Missouri River Commons (Riverfront Development)
Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Rethinking the riverfront: New committee is charged with implementing a vision for development
How about you's guys go visit some existing riverfronts? Don't look within to see how local businesses can prop up the concrete beach we call a riverfront.
Instead, go find ways that work in other towns. Fly, spread your wings little bird. Go out across the world and tell us what you see.
How about you's guys go visit some existing riverfronts? Don't look within to see how local businesses can prop up the concrete beach we call a riverfront.
Instead, go find ways that work in other towns. Fly, spread your wings little bird. Go out across the world and tell us what you see.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
I'm skeptical about sending food trucks to the Lewis & Clark Landing area. The whole idea behind food trucks is bringing food to where the people already are, for convenience, not vice-versa. They would be great to have for special events and to supplement other things happening there, but I don't think people are going to walk that far from downtown or drive there to buy stuff from food trucks.
I hope they focus on getting a new anchor there, such as a museum or substantial band shell venue, not another restaurant/bar. Covering the railroad tracks in a tunnel would help too. Duluth covered parts of I-35 between their downtown and the lake front to open it up. Omaha should do something similar to our riverfront from the ped bridge down past Leavenworth.
I hope they focus on getting a new anchor there, such as a museum or substantial band shell venue, not another restaurant/bar. Covering the railroad tracks in a tunnel would help too. Duluth covered parts of I-35 between their downtown and the lake front to open it up. Omaha should do something similar to our riverfront from the ped bridge down past Leavenworth.
Last edited by GetUrban on Wed Sep 21, 2016 12:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
...and then they were gone.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Food trucks where there should be a landmark facility is like putting a trailer park where there should be a museum.
15-17, 26, 32
-
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 11:13 am
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Build a year-round destination attraction like a Science and Industry Museum.... look to Chicago, Baltimore and Seattle as inspiration on how to develop a waterfront. San Diego did:
http://www.sandiegomagazine.com/San-Die ... aterfront/
http://www.sandiegomagazine.com/San-Die ... aterfront/
- TitosBuritoBarn
- Planning Board
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 7:08 pm
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
It's unfortunate that it seems everyone who goes into the river gets swept under and drowns, so that limits a lot of the activities that can take place there. That and the contamination. I think the initial idea of a boardwalk, event space, and restaurants was the right direction, but poorly executed. It's not enough to draw a lot of people down there frequently. It's far away from everything and difficult to get to. People are lazy. There needs to be more residential and commercial space provided and more activities and landmarks or "weenies" to visit. Capping the railroad is a must or it'll continue with a disjointed feeling.
"Video game violence is not a new problem. Who could forget in the wake of SimCity how children everywhere took up urban planning." - Stephen Colbert
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
google map
As Titos mentions, it's far away and difficult to get to. Also, the back side of the CLink is horrible from a pedestrian POV. So the right move would be building something over/near the tracks and re-configuring access to the riverfront. I'm in favor of small buildings under the highway and opening pop-up restaurants, bike rentals, whatever that can open/close according to the weather.
Fook it, I say just build a new children's museum on the riverfront.
Hartford, CT's new museum does a fantastic job of tying their downtown to their riverfront, and that's with a highway running past it.
As Titos mentions, it's far away and difficult to get to. Also, the back side of the CLink is horrible from a pedestrian POV. So the right move would be building something over/near the tracks and re-configuring access to the riverfront. I'm in favor of small buildings under the highway and opening pop-up restaurants, bike rentals, whatever that can open/close according to the weather.
Fook it, I say just build a new children's museum on the riverfront.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
I'd just be happy with something like this.
http://www.sciowa.org/
http://www.sciowa.org/
15-17, 26, 32
- nativeomahan
- County Board
- Posts: 5366
- Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:46 pm
- Location: Omaha and Puerto Vallarta
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Omaha could use a science museum. And a Museum of Modern Art. Something like that would attract people to this riverfront location, because they would be "one of a kind" tourist attractions not replicated elsewhere.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
I totally agree with the museum idea! We already have an art museum (Joslyn) and a modern art museum (Kaneko), so I'm thinking a science museum would be PERFECT! Given the war on science that's happening in the country this would be a great way to reach out to the community at large. You could also have partnerships with the universities. :-)
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
How limited are they with the type of building that can go up, due to the way they capped the contaminated soil?
Greg
Greg
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Building would be limited to the former Ricks/Storz building footprint and footing areas. Or new spot excavations through the cap and removal of contaminated soil and re-sealing around new footings/pilings could be done in an expanded area. Wholesale removal of all of the contamination would be the best thing, but I haven't heard what that might cost. In any case, it's an added cost that limits feasibility. The Ricks/Storz building footings could have just been shallow spread footings sitting on top of the cap, but a more substantial building might require deeper footings, even to the bedrock 40' below.Greg S wrote:How limited are they with the type of building that can go up, due to the way they capped the contaminated soil?
Greg
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
...and then they were gone.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
This is an excellent idea. A new children's museum with a splash park/playground maybe. This makes it a year-round destination and guarantees foot traffic. Not to mention a nice fit with the Lewis & Clark Trail Visitor Center.nebraska wrote:google mapHartford, CT's new museum does a fantastic job of tying their downtown to their riverfront, and that's with a highway running past it.
As Titos mentions, it's far away and difficult to get to. Also, the back side of the CLink is horrible from a pedestrian POV. So the right move would be building something over/near the tracks and re-configuring access to the riverfront. I'm in favor of small buildings under the highway and opening pop-up restaurants, bike rentals, whatever that can open/close according to the weather.
Fook it, I say just build a new children's museum on the riverfront.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
I heard something really big is churning behind the scenes. Like 9 digit budget big.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Doubt it, not enough room for a suburban mixed use development.
15-17, 26, 32
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Completely redoing the cap??iamjacobm wrote:I heard something really big is churning behind the scenes. Like 9 digit budget big.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.
The Bride
The Bride
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm kind of hoping it's an arena.iamjacobm wrote:I heard something really big is churning behind the scenes. Like 9 digit budget big.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
With state of the art parking lots.NEDodger wrote:I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm kind of hoping it's an arena.iamjacobm wrote:I heard something really big is churning behind the scenes. Like 9 digit budget big.
When fortune smiles on something as violent and ugly as revenge, it seems proof like no other that not only does God exist, you're doing his will.
The Bride
The Bride
-
- Library Board
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:57 pm
- Location: Omaha Metro Area
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
They are building a dedicated swimming arena to be used once every 4 years for the Olympic Swim Trials. The city is taking on 2 billion in new bond debt to finance. Announcement coming soon.
- TitosBuritoBarn
- Planning Board
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 7:08 pm
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Concession choices will include Omahans' beloved Dunkin Donuts and Chik Fil A. Something for breakfast, something for lunch, dead if heart attack by dinner.
"Video game violence is not a new problem. Who could forget in the wake of SimCity how children everywhere took up urban planning." - Stephen Colbert
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
A new basketball arena to attract lucrative NBA preseason games.
Verbum Domini Manet in Aeternum
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
And they will build it facing the wrong way, making it harder for the swimmers to swim, creating incredibly long finishing times.Joe_Sovereign wrote:They are building a dedicated swimming arena to be used once every 4 years for the Olympic Swim Trials. The city is taking on 2 billion in new bond debt to finance. Announcement coming soon.
- PotatoeEatsFish
- Human Relations
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 11:59 pm
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
iamjacobm wrote:I heard something really big is churning behind the scenes. Like 9 digit budget big.
My mega ferris wheel is getting built!
#SaveTheUglyGrainSilos2024
-
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:45 pm
- Location: Omaha Metro Area
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Splash park? That's for wimps. Grow them kids up right. into the river they go.....choke wrote:This is an excellent idea. A new children's museum with a splash park/playground maybe. This makes it a year-round destination and guarantees foot traffic. Not to mention a nice fit with the Lewis & Clark Trail Visitor Center.nebraska wrote:google mapHartford, CT's new museum does a fantastic job of tying their downtown to their riverfront, and that's with a highway running past it.
As Titos mentions, it's far away and difficult to get to. Also, the back side of the CLink is horrible from a pedestrian POV. So the right move would be building something over/near the tracks and re-configuring access to the riverfront. I'm in favor of small buildings under the highway and opening pop-up restaurants, bike rentals, whatever that can open/close according to the weather.
Fook it, I say just build a new children's museum on the riverfront.
-
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2959
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:48 pm
- Location: Beyond Thunderdome
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Ohhhh this made me laugh. Thanks bigred for the laugh this morningbigredmed wrote:Splash park? That's for wimps. Grow them kids up right. into the river they go.....choke wrote:This is an excellent idea. A new children's museum with a splash park/playground maybe. This makes it a year-round destination and guarantees foot traffic. Not to mention a nice fit with the Lewis & Clark Trail Visitor Center.nebraska wrote:google mapHartford, CT's new museum does a fantastic job of tying their downtown to their riverfront, and that's with a highway running past it.
As Titos mentions, it's far away and difficult to get to. Also, the back side of the CLink is horrible from a pedestrian POV. So the right move would be building something over/near the tracks and re-configuring access to the riverfront. I'm in favor of small buildings under the highway and opening pop-up restaurants, bike rentals, whatever that can open/close according to the weather.
Fook it, I say just build a new children's museum on the riverfront.
No posts exist for this topic
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
iamjacobm wrote:I heard something really big is churning behind the scenes. Like 9 digit budget big.
You serious Clark?
Go Cubs Go
-
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 1:58 pm
- Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
FINALLY!!!!iamjacobm wrote:I heard something really big is churning behind the scenes. Like 9 digit budget big.
"In Heaven there is no beer. That's why we drink it here." -Plato (Probably. No one is really sure.)
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
I wish they would turn the Gene Leahy mall into something similar to the San Antonio Riverwalk with shops and restaurants surrounding it. This "riverwalk" would encourage companies and businesses to build around the park and right in the middle of downtown to be close to new and walkable entertainment options for their employees (hopefully at least replacing the red box building and library). The "riverwalk" could also connect to and continue around Heartland of America Park with additional restaurants, rowhouses and condos. This would also provide a grand entrance and connection to the new riverfront development, which would hopefully be complimentary and an attraction in itself. I realize these are pie-in-the-sky dreams but something needs to be dramatically done to attract businesses, tourism and development to downtown Omaha. Otherwise we will keep seeing businesses like ConAgra, HDR and others look elsewhere. We need big ideas that stand out and become the envy of other cities. Come on Warren, please help us out!
- PotatoeEatsFish
- Human Relations
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 11:59 pm
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Lets say you got a billion dollars to build whatever you wanted on the riverfront, what would it be?
Personally I would build a observation tower, like 1,000 feet to the tip.
It wouldn't take up much land but it would still create a destination.
Maybe put some condo buildings around it and build over the railroad to make a park.
Personally I would build a observation tower, like 1,000 feet to the tip.
It wouldn't take up much land but it would still create a destination.
Maybe put some condo buildings around it and build over the railroad to make a park.
#SaveTheUglyGrainSilos2024
- Busguy2010
- County Board
- Posts: 5343
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
- Location: North Central Omaha
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
That's a very realistic site plan, nothing grandiose really. The Observation tower may be a bit out there, but not so much really. If anything, I'd put the observation tower on the south side and have the condos next to each other. But I like it. Do it!
-
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:44 pm
- Location: Omaha
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Whatever happens in this area will ideally flow with the development just west of Century and with any development that occurs on the land that ConAgra is vacating. Massive condo buildings and an observation tower don't really make for a more livable downtown. Both areas (ConAgra and the riverfront) provide the city with an incredible opportunity to promote an area that is dense, walkable, green, and which has dedicated infrastructure for alternative forms of transportation, such as cycling (just look at what Lincoln has done, which is a great start). The best "big city" neighborhoods are not full of massive 1,000 ft structures. They are occupied by small dwellings and buildings which are usually not much taller than 5 stories, such as The Old Market; and consider what is happening on Farnam St. with the Blackstone District.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
It's alive:The Lormung Lo Lagoon Lives!!!tpaine wrote:I wish they would turn the Gene Leahy mall into something similar to the San Antonio Riverwalk with shops and restaurants surrounding it. This "riverwalk" would encourage companies and businesses to build around the park and right in the middle of downtown to be close to new and walkable entertainment options for their employees (hopefully at least replacing the red box building and library). The "riverwalk" could also connect to and continue around Heartland of America Park with additional restaurants, rowhouses and condos. This would also provide a grand entrance and connection to the new riverfront development, which would hopefully be complimentary and an attraction in itself. I realize these are pie-in-the-sky dreams but something needs to be dramatically done to attract businesses, tourism and development to downtown Omaha. Otherwise we will keep seeing businesses like ConAgra, HDR and others look elsewhere. We need big ideas that stand out and become the envy of other cities. Come on Warren, please help us out!
My old signature got too old. So old it was getting almost as old me as me. Yeah, it was up there in years.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
This was actually the original plan for Gene Leahy and HoAP back in the day. Unfortunately it didn't work out like that.tpaine wrote:I wish they would turn the Gene Leahy mall into something similar to the San Antonio Riverwalk with shops and restaurants surrounding it. This "riverwalk" would encourage companies and businesses to build around the park and right in the middle of downtown to be close to new and walkable entertainment options for their employees (hopefully at least replacing the red box building and library). The "riverwalk" could also connect to and continue around Heartland of America Park with additional restaurants, rowhouses and condos. This would also provide a grand entrance and connection to the new riverfront development, which would hopefully be complimentary and an attraction in itself. I realize these are pie-in-the-sky dreams but something needs to be dramatically done to attract businesses, tourism and development to downtown Omaha. Otherwise we will keep seeing businesses like ConAgra, HDR and others look elsewhere. We need big ideas that stand out and become the envy of other cities. Come on Warren, please help us out!
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
I think we need to be careful. Expansion for the sake of expansion is never a good idea. How about we let the existing downtown businesses earn a living before we add more taxes and government sponsored competition. Sure an awesome riverfront would be cool, but not at the cost of the rest of downtown. You could spend a minimal amount of money on a building, just bathrooms and a couple of bays for concessions. Then just use the whole area for an outdoor events space.
-
- Human Relations
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 1:16 pm
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Warren will never give this city any money. He indirectly gives us revenue by having his meeting here though.tpaine wrote:I wish they would turn the Gene Leahy mall into something similar to the San Antonio Riverwalk with shops and restaurants surrounding it. This "riverwalk" would encourage companies and businesses to build around the park and right in the middle of downtown to be close to new and walkable entertainment options for their employees (hopefully at least replacing the red box building and library). The "riverwalk" could also connect to and continue around Heartland of America Park with additional restaurants, rowhouses and condos. This would also provide a grand entrance and connection to the new riverfront development, which would hopefully be complimentary and an attraction in itself. I realize these are pie-in-the-sky dreams but something needs to be dramatically done to attract businesses, tourism and development to downtown Omaha. Otherwise we will keep seeing businesses like ConAgra, HDR and others look elsewhere. We need big ideas that stand out and become the envy of other cities. Come on Warren, please help us out!
So let me get this straight. You want to take a nice park with greenspace, bulldoze all the greenspace, and build buildings?
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
I don't believe I said "bulldoze all the greenspace." Keep some for sure. But I believe (in my totally uneducated non-developer opinion) there is room for both.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
MTO wrote:Food trucks where there should be a landmark facility is like putting a trailer park where there should be a museum.
Little late to the party here but you can do a lot with food trucks. I have been to this several times. There is a day version and there is a night version with bands and booze. Might be a temporary fix but don't sell a circle of food trucks short.
https://offthegrid.com/
- Omaha_Gabe
- Human Relations
- Posts: 731
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:22 pm
- Location: Midtown Crossings
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Late to the party as well but as iv'e stated before I think it would be great to create a "family" area. A small park, explora science center, great wolf lodge, move the childrens museum, and perhaps a rain forest cafe.
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
or Lolla-pa-foodza Festival..blueblood wrote:MTO wrote:Food trucks where there should be a landmark facility is like putting a trailer park where there should be a museum.
Little late to the party here but you can do a lot with food trucks. I have been to this several times. There is a day version and there is a night version with bands and booze. Might be a temporary fix but don't sell a circle of food trucks short.
https://offthegrid.com/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_Truckin%27
15-17, 26, 32
- PotatoeEatsFish
- Human Relations
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 11:59 pm
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
I think quite the opposite, let's make a red light district. Brothels up and down the riverside with pot stores in between. If KC gets to be the "Paris of the Midwest" let's be the Amsterdam!Omaha_Gabe wrote:Late to the party as well but as iv'e stated before I think it would be great to create a "family" area. A small park, explora science center, great wolf lodge, move the childrens museum, and perhaps a rain forest cafe.
#SaveTheUglyGrainSilos2024
-
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:45 pm
- Location: Omaha Metro Area
Re: Riverfront Development (Rick's & Storz area)
Go back in time to the burnt district. The land that the Qwest center is on now, used to have dozens of 1 room cabins that hookers used to ply their trade. From the bluffs where the gold coast homes were, the brakemen's lights made the area look like coals burning in a fireplace at night.PotatoeEatsFish wrote:I think quite the opposite, let's make a red light district. Brothels up and down the riverside with pot stores in between. If KC gets to be the "Paris of the Midwest" let's be the Amsterdam!Omaha_Gabe wrote:Late to the party as well but as iv'e stated before I think it would be great to create a "family" area. A small park, explora science center, great wolf lodge, move the childrens museum, and perhaps a rain forest cafe.