Thanks!
Saturday Morning the Crane Operator was working in the fog!
1.
Thanks!

The Russell Investments Center in Seattle is a building that has the Seattle Art Museum in the podium and then multiple office tenants. It also has a 17th floor terrace with great views and a similar building in Omaha would need to have that overlooking the parks and river.stadsborgare wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 4:12 pm I would think an "architectural icon" is what should go in that spot, given its location. Anything that is going to be in a lot of camera shots - promotional material for the city, should be a beautiful edifice, whatever the use of it is going to be.
Maybe some kind of museum would be perfect for the location, though I have no idea what kind of museum. It's in a spot where there are lots of pedestrians and a streetcar stop, so that should be taken into account.
It has to be something special, whatever goes there. Not something ordinary.

I little over a year ago, I made a post comparing the renderings of MoOT's facade to one of my favorite modern skyscrapers, 1144 Fifteenth in Denver.
Wow, clouds are going to be insane when fully clad.
You see this worker hanging off the tower about 20 second in?

To each their own and I by no means hate MoO's architecture, but I actually think MoO's design will look more dated in 30 years than FNBO. I think there is going to be an eventual boredom to the blue glass towers we have seen the past decade. People will think it looks very 2010s kind of like people think Woodmen looks very 60s. FNBO with the very attractive and well proportined massing, difference in materials, and thoughtful lines I think will age really well.HighWinds wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:45 amI little over a year ago, I made a post comparing the renderings of MoOT's facade to one of my favorite modern skyscrapers, 1144 Fifteenth in Denver.
I'm proud to say now that this tower lives up to all my expectations and looks great. Really helps bring Omaha into the 21st century with that glass.
Always thought FNBT looked more late 80s/90s when compared to other regional buildings of the era.
I kind of agree on this. Don’t get me wrong, MoO is gonna be a great addition to the skyline and we’re lucky to get it. But FNBO has more classic architecture tones to it. One of my favorite skyscrapers is the Wells Fargo Center in Minneapolis and FNBO has aspects of that in it.iamjacobm wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:02 pmTo each their own and I by no means hate MoO's architecture, but I actually think MoO's design will look more dated in 30 years than FNBO. I think there is going to be an eventual boredom to the blue glass towers we have seen the past decade. People will think it looks very 2010s kind of like people think Woodmen looks very 60s. FNBO with the very attractive and well proportined massing, difference in materials, and thoughtful lines I think will age really well.HighWinds wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:45 amI little over a year ago, I made a post comparing the renderings of MoOT's facade to one of my favorite modern skyscrapers, 1144 Fifteenth in Denver.
I'm proud to say now that this tower lives up to all my expectations and looks great. Really helps bring Omaha into the 21st century with that glass.
Always thought FNBT looked more late 80s/90s when compared to other regional buildings of the era.
Fair point, these glass towers may age badly. Today their the new, hip thing that every "modern" city has just got to get their hands on, and tomorrow, like brutalist towers from the sixties, they are simply dated remnants of a distant time.Louie wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:14 pmI kind of agree on this. Don’t get me wrong, MoO is gonna be a great addition to the skyline and we’re lucky to get it. But FNBO has more classic architecture tones to it. One of my favorite skyscrapers is the Wells Fargo Center in Minneapolis and FNBO has aspects of that in it.iamjacobm wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:02 pmTo each their own and I by no means hate MoO's architecture, but I actually think MoO's design will look more dated in 30 years than FNBO. I think there is going to be an eventual boredom to the blue glass towers we have seen the past decade. People will think it looks very 2010s kind of like people think Woodmen looks very 60s. FNBO with the very attractive and well proportined massing, difference in materials, and thoughtful lines I think will age really well.HighWinds wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:45 amI little over a year ago, I made a post comparing the renderings of MoOT's facade to one of my favorite modern skyscrapers, 1144 Fifteenth in Denver.
I'm proud to say now that this tower lives up to all my expectations and looks great. Really helps bring Omaha into the 21st century with that glass.
Always thought FNBT looked more late 80s/90s when compared to other regional buildings of the era.
FNBO Tower was designed in the 90s and construction began in 1999, so yeah, that tracks.
I don’t believe the raised the forms after the last pour. I wonder if they are pouring a roof and equipment pads on top of the core?

Yeah, a modern Art Deco tower would be awesome in Omaha. Maybe something like Eleven on the River in Minneapolis, just at a smaller scale.Garrett wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 11:09 pm Agreed that the FNBT will probably age better. As exciting as the new Mutual tower is, and as nice as it looks, it has way more other skyscrapers that look exactly like it than the FNBT.
Neo-Art Deco has been having a moment in NYC architecture. I’d love to see Omaha get something like that.

Right, I do believe they are working on closing it up. I thought thats what they had done with the last pourBrad wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 7:09 amI don’t believe the raised the forms after the last pour. I wonder if they are pouring a roof and equipment pads on top of the core?
I looked at the tower from the mall yesterday and you can see the curve starting to be more obvious.HighWinds wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:13 am Wow, my favorite part of this towers design is starting to take shape!
What, does the dam thing have PD?ItsAllAboutMe wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:28 amI looked the tower from the mall yesterday and you can see the curve starting to be more obvious.HighWinds wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:13 am Wow, my favorite part of this towers design is starting to take shape!
I was driving east towards downtown this afternoon and I didn’t see it either, that said, there have been times in the past when I didn’t see it between pours.EricHaley wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 3:48 pm Might have just been the angle I was viewing the tower from, but it appears the concrete pumping arm is gone.

Ironically enough, I saw one Friday as I went over the bridge around noon and thought the same thingskinzfan23 wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 11:31 am Not really Mutual related but pulled up the city cam to look at the tower and noticed a barge on the river….don’t really see too many of them on the Missouri:
![]()
I imagine the yellow crane arm is next before the rest of the form works are removed.
You talking about the web cam they were talking about?

the Pickard Chilton company was an architect for both I believeHighWinds wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:45 amI little over a year ago, I made a post comparing the renderings of MoOT's facade to one of my favorite modern skyscrapers, 1144 Fifteenth in Denver.
I'm proud to say now that this tower lives up to all my expectations and looks great. Really helps bring Omaha into the 21st century with that glass.
Always thought FNBT looked more late 80s/90s when compared to other regional buildings of the era.
Yeah, Pickard also did things like Devon in OKC, and 1180 Peachtree in Atlanta.jorbie wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:04 pmthe Pickard Chilton company was an architect for both I believeHighWinds wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:45 amI little over a year ago, I made a post comparing the renderings of MoOT's facade to one of my favorite modern skyscrapers, 1144 Fifteenth in Denver.
I'm proud to say now that this tower lives up to all my expectations and looks great. Really helps bring Omaha into the 21st century with that glass.
Always thought FNBT looked more late 80s/90s when compared to other regional buildings of the era.