what those bonds would cover.
http://omaha.com/article/20090924/NEWS01/709249870
   My guess would be these bonds will fund road construction for 2010. The Blondo and 132nd Street widening projects were funded with general obligation bonds. I just love the way westbound Blondo backs up from 144th all the way to 132nd when local radio announces accidents on Dodge at 5 O'clock rush.
There is an article in the OWH about Suttle asking the Unicameral for a hike in city sales tax to cover police and fire pension shortfalls. The $45m estimate in the amount the tax will bring in is way beyond what is needed for pension. The streetcar could be funded out of the surplus...after more studies of course Â
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
Thanks for posting this. I just watched it and really enjoyed it, though it is very dated. I'm happy to say that we've come a long way from the time that documentary was made, and the outlook continues to become brighter and brighter for public transportation in the US.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
- Coyote
- City Council
- Posts: 32945
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
- Location: Aksarben Village
- Contact:
Suttle sidetracked, but undeterred
Maggie O'Brien world-herald staff writer wrote:With a tumultuous first year behind him, Suttle says his major priorities for the rest of his four-year term will be creating jobs and resolving the city's financial challenges. “You don't run from problems,” he said. “You face them.” And he's thinking about his legacy, saying he hopes to be the mayor who succeeds in bringing streetcars to Omaha.
Suttle has hired a public relations firm to promote Omaha streetcars and a Washington lobbyist to help secure federal funding. Bringing streetcars to Omaha probably would cost between $200 million and $250 million but could mean $1 billion in economic development, Suttle has said. The time is now for streetcars, he said, despite the city's troubled finances. If Omaha doesn't invest in the future, he said, “we might as well turn out the lights on the city.”
I think everyone is forgetting that funding for a project like streetcars is securing federal funds that usually pays for about 90% of the project. So the City of Omaha would be looking at about a $20-$25 million dollar commitment to a project like this....Thats why Suttle is pushing so hard for this because he sees it as a $20 million investment that will bring in $1 billion in private development around it. I also think he's pushing hard for it to have something linked to his four year legacy because there is no way that guy is going to get another four year term.
I think this would be a great thing for Omaha but it sounds like we are in a lot of competition with other cities for federal funding on this type of project so the cards are stacked against us. Yes there are budget concerns going on right now but finding $20 million won't be as hard as you think to find in this city. Its the same thing you seen happen with Fahey and the baseball park. Its amazing the amount of connections with Fahey, Creighton and friends of his that jumped on all the property around the stadium before it was publicly announced and also the millions of private dollars that they found to get that project off the ground. Do I care that it happened, no because truly it happens everywhere in this country.
I think this would be a great thing for Omaha but it sounds like we are in a lot of competition with other cities for federal funding on this type of project so the cards are stacked against us. Yes there are budget concerns going on right now but finding $20 million won't be as hard as you think to find in this city. Its the same thing you seen happen with Fahey and the baseball park. Its amazing the amount of connections with Fahey, Creighton and friends of his that jumped on all the property around the stadium before it was publicly announced and also the millions of private dollars that they found to get that project off the ground. Do I care that it happened, no because truly it happens everywhere in this country.