Pinnacle / Swanson Site (10th and Capitol)
Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss
- Omaha Cowboy
- The Don
- Posts: 1013183
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:31 am
- Location: West Omaha
I like the idea of the streetcar jumping over to 11th for a few reasons.
10th st has more car traffic on it, Omaha by Design showed 11th getting the brick restored and being a true ped friendly street. Also, I want my 11th st ped bridge through the GLM to happen.
With it going over to 11th through the Swanson site also puts it right on that empty block between 11th and 12th, Capitol and Dodge, which makes that instantly hot property as well.
As far as going south with a future extension of the streetcar, I've stated my preference for going down 13th over 10th. Flatter route, goes by Sokal, and the other buildings along 13th (think around Boheimian cafe) is a better area to boom after streetcar.
Don't get me wrong, if they decide to build down 10th, I won't object.
Anyways, someone needs to step up to the plate on the Swanson site. That hotel anchored tower needs to happen!
10th st has more car traffic on it, Omaha by Design showed 11th getting the brick restored and being a true ped friendly street. Also, I want my 11th st ped bridge through the GLM to happen.
With it going over to 11th through the Swanson site also puts it right on that empty block between 11th and 12th, Capitol and Dodge, which makes that instantly hot property as well.
As far as going south with a future extension of the streetcar, I've stated my preference for going down 13th over 10th. Flatter route, goes by Sokal, and the other buildings along 13th (think around Boheimian cafe) is a better area to boom after streetcar.
Don't get me wrong, if they decide to build down 10th, I won't object.
Anyways, someone needs to step up to the plate on the Swanson site. That hotel anchored tower needs to happen!
I like Brad's signature photo. I've had an idea for awhile. I would like to see a skyscraper on the swanson site with a similar design as the red steel markers at the corner of 10th and Cuming.
Something like:
http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=119425
or
http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=121138
Just dreaming .
Something like:
http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=119425
or
http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=121138
Just dreaming .
To Growth! When do we get a Supertall!
Zed
Zed
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
Swanson Site discussion
Speaking of the Swanson site, I was talking with someone last night who worked on schemes for the Swanson site and let's just say I left very disappointed after having talked with him.
His architectural firm worked on a design for the Swanson site that would have included a combination of office, apartment, and retail space. Â There were commitments from both retailers and businesses. Â The two retailers that had signed on were Borsheims and Nebraska Furniture Mart. Â They were both going to open up smaller scaled stores in order to satisfy the needs/wants of the new customers down there.
Then it all fell through because Swanson wanted way more than the developers were willing to pay. Â I asked him if there was going to be any potential development on that site and he said 'no, because no one will pay what they want for the site.' Â Swanson can charge as much as they want right now just because they know that is a prime space for re-development.
(Copied from the other thread)
I know the city had high hopes and specific plans for this site. I'm not at all to hear about the mixed use nature of the site since this is what the city was asking for. It's disappointing to know that we probably could have had something being built now if not for the high price of the site. Does anyone know what it's going for? And as Jeff said this would be the perfect time for emminant domain. The city stands to miss out on big bucks once Phase 1 of the streetcar rolls past here if Swanson is still holding out.
His architectural firm worked on a design for the Swanson site that would have included a combination of office, apartment, and retail space. Â There were commitments from both retailers and businesses. Â The two retailers that had signed on were Borsheims and Nebraska Furniture Mart. Â They were both going to open up smaller scaled stores in order to satisfy the needs/wants of the new customers down there.
Then it all fell through because Swanson wanted way more than the developers were willing to pay. Â I asked him if there was going to be any potential development on that site and he said 'no, because no one will pay what they want for the site.' Â Swanson can charge as much as they want right now just because they know that is a prime space for re-development.
(Copied from the other thread)
I know the city had high hopes and specific plans for this site. I'm not at all to hear about the mixed use nature of the site since this is what the city was asking for. It's disappointing to know that we probably could have had something being built now if not for the high price of the site. Does anyone know what it's going for? And as Jeff said this would be the perfect time for emminant domain. The city stands to miss out on big bucks once Phase 1 of the streetcar rolls past here if Swanson is still holding out.
DTO
Not specifically on topic, but more of a development-centric incentive idea...
The city needs to pass tax legislation that immediately assesses your property at your asking price if it's been sitting unsold for more than 120 days. Â
When an assumed project like this is being held up because of greedy or unrealistic landowners (Swanson, the Postal Annex, the parking lot on 12th and Harney with the Diner) asking WAY too much for their land. Â Property owners would have to seriously consider asking fair market prcies if they knew they were going to have to start paying taxes on a $2.3 million slab of concrete that won't sell. Â The 120 day window would allow them to test the market, but "forces" them to reasses their asking price. Â If they balk about it being assessed that high, the city can just say "Hey, we're going off YOUR assessment... Thanks for doing our job for us. Â We must have missed something in our drive-by review."
Any thoughts?
-Big E
The city needs to pass tax legislation that immediately assesses your property at your asking price if it's been sitting unsold for more than 120 days. Â
When an assumed project like this is being held up because of greedy or unrealistic landowners (Swanson, the Postal Annex, the parking lot on 12th and Harney with the Diner) asking WAY too much for their land. Â Property owners would have to seriously consider asking fair market prcies if they knew they were going to have to start paying taxes on a $2.3 million slab of concrete that won't sell. Â The 120 day window would allow them to test the market, but "forces" them to reasses their asking price. Â If they balk about it being assessed that high, the city can just say "Hey, we're going off YOUR assessment... Thanks for doing our job for us. Â We must have missed something in our drive-by review."
Any thoughts?
-Big E
Stable genius.
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
Big E, that sounds FANTASTIC. Â I wish the city would do something like that.
And Brad, get off it already. Â There's value in a new thread, a fresh slate for discussion. Â Again, just because it has to do with a similar subject doesn't mean it has to be a part of that discussion, especially one that ENDED two years ago! Â I see the need for thread consolidation if there are two threads pretty much running parallel at the same time and discussing the same thing, but if a new discussion develops in a new thread, it is UNIQUE, and if a thread hasn't been visited in years, it is DEAD.
And Brad, get off it already. Â There's value in a new thread, a fresh slate for discussion. Â Again, just because it has to do with a similar subject doesn't mean it has to be a part of that discussion, especially one that ENDED two years ago! Â I see the need for thread consolidation if there are two threads pretty much running parallel at the same time and discussing the same thing, but if a new discussion develops in a new thread, it is UNIQUE, and if a thread hasn't been visited in years, it is DEAD.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
That's a Big E original as far as I know.
Seems to make perfect sense and would be horribly easy to accomplish. Â I mean, how could someone legitimately claim their property was being overvalued by the city if the city was using the owner's own asking price for valuation?
Are you listening City Council??!?!?! Â Actually, I might have to send off an email on that one...
-Big E
Seems to make perfect sense and would be horribly easy to accomplish. Â I mean, how could someone legitimately claim their property was being overvalued by the city if the city was using the owner's own asking price for valuation?
Are you listening City Council??!?!?! Â Actually, I might have to send off an email on that one...
-Big E
Stable genius.
You guys just want to start a new thread so you can argue about the same |expletive| over again.StreetsOfOmaha wrote:Big E, that sounds FANTASTIC. I wish the city would do something like that.
And Brad, get off it already. There's value in a new thread, a fresh slate for discussion. Again, just because it has to do with a similar subject doesn't mean it has to be a part of that discussion, especially one that ENDED two years ago! I see the need for thread consolidation if there are two threads pretty much running parallel at the same time and discussing the same thing, but if a new discussion develops in a new thread, it is UNIQUE, and if a thread hasn't been visited in years, it is DEAD.
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
-
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 12:29 pm
- Location: Omaha
DTO Luv, I posted the price for the property just over two years ago on a thread titled "Pinnacle Foods". Â The information I had back then was "3.24 acres and includes two small parcels that are in the parking lot across the street. The listing price is $6,332,580. The estimated price for the demolition is around $1.2M." Â As mentioned that information is old, and the details may be much different now.
Anyone heard anything new on the Swanson site lately?
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
You may have to give this thread mouth-to-mouth, Brad. Â Meanwhile, if you're interested in a CURRENT discussion of the Swanson site, there's a thread started here:Brad wrote:Anyone heard anything new on the Swanson site lately?
http://eomahaforums.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=5856
 :;):  :;):  :;):  :;):
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
Well, Big E, your idea is BRILLIANT.
And Brad, as someone already said, I don't see anyone "arguing" anything.
I'm just pointing out, that this thread was started, and if the other old thread was more pertinent, this thread would die and people would continue to post over there. And besides, to just tell everyone to "continue the discussion over at the old thread" completely discounts all the legitimate comments that have already been made in the new thread, and the evolving discussion that they constitute.
And Brad, as someone already said, I don't see anyone "arguing" anything.
I'm just pointing out, that this thread was started, and if the other old thread was more pertinent, this thread would die and people would continue to post over there. And besides, to just tell everyone to "continue the discussion over at the old thread" completely discounts all the legitimate comments that have already been made in the new thread, and the evolving discussion that they constitute.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Aaron, and Everyone
I am not trying to be Difficult. Â We are all here for the same reason, we love Omaha.
I look at this form as an Omaha Resource. Â I hope that when people make decisions about Omaha they check out "our" forum. Â I think that it is easier and people get the full story if they can look under one topic on a "broad" subject and get the full story. Â
In the case of this thread, I would hope that people can look up "Pinnacle Foods" or "Swanson Site" and get one thread with everything. Â In the old thread there were a lot of good Ideas that people on this time took their time to think up and draw up. Â I would hope that an outside developer might look at this thread and decide there are so many possibilities with this site and we can get a GREAT new development.
I hope that we can all work together to make Omaha and surrounding areas a great place.
Sincerely,
Brad Williams
I am not trying to be Difficult. Â We are all here for the same reason, we love Omaha.
I look at this form as an Omaha Resource. Â I hope that when people make decisions about Omaha they check out "our" forum. Â I think that it is easier and people get the full story if they can look under one topic on a "broad" subject and get the full story. Â
In the case of this thread, I would hope that people can look up "Pinnacle Foods" or "Swanson Site" and get one thread with everything. Â In the old thread there were a lot of good Ideas that people on this time took their time to think up and draw up. Â I would hope that an outside developer might look at this thread and decide there are so many possibilities with this site and we can get a GREAT new development.
I hope that we can all work together to make Omaha and surrounding areas a great place.
Sincerely,
Brad Williams
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
Please check out that other thread, I tried to explain myself.StreetsOfOmaha wrote:You may have to give this thread mouth-to-mouth, Brad. Meanwhile, if you're interested in a CURRENT discussion of the Swanson site, there's a thread started here:Brad wrote:Anyone heard anything new on the Swanson site lately?
http://eomahaforums.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=5856
:;): :;): :;): :;):
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
-
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 1:58 pm
- Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Actually, that very concept was tossed around a couple of years ago in CB. Â When Lewis Central School District built its new HS at Hwy 92 and 275, for some INEXPLICABLE reason, they didn't buy all of the land all the way up to the corner...so they went about their merry way building a state-of-the-art HS, and then suddenly noticed that the owner of the land sitting adjacent to the HS site had proposed building a self-storage facility (you've all seen them countless times...U-G-L-Y!).Big E wrote:That's a Big E original as far as I know.
Seems to make perfect sense and would be horribly easy to accomplish. I mean, how could someone legitimately claim their property was being overvalued by the city if the city was using the owner's own asking price for valuation?
Are you listening City Council??!?!?! Actually, I might have to send off an email on that one...
-Big E
Anyway, the guy that owned the land offered to sell it to the LC School District...at about 4 times its assessed value. Â Many on the school board, in the administration, and within Lewis Township and City of Council Bluffs leadership wanted to take the tack you suggested...and tell the guy, "Okay, you want to say your land is worth 1.2M when the county has assessed it at 300k...that's fine by us. Â We'll just charge you property taxes on your self-assessment. Â Good luck with that. Â Oh, and when you come into default because you can't pay your taxes, we'll just take your land, lock, stock, and barrel." Â
But for whatever reason (probably because they didn't really have a legal leg to stand on at the time), they never attempted that tactic. Â And now, the premier high school in southwest Iowa has a big, ugly, eyesore of a storage facility out in front of it. Â
Granted, it was the school districts own idiotic failing in not securing ALL of the land when it had the chance originally, but it certainly opened a lot of eyes to the problem of over-inflated valuations by land owners and what could be done to abort such a trend.
Value and worth are purely subjective when it comes to assessing property for taxation. Â I have sold two primary residences in the past six years (in MN and MD) and not one of them was assessed close to what I paid for it originally nor what I sold it for, nor is the one I currently own in NE.scraper wrote:Property needs to be assessed based on its actual value. The value an owner places on the property when they are selling property is not necessarily the actual value.
It is their property and they can ask what they want - but it doesn't mean that is what the property is worth.
When you state that you want $100 for something for a good, service or property, you have immediately placed a value on that item. Â Worth will be determined by the market... as in, will anyone pay that much for it?
-Big E
Stable genius.
Correct me if I am wrong, but if the city wanted to use eminent domain, wouldn't they have to pay pair market value. Â If so, then they would have to spend millions to tear it down and clean up the site.Swift wrote:OR the city should just go ahead and use eminent domain.
Probably not worth it to them.
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
-
- Human Relations
- Posts: 857
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 6:14 am
I think the city should get really tough on this property. Â The city of Omaha did $3 million in renovations to that plant in return Swanson agreed to keep the plant open for at least 2 years. Â I thought it was a huge mistake for Fahey to do this as I thought it was just stupid to invest city money to save 250 jobs for only a 2 year guarantee. Â So Swanson sells the plant and the new owners shut it down in less then a year. Â Â So now we have $3 million dollars wasted on a building that is just going to get torn down. Â The city should have invested $3 million dollars tearing it down and had they done that the the site would look much more inviting to development.
I'm not sure what all the city can do to force something along here. I do like Big E's idea about taxing them at what they say it's worth. I'm not certain how eminent domain works but it's something the city should consider.
Since the streetcar will be running next to here it would make sense for their plan to spur development by knocking this down.
Since the streetcar will be running next to here it would make sense for their plan to spur development by knocking this down.
DTO
The city purportedly plans to buy the Pinnacle site for $2.5M
http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2 ... id=2337371
Mayor Mike Fahey believes the more than three acres of prime downtown real-estate are too valuable to the city's future to leave to hodgepodge development, said Paul Landow, the mayor's chief of staff.
A private buyer has offered to purchase the remaining plant, where workers once produced Swanson frozen dinners.
City officials were particularly concerned that the private buyer's short-term plan is for surface parking lots. City officials saw no long-term development plans by the private buyer, Landow said.
The city is planning to put out a request for private development of the land. The parcel is large enough to include office buildings, hotels, retail and residential buildings, (planning directory) Jensen said.
http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2 ... id=2337371
Shoot for the Moon... if you miss, you'll land among the stars.
This is good news. Even though it is going to cost the city some money, I for one am glad that they are acquiring this parcel to control the development there. Surface parking IS NOT good enough.
How about someone builds this, only with one tower being a hotel.
http://www.keynotecalgary.com
How about someone builds this, only with one tower being a hotel.
http://www.keynotecalgary.com
About time. Â There better be something with some height to it!!!
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
Wow. Â I'm thrilled that the city is willing to step in and prevent this from becoming a parking lot. Â (We need to spend all that new Elkhorn money somewhere, I guess.)
It's still just a shame that they HAVE to step in to prevent that kind of "development". Â Why does it always seem like we're in prevention mode rather than progression mode?
-Big E
It's still just a shame that they HAVE to step in to prevent that kind of "development". Â Why does it always seem like we're in prevention mode rather than progression mode?
-Big E
Stable genius.
The private developer had no intention of turning the property into a parking lot. Â The developer is a local group who the city never even contacted to see what the developer might do on the lot. Â The sad thing is that the developer currently has a proposed project on the table for downtown Lincoln that would cost 30 million.
The proposed project in Lincoln will be mixed-use retail, condo, office.
All I can say is that the pinnacle property would have been nothing but 1st class...Hotel or mixed-use
The city is trying to make this look like a developer is going to come in and park cars???
Thus justifying spending 2.5 million in city funds...
I don.t get it?  Not only that  but the city will also lose the property tax on that property which is substantial when you consider the property is currently assessed at 6.5 million.
The proposed project in Lincoln will be mixed-use retail, condo, office.
All I can say is that the pinnacle property would have been nothing but 1st class...Hotel or mixed-use
The city is trying to make this look like a developer is going to come in and park cars???
Thus justifying spending 2.5 million in city funds...
I don.t get it?  Not only that  but the city will also lose the property tax on that property which is substantial when you consider the property is currently assessed at 6.5 million.
-
- Library Board
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 2:31 pm
- Location: Back in Omaha!
- OmahaJaysCU
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:00 pm
- Coyote
- City Council
- Posts: 33154
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
- Location: Aksarben Village
- Contact:
The operative words in that article may have been short term and long term. Apparently whoever was looking at this property would have had to clear the block - short term - but had not secured any tenants for the long term planning. It may have been a parking lot for several years. What I read into it is that the City wants someone to come in and develop it right away and not wait 4 or 5 years. They do not want it to stay off the tax role for very long at all. They want to aggresively get something on this block - something that they have more control over. This is prime property - an entrance to Omaha - a connection between North Downtown and the Old Market - so they have a serious vested interest on this land.