Athomsfere wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:46 am
GetUrban wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 8:31 am
People are free to live wherever they want for whatever stage in life they are. No point in stirring up resentment amongst those who have made choices to suit whatever works best for them and their families. I’m very pro-urban but have not spent my whole life living near the urban core. I’ve found at this stage in in my life I wanted to try living outside of the immediate area surrounding the core. I may move back eventually if I decide to.
And I agree with this. West O should have libraries, schools, police, roads and all the services a US city provides.
What we shouldn't do, is take something iconic and fitting for the core, and move it out west to make it more "central". As we've discussed here, this move makes it in many ways less accessible to a large portion of Omaha too.
Transit examples:
Zoo to Current: 11 minutes
Zoo to 72nd and Dodge: 43 minutes
24th and Lake
Current: 18 minutes
72nd: 31 minutes
Old Market
Current: 4 minutes
72nd: 29 minutes
Village Point
Current: 1 hr 5 minutes
72nd: 45 minutes
Of course, we all know west Omaha will just drive it:
Current: 21 minutes
72nd: 15 minutes
So keeping the current location has the smallest impact to everyone, and encourages the right kind of growth.
(All numbers are me using Google Maps, just now, to plot the courses using the transit, or drive option and using the fastest option)
Not trying to be a douchelord, but none of this data is useful. There are so many assumptions baked in that it's just not valid.
What percent of users are from any of those given locations?
What percent of the users from each of those locations use public transit vs drive?
How many visits do all of the above users make in a year?
What percent of users will be from those locations if the library is moved?
What percent of users will use public transit vs drive if the library is moved?
How will moving the library affect the number of annual visits from people in each location?
And about a thousand other questions.
It may well turn out that the current location is a net time savings. But we'd have to be able to answer a great many questions to find out.
And even then, time saving isn't our only metric.
Would there be a net gain in overall development in Omaha if it was moved? (This would require answering a whole slew of new questions.)
What is the opportunity cost of putting it downtown (where space is more limited)? (Slew more questions.)
Would it get the same financial backing downtown? (Few more questions.)
The complexity of this analysis would likely require quite the team with pretty significant expertise in a variety of fields.