OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

The Political decisions of Omaha.

Moderators: Brad, nebugeater, Coyote, Omaha Cowboy

User avatar
Silverspoon
New to the Neighborhood
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:05 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby Silverspoon » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:09 am

I heard tonight that the last two candidates withdrew from the race at the same time leaving OPS with no immediate candidates to choose from. What is scaring candidates off? What are their biggest tasks that they are going to face after being appointed?

User avatar
Omababe
Planning Board
Posts: 2125
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:47 am
Contact:

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby Omababe » Sun Mar 19, 2017 6:33 am

My guess is the market is more competitive and they found greener pastures to pursue. Perhaps some of their current districts offered to pay them to stay maybe?

bigredmed
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1838
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:45 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby bigredmed » Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:41 am

Omababe wrote:My guess is the market is more competitive and they found greener pastures to pursue. Perhaps some of their current districts offered to pay them to stay maybe?


Both of these are likely. Honestly, if you were really good at that job, and an offer came in from a school district with serious structural issues, an obstructionist teachers union, a school board who took 127 votes to determine who got to chair the board, and thinks nothing is odd about that, and when a school board member wanted compensation data, was told by the admin bureaucracy that he was not entitled to it; would you even apply? I would round file that before it got to room temperature.

User avatar
jessep28
Planning Board
Posts: 2288
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby jessep28 » Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:38 am

The fact that both finalists simultaneously dropped out and released a joint statement seems to suggest they no longer wanted to deal with the board and/or administration.
Verbum Domini Manet in Aeternum

mistergutierrez
New to the Neighborhood
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:28 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby mistergutierrez » Sun Mar 19, 2017 1:14 pm

During many years the board did not properly oversight the school administration, that´s why John Mackiel left with $1M in compensation while student achievement was beyond depressing. Now the Board is in the completely other side, which causes frequent clashes between BoE and superintendent.

I don't think it´s a matter of money. OPS is three times the size of their original districts and they salary here is quite high comparing to other similar size school districts. Mumin is well appreciated in his district, while Gausman not so much due to budget cuts and increase in class sizes. However, in my opinion, the message it´s pretty clear: "We don´t want to work with a BoE that is going to convert each decision into a fight", and the cause it´s the vast differences inside the board.

I do not want a board that votes unanimously 100% of the times, disagreement is good, but at this moment the board has converted the district decision making process in a war of trenches.

User avatar
Omababe
Planning Board
Posts: 2125
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:47 am
Contact:

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby Omababe » Mon Mar 20, 2017 5:33 am

jessep28 wrote:The fact that both finalists simultaneously dropped out and released a joint statement seems to suggest they no longer wanted to deal with the board and/or administration.


The impression I got from the Talking Heads yesterday is that both of them were more or less snubbed by the board and the headhunting firm told them they should withdraw. Is this incorrect?

User avatar
Uffda
Planning Board
Posts: 2933
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby Uffda » Mon Mar 20, 2017 6:06 am

Omababe wrote:
jessep28 wrote:The fact that both finalists simultaneously dropped out and released a joint statement seems to suggest they no longer wanted to deal with the board and/or administration.


The impression I got from the Talking Heads yesterday is that both of them were more or less snubbed by the board and the headhunting firm told them they should withdraw. Is this incorrect?


Based on one board member quote I saw in the paper that might be true at least the first part might be true.

User avatar
Omaha Cowboy
The Don
Posts: 5797
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:31 am
Location: West Omaha

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby Omaha Cowboy » Mon Mar 20, 2017 12:25 pm

jessep28 wrote:The fact that both finalists simultaneously dropped out and released a joint statement seems to suggest they no longer wanted to deal with the board and/or administration.


Agreed. It's an embarrassment..

In this case, I'm in complete agreement with the W-H editorial regarding this matter from the Sunday paper...

Ciao..LiO...Peace
Go Cowboys!

User avatar
Uffda
Planning Board
Posts: 2933
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby Uffda » Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:53 pm

Omaha Cowboy wrote:
jessep28 wrote:The fact that both finalists simultaneously dropped out and released a joint statement seems to suggest they no longer wanted to deal with the board and/or administration.


Agreed. It's an embarrassment..

In this case, I'm in complete agreement with the W-H editorial regarding this matter from the Sunday paper...

Ciao..LiO...Peace


I agree they should pause but as to Mr. Evans if I remember correctly he was in 'cut' his contract short for family reasons - so he might not want to stay.

Also as to all his 'accomplishments' I dislike seeing someone getting credit for some things that they had little to do with.... but that's just me.

User avatar
Omaha Cowboy
The Don
Posts: 5797
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:31 am
Location: West Omaha

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby Omaha Cowboy » Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:42 pm

Uffda wrote:
Omaha Cowboy wrote:
jessep28 wrote:The fact that both finalists simultaneously dropped out and released a joint statement seems to suggest they no longer wanted to deal with the board and/or administration.


Agreed. It's an embarrassment..

In this case, I'm in complete agreement with the W-H editorial regarding this matter from the Sunday paper...

Ciao..LiO...Peace


I agree they should pause but as to Mr. Evans if I remember correctly he was in 'cut' his contract short for family reasons - so he might not want to stay.

Also as to all his 'accomplishments' I dislike seeing someone getting credit for some things that they had little to do with.... but that's just me.


My sister has worked for OPS for 16 years. She told me Sunday the opinion many have within the district for Mr. Evans is pretty milk-toast..

The W-H editorial piece sure seemed to pro-slant his many 'accomplishments' over the past 3 years that's for sure...

Ciao..LiO...Peace
Go Cowboys!

User avatar
Uffda
Planning Board
Posts: 2933
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby Uffda » Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:12 am

Omaha Cowboy wrote:
My sister has worked for OPS for 16 years. She told me Sunday the opinion many have within the district for Mr. Evans is pretty milk-toast..

The W-H editorial piece sure seemed to pro-slant his many 'accomplishments' over the past 3 years that's for sure...

Ciao..LiO...Peace


:cheers:

User avatar
nebugeater
County Board
Posts: 5762
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby nebugeater » Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:28 am

Omababe wrote:My guess is the market is more competitive and they found greener pastures to pursue. Perhaps some of their current districts offered to pay them to stay maybe?


I don't think either are the case in this situation.
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!

User avatar
nebugeater
County Board
Posts: 5762
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Re: OPS Superintendent opening down to 0 again

Postby nebugeater » Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:21 am

Pretty pointed comments by the candidate from Pennsylvania

http://www.omaha.com/news/education/ove ... 6dbec.html


"The uncertainty, that's what it was," Mumin later said to the Eagle. "Here in Reading, there's no uncertainty. We work together. It's not an atmosphere of aggression or political grandstanding, and that's important to me."



"The uncertainty, that's what it was," Mumin later said to the Eagle. "Here in Reading, there's no uncertainty. We work together. It's not an atmosphere of aggression or political grandstanding, and that's important to me."



In his email, Mumin said he didn't believe OPS leaders "have the best interest of kids in their actions."
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!


Return to “Omaha Metro Area Government”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest