riceweb wrote: Wed Nov 19, 2025 10:37 pm
TitosBuritoBarn wrote: Wed Nov 19, 2025 9:44 pm
We are absolutely on no cusp of any transit revolution. Everything being sold as revolutionary right now either creates more problems than solutions or won't come close to its full potential in America until we stop placing the car at the top of the transportation hierarchy.
Well, I mean, I agree, most things like self-driving cars are likely to exacerbate traffic issues and further push people away from transit. My point is that revolutionary things are happening, and it's actually quite possible our streetcar investment will be fruitless at this juncture.
I'm a little hesitant to say that the streetcar is going to be fruitless at this juncture.
Let's just look at ridership numbers and compare it to
San Fransisco Muni's ridership (It may take a couple of seconds for the linked graph to load). I will admit that San Fransisco is several orders of magnitude more transit-friendly than Omaha, but it's also
Waymo's strongest market by volume. The most recent number I can find showed 101k weekly Waymo rides in San Fransisco. I didn't crunch the numbers very hard so I may be a little off, but there are seven individual bus routes, 1, 8, 14, 22, 29, 38, and 49, that clear 101k weekly riders and three light rail lines, M, N, and T, that do as well.
Now, I don't expect the streetcar to get anywhere near 101k riders/week. If we can approach the KC starter lines ~35k riders/week, I would consider that a success. All this focus on ridership is also completely ignoring the real main reason for building a streetcar line.
I know many of you, including myself, grumble at this fact, but the main reason for the streetcar is to stimulate property development along the route. It does this by having permanent physical infrastructure that serves as a promise to developer's that the streetcar is here and will remain here and will bring customers to and from the front door of your building. Self-driving cars don't offer this sort of infrastructure.