Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Proposed Development Projects that got Minarded.

Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss

NovakOmaha
Planning Board
Posts: 2733
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by NovakOmaha »

There were other renderings that looked better...like daytime.
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9089
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by skinzfan23 »

RNcyanide wrote:
Midwestern wrote:I'd still much rather have that than the Hilton though... :( :(
I feel like it would have set an entirely different vibe in North Downtown. Buildings would be taller, more interesting things would be down there, the crappy suburban hotels would have been done differently, etc.
I sometimes wonder about this as well. I think it would have set a precedent and created a different vibe away from the suburban looking hotels that were all built in North Downtown.
NovakOmaha
Planning Board
Posts: 2733
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

Marriott

Post by NovakOmaha »

Brad wrote:Capitol District last night from the Helicopter:
Image
This horse is just as dead now as it was in 2003 but I've got to tilt at windmills one more time...

IF the hotel chosen by Hal Daub (the highrise) had been built look at all the land that could have been developed. Yes, yes, yes, it's also a height thing but take a look at the picture. The amount of land that the Hilton takes up is obscene. And 800 room hotel, or even the 525 room one that was proposed could have been 20-30 or more floors. And if the 525 room one was built and an expansion was warranted, as was the case, a shorter addition could have been built.

Just lamenting....
User avatar
PotatoeEatsFish
Human Relations
Posts: 743
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 11:59 pm

Re: Official: Capitol District

Post by PotatoeEatsFish »

NovakOmaha wrote:
Brad wrote:Capitol District last night from the Helicopter:
Image
This horse is just as dead now as it was in 2003 but I've got to tilt at windmills one more time...

IF the hotel chosen by Hal Daub (the highrise) had been built look at all the land that could have been developed. Yes, yes, yes, it's also a height thing but take a look at the picture. The amount of land that the Hilton takes up is obscene. And 800 room hotel, or even the 525 room one that was proposed could have been 20-30 or more floors. And if the 525 room one was built and an expansion was warranted, as was the case, a shorter addition could have been built.

Just lamenting....
The Great Wall of Hilton annoys me to no end.
#SaveTheUglyGrainSilos2024
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32804
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Official: Capitol District

Post by Coyote »

Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
User avatar
Brad
City Council
Posts: 1033296
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Official: Capitol District

Post by Brad »

Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
To lessen the burden on tax payers:
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.p ... it=Mariott
edsas
Human Relations
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 9:47 pm
Location: La Vista

Re: Official: Capitol District

Post by edsas »

Brad wrote:
Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
To lessen the burden on tax payers:
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.p ... it=Mariott
I seem to remember Fahey calling Hilton more "Union-friendly" than Mariott. I remember him using that as one of his deciding factors.
NovakOmaha
Planning Board
Posts: 2733
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

Re: Official: Capitol District

Post by NovakOmaha »

edsas wrote:
Brad wrote:
Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
To lessen the burden on tax payers:
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.p ... it=Mariott
I seem to remember Fahey calling Hilton more "Union-friendly" than Mariott. I remember him using that as one of his deciding factors.
I want to say is was out of spite against Hal Daub. Also it was cheaper & of course that always plays into it. The proposed Marriot was 525 rooms & the wisdom was that 400 rooms would be just fine.
NovakOmaha
Planning Board
Posts: 2733
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

Re: Official: Capitol District

Post by NovakOmaha »

edsas wrote:
Brad wrote:
Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
To lessen the burden on tax payers:
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.p ... it=Mariott
I seem to remember Fahey calling Hilton more "Union-friendly" than Mariott. I remember him using that as one of his deciding factors.
I want to say is was out of spite against Hal Daub. Also it was cheaper & of course that always plays into it. The proposed Marriot was 525 rooms & the wisdom was that 400 rooms would be just fine.

I found a picture from way back when. This would have made such a different vibe.

Image
User avatar
RNcyanide
Planning Board
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Boston

Re: Official: Capitol District

Post by RNcyanide »

Honestly the height is the only thing I like about the Marriott proposal. That's way too industrial of a look.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.

The Bride
User avatar
Linkin5
County Board
Posts: 4532
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:59 pm

Re: Official: Capitol District

Post by Linkin5 »

We gotta stop talking about this tower.
Joe_Sovereign
Library Board
Posts: 433
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:57 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by Joe_Sovereign »

The deal was Daub picked the winner as a lame duck after losing the election. Fahey changed it out of spite or other reasons.

The cynic in me would suggest picking one group over another could be lucrative for a politician, in legal campaign contributions or possible in post mayoral jobs or contracts or deals, even in illegal cash. I am not accusing anyone of anything but building one hotel instead of another has to be worth a lot of money to the groups involved.
choke
Human Relations
Posts: 696
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 8:46 am
Location: North Omaha

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by choke »

NovakOmaha wrote:
edsas wrote:
Brad wrote:
Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
To lessen the burden on tax payers:
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.p ... it=Mariott
I seem to remember Fahey calling Hilton more "Union-friendly" than Mariott. I remember him using that as one of his deciding factors.
I want to say is was out of spite against Hal Daub. Also it was cheaper & of course that always plays into it. The proposed Marriot was 525 rooms & the wisdom was that 400 rooms would be just fine.

I found a picture from way back when. This would have made such a different vibe.

Image
That pic looks like it came out of The Great Gatsby.
User avatar
Omaha Cowboy
The Don
Posts: 1013156
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:31 am
Location: West Omaha

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by Omaha Cowboy »

choke wrote:
NovakOmaha wrote:
edsas wrote:
Brad wrote:
Coyote wrote:Does anyone remember the politics behind that decision? Who benefited the most in that decision?
To lessen the burden on tax payers:
http://www.eomahaforums.com/viewtopic.p ... it=Mariott
I seem to remember Fahey calling Hilton more "Union-friendly" than Mariott. I remember him using that as one of his deciding factors.
I want to say is was out of spite against Hal Daub. Also it was cheaper & of course that always plays into it. The proposed Marriot was 525 rooms & the wisdom was that 400 rooms would be just fine.

I found a picture from way back when. This would have made such a different vibe.

Image
That pic looks like it came out of The Great Gatsby.
There are other renderings of this proposed hotel that make it look a bit more reserved than this one.. But indeed, it would have been an impressive development for Omaha.. Anyone who remembers my imput at the time from the old Omaha Chamber Forum (several years before this forum was created) back in 2001, will recall my profound disappointment when Fahey was elected and promptly shelved Daub's hotel..then proposed what we now know is the downtown Omaha Hilton.. But, friends, that was 15 years ago.. I've moved on. Certainly we've seen other highrise disappointments- The Wallstreet Tower debacle and recently, HDR pulling the plug on their downtown HQ's.. I agree with Novak that this Marriott, if built, would have given the area surrounding the arena and north downtown a different, perhaps more positive vibe..

That said.. I've learned over the years, there is a HUGE difference between getting excited over a proposed development vs one which actually breaks ground with tower cranes in the air. At present, I'm thrilled with the Capitol District project and potentially what it will bring to downtown Omaha..as we know for certain, this project WILL become reality and completed in a little more than a year...

Ciao..LiO...Peace
Go Cowboys!
Athomsfere
Planning Board
Posts: 2005
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:03 pm

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by Athomsfere »

Omaha Cowboy wrote:
That said.. I've learned over the years, there is a HUGE difference between getting excited over a proposed development vs one which actually breaks ground with tower cranes in the air. At present, I'm thrilled with the Capitol District project and potentially what it will bring to downtown Omaha..as we know for certain, this project WILL become reality and completed in a little more than a year...

Ciao..LiO...Peace
Whoa there, lay off the sane and rationalist propaganda! Let us lament!

Jokes aside, agreed. But I think that rendering is gorgeous. I'd love to see it or something like it built North Downtown or south a bit to pull the skyline out. (and look like a sexy, sexy building from another city)
User avatar
Omaha Cowboy
The Don
Posts: 1013156
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:31 am
Location: West Omaha

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by Omaha Cowboy »

Athomsfere wrote:
Omaha Cowboy wrote:
That said.. I've learned over the years, there is a HUGE difference between getting excited over a proposed development vs one which actually breaks ground with tower cranes in the air. At present, I'm thrilled with the Capitol District project and potentially what it will bring to downtown Omaha..as we know for certain, this project WILL become reality and completed in a little more than a year...

Ciao..LiO...Peace
Whoa there, lay off the sane and rationalist propaganda! Let us lament!

Jokes aside, agreed. But I think that rendering is gorgeous. I'd love to see it or something like it built North Downtown or south a bit to pull the skyline out. (and look like a sexy, sexy building from another city)
LOL.. And to your point about a potential building, such as this, pulling the skyline out.. I completely agree :thumb: ...

Ciao..LiO...Peace
Go Cowboys!
mr. omaha
Home Owners Association
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 4:38 am

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by mr. omaha »

Found another view of this proposal:
IMG_1361.JPG
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 9089
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by skinzfan23 »

I also like the enclosed walkway a lot more in that design.
User avatar
Greg S
City Council
Posts: 7398
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:46 am

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by Greg S »

I remember how disappointed everyone was when Fahey passed on the high rise Marriott in favor of the Hilton. I remember he started referring to the Hilton as a "mid-rise."

I have absolutely no recollection of Fahey partly justifying the Hilton because it was more union friendly though.....


Greg
NovakOmaha
Planning Board
Posts: 2733
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by NovakOmaha »

One other thing about this design. Think of the land that would have been free for other development rather the current design needing so much more land for rooms.
Joe_Sovereign
Library Board
Posts: 433
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:57 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by Joe_Sovereign »

NovakOmaha wrote:One other thing about this design. Think of the land that would have been free for other development rather the current design needing so much more land for rooms.
There would have still been a parking garage behind the Marriott. I don't know if you would have gotten more land back.
NovakOmaha
Planning Board
Posts: 2733
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by NovakOmaha »

Joe_Sovereign wrote:
NovakOmaha wrote:One other thing about this design. Think of the land that would have been free for other development rather the current design needing so much more land for rooms.
There would have still been a parking garage behind the Marriott. I don't know if you would have gotten more land back.
The Des Moines downtown Marriott packs 417 rooms and all the first class amenities into 33 floors with a parking garage and takes up a half block, approx 300X150. Tossing on a few more floors and a few more rooms per floor, with all the required amenities and a parking garage and you'd still have a huge part of that land for another high rise or pretty much any development.
User avatar
Omaha Cowboy
The Don
Posts: 1013156
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:31 am
Location: West Omaha

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by Omaha Cowboy »

Wow. It's hard for me to go back in time and revisit this proposed development from 2001-

Opportunity lost..

I thought Fahey was such a chump for scrapping this hotel plan (still do).. He originally proposed a ridiculous looking 400 room Hilton.. The design was completely incompatible with the futuristic look of the now CenturyLink Center. After pressure from the city-council and the public, Fahey then had a redesigned Hilton proposal adding 50 rooms. So the Original Hilton was built with a too small 450 rooms (and we had to beg, borrow and steal to get Fahey to add 50 rooms from the initial 400).. So the Hilton we see today, was the Fahey "redesign" adding 50 rooms and thus, the 450 room, still too small Hilton was born (remember the Daub Marriott highrise was designed at 528 rooms).. of course, I said at the time, in 2001, that 450 rooms was too small and that within a 5 or so years, the city would have to add more rooms to have any sort of competitive edge (and at what cost?)..and Viola! In 2011, 150 rooms were added making the Hilton its current 600 rooms (and at an extra inflated cost)..

It was ego driven, short sightedness by Fahey.. Had he built the original Daub highrise Marriott, and perhaps enhanced the 528 room total to 550-600, the higher cost of the 2011 Hilton expansion would not have been necessary..

Sigh..

In any case, I am very pleased with the Capitol District 330 room Marriott development.. This makes nearly 1000 hotel rooms (930) within an easy walk from CenturyLink.. This puts Omaha in a much more competitive bracket when attempting to attract revenue rich conventions to the city..

I just think it's unfortunate we had to take a long, costly alternative route to finally make this happen...

Ciao..LiO...Peace
Go Cowboys!
HskrFanMike
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1212
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by HskrFanMike »

The main reason Fahey chose the smaller Hilton was cost; the Hilton was originally bid at $60 million for the 400 rooms versus over $90 million for the 528 room Marriott. The redesigns to the Hilton pushed the final cost of the Hilton to $71 million for 450 rooms. Pretty tough to justify spending the extra $20 million to add 78 rooms...especially when the Hilton added twice as many rooms (150) ten years later at $37 million. (Still a lower cost per room, especially when you consider that the expansion was built with 2011 money instead of 2002 money.)

The only reason people are still upset about this is the obsession by some people for height... the same height obsession that resulted in the dumb selection of the Wall Street Tower boondoggle instead of a midrise office building. Nearly a dozen years later, all we have to show for it is the remnants of a wiffle ball field.
buildomaha
Human Relations
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 7:06 pm

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by buildomaha »

HskrFanMike wrote:The main reason Fahey chose the smaller Hilton was cost; the Hilton was originally bid at $60 million for the 400 rooms versus over $90 million for the 528 room Marriott. The redesigns to the Hilton pushed the final cost of the Hilton to $71 million for 450 rooms. Pretty tough to justify spending the extra $20 million to add 78 rooms...especially when the Hilton added twice as many rooms (150) ten years later at $37 million. (Still a lower cost per room, especially when you consider that the expansion was built with 2011 money instead of 2002 money.)

The only reason people are still upset about this is the obsession by some people for height... the same height obsession that resulted in the dumb selection of the Wall Street Tower boondoggle instead of a midrise office building. Nearly a dozen years later, all we have to show for it is the remnants of a wiffle ball field.
I'd take waiting a few years to get something worth downtown space rather than midrises filling our downtown...
#gohawks
HskrFanMike
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1212
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by HskrFanMike »

And wait...and wait...and wait...
daveoma
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1211
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 7:18 pm

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by daveoma »

buildomaha wrote:
HskrFanMike wrote:The main reason Fahey chose the smaller Hilton was cost; the Hilton was originally bid at $60 million for the 400 rooms versus over $90 million for the 528 room Marriott. The redesigns to the Hilton pushed the final cost of the Hilton to $71 million for 450 rooms. Pretty tough to justify spending the extra $20 million to add 78 rooms...especially when the Hilton added twice as many rooms (150) ten years later at $37 million. (Still a lower cost per room, especially when you consider that the expansion was built with 2011 money instead of 2002 money.)

The only reason people are still upset about this is the obsession by some people for height... the same height obsession that resulted in the dumb selection of the Wall Street Tower boondoggle instead of a midrise office building. Nearly a dozen years later, all we have to show for it is the remnants of a wiffle ball field.
I'd take waiting a few years to get something worth downtown space rather than midrises filling our downtown...
I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 32804
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village
Contact:

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by Coyote »

daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
Not too bad for a 200k city...:
image.jpeg
image.jpeg (143.02 KiB) Viewed 10453 times
User avatar
damonhynes
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1066
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 7:35 pm
Location: North Springfield, Nebraska
Contact:

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by damonhynes »

Coyote wrote:
daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
Not too bad for a 200k city...:
image.jpeg
MOB is on my short list for places to retire.
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
Posts: 108844
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by nebugeater »

damonhynes wrote:
Coyote wrote:
daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
Not too bad for a 200k city...:
image.jpeg
MOB is on my short list for places to retire.

Mall Of the Bluffs ?
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!
User avatar
damonhynes
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1066
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 7:35 pm
Location: North Springfield, Nebraska
Contact:

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by damonhynes »

nebugeater wrote:
damonhynes wrote:
Coyote wrote:
daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
Not too bad for a 200k city...:
image.jpeg
MOB is on my short list for places to retire.

Mall Of the Bluffs ?
LOFL!

I've got retirement narrowed down to Texoma, Mobile or Savannah. I'm in talks with the lottery commission...
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
Posts: 108844
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by nebugeater »

damonhynes wrote:
nebugeater wrote:
damonhynes wrote:
Coyote wrote:
daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
Not too bad for a 200k city...:
image.jpeg
MOB is on my short list for places to retire.

Mall Of the Bluffs ?
LOFL!

I've got retirement narrowed down to Texoma, Mobile or Savannah. I'm in talks with the lottery commission...
I knew what you meant but you tee'ed it up all to well. And if that lottery commission doesn't come through you can still say you meet your original plan and use this alternate as a backup plan.
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!
User avatar
damonhynes
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1066
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 7:35 pm
Location: North Springfield, Nebraska
Contact:

Re: Never built Omaha Marriott Hotel

Post by damonhynes »

nebugeater wrote:
damonhynes wrote:
nebugeater wrote:
damonhynes wrote:
Coyote wrote:
daveoma wrote: I want high rises too, but I don't want a situation like Mobile, Alabama where there's like 1 awkward tall building and no-one has heard of your city. Height is important but the city can still have a great reputation.
Not too bad for a 200k city...:
image.jpeg
MOB is on my short list for places to retire.

Mall Of the Bluffs ?
LOFL!

I've got retirement narrowed down to Texoma, Mobile or Savannah. I'm in talks with the lottery commission...
I knew what you meant but you tee'ed it up all to well. And if that lottery commission doesn't come through you can still say you meet your original plan and use this alternate as a backup plan.
(snort!)
Post Reply