User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10832
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 11:52 am
Location: Chicago
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Rezoning and PUD items before the planning board next week so should get an idea of the plans here.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10832
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 11:52 am
Location: Chicago
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
225 apartments and 8 townhomes. Looks like they plan to leave a few of the silos standing for those that like the look of them.
skip
Library Board
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2022 7:36 pm
Location: Midtown
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:29 am
Location: New York City
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Nice! Using some of the silos as a pool is a creative touch. Looks like the bases of the demolished components will remain intact generally.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
PotatoeEatsFish
Human Relations
Posts: 797
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:59 am
User avatar
PotatoeEatsFish
Human Relations
I won
#Save(TheBaseandSidesof)TheUglyGrainSilos2025
GenX
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Omaha
GenX
Parks & Recreation
PotatoeEatsFish wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 8:42 amI won
Need to update it to #Save(MostOf)TheUglyGrainSilos2025
User avatar
Busguy2010
City Council
Posts: 7405
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:32 am
Location: North Central Omaha
User avatar
Busguy2010
City Council
Interesting aesthetic. I do wonder what's the point of keeping *some* of the silos if they aren't so prohibitively difficult and costly to remove? Is there charm and allure in living next to some old silos next to the interstate?
Huskerbum
New to the Neighborhood
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:22 pm
Huskerbum
New to the Neighborhood
Busguy2010 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:41 am Interesting aesthetic. I do wonder what's the point of keeping *some* of the silos if they aren't so prohibitively difficult and costly to remove? Is there charm and allure in living next to some old silos next to the interstate?
Great question!… I guess the future (and market) will give us an answer!
GenX
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Omaha
GenX
Parks & Recreation
Busguy2010 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:41 am Interesting aesthetic. I do wonder what's the point of keeping *some* of the silos if they aren't so prohibitively difficult and costly to remove? Is there charm and allure in living next to some old silos next to the interstate?
I would have figured the ones closest to the interstate would be easy targets for elimination, but I guess not.
User avatar
Busguy2010
City Council
Posts: 7405
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:32 am
Location: North Central Omaha
User avatar
Busguy2010
City Council
EricHaley wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:01 am
Busguy2010 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:41 am Interesting aesthetic. I do wonder what's the point of keeping *some* of the silos if they aren't so prohibitively difficult and costly to remove? Is there charm and allure in living next to some old silos next to the interstate?
I would have figured the ones closest to the interstate would be easy targets for elimination, but I guess not.
My only thought is (not much of a) sound barrier? Like the poster above you said, time and the market will tell. I just think it's kind of a goofy selling point, but hey, times are 'a changin'.
User avatar
PotatoeEatsFish
Human Relations
Posts: 797
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:59 am
User avatar
PotatoeEatsFish
Human Relations
Busguy2010 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:41 am Interesting aesthetic. I do wonder what's the point of keeping *some* of the silos if they aren't so prohibitively difficult and costly to remove? Is there charm and allure in living next to some old silos next to the interstate?
It’s because they’re cool and this city was built on the agricultural/railroad industry so it’s stupid to just demolish it. Why are we questioning why they’re preserving something? Don’t you all throw a fit when they try to tear anything down but suddenly when it’s something actually cool and historic you question why we preserve things?Also I’ve dedicated too much time on these dumb silos for people to backtrack suddenly.
#Save(TheBaseandSidesof)TheUglyGrainSilos2025
Habits76
Home Owners Association
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 6:39 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area
Habits76
Home Owners Association
I'm glad they were able to find someone to hopefully transform an area that was once abandoned to a lively living space. I'm a little disappointed by the lack of access to the field club trail from the development plans, though. I was also hoping to see some street or trail access to a coffee shop or bar/tap room to activate this portion of Vinton St. and the Field Club Trail.

I hope they bring back the tapestry's on the remaining silos. I thought this was a cool thing to see while driving east on I-80.
User avatar
stormchaser
Planning Board
Posts: 2380
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2018 1:14 pm
User avatar
stormchaser
Planning Board
Maybe they could do something like this with the remaining silos. This is from an area where I used to live in MN. Something different anyway...

Image

Image
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
Posts: 111070
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 11:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
stormchaser wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:13 pm Maybe they could do something like this with the remaining silos. This is from an area where I used to live in MN. Something different anyway...

Image

Image


That cool. From the photos looks like they are still actvly in use at the time of the photo at least
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!
User avatar
Busguy2010
City Council
Posts: 7405
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:32 am
Location: North Central Omaha
User avatar
Busguy2010
City Council
PotatoeEatsFish wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 6:14 am
Busguy2010 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:41 am Interesting aesthetic. I do wonder what's the point of keeping *some* of the silos if they aren't so prohibitively difficult and costly to remove? Is there charm and allure in living next to some old silos next to the interstate?
It’s because they’re cool and this city was built on the agricultural/railroad industry so it’s stupid to just demolish it. Why are we questioning why they’re preserving something? Don’t you all throw a fit when they try to tear anything down but suddenly when it’s something actually cool and historic you question why we preserve things?Also I’ve dedicated too much time on these dumb silos for people to backtrack suddenly.
This is why I don't post here often anymore, my comments always get misconstrued as if I'm trying to put someone on defense. Anyway, I didn't say I thought they should all be removed. I was questioning the point of the aesthetic. Wasn't the whole point behind the push to save them, to actually convert the silos themselves into living spaces? So now they're still just for show. Don't get me wrong, I've always thought they were a cool land mark. But to me, keeping a handful of them is an odd selling point. "Come live in some apartments down by the interstate and railroad tracks." We promise you won't even notice the noise, or the smell of the dog food plant and stockyards when you marvel in awe the beauty of living next to those historic, iconic, concrete grain elevators"
User avatar
PotatoeEatsFish
Human Relations
Posts: 797
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:59 am
User avatar
PotatoeEatsFish
Human Relations
Busguy2010 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 8:03 pm
PotatoeEatsFish wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 6:14 am
Busguy2010 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:41 am Interesting aesthetic. I do wonder what's the point of keeping *some* of the silos if they aren't so prohibitively difficult and costly to remove? Is there charm and allure in living next to some old silos next to the interstate?
It’s because they’re cool and this city was built on the agricultural/railroad industry so it’s stupid to just demolish it. Why are we questioning why they’re preserving something? Don’t you all throw a fit when they try to tear anything down but suddenly when it’s something actually cool and historic you question why we preserve things?Also I’ve dedicated too much time on these dumb silos for people to backtrack suddenly.
This is why I don't post here often anymore, my comments always get misconstrued as if I'm trying to put someone on defense. Anyway, I didn't say I thought they should all be removed. I was questioning the point of the aesthetic. Wasn't the whole point behind the push to save them, to actually convert the silos themselves into living spaces? So now they're still just for show. Don't get me wrong, I've always thought they were a cool land mark. But to me, keeping a handful of them is an odd selling point. "Come live in some apartments down by the interstate and railroad tracks." We promise you won't even notice the noise, or the smell of the dog food plant and stockyards when you marvel in awe the beauty of living next to those historic, iconic, concrete grain elevators"
I’m sorry I was mostly joking
#Save(TheBaseandSidesof)TheUglyGrainSilos2025
BuildTaller
Home Owners Association
Posts: 204
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2025 2:57 pm
BuildTaller
Home Owners Association
Is this the same plan from the news story on channel 7?
GenX
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Omaha
GenX
Parks & Recreation
BuildTaller wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 2:45 pm
Is this the same plan from the news story on channel 7?
The story was on Channel 3, and yes.

https://www.3newsnow.com/south-omaha/so ... ment-plans
BuildTaller
Home Owners Association
Posts: 204
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2025 2:57 pm
BuildTaller
Home Owners Association
EricHaley wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 3:14 pm
BuildTaller wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 2:45 pm
Is this the same plan from the news story on channel 7?
The story was on Channel 3, and yes.

https://www.3newsnow.com/south-omaha/so ... ment-plans
I'll see your 3 and raise you 7

https://www.ketv.com/article/omaha-ron- ... s/64546291
GenX
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Omaha
GenX
Parks & Recreation
BuildTaller wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 8:28 pm
EricHaley wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 3:14 pm
BuildTaller wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 2:45 pm
Is this the same plan from the news story on channel 7?
The story was on Channel 3, and yes.

https://www.3newsnow.com/south-omaha/so ... ment-plans
I'll see your 3 and raise you 7

https://www.ketv.com/article/omaha-ron- ... s/64546291
Nice!
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:29 am
Location: New York City
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
TIF Request for "Vinton Silos" in front of the planning board at the next meeting
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
jag42
Human Relations
Posts: 546
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:29 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area
jag42
Human Relations
Funny this thread came alive because just the other day I stumbled upon an alternate ending of the movie "Election", and those grain elevators are visible later on in the clip:

User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:29 am
Location: New York City
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
https://planning.cityofomaha.org/images ... May/07.pdf

Pretty similar to previously seen documents with a few adjustments to unit allocation and parking.

Image

Image
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
thenewguy
County Board
Posts: 4442
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:50 am
Location: Council Bluffs
User avatar
thenewguy
County Board
based on the renderings, they will have to remove a significant portion of the tops of the silos for that to look like the image. Thing is, why keep the silos at all?
Go Cubs Go
ita
County Board
Posts: 4773
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm
thenewguy wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 5:05 pm based on the renderings, they will have to remove a significant portion of the tops of the silos for that to look like the image. Thing is, why keep the silos at all?
You can see from the east perspective that the silo foundations not only serve as foundations for those two apartment buildings, but also a retaining wall for the east side of the apartment complex. The developer mentioned this aspect in the planning board meeting and it's mentioned in the TIF exhibit. My guess, is that is also saves on demolition costs. I don't know much about the foundations of a concrete silo like that, but it must be substantial. I could imagine there is significant cost savings the way they have planned it, building right on top of the bases of the silos. The cost of demolition is $4 million. Again, that's without removing the silo foundations, although it notes it includes utility demo. They are keeping about 1/3 of the silos. The ones on the north are staying. The ones on the south the developer is letting the state deal with them as the state will widen the I-80 bridge there in the 2030's.
User avatar
thenewguy
County Board
Posts: 4442
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:50 am
Location: Council Bluffs
User avatar
thenewguy
County Board
ita wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 6:47 pm
thenewguy wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 5:05 pm based on the renderings, they will have to remove a significant portion of the tops of the silos for that to look like the image. Thing is, why keep the silos at all?
You can see from the east perspective that the silo foundations not only serve as foundations for those two apartment buildings, but also a retaining wall for the east side of the apartment complex. The developer mentioned this aspect in the planning board meeting and it's mentioned in the TIF exhibit. My guess, is that is also saves on demolition costs. I don't know much about the foundations of a concrete silo like that, but it must be substantial. I could imagine there is significant cost savings the way they have planned it, building right on top of the bases of the silos. The cost of demolition is $4 million. Again, that's without removing the silo foundations, although it notes it includes utility demo. They are keeping about 1/3 of the silos. The ones on the north are staying. The ones on the south the developer is letting the state deal with them as the state will widen the I-80 bridge there in the 2030's.
understandable. I didn't realize the cost of demolition was that high and didn't consider the fact that silos would have such a substantial base. My only worry, if i were the developer, would be the maintenance of the exterior of the elevators from a graffiti perspective and the overall impression of the property when trying to attract tenants
Go Cubs Go
Dusty
Human Relations
Posts: 794
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 3:53 am
Location: Central Florida
Dusty
Human Relations
I wished they would keep the silos up. Build the apartments right against the silos on one side.
Then you can cut holes on the back side and make the silos a vertical parking garage. Instead, you would drive your car on a covered lift. Then it would place your car in your designated parking stall. Think of it like a giant vending machine or "elevator."
Omaha's Transit Future starts now. Let's make the change!
Omaha Transit Network
ita
County Board
Posts: 4773
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm
Dusty wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 8:19 pm I wished they would keep the silos up. Build the apartments right against the silos on one side.
Then you can cut holes on the back side and make the silos a vertical parking garage. Instead, you would drive your car on a covered lift. Then it would place your car in your designated parking stall. Think of it like a giant vending machine or "elevator."
So a giant-er Carvana vending machine? That would be cool. The developer said they considered reuse of the silos for anything, but it would be too expensive.
OmahaOmaha
Library Board
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 10:30 pm
Location: West Omaha
OmahaOmaha
Library Board
Am I the only one here who thinks the nine townhomes look kind of out of place. It just doesn’t seem to go well with the rest of the development.
almighty_tuna
City Council
Posts: 106417
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:34 pm
Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado
almighty_tuna
City Council
I think the whole thing looks kinda weird and out of place, but it's not my money on the project so to each his own I guess.
User avatar
Brad
Photographer
Posts: 1036713
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 12:03 am
Location: Omaha, NE
OmahaOmaha wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 10:48 pm Am I the only one here who thinks the nine townhomes look kind of out of place. It just doesn’t seem to go well with the rest of the development.
Many times townhomes or row houses are used as a transition between single family houses and apartments.
Dusty
Human Relations
Posts: 794
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 3:53 am
Location: Central Florida
Dusty
Human Relations
ita wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 9:12 pm
Dusty wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 8:19 pm I wished they would keep the silos up. Build the apartments right against the silos on one side.
Then you can cut holes on the back side and make the silos a vertical parking garage. Instead, you would drive your car on a covered lift. Then it would place your car in your designated parking stall. Think of it like a giant vending machine or "elevator."
So a giant-er Carvana vending machine? That would be cool. The developer said they considered reuse of the silos for anything, but it would be too expensive.
Exactly! They could double the amount of units by building to the height of the silos. Then the silos become vertical storage for cars. Probably cost less than tearing down all that concrete.
Omaha's Transit Future starts now. Let's make the change!
Omaha Transit Network
Flyer14
Home Owners Association
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2021 5:14 pm
Flyer14
Home Owners Association
If built as proposed I think it looks amazing. A little wonky? Sure. But considering what they are dealing with to work some of them into the designs is very cool imo.
OmahaFan
Library Board
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:07 am
Location: Omaha
OmahaFan
Library Board
TIF has been approved for the project
bbinks
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:10 pm
bbinks
Parks & Recreation
I won't miss the grafitti.
User avatar
nativeomahan
County Board
Posts: 6045
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Omaha and Puerto Vallarta
User avatar
nativeomahan
County Board
Can’t come soon enough.