https://planning.cityofomaha.org/images ... une/25.pdf
So, pretty good infill from a numbers standpoint. 18 one bedroom units on 8000 sq. ft. lot. But, woah, my first impression is it's ugly. I know we bag on big block apartment buildings, but this missing middle scaled project is disappointing from an aesthetic standpoint.
County Board
Posts: 4774
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm
County Board
Posts: 4445
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:50 am
Location: Council Bluffs
yeah i don't like that look either. looks cheap
Go Cubs Go
County Board
Posts: 4774
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm
County Board
Posts: 4445
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:50 am
Location: Council Bluffs
that's good. i hadn't read it, but i'm glad they pointed that out to them. I'm sure they will be nice but the exterior looks like a run-of-the-mill, cookie cutter type development. Great spot for apartments, though
Go Cubs Go
County Board
Posts: 4774
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm
https://cityclerk.cityofomaha.org/wp-co ... -43525.pdf
This project went to city council yesterday for rezoning and PUR approval. Redesign looks much better.
This project went to city council yesterday for rezoning and PUR approval. Redesign looks much better.
New to the Neighborhood
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri May 16, 2025 11:33 pm
Where will all of these new residents park??
County Board
Posts: 4974
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:23 pm
Location: Dundee
Think of the children!!!!!!
Planning Board
Posts: 2906
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: 68102
It’s a T.O.D. (transit oriented development) so only 50% parking is required. There will be 9 spots one of which will be handicapped. Not everyone who would live here would have a car and thus those without would utilize other forms of transportation like public transit. Less parking should also yield more affordable units.
"It's just a rendering."
Human Relations
Posts: 797
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:59 am