Don't worry that's all just the vocal minority. People who actually have a brain and care about the development of this city know just how amazing this day is. I was looking at the Kansas City forum and the Des Moines forum and they are all EXTREMELY jealous of this. Especially Kansas City. They don't have much in the realm of downtown HQ's. Now we have 3 skyscrapers that are local HQ's. That is actually pretty impressive. And now 2 of them will be taller and better looking than anything in KC or DSM.skinzfan23 wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:56 pm100% agree...when is the last time, if ever, that any of those people even stepped foot into that library? And its not like it is going away. It is just moving to a new site. And this is the biggest development in the city since the CHI Center was built almost 20 years ago.stormchaser wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:46 pmLol good grief, some of the Twitter comments to Mutual of Omaha about this project![]()
![]()
![]()
People act like the old downtown library was nice or something. I swear, some Omaha people will complain about ANYTHING. The reality is this development is the best thing to happen to Omaha in a long time...
Mutual of Omaha Tower (14th & Farnam)
-
kuzhouse
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:37 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
-
Vitruvius
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2019 5:11 am
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
One last CC agenda there was an item to approve 18million in TIF for the twin bricks facelift.skinzfan23 wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:21 pmI will gladly take this tower over the renovations to the CPP.Hawkeye wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:16 pmOmaha Cowboy wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:06 pmI was wondering when we’d get an ‘ol Hawkeye take on this developmentHawkeye wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:03 pm More like Mutual of OMG! Amirite people!? (*tapping microphone*) Is this thing on?…
Ciao..LiO…Peace![]()
If it ends up looking anything like that rendering, it'll be a real game-changer for downtown. That said, it begs several questions. First, what is likely to happen to the other/original Lanoha parcel? Secondly, will the folks involved in the Central Park Plaza retrofit still go forward with their aggressive plans. Unfortunately for them, this Mutual tower would totally obscure CPP from the traditional Omaha beauty shot.
-
stormchaser
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2018 1:14 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Do you post anything but negative/whiney stuff on here?? I mean honestly, you must be the life of the party everywhere you go.Vitruvius wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:06 pm What if it looks nothing like the concept? What if it ends up half as tall? It can't be a best thing until it materializes.
Of course it's the best thing even if it's half as tall and doesn't look like the concept. Over 4,000 employees are moving into the downtown core from one of Omaha's largest employers. That's GREAT news for the continued revitalization of downtown. A project like this will have a ripple effect that will likely last for decades with additional residential developments, likely additional commercial developments, etc.
Last edited by stormchaser on Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Vitruvius
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2019 5:11 am
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
It does have a tumescent quality, even with the MGM logo on top.BobbiDon wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 6:15 pm I obviously love this, though the base sort of creates phallic resemblance. Haha.
-
BobbiDon
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:54 am
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
If anyone has a link to the whole press conference, would you mind dropping it here ? I can’t seem to find anything.
Thanks!
Thanks!
-
Hawkeye
- Library Board
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:58 pm
- Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
That would be pretty amazing. But given the City's track record in general, and on that site in particular, let's just say Ol' Hawkeye ain't holdin' his breath on that one.Omaha Cowboy wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:25 pmTo your last question, I’d say I’m not sure. But if the new owner is true to his words, it could still be a go..Hawkeye wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:16 pmOmaha Cowboy wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:06 pmI was wondering when we’d get an ‘ol Hawkeye take on this developmentHawkeye wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:03 pm More like Mutual of OMG! Amirite people!? (*tapping microphone*) Is this thing on?…
Ciao..LiO…Peace![]()
If it ends up looking anything like that rendering, it'll be a real game-changer for downtown. That said, it begs several questions. First, what is likely to happen to the other/original Lanoha parcel? Secondly, will the folks involved in the Central Park Plaza retrofit still go forward with their aggressive plans. Unfortunately for them, this Mutual tower would totally obscure CPP from the traditional Omaha beauty shot.
To your first, since this was basically a parcel swap- Lanoha now owns the library site and is the developer for the Mutual Skyscraper- and the city now retrieved back ownership of the old UP site at 1401 Dodge from Lanoha- I’d say the sky (pardon the pun) is the limit. We know the Old UP parcel is “shovel ready”- with the city back in the drivers seat of owning that property again, I would not be surprised if we heard a significant development announcement on that land before the end of 2022…
Ciao..LiO…Peace
"In Heaven there is no beer. That's why we drink it here." -Plato (Probably. No one is really sure.)
-
Hawkeye
- Library Board
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:58 pm
- Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Cool! Thanks for sharing that. It's not an Earth-shattering development....but it's another brick in the foundation of a bigger, better DTO. (and yes, pun intended).Vitruvius wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:10 pm
One last CC agenda there was an item to approve 18million in TIF for the twin bricks facelift.
"In Heaven there is no beer. That's why we drink it here." -Plato (Probably. No one is really sure.)
-
ItsAllAboutMe
- Human Relations
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 12:14 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Question, was there any mention of what happens with the block in front (east) of the building? Will Mutual control what happens there? Will it be part of the overall MofO project?
-
almighty_tuna
- City Council
- Posts: 106417
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:34 pm
- Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Stothert brought that lot up and joked about developing something bigger to block the MofO tower. In jest, yes, but she did make it a point to say that block is available. My guess is that any development there will be minor in scale as not to obstruct MofO's money view from 10th St.ItsAllAboutMe wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:33 pm Question, was there any mention of what happens with the block in front (east) of the building? Will Mutual control what happens there? Will it be part of the overall MofO project?
-
RocaHusker
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:31 pm
Re: Mutual Rendering
Hopefully I'm doing this right...new to the forum (and not a photoshop whiz). Obviously the new building would be at an angle (maybe a little bit more to the left), but this gives an idea of location. Imagine the old UP location getting anything UP height or taller built there too.Garrett wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:48 pm Can someone with photoshop skills show the angle from the baseball stadium? That's how most of the country will see this after all.

-
ita
- County Board
- Posts: 4773
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
It would likely be limited to nothing taller than the parking garage. I would like to see multiple buildings on that site, so it also doesn't obstruct the new tower from GLM and east downtown. I guest it could be taller than the parking garage it anything built there was offset either to the north or south, or both ends.almighty_tuna wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:36 pmStothert brought that lot up and joked about developing something bigger to block the MofO tower. In jest, yes, but she did make it a point to say that block is available. My guess is that any development there will be minor in scale as not to obstruct MofO's money view from 10th St.ItsAllAboutMe wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:33 pm Question, was there any mention of what happens with the block in front (east) of the building? Will Mutual control what happens there? Will it be part of the overall MofO project?
-
ita
- County Board
- Posts: 4773
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm
Re: Mutual Rendering
Thanks for the photoshop. It would be nice to see what it would look like with even like 200 foot tower(s) at the UP site.RocaHusker wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:37 pmHopefully I'm doing this right...new to the forum (and not a photoshop whiz). Obviously the new building would be at an angle (maybe a little bit more to the left), but this gives an idea of location. Imagine the old UP location getting anything UP height or taller built there too.Garrett wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:48 pm Can someone with photoshop skills show the angle from the baseball stadium? That's how most of the country will see this after all.
![]()
-
skinzfan23
- City Council
- Posts: 11679
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 5:26 pm
- Location: Omaha/Bellevue
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Here is another building the rendering reminds me of in Atlanta: This one is 657 ft tall.


-
buildomaha
- Human Relations
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 12:06 am
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
https://www.facebook.com/wowt6news/vid ... 630201361/BobbiDon wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:16 pm If anyone has a link to the whole press conference, would you mind dropping it here ? I can’t seem to find anything.
Thanks!
#gohawks
-
Vitruvius
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2019 5:11 am
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Wow! Other than the Atlanta building's top having more flair and reach, they look identical.skinzfan23 wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:04 pm Here is another building the rendering reminds me of in Atlanta: This one is 657 ft tall.
![]()
-
OracleOfOmaha
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2021 7:16 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
The signage at the top makes it much worse and unacceptable...following your logicVitruvius wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:44 pmWow! Other than the Atlanta building's top having more flair and reach, they look identical.skinzfan23 wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:04 pm Here is another building the rendering reminds me of in Atlanta: This one is 657 ft tall.
![]()
![]()
-
Louie
- County Board
- Posts: 4972
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:23 pm
- Location: Dundee
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
He said 'reminds' him of it.Vitruvius wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:44 pmWow! Other than the Atlanta building's top having more flair and reach, they look identical.skinzfan23 wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:04 pm Here is another building the rendering reminds me of in Atlanta: This one is 657 ft tall.
![]()
![]()
-
Omaha Cowboy
- The Don
- Posts: 1013739
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 11:31 am
- Location: West Omaha
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Good eye..skinzfan23 wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:04 pm Here is another building the rendering reminds me of in Atlanta: This one is 657 ft tall.
![]()
I definitely see the resemblance
Ciao..LiO…Peace
Go Cowboys!
-
Omaha Cowboy
- The Don
- Posts: 1013739
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 11:31 am
- Location: West Omaha
Re: Mutual Rendering
Nice jobRocaHusker wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:37 pmHopefully I'm doing this right...new to the forum (and not a photoshop whiz). Obviously the new building would be at an angle (maybe a little bit more to the left), but this gives an idea of location. Imagine the old UP location getting anything UP height or taller built there too.Garrett wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:48 pm Can someone with photoshop skills show the angle from the baseball stadium? That's how most of the country will see this after all.
![]()
Looks good from that view…
Ciao..LIO…Peace
Go Cowboys!
-
Omaha Cowboy
- The Don
- Posts: 1013739
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 11:31 am
- Location: West Omaha
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Can’t argue with thatHawkeye wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:27 pmThat would be pretty amazing. But given the City's track record in general, and on that site in particular, let's just say Ol' Hawkeye ain't holdin' his breath on that one.Omaha Cowboy wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:25 pmTo your last question, I’d say I’m not sure. But if the new owner is true to his words, it could still be a go..Hawkeye wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:16 pmOmaha Cowboy wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:06 pmI was wondering when we’d get an ‘ol Hawkeye take on this developmentHawkeye wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:03 pm More like Mutual of OMG! Amirite people!? (*tapping microphone*) Is this thing on?…
Ciao..LiO…Peace![]()
If it ends up looking anything like that rendering, it'll be a real game-changer for downtown. That said, it begs several questions. First, what is likely to happen to the other/original Lanoha parcel? Secondly, will the folks involved in the Central Park Plaza retrofit still go forward with their aggressive plans. Unfortunately for them, this Mutual tower would totally obscure CPP from the traditional Omaha beauty shot.
To your first, since this was basically a parcel swap- Lanoha now owns the library site and is the developer for the Mutual Skyscraper- and the city now retrieved back ownership of the old UP site at 1401 Dodge from Lanoha- I’d say the sky (pardon the pun) is the limit. We know the Old UP parcel is “shovel ready”- with the city back in the drivers seat of owning that property again, I would not be surprised if we heard a significant development announcement on that land before the end of 2022…
Ciao..LiO…Peace![]()
Ciao..LiO…Peace
Go Cowboys!
-
Vitruvius
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2019 5:11 am
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
"much worse"? actually not. I said the Atlanta building has more flair and reach. It's actually graceful. Construction and materials are high quality too.OracleOfOmaha wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:57 pmThe signage at the top makes it much worse and unacceptable...following your logicVitruvius wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:44 pmWow! Other than the Atlanta building's top having more flair and reach, they look identical.skinzfan23 wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:04 pm Here is another building the rendering reminds me of in Atlanta: This one is 657 ft tall.
![]()
![]()
-
HskrFanMike
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:40 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
I don't think it's so much an attraction to the existing library as much as it's being relegated and downsized into an old warehouse south of the Old Market with limited access from public transportation. Critics would be more accepting if there was a commitment that something new and better is being prepared along the streetcar route downtown once this five year rental is complete.stormchaser wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:46 pm Lol good grief, some of the Twitter comments to Mutual of Omaha about this project![]()
![]()
![]()
People act like the old downtown library was nice or something. I swear, some Omaha people will complain about ANYTHING. The reality is this development is the best thing to happen to Omaha in a long time...
The fear is that that city leaders will look at the Jones Street Library's lack of use and say "it's not necessary" and simply close it down completely in five years. There's a lot of distrust following the discussions last fall between the Library board and Heritage Services. I'm not saying the Mutual tower is a bad idea at all; if it happens, it'll be a great addition to the city of Omaha. It's just that it shouldn't come at the expense of a public facility, and properly replacing the downtown library needs to be a much higher priority than it has been in these discussions. (Hint: the Jones Street warehouse is, at best, a temporary band-aid.)
-
Stan
- Library Board
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2020 1:55 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Vitruvius wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:16 amConstruction and materials are high quality too.OracleOfOmaha wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:57 pmThe signage at the top makes it much worse and unacceptable...following your logicVitruvius wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:44 pmWow! Other than the Atlanta building's top having more flair and reach, they look identical.skinzfan23 wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:04 pm Here is another building the rendering reminds me of in Atlanta: This one is 657 ft tall.
![]()
![]()
-
Cermak
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2351
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2018 7:02 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
They should take one of the empty Shopko’s and turn it into a library. The Shopko at 84th and I-80 comes to mind.
-
PotatoeEatsFish
- Human Relations
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:59 am
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Half as tall and it's still the biggest project Omaha has seen since the early 2000sVitruvius wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:06 pm What if it looks nothing like the concept? What if it ends up half as tall? It can't be a best thing until it materializes.
#Save(TheBaseandSidesof)TheUglyGrainSilos2025
-
Stargazer
- County Board
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 5:06 pm
- Location: Bennington
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Is someone going to come up with some skyline renderings? 
Shoot for the Moon... if you miss, you'll land among the stars.
-
GrowUpFrances
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:36 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Did she happen to say why the library site? That's what I don't understand. The block to the east is already available. MoO could hypothetically start once GLM is completed AND then there's zero chance of another development obstructing view from the park.almighty_tuna wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:36 pmStothert brought that lot up and joked about developing something bigger to block the MofO tower. In jest, yes, but she did make it a point to say that block is available. My guess is that any development there will be minor in scale as not to obstruct MofO's money view from 10th St.ItsAllAboutMe wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:33 pm Question, was there any mention of what happens with the block in front (east) of the building? Will Mutual control what happens there? Will it be part of the overall MofO project?
-
Vitruvius
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2019 5:11 am
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Not that they'll will ever consider it from this perspective, but there needs to be something to create a transition to the green space/park/GLM. To go from a 700 ft. tower to flat green space would be abrupt. Maybe a new library would be good on that parcel, or a Costco... haha, kidding.GrowUpFrances wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:58 amDid she happen to say why the library site? That's what I don't understand. The block to the east is already available. MoO could hypothetically start once GLM is completed AND then there's zero chance of another development obstructing view from the park.almighty_tuna wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:36 pmStothert brought that lot up and joked about developing something bigger to block the MofO tower. In jest, yes, but she did make it a point to say that block is available. My guess is that any development there will be minor in scale as not to obstruct MofO's money view from 10th St.ItsAllAboutMe wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:33 pm Question, was there any mention of what happens with the block in front (east) of the building? Will Mutual control what happens there? Will it be part of the overall MofO project?
-
GrowUpFrances
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:36 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Yeah, a new library or museum would definitely make sense.Vitruvius wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 1:14 amNot that they'll will ever consider it from this perspective, but there needs to be something to create a transition to the green space/park/GLM. To go from a 700 ft. tower to flat green space would be abrupt. Maybe a new library would be good on that parcel, or a Costco... haha, kidding.GrowUpFrances wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:58 amDid she happen to say why the library site? That's what I don't understand. The block to the east is already available. MoO could hypothetically start once GLM is completed AND then there's zero chance of another development obstructing view from the park.almighty_tuna wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:36 pmStothert brought that lot up and joked about developing something bigger to block the MofO tower. In jest, yes, but she did make it a point to say that block is available. My guess is that any development there will be minor in scale as not to obstruct MofO's money view from 10th St.ItsAllAboutMe wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:33 pm Question, was there any mention of what happens with the block in front (east) of the building? Will Mutual control what happens there? Will it be part of the overall MofO project?
-
Vitruvius
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2019 5:11 am
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Completely. What's not high quality? In fact, It's award-winning and LEED GoldStan wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:32 amVitruvius wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:16 amConstruction and materials are high quality too.OracleOfOmaha wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:57 pmThe signage at the top makes it much worse and unacceptable...following your logicVitruvius wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:44 pmWow! Other than the Atlanta building's top having more flair and reach, they look identical.skinzfan23 wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:04 pm Here is another building the rendering reminds me of in Atlanta: This one is 657 ft tall.
![]()
![]()
![]()
You can't be serious.
-
omahahawk
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:16 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Utterly elegant and exceeded my expectations. Reminiscent of the Salesforce building in San Francisco.
-
Stan
- Library Board
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2020 1:55 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
I'm laughing at the fact that you're basing it on a picture and now LEED certification which is more about making it environmentally driven in design than it is the all around materials and construction. Do you think the new tower won't have these considerations?Vitruvius wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 2:40 amCompletely. What's not high quality? In fact, It's award-winning and LEED GoldStan wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:32 amVitruvius wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:16 amConstruction and materials are high quality too.OracleOfOmaha wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:57 pmThe signage at the top makes it much worse and unacceptable...following your logicVitruvius wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:44 pmWow! Other than the Atlanta building's top having more flair and reach, they look identical.skinzfan23 wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:04 pm Here is another building the rendering reminds me of in Atlanta: This one is 657 ft tall.
![]()
![]()
![]()
You can't be serious.
-
GetUrban
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2650
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:07 pm
- Location: Omaha
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
I know one thing, there are already 10 times more pictures of this Atlanta building in this thread that the one that is actually proposed for the Library site. Sheesh!
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
...and then they were gone.
-
Athomsfere
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 3:03 am
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
The building from Atlanta shows us something too, maybe, from the rendering.
That top has no function and could be stretched somewhat for any height MoO wants probably in the 6-10 stories range if their requirements end up a little short of some magic number.
That top has no function and could be stretched somewhat for any height MoO wants probably in the 6-10 stories range if their requirements end up a little short of some magic number.
-
Big E
- City Council
- Posts: 8181
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 5:12 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
No one has even brought up the fact the Mutual of Omaha campus housed the state's only Chik-Fil-A for years, too. Does this mean downtown might actually be getting a Chik-Fil-A? This could be the most important dining announcement in Omaha's recent history.GetUrban wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 2:12 pm I know one thing, there are already 10 times more pictures of this Atlanta building in this thread that the one that is actually proposed for the Library site. Sheesh!
Stable genius.
-
omaha79
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1664
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:46 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
There is already a fair amount of chatter among employees about further commutes along with parking availability and cost. I don't have a dog in that fight as my commute would be the same or slightly less as I could take different routes. Parking will be interesting, and the knee jerk will be to poo poo that, but it is a valid concern. Most mutual employees are paying between $10 for surface, $15 for MTC garage parking, or $25 for main garage. Of course, none of them have paid those amounts for nearly 2 years now.
The Nebraska Examiner article indicated the new facility will have roughly 2k parking spots. The old Mutual facility had roughly 5,000 employees on site between the old buildings and South campus. I would assume the new facility will house closer to 7,000-8,000 employees. How the company will reach that number will be interesting. Organic growth? Mergers and acquisitions? But, certainly, with only 2,000 parking spots, it will mean that some employees will likely either have to utilize city of Omaha garages which could cost between $80-$100 per month, unless Mutual subsidizes it, or they are going to have to park in mid town and ride the trolley in.
Say what you will about whether an aversion to that is laziness or not, but I think a significant number of workers will have issues with that and would prefer to work from home. Going from no commute currently, to either having to likely pay more for parking and walk a couple of blocks or ride public transportation for an additional 10 minutes or more each way is something they will have to figure out.
To combat work from home, they are really going to have to change mindsets and create compelling reasons for people to want to be in the office. I think about what tech companies do like free breakfast, coffee/soda, lunches, and maybe friday happy hours. Otherwise, where is the reason to leave your house?
The Nebraska Examiner article indicated the new facility will have roughly 2k parking spots. The old Mutual facility had roughly 5,000 employees on site between the old buildings and South campus. I would assume the new facility will house closer to 7,000-8,000 employees. How the company will reach that number will be interesting. Organic growth? Mergers and acquisitions? But, certainly, with only 2,000 parking spots, it will mean that some employees will likely either have to utilize city of Omaha garages which could cost between $80-$100 per month, unless Mutual subsidizes it, or they are going to have to park in mid town and ride the trolley in.
Say what you will about whether an aversion to that is laziness or not, but I think a significant number of workers will have issues with that and would prefer to work from home. Going from no commute currently, to either having to likely pay more for parking and walk a couple of blocks or ride public transportation for an additional 10 minutes or more each way is something they will have to figure out.
To combat work from home, they are really going to have to change mindsets and create compelling reasons for people to want to be in the office. I think about what tech companies do like free breakfast, coffee/soda, lunches, and maybe friday happy hours. Otherwise, where is the reason to leave your house?
-
Coyote
- City Council
- Posts: 34365
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 5:18 pm
- Yahoo Messenger: jestcoyote
- Location: Aksarben Village
-
TitosBuritoBarn
- Planning Board
- Posts: 3294
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 1:08 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Even better, rumor mill has it that each streetcar train will have a Chik-Fil-A car, allowing passengers to purchase and eat Chik-Fil-A while they ride.Big E wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:28 pmNo one has even brought up the fact the Mutual of Omaha campus housed the state's only Chik-Fil-A for years, too. Does this mean downtown might actually be getting a Chik-Fil-A? This could be the most important dining announcement in Omaha's recent history.GetUrban wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 2:12 pm I know one thing, there are already 10 times more pictures of this Atlanta building in this thread that the one that is actually proposed for the Library site. Sheesh!
Announcement forthcoming on a day that isn't Sunday in 60-90 days.
"Video game violence is not a new problem. Who could forget in the wake of SimCity how children everywhere took up urban planning." - Stephen Colbert
-
HskrFanMike
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:40 pm
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
I think Mutual of Omaha only has about 4,000 employees, and I thought the south site building has been leased out to other companies for quite some time.omaha79 wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:38 pm The Nebraska Examiner article indicated the new facility will have roughly 2k parking spots. The old Mutual facility had roughly 5,000 employees on site between the old buildings and South campus. I would assume the new facility will house closer to 7,000-8,000 employees. How the company will reach that number will be interesting. Organic growth? Mergers and acquisitions? But, certainly, with only 2,000 parking spots, it will mean that some employees will likely either have to utilize city of Omaha garages which could cost between $80-$100 per month, unless Mutual subsidizes it, or they are going to have to park in mid town and ride the trolley in.
Update: UNMC has been leasing space there for 15 years now: https://www.unmc.edu/news.cfm?match=3110
Last edited by HskrFanMike on Thu Jan 27, 2022 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Linkin5
- County Board
- Posts: 4917
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2004 1:59 am
Re: Mutual Tower on the Library Lot
Yeah I believe 4000 is the number that they gave out yesterday. Additionally, the MoO representative said yesterday that with flex schedules they only anticipate it to be 2/3 full during peak times. That said, 2000 parking spots sounds like it will work perfect.HskrFanMike wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 6:37 pmI think Mutual of Omaha only has about 4,000 employees, and I thought the south site building has been leased out to other companies for quite some time.omaha79 wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:38 pm The Nebraska Examiner article indicated the new facility will have roughly 2k parking spots. The old Mutual facility had roughly 5,000 employees on site between the old buildings and South campus. I would assume the new facility will house closer to 7,000-8,000 employees. How the company will reach that number will be interesting. Organic growth? Mergers and acquisitions? But, certainly, with only 2,000 parking spots, it will mean that some employees will likely either have to utilize city of Omaha garages which could cost between $80-$100 per month, unless Mutual subsidizes it, or they are going to have to park in mid town and ride the trolley in.