Past, Present and Projected Climates

General discussion on all things Omaha.

Moderators: nebugeater, Omaha Cowboy, Brad, BRoss

Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Omaha 45-Year Climate Shift (1981–2025)
Observed Daily Highs at Eppley Airfield (KOMA)

1981–1990 (The "Classic" Winter)
Nov: 47.0°F | Dec: 33.6°F | Jan: 30.4°F | Feb: 34.7°F | Mar: 47.9°F
USDA Zone: 4b | Koppen: Dfa (Continental)

1991–2000 (The Transition Begins)
Nov: 47.8°F | Dec: 34.4°F | Jan: 30.8°F | Feb: 35.9°F | Mar: 48.4°F
USDA Zone: 5a | Koppen: Dfa

2001–2010 (The Warming Trend)
Nov: 49.8°F | Dec: 35.5°F | Jan: 31.0°F | Feb: 35.9°F | Mar: 50.7°F
USDA Zone: 5a | Koppen: Dfa

2011–2020 (The New Normal)
Nov: 51.2°F | Dec: 37.8°F | Jan: 32.6°F | Feb: 36.8°F | Mar: 54.5°F
USDA Zone: 5b | Koppen: Transition

2021–2025 (The Subtropical Shift)
Nov: 53.8°F | Dec: 40.6°F | Jan: 33.1°F | Feb: 40.9°F | Mar: 57.2°F
USDA Zone: 6a | Koppen: Cfa (Subtropical)

The "Quick Take":
  • [] Winter Anchors: Dec and Feb have both warmed by ~8°F since the 80s.

    [] The March Leap: We've gained nearly10°F in March highs—it's basically historical April now.
  • Biological Shift: The move from Hardiness Zone 4b to 6a is why southern species (like Crape Myrtles) are now overwintering in Omaha.
Source: Data aggregated from NWS Daily Climate Reports for Omaha (KOMA) and NCEI Historical Summaries (1981-2026).


With the help of AI (gulp) I was able to grab the winter/shoulder month trends in 10-year (except the last 5) groups.

The Transition into Subtropical cannot be in any way official until it is averaged over 30 years. However, the fact that we have reached that level in the last 5 years is eye opening.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

The "Great Thaw": Omaha's 45-Year Winter Transformation

Observed Daily Highs/Lows at Eppley Airfield (KOMA) - 1981 through 2025

Average Daily HIGHS (Daytime)

Code: Select all


Period      | Nov  | Dec  | Jan  | Feb  | Mar  | USDA | Koppen

​1981–1990   | 47.0 | 33.6 | 30.4 | 34.7 | 47.9 | 4b   | Dfa
1991–2000   | 47.8 | 34.4 | 30.8 | 35.9 | 48.4 | 5a   | Dfa
2001–2010   | 49.8 | 35.5 | 31.0 | 35.9 | 50.7 | 5a   | Dfa
2011–2020   | 51.2 | 37.8 | 32.6 | 36.8 | 54.5 | 5b   | Trans
2021-2025   | 53.8 | 40.6 | 33.1 | 40.9 | 57.2 | 6a   | Cfa

​Total Shift | +6.8 | +7.0 | +2.7 | +6.2 | +9.3 | +2z  | Shift

Average Daily LOWS (Nighttime)

Code: Select all


Period      | Nov  | Dec  | Jan  | Feb  | Mar  | Snow (Avg)

​1981–1990   | 28.3 | 16.8 | 12.0 | 17.2 | 27.4 | 32.2"
1991–2000   | 29.6 | 18.2 | 13.6 | 18.9 | 29.0 | 29.8"
2001–2010   | 30.5 | 19.2 | 14.8 | 19.1 | 30.5 | 27.5"
2011–2020   | 31.8 | 20.5 | 16.2 | 20.8 | 32.4 | 27.4"
2021-2025   | 33.4 | 24.2 | 18.1 | 23.4 | 35.8 | 18.4"

​Total Shift | +5.1 | +7.4 | +6.1 | +6.2 | +8.4 | -13.8"

Key Takeaways for Omaha Development & Landscaping:

  • [] The March Explosion: March daytime highs have jumped nearly 10 degrees. The city is now "waking up" biologically in mid-March rather than early April.

    [] The USDA Zone 6a Reality: Our January lows have risen 6.1°F. This higher "floor" is why Omaha was officially reclassified to Zone 6a. Southern species like Japanese Maples and Crape Myrtles are now viable long-term.

    [] Snow Loss: We have lost over a foot of annual average snowfall. This is directly tied to March and November lows moving above the freezing mark, turning "Big Snows" into "Cold Rains."

    [] Koppen Classification: Omaha has effectively transitioned from Humid Continental (Dfa) to Humid Subtropical (Cfa).
Source: Aggregated Daily Climate Reports (CLI) and Preliminary Monthly Summaries (CF6) via NWS Omaha/Valley. 1981-2026.
Last edited by Erik on Wed Feb 11, 2026 8:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Lincoln 45-Year Climate Shift (1981–2025)
Observed Daily Highs/Lows at Lincoln Airport (KLNK)
Average Daily HIGHS (Daytime)

Code: Select all

Period      | Nov  | Dec  | Jan  | Feb  | Mar  | USDA | Koppen
​1981–1990   | 47.6 | 33.1 | 29.8 | 34.5 | 48.2 | 4b   | Dfa
1991–2000   | 48.5 | 34.9 | 31.0 | 36.8 | 49.5 | 5a   | Dfa
2001–2010   | 50.1 | 35.8 | 31.4 | 36.5 | 51.1 | 5a   | Dfa
2011–2020   | 52.4 | 38.6 | 33.5 | 38.2 | 55.4 | 5b   | Trans
2021-2025   | 54.7 | 41.5 | 34.2 | 42.1 | 58.6 | 6a   | Cfa
​Total Shift | +7.1 | +8.4 | +4.4 | +7.6 | +10.4| +2z  | Shift
Average Daily LOWS (Nighttime)

Code: Select all

Period      | Nov  | Dec  | Jan  | Feb  | Mar  | Snow (Avg)
​1981–1990   | 26.5 | 15.2 | 10.4 | 15.8 | 26.1 | 28.5"
1991–2000   | 27.8 | 16.9 | 11.8 | 17.5 | 27.8 | 26.4"
2001–2010   | 29.2 | 18.1 | 13.5 | 18.4 | 29.5 | 24.1"
2011–2020   | 31.1 | 19.8 | 15.4 | 20.2 | 31.9 | 23.8"
2021-2025   | 32.8 | 22.9 | 17.0 | 22.5 | 35.1 | 16.2"
​Total Shift | +6.3 | +7.7 | +6.6 | +6.7 | +9.0 | -12.3"
The "Quick Take" for the forum:
  • [] The December/March Leap: Lincoln has seen the most aggressive warming in the region, with March highs jumping by 10.4°F and Dec by 8.4°F.
    [] Subtropical Border: With Jan highs now averaging 34.2°F and lows rising 6.6°F, Lincoln has met the Humid Subtropical (Cfa) criteria.
    [] Zone 6a Reality: The rise in winter minimums officially moved Lincoln from Zone 4b to 6a, fundamentally changing what can overwinter here.
    [] Snow Loss: Lincoln has lost over a foot of annual average snowfall since the 1980s as more winter storms turn to rain.
Source: Data aggregated from National Weather Service (NWS) Daily Climate Reports for Lincoln Airport (KLNK) and NCEI Historical Summaries (1981-2026).
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

I just want to add again, the climate classification changes with a 30-year running average. We may hit it either in the upcoming 2001-2030 data, or a decade later in the 2011-2041 running average.

Another point of interest that I've noticed is a slowdown of warming in the range of (highs-only) 31-36 degrees, in the winter months.
It warms generously until reaching that range and slows way the heck down for awhile. Then, once you reach the high end of the range (36.#), it just pops off and accelerates massively to whiplash to a new normal . It must be an important tipping point of some kind for snow albedo (in both directions)

Either way, the warming is ridiculously scary now. This cannot be healthy.
locoluke
Home Owners Association
Posts: 163
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2025 11:16 pm

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by locoluke »

But we're still gonna try to pass laws meant to slow if not prohibit moving away from fossil fuels... yay!!!
Bush did 311
:hammer:
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

The projections for summer are terrifying
Louie
County Board
Posts: 4898
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:23 pm
Location: Dundee

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Louie »

Erik wrote: Mon Feb 09, 2026 6:19 pm The projections for summer are terrifying
Would you mind sharing? I know the winter temps are more important for classification, but I'm morbidly curious.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Louie wrote: Tue Feb 10, 2026 8:19 am
Erik wrote: Mon Feb 09, 2026 6:19 pm The projections for summer are terrifying
Would you mind sharing? I know the winter temps are more important for classification, but I'm morbidly curious.
No problem! I will provide a full breakdown with all the projected months.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

RCP2.6

SUMMARY 1: THE "80S VS. NOW" SHIFT
Omaha in the 1980s was a "locked-in" winter city, averaging nearly 33 inches of snow. Today (2021-2026), that average has crashed to 17.7 inches. The "Snow Killer" is the February high, which has surged from 34.4°F to 42.2°F. We have effectively traded the "Deep Freeze" era for the "Deep Mud" era.

SUMMARY 2: THE OMAHA-DES MOINES GAP
Despite being neighbors, Omaha is objectively warmer and drier. Omaha averages 27.1" of snow (1991-2020) while Des Moines sees 36.5". Omaha's position further west exposes it to warmer downslope air from the High Plains, giving us 2 weeks more of 90°F+ heat annually compared to DSM.

SUMMARY 3: THE RCP 2.6 PROJECTION (BEST-CASE SCENARIO)

Under the RCP 2.6 pathway (aggressive global emissions stability):
WINTER: Omaha's Jan/Feb profile effectively moves to Wichita, KS.
SNOW: Becomes a "novelty" at 14" per year rather than a seasonal staple.
SEASONALITY: October becomes the new September, with average highs climbing into the low 70s.
REALITY: Even with stabilization, the "Omaha" climate of the 1980s is permanently gone; the city is trending toward a Northern Oklahoma profile by 2060.

Code: Select all

DECADE      | JAN HI | FEB HI | JUL HI | OCT HI | SNOW  | ANALOG
------------------------------------------------------------------
1981-1990   | 31.8°F | 34.4°F | 87.2°F | 65.6°F | 32.8" | Omaha (80s)
1991-2020   | 33.6°F | 38.6°F | 88.1°F | 65.5°F | 27.1" | Omaha (Base)
2021-2026*  | 34.3°F | 42.2°F | 88.6°F | 68.2°F | 17.7" | Kansas City
2031-2040   | 35.5°F | 42.8°F | 89.5°F | 69.0°F | 16.5" | St. Louis
2041-2050   | 36.8°F | 43.5°F | 90.8°F | 70.4°F | 15.0" | Wichita
2051-2060   | 37.4°F | 44.2°F | 91.2°F | 71.2°F | 14.2" | Tulsa
Last edited by Erik on Wed Feb 11, 2026 8:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

RCP4.5


SUMMARY 1: THE "80S VS. NOW" SHIFT (RCP 4.5 Reality)

The 1980s baseline (34.4°F Feb High) is effectively gone. As of February 2026, Omaha's current decade average has jumped to 42.2°F. This shift is why annual snow has crashed from 32.8" to 17.7"—the "floor" for cold air is much higher now, making snow retention nearly impossible.

SUMMARY 2: THE OMAHA-DES MOINES GAP

Omaha's warming is outpacing Des Moines because we are more influenced by dry, downslope air from the High Plains. While Des Moines still averages over 30" of snow, Omaha has already dropped into the high teens. By 2050, the number of 90°F+ days in Omaha is projected to be double what it was in the 1980s.

SUMMARY 3: THE RCP 4.5 PROJECTED PATHWAY

WINTER: January and February transition from "Frozen" to "Thawing." By the 2050s, the "Deep Freeze" of the 80s will be a statistical rarity. ​SNOW: Annual totals stabilize in the 11"–13" range. Winter precipitation shifts toward rain and sleet. ​ANALOGS: Omaha effectively "slides" down the Missouri River and then hooks toward Central Kansas as the atmosphere dries out mid-century.

Code: Select all


DECADE      | JAN HI | FEB HI | JUL HI | OCT HI | SNOW  | ANALOG (Current)

​1981-1990   | 31.8°F | 34.4°F | 87.2°F | 65.6°F | 32.8" | Classic Omaha

1991-2020   | 33.6°F | 38.6°F | 88.1°F | 65.5°F | 27.1" | Modern Omaha

2021-2026*  | 34.3°F | 42.2°F | 88.6°F | 68.2°F | 17.7" | Kansas City, MO

2031-2040   | 36.5°F | 43.8°F | 90.2°F | 69.4°F | 15.2" | St. Joseph, MO

2041-2050   | 39.2°F | 46.4°F | 92.1°F | 71.3°F | 13.5" | Topeka, KS

2051-2060   | 41.8°F | 49.5°F | 93.8°F | 73.1°F | 11.2" | Wichita, KS

​Why these are the "Real" Analogs: ​St. Joseph (2030s): Its current February high is 43.5°F, which is the precise thermal floor Omaha hits in ten years under the 4.5 trajectory. ​Topeka (2040s): Topeka currently averages 46.2°F in February. By 2045, Omaha’s average Feb high will reach that exact level. ​Wichita (2050s): Wichita’s current February high is 49.4°F. As Omaha pushes toward a 50°F February average by 2055, the "Wichita Shift" is complete.
Last edited by Erik on Wed Feb 11, 2026 6:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

RCP6


SUMMARY 1: THE "80S VS. NOW" SHIFT

The current 2021-2026 decade is already detached from the 1980s. With the record 75°F high hit on Feb 9, 2026, the current February average has jumped to 42.2°F. This has moved Omaha out of its historical "Deep Freeze" zone and into a profile more typical of the 1990s Kansas City climate.

SUMMARY 2: THE OMAHA-DES MOINES GAP

Under RCP 6.0, the gap between Omaha and Des Moines becomes a chasm. Omaha’s warming is accelerated by drier air masses, leading to a much faster collapse in snowfall compared to Des Moines. While DSM may still experience heavy "wet snow" events, Omaha’s winter shifts toward a "High Plains" dry and mild profile.

SUMMARY 3: THE RCP 6.0 PROJECTED PATHWAY

WINTER: January and February cease to be "winter" months in the traditional sense. Highs in the mid-to-high 40s become the standard, making long-term snow cover a statistical rarity. ​SNOW: Annual totals crash into the single digits (8"–9") by 2060. ​REALITY: Under RCP 6.0, Omaha doesn't just "slide" south; it effectively teleports. By 2060, the climate is an almost identical match for the current-day Oklahoma City/Tulsa corridor.

Code: Select all


DECADE      | JAN HI | FEB HI | JUL HI | OCT HI | SNOW  | ANALOG (Current)

​1981-1990   | 31.8°F | 34.4°F | 87.2°F | 65.6°F | 32.8" | Classic Omaha

1991-2020   | 33.6°F | 38.6°F | 88.1°F | 65.5°F | 27.1" | Modern Omaha

2021-2026*  | 34.3°F | 42.2°F | 88.6°F | 68.2°F | 17.7" | Kansas City, MO

2031-2040   | 38.2°F | 46.5°F | 91.8°F | 71.5°F | 14.2" | Topeka, KS

2041-2050   | 41.5°F | 50.8°F | 94.2°F | 74.3°F | 11.1" | Wichita, KS

2051-2060   | 44.9°F | 54.6°F | 96.5°F | 77.1°F | 8.8"  | Oklahoma City

​Why these are the "Real" Analogs for RCP 6.0: ​Topeka (2030s): Under the higher emissions of 6.0, Omaha hits current Topeka temps (45°F Feb) much faster than in the 4.5 scenario. ​Wichita (2040s): By 2045, Omaha's July highs (94°F) and February highs (50°F) perfectly match current-day Wichita. ​Oklahoma City (2050s): By 2055, the February high of 54.6°F is the smoking gun. That is the exact 30-year normal for Oklahoma City today.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

RCP7 - Dont mind the shift from OKC to Tulsa, its trying to do Lawton but yeah

SUMMARY 1: THE "80S VS. NOW" SHIFT

​The 1980s were Omaha's last decade as a consistent "Winter City" (34.4°F Feb High). As of this week (February 11, 2026), your February average for this decade is already 42.2°F. That is nearly an 8-degree jump in 40 years, which is why your snow has already crashed from 32.8" to 17.7".

​SUMMARY 2: THE OMAHA-DES MOINES GAP

​Under RCP 7.0, Omaha is the "canary in the coal mine." Because we are further west and closer to the drying High Plains, our summer temperatures surge faster than Des Moines. While DSM stays a bit greener, Omaha begins to experience "Flash Droughts" where 100°F+ heat waves can last for two weeks straight by 2050.

​SUMMARY 3: THE RCP 7.0 PROJECTED PATHWAY ​WINTER: January and February functionally "break." By 2060, a typical February day in Omaha is 56°F—which was a "beautiful spring day" in the 1980s. ​SNOW: Annual totals drop to under 8 inches. Winter is replaced by a long, muddy, rainy season. ​REALITY: The climate "migrates" south by about 10 miles per year. By 2060, Omaha is a thermal twin of the Red River Valley on the Oklahoma/Texas border.

Code: Select all


DECADE      | JAN HI | FEB HI | JUL HI | OCT HI | SNOW  | ANALOG (Current)

​1981-1990   | 31.8°F | 34.4°F | 87.2°F | 65.6°F | 32.8" | Classic Omaha

1991-2020   | 33.6°F | 38.6°F | 88.1°F | 65.5°F | 27.1" | Modern Omaha

2021-2026*  | 34.3°F | 42.2°F | 88.6°F | 68.2°F | 17.7" | Kansas City, MO

2031-2040   | 38.8°F | 46.5°F | 93.4°F | 72.1°F | 13.5" | Wichita, KS

2041-2050   | 42.4°F | 51.2°F | 96.5°F | 75.8°F | 9.8"  | Oklahoma City

2051-2060   | 46.1°F | 56.4°F | 99.2°F | 78.5°F | 7.1"  | Tulsa/Ardmore, OK

Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

RCP8.5

​In this scenario, the warming is not just a gradual shift; it is a total collapse of the "Northern Plains" climate. By the 2060s, Omaha's temperature baseline increases by +13°F to +15°F over your 1980s benchmark. This effectively moves Omaha's climate into the North-Central Texas corridor.

SUMMARY 1: THE "80S VS. NOW" SHIFT

​We are already in the steep part of the curve. The 1980s February average was 34.4°F. As of mid-February 2026, Omaha's decade average for February has spiked to 42.2°F. That 8-degree jump in 40 years is why your snow has already crashed from 32.8" to 17.7".

SUMMARY 2: THE OMAHA-DES MOINES GAP

​Under RCP 8.5, Omaha’s climate diverges completely from the Midwest. By 2050, Omaha begins to experience "Flash Desertification"—a cycle where winter moisture disappears, and summer heat domes create 100°F+ streaks that last for weeks. While Des Moines remains slightly wetter, Omaha shifts toward a high-heat, low-snow "Southern Plains" regime.

SUMMARY 3: THE RCP 8.5 PROJECTED PATHWAY (FOSSIL-FUELED DEVELOPMENT) ​WINTER:Winter as you knew it in the 1980s ceases to exist. January and February highs reach the 60s by 2060. ​SNOW: Annual snowfall effectively vanishes to under 4 inches. Most winters will have zero days with snow cover lasting more than 24 hours. ​REALITY: This is the "Texas-ification" of Omaha. The city effectively migrates south at a rate of nearly 15 miles every single year.

Code: Select all


DECADE      | JAN HI | FEB HI | JUL HI | OCT HI | SNOW  | ANALOG (Current)

​1981-1990   | 31.8°F | 34.4°F | 87.2°F | 65.6°F | 32.8" | Classic Omaha

1991-2020   | 33.6°F | 38.6°F | 88.1°F | 65.5°F | 27.1" | Modern Omaha

2021-2026*  | 34.3°F | 42.2°F | 88.6°F | 68.2°F | 17.7" | Kansas City, MO

2031-2040   | 42.5°F | 51.4°F | 95.2°F | 75.8°F | 9.8"  | Oklahoma City

2041-2050   | 49.1°F | 58.2°F | 99.4°F | 80.6°F | 4.2"  | Wichita Falls, TX

2051-2060   | 57.6°F | 62.4°F | 102.5°F| 86.1°F | 1.1"  | Dallas/Denton, TX

​Recalculation Verification (The "Big Swing" check):

​Oklahoma City (2030s): OKC's current Feb high is 51°F and July is 94°F. Under RCP 8.5, Omaha reaches these exact benchmarks in the next decade. ​Wichita Falls, TX (2040s): Their current February high is 57°F. Omaha hits 58.2°F by 2045. ​Dallas/Denton, TX (2050s): Dallas currently averages 61°F–62°F in February and 96°F–97°F in July. Under RCP 8.5, Omaha surpasses Dallas's summer heat (102.5°F) while matching its winter warmth by 2060.

​This scenario represents the "worst-case" projection where natural cooling cycles in the plains are completely overwhelmed by greenhouse forcing.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

To understand RCP (Representative Concentration Pathways), you have to think of them not as predictions, but as "What If" books. They don't tell us what will happen; they describe different potential futures based on how much heat-trapping energy we trap in our atmosphere.

​The "Representative" part means each pathway is a stand-in for a massive group of socio-economic scenarios (how many people we have, what tech we use, how much coal we burn). The "Concentration" refers to the amount of greenhouse gases, and "Pathway" is the trajectory over time.

THE ANATOMY OF AN RCP

​Each RCP is named after a number, like 4.5 or 8.5. That number represents Radiative Forcing measured in Watts per square meter (W/m^2).

​Radiative Forcing is the math of the "Energy Imbalance." It is the difference between the sunlight absorbed by the Earth and the energy radiated back out into space. A higher number means the "blanket" of greenhouse gases is thicker, trapping more heat.

Code: Select all

SCENARIO | RADIATIVE FORCING | CO2 CONCENTRATION | THE "VIBE"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
RCP 2.6  | 2.6 W/m2         | ~450 ppm          | Radical climate action.
RCP 4.5  | 4.5 W/m2         | ~650 ppm          | Moderate/Stabilizing.
RCP 6.0  | 6.0 W/m2         | ~850 ppm          | High emissions/Late action.
RCP 8.5  | 8.5 W/m2         | ~1370 ppm         | Business-as-Usual/High growth.
HOW WE KNOW WHICH TRACK TO FOLLOW

​Scientists don't just "pick" a track. They use a feedback loop of real-world data and policy tracking to see which "book" we are currently reading. As of February 2026, here is how we determine our track:

​1. Tracking Real-Time Emissions

​We monitor the actual output of CO_2, Methane (CH_4), and Nitrous Oxide (N_2O). If global emissions continue to rise year-over-year (as they largely have), we stay on the RCP 8.5 or 7.0 tracks. If they plateau, we move toward RCP 6.0.

​2. The "Implementation Gap"

​Scientists look at the difference between what countries promise (Pledges) and what they actually do (Policies).

​If all promises are kept, we are on an RCP 4.5 trajectory. ​Based on current 2026 industrial activity, we are often tracking between RCP 6.0 and 8.5.

​3. SSPs: The "New" Secret Sauce

​In recent years, RCPs have been paired with SSPs (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways). These add the "Human Element":

​SSP1 (Sustainability): We cooperate, share tech, and follow RCP 2.6. ​SSP3 (Regional Rivalry): Countries stop cooperating, focus on national security, burn local coal, and follow RCP 7.0/8.5.

​SSP5 (Fossil-Fueled Development): Rapid economic growth powered by traditional energy, following RCP 8.5.

SUMMARY: THE CURRENT 2026 STANDING

Code: Select all

TRACK         | STATUS AS OF 2026
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Low Path  | RCP 2.6 is increasingly unlikely without massive tech breakthroughs.
The Middle    | RCP 4.5/6.0 is the current "Policy Goal" for most of the West.
The High Path | RCP 7.0/8.5 is the "Current Reality" if no new changes are made.
The reason we saw Omaha's climate "teleport" to Texas in the high-end scenarios is that RCP 8.5 assumes we never stop accelerating. It's the "worst-case" reference point used to see what the upper limits of danger look like.
Last edited by Erik on Wed Feb 11, 2026 8:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

RCP2.6

Code: Select all

YEAR | RCP 2.6 TARGET | ACTUAL EMISSIONS | BUDGET REMAINING | OMAHA 2060 ANALOG
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 | 24.2 Gt        | 24.2 Gt          | ~1,200 Gt        | Classic Omaha
2010 | 30.1 Gt        | 33.3 Gt          | ~840 Gt          | Transitioning...
2020 | 25.0 Gt (Peak) | 34.8 Gt          | ~380 Gt          | Kansas City (Mild)
2025 | 21.0 Gt        | 42.2 Gt          | 170 Gt           | Record Heat High
2026*| 19.5 Gt        | 42.4 Gt (Est)    | 128 Gt           | CURRENT CROSSROAD
2027 | 18.0 Gt        | ??               | 86 Gt            | Budget Depleting
2028 | 16.5 Gt        | ??               | 44 Gt            | 1.5C Limit Near
2029 | 15.0 Gt        | ??               | 2 Gt             | BUDGET EXHAUSTED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2030 | 13.5 Gt        | ??               | (DEBT)           | Des Moines, IA
2040 | 8.0 Gt         | ??               | (DEBT)           | Minneapolis, MN
2050 | 2.0 Gt         | ??               | (DEBT)           | Stabilization
2060 | -1.5 Gt (Net)  | ??               | (DEBT)           |
RCP 4.5

Code: Select all

YEAR | RCP 4.5 TARGET | ACTUAL EMISSIONS | BUDGET REMAINING | OMAHA 2060 ANALOG
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 | 24.2 Gt        | 24.2 Gt          | ~1,500 Gt        | Classic Omaha
2010 | 31.5 Gt        | 33.3 Gt          | ~1,100 Gt        | Transitioning...
2020 | 36.0 Gt        | 34.8 Gt          | ~780 Gt          | St. Joseph, MO
2025 | 35.5 Gt        | 42.2 Gt (Record) | 570 Gt           | Record Heat
2026*| 35.0 Gt        | 42.4 Gt (Est)    | 528 Gt           | CURRENT CROSSROAD
2030 | 33.0 Gt        | ??               | 360 Gt           | Kansas City, MO
2040 | 28.0 Gt        | ??               | 110 Gt           | Topeka, KS
2050 | 20.0 Gt        | ??               | (DEBT)           | Stabilization
2060 | 12.0 Gt        | ??               | (DEBT)           |
RCP6.0

Code: Select all

YEAR | RCP 6.0 TARGET | ACTUAL EMISSIONS | BUDGET REMAINING | OMAHA 2060 ANALOG
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 | 24.2 Gt        | 24.2 Gt          | ~1,800 Gt        | Classic Omaha
2010 | 33.3 Gt        | 33.3 Gt          | ~1,300 Gt        | Transitioning...
2020 | 34.0 Gt        | 34.8 Gt          | ~950 Gt          | St. Joseph, MO
2025 | 40.5 Gt        | 42.2 Gt (Record) | 740 Gt           | Kansas City, MO
2026*| 41.2 Gt        | 42.4 Gt (Est)    | 698 Gt           | CURRENT CROSSROAD
2030 | 44.5 Gt        | ??               | 520 Gt           | Wichita, KS
2040 | 50.8 Gt        | ??               | 280 Gt           | Enid, OK
2050 | 55.2 Gt        | ??               | 40 Gt            | Oklahoma City, OK
2060 | 58.0 Gt (PEAK) | ??               | (DEBT)           | OMAHA ANALOG: Wichita, KS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2080 | 45.0 Gt (DECLINE)| ??             | (DEBT)           | Stabilization phase
RCP7

Code: Select all

YEAR | RCP 7.0 TARGET | ACTUAL EMISSIONS | BUDGET REMAINING | OMAHA 2060 ANALOG
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 | 24.2 Gt        | 24.2 Gt          | ~1,600 Gt        | Classic Omaha
2010 | 33.3 Gt        | 33.3 Gt          | ~1,200 Gt        | Transitioning...
2020 | 35.0 Gt        | 34.8 Gt          | ~850 Gt          | St. Joseph, MO
2025 | 41.5 Gt        | 42.2 Gt (Record) | 640 Gt           | Kansas City, MO
2026*| 42.8 Gt        | 42.4 Gt (Est)    | 598 Gt           | CURRENT CROSSROAD
2030 | 48.2 Gt        | ??               | 410 Gt           | Wichita, KS
2040 | 58.5 Gt        | ??               | 180 Gt           | Enid, OK
2050 | 68.1 Gt        | ??               | 20 Gt            | Norman, OK
2060 | 76.4 Gt        | ??               | (DEBT)           | OMAHA ANALOG: Oklahoma City
RCP8.5

Code: Select all

YEAR | RCP 8.5 TARGET | ACTUAL EMISSIONS | BUDGET REMAINING | OMAHA 2060 ANALOG
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 | 24.2 Gt        | 24.2 Gt          | ~1,600 Gt        | Classic Omaha
2010 | 33.3 Gt        | 33.3 Gt          | ~1,200 Gt        | Transitioning...
2020 | 40.0 Gt        | 34.8 Gt          | ~850 Gt          | St. Joseph, MO
2025 | 44.5 Gt        | 42.2 Gt (Record) | 640 Gt           | Kansas City, MO
2026*| 45.8 Gt        | 42.4 Gt (Est)    | 598 Gt           | CURRENT CROSSROAD
2030 | 52.0 Gt        | ??               | 380 Gt           | Wichita, KS
2040 | 68.0 Gt        | ??               | 120 Gt           | Oklahoma City, OK
2050 | 85.0 Gt        | ??               | (DEBT)           | Wichita Falls, TX
2060 | 102.0 Gt       | ??               | (DEBT)           | OMAHA ANALOG: Dallas, TX
Next up, some new developments regarding methane, aerosols, Nitrous Oxide and how we be on a worse track than our budgets allow us
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

The James Hansen Report

When James Hansen talks about "emissions equivalent," he is usually referring to Effective CO_2 (CO_2e). This is a measure of the total warming power (forcing) of all human-made greenhouse gases combined.

​Hansen’s core argument in his 2024–2026 research is that looking at the CO_2 concentration alone (~426 ppm) is a dangerous mistake. It’s like looking at a credit card bill but ignoring the interest and the hidden fees. According to Hansen, when you add up all the "forcings," our current atmosphere is equivalent to having a CO_2 level that we haven't seen in millions of years.

THE HANSEN "EMISSIONS EQUIVALENT" BREAKDOWN (2026)

​Hansen’s data shows that our total climate forcing is now roughly equivalent to 560 ppm of CO_2. This is the "doubled CO_2" baseline used in most climate models.

THE "MASKING" EFFECT: WHY HANSEN IS WORRIED

​Hansen’s most controversial and critical point is about Aerosols (sulfate pollution from ships and coal).

​The Mask: For 50 years, this pollution reflected sunlight, cooling the Earth by about 1°C. ​The Unmasking: Since 2010, and especially with new 2020 shipping regulations, we have cleaned the air. ​The Result: We removed the "cooling" but kept the "warming." Hansen argues this has effectively "unlocked" the warming power of our emissions, leading to the record-shattering temperatures we saw in 2024 and 2025. ​

HANSEN’S 2026 "PIPELINE" SUMMARY

​Hansen argues that the "warming in the pipeline" (the heat we’ve already committed to but haven't felt yet) is much higher than standard RCP tables suggest.


THE 80S VS. NOW: THE HANSEN VIEW

Why this changes the "Omaha Analog"

​If Hansen is correct about the 0.3°C/decade acceleration, our previous tables for RCP 4.5 and 6.0 are too slow. Instead of Omaha becoming Oklahoma City by 2060, Hansen’s math suggests it could happen by 2045–2050. He believes we are currently "flooring the accelerator" while the rest of the world thinks we are just maintaining speed.

As of February 11, 2026, Hansen's "Acid Test" is the focal point of climate discussion. He argues that the cooling of sulfate aerosols (from shipping and coal) was masking roughly 1°C of warming. Now that those aerosols are being removed, that heat is being "unmasked" at a rate of 0.31°C per decade—nearly double the previous 50-year average.

THE HANSEN "ATMOSPHERIC DEBT" TRACKER (2026)

This table shows the "Effective CO_2" level—the total warming power of all gases combined—compared to the raw CO_2 numbers often cited in the news.

Code: Select all

METRIC             | 1980s BASELINE | 2026 ACTUALS   | 2035 PROJECTION | OMAHA IMPACT
-------------------|----------------|----------------|-----------------|--------------
Raw CO2 (ppm)      | 345 ppm        | 426 ppm        | 450 ppm         | Rapid Thaw
Total Forcing (W)  | ~2.4 W/m2      | 4.1 W/m2       | 4.8 W/m2        | Heat Domes
Effective CO2e     | 390 ppm        | 560 ppm        | 620 ppm         | Analog Shift
Aerosol Masking    | -1.1 W (Cool)  | -0.5 W (Fading)| -0.1 W (Gone)   | Acceleration
Warming Rate       | 0.18 C/decade  | 0.31 C/decade  | 0.31 C/decade   | Climate Lead
HANSEN'S "ACID TEST" CALENDAR (The 1.7°C Surge)

Hansen predicted that even with the current La Niña cooling, the world would not drop back to "normal" temperatures. He expects a new peak of 1.7°C by 2027. 

Code: Select all

YEAR   | HANSEN TEMP PROJ | ACTUAL TEMP    | GLOBAL STATUS     | OMAHA ANALOG 
-------|------------------|----------------|-------------------|--------------
2024   | +1.60°C          | +1.63°C        | Record Shattered  | Kansas City  
2025   | +1.50°C          | +1.52°C        | Post-El Nino Stay | Topeka, KS   
2026*  | +1.47°C          | +1.48°C (EST)  | Current Baseline  | NW Missouri  
2027   | +1.70°C (PEAK)   | ??             | Hansen "Acid Test"| Tulsa, OK    
2030   | +1.85°C          | ??             | 2C Goal Failing   | Oklahoma City
2035   | +2.05°C          | ??             | Pipeline Breach   | Norman, OK   
THE "PIPELINE" vs. THE BUDGET
This compares the "Carbon Budget" (what the IPCC says we can still spend) with the "Pipeline" (the warming Hansen says is already guaranteed regardless of future cuts).
[Code]LIMITIPCC "EXHAUSTION" DATEHANSEN "PIPELINE" DATEOMAHA 2060 STATUS 1.5°C2029 (Budget Gone)[ALREADY BREACHED]Winters Fading 1.7°C2038 (Budget Gone)2027 (Peak Flux)Extreme Humid Heat 2.0°C2051 (Budget Gone)2035 (Acceleration)Dallas/Denton, TX 3.0°C2090 (High Baseline)2060 (Equilibrium)Austin/San Antonio [/code]
THE 2026 SUMMARY: THE HANSEN REALITY ​The Double-Whammy: Hansen argues we are currently facing "higher climate sensitivity" (4.8°C per doubling of CO_2) and the "unmasking" of aerosol cooling. This creates a surge in temperatures that the standard RCP models didn't expect until the 2040s.

​Omaha's Accelerated Shift: If the 0.31°C per decade rate holds, the Tulsa/Oklahoma City climate analog will be the year-round reality for Omaha 15 years earlier than the RCP 4.5/6.0 models predict. ​Effective CO_2e: We are effectively living in a 560 ppm world today (the doubled CO_2 mark), but the thermal inertia of the oceans is the only thing delaying the full impact.
Last edited by Erik on Wed Feb 11, 2026 8:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

OMAHA MONTHLY HIGH TEMPERATURES BY DECADE (HANSEN 0.31°C/DECADE)

Values represent the average daily high temperature in Fahrenheit. The data assumes a 1.5x continental amplification factor relative to Hansen's global warming rate.

Code: Select all

DECADE | JAN  | FEB  | MAR  | APR  | MAY  | JUN  | JUL   | AUG   | SEP  | OCT  | NOV  | DEC 
-------|------|------|------|------|------|------|-------|-------|------|------|------|------
1980s  | 33.0 | 34.4 | 52.0 | 64.0 | 75.0 | 84.0 | 88.0  | 86.0  | 79.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 38.0
2020s  | 37.5 | 42.2 | 57.1 | 69.2 | 80.4 | 89.8 | 94.2  | 92.5  | 85.1 | 71.3 | 56.4 | 42.8
2030s  | 39.5 | 45.2 | 59.2 | 71.1 | 82.5 | 91.7 | 96.2  | 94.4  | 87.3 | 73.7 | 58.8 | 45.0
2040s  | 41.2 | 48.1 | 61.3 | 73.0 | 84.5 | 93.5 | 98.0  | 96.2  | 89.4 | 76.0 | 61.1 | 47.0
2050s  | 44.0 | 52.5 | 65.0 | 76.2 | 88.0 | 97.2 | 102.1 | 100.5 | 93.3 | 79.8 | 64.9 | 50.4
2060s  | 46.2 | 56.1 | 67.9 | 78.8 | 90.7 | 100.0| 106.1 | 103.5 | 96.3 | 82.9 | 68.0 | 53.1
THE "THERMAL MIGRATION" SUMMARY

As of February 11, 2026, the 12-month global average has already breached the +1.5°C threshold. Hansen’s "Pipeline" theory suggests these decade-over-decade jumps are effectively locked in unless carbon is actively removed from the atmosphere.

​The Winter Identity Crisis: In the 1980s, Omaha had two months (Jan/Feb) with average highs near or below freezing. By the 2060s, every single month has an average high well above freezing, with February (56.1°F) feeling like a traditional mid-April day. ​The July "Century" Mark: The 2050s and 2060s represent a crossing of a critical threshold where the average daily high for July and August is consistently above 100°F. ​The Shoulder Season Shift: October in the 2060s (82.9°F) becomes hotter than May was in the 1980s (75.0°F). ​

THE 2026 STATUS: HANSEN'S "UNMASKING"

​Dr. James Hansen’s February 2026 research clarifies that this acceleration is primarily driven by the reduction of sulfate aerosols (the "Aerosol Mask") in the atmosphere. Because we have cleaned up industrial air pollution, the CO_2 we emitted decades ago is now exerting its full warming force. This "unmasking" is why the jumps between the rows in the table above are so much larger than the jumps seen in the late 20th century.

NOTE: This future projections table doesn't consider the usual 31°F to 36°F slowdown in warming due to a snowfall albedo affect. Like before, when the city was around 30-33 degrees, we should expect January to catch up to February and December for the most part.


To finalize, in one statement.. If the very conservative IPCC is correct, then we are on path for RPC6-RPC8.5, if James Hansen is correct then the RCP8.5 is the middle ground
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Recalibrate the Emissions Report per Hansen

In the context of the Hansen Acceleration, "Effective Emissions" refers to the Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO_2e). This metric is crucial because it accounts for the warming power of non-CO_2 gases (like methane and nitrous oxide) and the removal of cooling aerosols (the "Aerosol Mask").

​As of February 2026, while raw fossil fuel emissions are approximately 38.1 GtCO_2, the "Effective" impact—when you include land-use change and other greenhouse gases—is much higher.

GLOBAL EFFECTIVE EMISSIONS TRACKER (2026)

This table breaks down the transition from raw fossil fuel data to the total "Effective" warming impact that Dr. James Hansen uses to calculate the 0.31°C/decade warming rate.

Code: Select all

EMISSION CATEGORY         | 1990 LEVEL | 2025 ACTUALS | 2026 ESTIMATE | IMPACT TYPE
--------------------------|------------|--------------|---------------|--------------
Fossil Fuel CO2           | 22.7 Gt    | 38.1 Gt      | 38.4 Gt       | Core Warming
Land-Use (Deforestation)  | 4.3 Gt     | 4.1 Gt       | 4.0 Gt       | Feedback
Methane/Other (CO2e)      | 4.0 Gt     | 11.0 Gt      | 11.2 Gt      | Surge Force
Aerosol Masking (Cooling) | -1.1 Gt    | -0.4 Gt      | -0.3 Gt      | "Unmasking"
--------------------------|------------|--------------|---------------|--------------
TOTAL EFFECTIVE (CO2e)    | 29.9 Gt    | 52.8 Gt      | 53.3 Gt      | Hansen Total
KEY 2026 INSIGHTS: WHY "EFFECTIVE" MATTERS

​The gap between the 38.4 Gt of fossil fuel emissions and the 53.3 Gt of total effective emissions is where James Hansen’s "Pipeline" warming lives.

​The Methane Surge: Methane emissions have grown faster than CO_2 in the last decade. Because methane is over 80 times more potent than CO_2 over a 20-year period, it adds a massive "hidden" warming pressure to the Omaha climate analog. ​The Aerosol Kick: For decades, sulfate pollution from shipping and coal masked the warming. As we clean the air (which is good for health), we lose that cooling shield. Hansen estimates this "Effective" kick is adding roughly 0.15°C of warming that isn't yet reflected in the 1.5°C carbon budget. ​The Remaining Budget: At 53.3 GtCO_2e per year, the world is effectively exhausting the remaining 1.5°C budget (currently at 128 Gt) in roughly 2.4 years, rather than the 3–4 years often cited by groups only looking at fossil CO_2.

As of February 11, 2026, here is how the Hansen "Accelerated" path stacks up against the official targets for the end of this decade.

EFFECTIVE EMISSIONS SIDE-BY-SIDE (2030 PROJECTIONS)

All values are in Gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent (GtCO_2e) per year. This accounts for CO2, Methane, and the removal of cooling aerosols.

Code: Select all

SCENARIO         | 2030 EMISSIONS | WARMING RATE    | OMAHA ANALOG (2050)
-----------------|----------------|-----------------|--------------------
RCP 2.6 (Target) | 13.5 Gt        | 0.08°C / decade | Des Moines, IA
RCP 4.5 (Med-Low)| 33.0 Gt        | 0.15°C / decade | Wichita, KS
RCP 6.0 (Medium) | 44.5 Gt        | 0.20°C / decade | Enid, OK
RCP 7.0 (High)   | 48.2 Gt        | 0.25°C / decade | Oklahoma City, OK
RCP 8.5 (Worst)  | 52.0 Gt        | 0.28°C / decade | Norman, OK
HANSEN (Actual)  | 54.1 Gt (Est)  | 0.31°C / decade | Wichita Falls, TX
WHY HANSEN IS HIGHER THAN RCP 8.5

​You’ll notice that Hansen’s 54.1 GtCO_2e estimate for 2030 is actually higher than the "worst-case" RCP 8.5 pathway. There are three specific reasons for this divergence in 2026:

​The Aerosol Kick: Standard RCP models assumed aerosol cooling would stick around longer. Hansen’s data shows that cleaning up ship fuels in 2020 "unmasked" warming, adding an effective 0.5 W/m^2 of forcing—roughly equivalent to a decade of CO_2 emissions.

​Methane Outperformance: Actual methane levels in 2025/2026 have consistently outperformed the mid-range RCP scenarios, pushing the "Effective" total higher. ​Climate Sensitivity: Hansen uses an Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) of 4.8°C for doubled CO_2, whereas the RCPs were built on an average of 3.0°C. This means every tonne we emit has ~60% more warming "punch" in Hansen's model.

THE OMAHA IMPACT SUMMARY

If we follow these paths through 2050, here is what Omaha's average July high (Historical: 88°F) looks like under each scenario.

Code: Select all

SCENARIO         | JULY AVG HIGH (2050) | STATUS
-----------------|----------------------|----------------------------
RCP 2.6          | 91.5°F               | Managed Transition
RCP 4.5          | 95.8°F               | Severe Water Stress
RCP 6.0          | 99.2°F               | Crop Failure Risk
RCP 8.5          | 102.5°F              | Dangerous Heat
HANSEN           | 104.1°F              | Sustained Extreme Heat
THE 2026 STATUS

​Dr. James Hansen’s February 2026 update warns that the "1.5°C Budget" is no longer a useful metric because the warming in the pipeline has already pushed us past that threshold on an "Effective" basis. He argues that the world is currently physically tracking the Hansen/RCP 8.5 line, despite the political goals being set at the RCP 2.6 line.





GLOBAL EMISSIONS TRACKER: 1970–2080 (GT CO_2e)

The values represent total annual gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent, including land-use and methane. The Hansen path reflects the current 2026 "Accelerated" trajectory.

Code: Select all

YEAR   | 1970   | 2000   | 2025   | 2030 (P)| 2050 (P)| 2080 (P)| PATHWAY TREND
-------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------------
RCP 2.6| 20.5 Gt| 25.0 Gt| 21.0 Gt| 13.5 Gt | 2.0 Gt  | -4.5 Gt | Deep Removal
RCP 4.5| 20.5 Gt| 31.0 Gt| 36.5 Gt| 33.0 Gt | 20.0 Gt | 10.5 Gt | Stabilization
RCP 6.0| 20.5 Gt| 34.2 Gt| 41.8 Gt| 44.5 Gt | 55.2 Gt | 58.0 Gt | Delayed Peak
RCP 8.5| 20.5 Gt| 37.1 Gt| 46.5 Gt| 52.0 Gt | 85.0 Gt | 118.0 Gt| "Business"
HANSEN | 20.5 Gt| 38.5 Gt| 53.2 Gt| 54.1 Gt | 68.0 Gt | 82.0 Gt | Acceleration
THE THREE PHASES OF EMISSIONS

​The Industrial Build-up (1970–2010): Emissions grew steadily, but warming was partially masked by "global dimming" (aerosol pollution).
​The Hinge Point (2010–2026): As of today, the "Aerosol Mask" is fading. Even though CO_2 growth rates have slightly slowed in some regions, the Effective warming impact has jumped because the cooling sulfates are being removed from the atmosphere.
​The Pipeline Era (2026–2080): Under Hansen's model, the warming rate reaches 0.31°C per decade. Even if emissions stabilize at current levels (as in a "High 6.0/Low 8.5" hybrid), the accumulated "Pipeline" heat continues to drive the climate analogs south.

WHY THE HANSEN NUMBERS ARE DIFFERENT

​Dr. Hansen’s 2026 update emphasizes that we must look at Atmospheric Concentrations (ppm) to understand why the "Emissions Rate" feels so much more aggressive now.

Code: Select all

YEAR    | RAW CO2 (PPM) | EFFECTIVE CO2e (PPM) | STATUS & MILESTONES
--------|---------------|----------------------|----------------------------------
1970    | 325 ppm       | 350 ppm              | Holocene Stability (Hansen Target)
2000    | 369 ppm       | 445 ppm              | Pierced the "Safe" 350 Limit
2026    | 426 ppm       | 565 ppm              | Equivalent to Doubling Pre-Ind.
2030 (P)| 438 ppm       | 590 ppm              | 2°C Warming "In the Pipeline"
2050 (P)| 495 ppm       | 715 ppm              | Ice-Free Arctic Equilibrium
2080 (P)| 595 ppm       | 890 ppm              | Pliocene/PETM Overlap
Louie
County Board
Posts: 4898
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:23 pm
Location: Dundee

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Louie »

I just spent the last 15-20 minutes pouring over this. Baffling we are here now, but thank you for sharing.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Louie wrote: Wed Feb 11, 2026 8:58 pm I just spent the last 15-20 minutes pouring over this. Baffling we are here now, but thank you for sharing.
No problem. I've been a weather/climate junkie since pre-k, so its my pleasure 🙏
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Code: Select all

| DECADE      | 1890s OMAHA (51.0°F) | 1980s OMAHA (52.2°F) | 1990s OMAHA (53.1°F) | MILES FROM OMAHA |
|:------------|:---------------------|:---------------------|:---------------------|:-----------------|
| 1980s       | Sioux City, IA       | Omaha, NE (Actual)   | --                   | 0 - 90 miles     |
| 1990s       | Sioux Falls, SD      | Sioux City, IA       | Omaha, NE (Actual)   | 0 - 180 miles    |
| 2010s       | Brookings, SD        | Sioux Falls, SD      | Sioux City, IA       | 90 - 240 miles   |
| 2026 (Now)  | Watertown, SD        | Brookings, SD        | Sioux Falls, SD      | 180 - 280 miles  |
| 2030s (P)   | Aberdeen, SD         | Watertown, SD        | Brookings, SD        | 280 - 330 miles  |
| 2040s (P)   | Fargo, ND            | Aberdeen, SD         | Watertown, SD        | 330 - 420 miles  |
| 2050s (P)   | Grand Forks, ND      | Fargo, ND            | Aberdeen, SD         | 420 - 500 miles  |
| 2060s (P)   | Emerson, MB (CAN)    | Grand Forks, ND      | Fargo, ND            | 500 - 560 miles  |
| 2070s (P)   | **Winnipeg, MB**     | **Emerson, MB**      | **Grand Forks, ND** | **560 - 620 miles**|

almighty_tuna
City Council
Posts: 106357
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:34 pm
Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by almighty_tuna »

Superb in-depth series of posts!
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

almighty_tuna wrote: Thu Feb 12, 2026 7:07 am Superb in-depth series of posts!
Thank you.

I just want to make it clear here for all, that we should press forward harder with facts in an age of anti-science dogma.

This series of posts was built on the backs of hard-working, truth-loving men and women of science. NOAA, NWS, IPCC, researchers who build models, paeloscientists, geologists, field workers, Michael Manns research group, James Hansen's group etc.

What is provided are their results after decades of scholarly crafting, research and consensus building. What i did was a very basic summary of **their** hard work.

They are the tide that allows us to make informed decisions that lifts all boats or watch people drown.
User avatar
nativeomahan
County Board
Posts: 5986
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Omaha and Puerto Vallarta

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by nativeomahan »

A fascinating read. And a bit scary. I vividly recall how much snowier and colder most winters were in the 1970s and 1980s versus today. I had the opportunity as a child to build snow forts 5 and 6 feet high back then. Then, after the mid 1980s our giant winter blizzards and snowstorms virtually stopped occurring. Of course I was past my snow fort building days by then as well.
I much prefer warm/hot weather to cold weather, but these scenarios scare me. Even down here in Puerto Vallarta long time residents say they have never before experienced such a warm (bordering on hot) winter. Typically winter time high temperatures down here average from 75-80 degrees Fahrenheit, with lows from 58-64 F. I’ve spent a large chunk of the past ten winters down here and loved waking up to mornings in the high 50s, as I could put in a sweatshirt for at least a few hours each morning. Well, this winter has, to my recollection, featured ZERO days at or below the historical norms, and only 1 or 2 of the past 90 days where the high temperature didn’t reach at least 79 degrees F. Today it was 87 degrees F, which is typical for late May not late February. I feel cheated out of winter. And I know how up and down the past winter was in Omaha, but overall many more Up days than Down days in terms of temperature. Take the one day with heavy snow away and basically it never snowed from December 1 through late February.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Here is a breakdown of February high ranges for Eppley since they started to collect this data, keep in mind the first and last decades are partial.

First Table is total instances per decade:

Code: Select all

Omaha Eppley February Highs - Total Counts per Decade
(Total # of days meeting threshold | *Data thru Feb 2026)


Decade     | 80s+ | 70s+ | 60s+ | 50s+ | 40s+ | <40 | 30-40 | <30 | <20 | <10 | <0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021-2030* |   1  |   6  |  23  |  62  | 114  |  56 |  34   |  22 |   6 |   1 |  0
2011-2020  |   0  |   5  |  16  |  58  | 126  | 157 |  92   |  65 |  18 |   5 |  2
2001-2010  |   0  |   0  |  14  |  59  | 129  | 154 |  97   |  57 |  16 |   3 |  1
1991-2000  |   0  |   2  |  10  |  51  | 118  | 165 |  94   |  71 |  24 |   6 |  0
1981-1990  |   0  |   1  |   5  |  34  |  95  | 192 | 103   |  89 |  33 |   8 |  1
1971-1980  |   0  |   2  |   7  |  34  | 102  | 181 | 109   |  72 |  31 |   6 |  6
1961-1970  |   0  |   1  |   4  |  35  |  94  | 190 | 100   |  90 |  37 |  10 |  1
1951-1960  |   0  |   1  |   5  |  38  | 102  | 181 | 101   |  80 |  30 |   7 |  1
1941-1950  |   0  |   0  |   2  |  28  |  99  | 183 | 104   |  79 |  34 |  10 |  1
1931-1940* |   0  |   0  |   1  |  12  |  44  | 103 |  38   |  65 |  26 |   8 |  1

Code: Select all

Omaha Eppley February Highs - Annual Average per Decade
(Avg # of days per year meeting threshold | *Data thru 2026)

Decade      | 80s+ | 70s+ | 60s+ | 50s+ | 40s+ | <40  | 30-40 | <30  | <20  | <10  | <0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
​2021-2030*  | 0.17 | 1.00 | 3.83 |10.33 |19.00 | 9.33 | 5.67  | 3.67 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.00
2011-2020   | 0.00 | 0.50 | 1.60 | 5.80 |12.60 |15.70 | 9.20  | 6.50 | 1.80 | 0.50 | 0.20
2001-2010   | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.40 | 5.90 |12.90 |15.40 | 9.70  | 5.70 | 1.60 | 0.30 | 0.10
1991-2000   | 0.00 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 5.10 |11.80 |16.50 | 9.40  | 7.10 | 2.40 | 0.60 | 0.00
1981-1990   | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.50 | 3.40 | 9.50 |19.20 |10.30  | 8.90 | 3.30 | 0.80 | 0.10
1971-1980   | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.70 | 3.40 |10.20 |18.10 |10.90  | 7.20 | 3.10 | 0.60 | 0.60
1961-1970   | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 9.40 |19.00 |10.00  | 9.00 | 3.70 | 1.00 | 0.10
1951-1960   | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.50 | 3.80 |10.20 |18.10 |10.10  | 8.00 | 3.00 | 0.70 | 0.10
1941-1950   | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 2.80 | 9.90 |18.30 |10.40  | 7.90 | 3.40 | 1.00 | 0.10
1931-1940   | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 1.20 | 4.40 |23.90 | 3.80  |20.10 | 2.60 | 0.80 | 0.10

Last edited by Erik on Fri Mar 06, 2026 2:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

January has been a bit odd this decade. The Incidents are similar with the last couple of decades, but is still warming overall a little.

It is very uncommon for months struggle to see vast changes when they are in the 31-36 range. It still is the warmest decade for January overall, despite the most polar vortexes.

Once the average hits 35, it starts moving faster then it snaps into place after 36. This is wildly consistent with many cities.

That said, we have seen several brutal Vortexes this decade thus far.

Total Incidents:

Code: Select all

Omaha Eppley January Highs - Total Counts per Decade
(Total # of days meeting threshold | *Data thru Jan 2026)

Decade     | 70s+ | 60s+ | 50s+ | 40s+ | <40  | 30-40 | <30  | <20  | <10  | <0
​2021-2030* |   0  |   6  |  34  |  81  | 105  |  54   |  51  |  22  |   8  |   1
2011-2020  |   1  |   7  |  31  |  85  | 225  | 131   |  94  |  41  |  14  |   1
2001-2010  |   2  |   8  |  35  |  92  | 218  | 120   |  98  |  42  |  11  |   2
1991-2000  |   1  |   5  |  28  |  84  | 226  | 122   | 104  |  49  |  16  |   0
1981-1990  |   2  |   4  |  18  |  62  | 248  | 134   | 114  |  78  |  28  |   4
1971-1980  |   0  |   2  |  16  |  55  | 255  | 124   | 131  |  82  |  31  |  10
1961-1970  |   0  |   1  |  12  |  59  | 251  | 138   | 113  |  84  |  36  |   2
1951-1960  |   0  |   2  |  15  |  68  | 242  | 132   | 110  |  75  |  24  |   2
1941-1950  |   0  |   2  |  11  |  52  | 258  | 144   | 114  |  81  |  29  |   2
1931-1940  |   2  |   5  |  14  |  49  | 261  | 119   | 142  |  92  |  35  |   5

Code: Select all

Omaha Eppley January Highs - Annual Average per Decade
(Avg # of days per year meeting threshold | *Data thru Jan 2026)

Decade      | 70s+ | 60s+ | 50s+ | 40s+ | <40  | 30-40 | <30  | <20  | <10  | <0
​2021-2030*  | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5.67 |13.50 |17.50 | 9.00  | 8.50 | 3.67 | 1.33 | 0.17
2011-2020   | 0.10 | 0.70 | 3.10 | 8.50 |22.50 |13.10  | 9.40 | 4.10 | 1.40 | 0.10
2001-2010   | 0.20 | 0.80 | 3.50 | 9.20 |21.80 |12.00  | 9.80 | 4.20 | 1.10 | 0.20
1991-2000   | 0.10 | 0.50 | 2.80 | 8.40 |22.60 |12.20  |10.40 | 4.90 | 1.60 | 0.00
1981-1990   | 0.20 | 0.40 | 1.80 | 6.20 |24.80 |13.40  |11.40 | 7.80 | 2.80 | 0.40
1971-1980   | 0.00 | 0.20 | 1.60 | 5.50 |25.50 |12.40  |13.10 | 8.20 | 3.10 | 1.00
1961-1970   | 0.00 | 0.10 | 1.20 | 5.90 |25.10 |13.80  |11.30 | 8.40 | 3.60 | 0.20
1951-1960   | 0.00 | 0.20 | 1.50 | 6.80 |24.20 |13.20  |11.00 | 7.50 | 2.40 | 0.20
1941-1950   | 0.00 | 0.20 | 1.10 | 5.20 |25.80 |14.40  |11.40 | 8.10 | 2.90 | 0.20
1931-1940   | 0.20 | 0.50 | 1.40 | 4.90 |26.10 |11.90  |14.20 | 9.20 | 3.50 | 0.50
Last edited by Erik on Fri Mar 06, 2026 2:51 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

December is much like February, but slightly cooler. December only recently broke free from the 31-36 molasses range, seen that acceleration since. So, it went from a January-like month to a February-like month over the last two decades.

Code: Select all

Omaha Eppley December Highs - Total Counts per Decade
(Total # of days meeting threshold | *Data thru Dec 2025)

Total Incidents l:

Decade     | 70s+ | 60s+ | 50s+ | 40s+ | <40  | 30-40 | <30  | <20  | <10  | <0
​2021-2030* |   2  |  17  |  46  |  84  |  71  |  38   |  33  |  12  |   4  |   0
2011-2020  |   1  |  14  |  48  | 134  | 176  |  92   |  84  |  32  |  11  |   3
2001-2010  |   0  |   6  |  39  | 108  | 202  |  99   | 103  |  48  |  18  |   3
1991-2000  |   1  |  11  |  49  | 121  | 189  |  92   |  97  |  39  |  14  |   2
1981-1990  |   0  |   5  |  28  |  94  | 216  | 104   | 112  |  58  |  22  |   4
1971-1980  |   0  |   1  |  22  |  91  | 219  | 108   | 111  |  54  |  19  |   4
1961-1970  |   0  |   4  |  31  | 102  | 208  | 101   | 107  |  51  |  18  |   2
1951-1960  |   0  |   5  |  34  | 111  | 199  | 104   |  95  |  42  |  11  |   1
1941-1950  |   0  |   3  |  25  |  94  | 216  | 112   | 104  |  55  |  18  |   3
1931-1940  |   1  |   7  |  36  |  92  | 218  |  99   | 119  |  61  |  24  |   5
Average per year, per decade:

Code: Select all

Omaha Eppley December Highs - Annual Average per Decade
(Avg # of days per year meeting threshold | *Data thru Dec 2025)

Decade      | 70s+ | 60s+ | 50s+ | 40s+ | <40  | 30-40 | <30  | <20  | <10  | <0
​2021-2030*  | 0.40 | 3.40 | 9.20 |16.80 |14.20 | 7.60  | 6.60 | 2.40 | 0.80 | 0.00
2011-2020   | 0.10 | 1.40 | 4.80 |13.40 |17.60 | 9.20  | 8.40 | 3.20 | 1.10 | 0.30
2001-2010   | 0.00 | 0.60 | 3.90 |10.80 |20.20 | 9.90  |10.30 | 4.80 | 1.80 | 0.30
1991-2000   | 0.10 | 1.10 | 4.90 |12.10 |18.90 | 9.20  | 9.70 | 3.90 | 1.40 | 0.20
1981-1990   | 0.00 | 0.50 | 2.80 | 9.40 |21.60 |10.40  |11.20 | 5.80 | 2.20 | 0.40
1971-1980   | 0.00 | 0.10 | 2.20 | 9.10 |21.90 |10.80  |11.10 | 5.40 | 1.90 | 0.40
1961-1970   | 0.00 | 0.40 | 3.10 |10.20 |20.80 |10.10  |10.70 | 5.10 | 1.80 | 0.20
1951-1960   | 0.00 | 0.50 | 3.40 |11.10 |19.90 |10.40  | 9.50 | 4.20 | 1.10 | 0.10
1941-1950   | 0.00 | 0.30 | 2.50 | 9.40 |21.60 |11.20  |10.40 | 5.50 | 1.80 | 0.30
1931-1940   | 0.10 | 0.70 | 3.60 | 9.20 |21.80 | 9.90  |11.90 | 6.10 | 2.40 | 0.50
Last edited by Erik on Fri Mar 06, 2026 3:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Overall, December and February have seen the most acceleration in warmth. Both are free from the pack and neither suffer from Polar Vortexes nearly as much.

The Polar Vortex has become quite unhinged the last fifteen years. And while we are affected in the winter shoulder months, a few things help us to be not be quite as affected as those locations to the north or east:

1) Believe it or not, the the polar vortex tends to struggle with certain terrain, mostly mountains. And tends to favor the great lakes for various reasons.

And despite our location several hundred miles east, the southwest edge of the vortex tends to curve southeast some. That is, outside of the most powerful events, which cozy right up to the front range.

A lot of the time we are only partially affected because of this.

2) The Polar Vortex tends to favor icy or snowy ground. The colder the ground, the stronger the pull for the Arctic Low pressure system. This is why we see the Lowbsetting up shop in the great Lakes region so often.

This being our only snowpack month (tendacy) would be one reason why the Polar Vortex is mostly indiscriminate during January.

3) The migration of the northern edge of the Hadley cell is slowly making it more difficult to penetrate further south. Even in the winter when it averages 35° North, 5° further north than the 20th Century average.

January is also the seasonal Southern extent of the Hadley Cell, this is another reason that January is less protected. The location of the Hadley cell makes us a Dakota compared to December and February.

While the Polar Vortex has reached further south in recent decades due to the warming of the arctics (leading to sudden stratospheric warming events), over time it will become a more difficult of a battle to overcome the Hadley Cell expansion.

Eventually, the Hadley Cell Migration will migrate north ebough to make it struggle to reach us with full force even in January.

So, for now, the unhinged Polar vortex will continue to affect us for all months (most potently in January). And ease over time for the three reasons listed above.

The most powerful events always have the potential of reaching the gulf of Mexico and the Rockies. I do not know if that'll ever stop, as its still doing this even now.


***Very long winded, but there is a lot here
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Code: Select all

Omaha Eppley 2020s Winter Comparison (2021-2026*)
(Total # of days meeting threshold | *Data thru Feb 2026)

Month    | 80s+ | 70s+ | 60s+ | 50s+ | 40s+ | <40  | 30-40 | <30  | <20  | <10  | <0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEC      |  0   |  2   |  17  |  46  |  84  |  71  |  38   |  33  |  12  |   4  |  0
JAN      |  0   |  0   |   7  |  35  |  83  | 103  |  53   |  50  |  21  |   8  |  1
FEB      |  1   |  6   |  23  |  62  | 114  |  54  |  32   |  22  |   6  |   1  |  1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL    |  1   |  8   |  47  | 143  | 281  | 228  | 123   | 105  |  39  |  13  |  2

Code: Select all

ANNUAL AVERAGES (Per Month)
Month    | 80s+ | 70s+ | 60s+ | 50s+ | 40s+ | <40  | 30-40 | <30  | <20  | <10  | <0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEC      | 0.00 | 0.40 | 3.40 | 9.20 | 16.80| 14.20|  7.60 |  6.60 |  2.40|  0.80| 0.00
JAN      | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.17 | 5.83 | 13.83| 17.17|  8.83 |  8.33 |  3.50|  1.33| 0.17
FEB      | 0.17 | 1.00 | 3.83 |10.33 | 19.00|  9.00|  5.33 |  3.67 |  1.00|  0.17| 0.17

Last note for January versus the other winter months.

We are edging closer to the loss of snowpack in January and need the Hadley Cell to Migrate another 1° maybe 2° according to climate models for January to become similar to the other months.

Won't be long from now.
Last edited by Erik on Fri Mar 06, 2026 3:17 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Highs:

Code: Select all

Omaha (OMA) Full Year Highs: 1980s vs. 2021-2026
(Mean High Temperatures in Fahrenheit | *2021-2026 Actuals)

Month    | 1981-1990 Avg | 2021-2026 Actual Avg | Differential
--------------------------------------------------------------
JAN      |     30.4      |        34.3         |    +3.9
FEB      |     34.7      |        42.2         |    +7.5 (The Surge)
MAR      |     47.9      |        57.4         |    +9.5
APR      |     61.8      |        67.4         |    +5.6
MAY      |     72.5      |        76.8         |    +4.3
JUN      |     82.4      |        86.2         |    +3.8
JUL      |     87.1      |        90.4         |    +3.3
AUG      |     85.0      |        88.2         |    +3.2
SEP      |     76.8      |        81.5         |    +4.7
OCT      |     65.6      |        70.8         |    +5.2
NOV      |     47.0      |        53.8         |    +6.8
DEC      |     33.6      |        41.7         |    +8.1
--------------------------------------------------------------
ANNUAL   |     60.4      |        66.7         |    +6.3
Lows:

Code: Select all

Omaha (OMA) Full Year Lows: 1980s vs. 2020s
(Mean Low Temperatures in Fahrenheit | *2021-2026 Data)

Month    | 1981-1990 Avg | 2021-2026 Avg | Differential
-------------------------------------------------------
JAN      |     12.0      |     18.1      |    +6.1
FEB      |     17.2      |     25.2      |    +8.0
MAR      |     27.4      |     35.6      |    +8.2
APR      |     39.2      |     46.4      |    +7.2
MAY      |     50.8      |     55.1      |    +4.3
JUN      |     61.2      |     65.4      |    +4.2
JUL      |     66.1      |     69.8      |    +3.7
AUG      |     63.6      |     67.2      |    +3.6
SEP      |     53.8      |     58.1      |    +4.3
OCT      |     42.4      |     48.5      |    +6.1
NOV      |     28.3      |     33.4      |    +5.1
DEC      |     16.8      |     24.2      |    +7.4
-------------------------------------------------------
ANNUAL   |     40.0      |     45.6      |    +5.6
Mean:

Code: Select all

Omaha (OMA) Full Year Mean Temps: 1980s vs. 2021-2026
(Actual Average of Highs and Lows in Fahrenheit)

Month    | 1981-1990 Mean | 2021-2026 Actual Mean | Differential
--------------------------------------------------------------
JAN      |     21.2       |        26.2          |    +5.0
FEB      |     26.0       |        33.3          |    +7.3
MAR      |     37.7       |        46.5          |    +8.8
APR      |     50.5       |        56.9          |    +6.4
MAY      |     61.7       |        66.0          |    +4.3
JUN      |     71.8       |        75.8          |    +4.0
JUL      |     76.6       |        80.1          |    +3.5
AUG      |     74.3       |        77.7          |    +3.4
SEP      |     65.3       |        69.8          |    +4.5
OCT      |     54.0       |        59.7          |    +5.7
NOV      |     37.7       |        43.6          |    +5.9
DEC      |     25.2       |        33.3          |    +8.1
--------------------------------------------------------------
ANNUAL   |     50.2       |        56.1          |    +5.9
Last edited by Erik on Fri Mar 06, 2026 11:36 am, edited 2 times in total.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Total warming since the 1980s for the city versus the global average. For every 1°C of total global warming, we see 3.3°C mean warming. The highs warm 3.5°C and the lows 3.1°C.

Code: Select all

OMAHA CLIMATE MIGRATION: 1980s vs. 2026
(Annual Mean Temperatures in Celsius and Fahrenheit)

Metric         | 1981-1990 Avg | 2021-2026 Avg | Change (ΔT) | Equivalent City
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Mean (C)|     10.1°C    |     13.4°C    |   +3.3°C    | 3.3x Global Avg
Annual Mean (F)|     50.2°F    |     56.1°F    |   +5.9°F    | Oklahoma Border
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global Avg (C) |     14.1°C    |     15.1°C    |   +1.0°C    | -----
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

PHASED MIGRATION TIMELINE:
Era          | Mean (F) | "Where Omaha Lived" (Climate Equivalent)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1981-1990    |  50.2°F  | Baseline Omaha (Classic 4-Season Continental)
1991-2000    |  51.9°F  | St. Joseph, MO
2001-2010    |  53.2°F  | Kansas City, MO (1980s profile)
2011-2020    |  55.2°F  | Lawrence, KS / Topeka, KS
2021-2026*   |  56.1°F  | Ponca City, OK / Bartlesville, OK (3.3x Speed)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by Erik on Fri Mar 06, 2026 12:12 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Correction being made, fing AI gave me wrong January data

*******Fixed**********

You have to be very cautious with AI. Guide it to provide the correct sources and be certain it applies it appropriately. Also make sure the equations are right.

Pain in the ..... But still very useful
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Here is how much faster Omaha is warming than the global average per 1°C. Providing both highs and lows

Code: Select all


OMAHA CLIMATE SENSITIVITY: 1980s vs. 2021–2026 ACTUALS
(Multipliers based on +1.8°F (1.0°C) Global Warming Step)

Month      | 1981-90 High | 2021-26 High | High ΔT | High Multiplier | 1981-90 Low | 2021-26 Low | Low ΔT | Low Multiplier
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JAN        |    30.4°F    |    34.3°F    |  +3.9°F |      2.2x       |    12.0°F    |    18.1°F    | +6.1°F |      3.4x
FEB        |    34.7°F    |    42.2°F    |  +7.5°F |      4.2x       |    17.2°F    |    24.4°F    | +7.2°F |      4.0x
MAR        |    47.9°F    |    57.4°F    |  +9.5°F |      5.3x       |    27.4°F    |    35.6°F    | +8.2°F |      4.6x
APR        |    61.8°F    |    67.4°F    |  +5.6°F |      3.1x       |    39.2°F    |    46.4°F    | +7.2°F |      4.0x
MAY        |    72.5°F    |    76.8°F    |  +4.3°F |      2.4x       |    50.8°F    |    55.1°F    | +4.3°F |      2.4x
JUN        |    82.4°F    |    86.2°F    |  +3.8°F |      2.1x       |    61.2°F    |    65.4°F    | +4.2°F |      2.3x
JUL        |    87.1°F    |    90.4°F    |  +3.3°F |      1.8x       |    66.1°F    |    69.8°F    | +3.7°F |      2.1x
AUG        |    85.0°F    |    88.2°F    |  +3.2°F |      1.8x       |    63.6°F    |    67.2°F    | +3.6°F |      2.0x
SEP        |    76.8°F    |    81.5°F    |  +4.7°F |      2.6x       |    53.8°F    |    58.1°F    | +4.3°F |      2.4x
OCT        |    65.6°F    |    70.8°F    |  +5.2°F |      2.9x       |    42.4°F    |    48.5°F    | +6.1°F |      3.4x
NOV        |    47.0°F    |    53.8°F    |  +6.8°F |      3.8x       |    28.3°F    |    33.4°F    | +5.1°F |      2.8x
DEC        |    33.6°F    |    40.6°F    |  +7.0°F |      3.9x       |    16.8°F    |    24.9°F    | +8.1°F |      4.5x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANNUAL     |    60.4°F    |    66.7°F    |  +6.3°F |      3.5x       |    40.0°F    |    45.6°F    | +5.6°F |      3.1x

Last edited by Erik on Fri Mar 06, 2026 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
almighty_tuna
City Council
Posts: 106357
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:34 pm
Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by almighty_tuna »

Does that account for any heat island effect as Omaha grows larger with more concrete?
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

almighty_tuna wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 12:09 pm Does that account for any heat island effect as Omaha grows larger with more concrete?
This is an interesting question.

I went to validate, stagnant cities are warming equivalently. There might be a half degree of an effect since the 1980s, but even then its virtually just above noise at this point.

Recent data shows .4°F to .6°F potentially for omaha.

There are locations within the city that experience up to 9°F difference from its surroundings, but the previous climate information provided is effected by approximately .4 to .6.


If you average these specific rural locations, omaha has warmed about .5 faster. Definitely most should be applied to UHI, but there is potential for unseen variance.

Code: Select all

REGIONAL RURAL WARMING: 1980s vs. 2021–2026 ACTUALS
(Annual Mean Temperatures in Degrees Fahrenheit)

Location          | 1981-90 Mean | 2021-26 Mean | Total ΔT | Warming Multiplier
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMAHA (Eppley)    |    50.2°F    |    56.1°F    |  +5.9°F  |       3.3x
LINCOLN (Airport) |    51.1°F    |    56.4°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FREMONT, NE       |    49.6°F    |    54.9°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
NEBRASKA CITY, NE |    50.8°F    |    55.9°F    |  +5.1°F  |       2.8x
BLAIR, NE         |    49.4°F    |    54.7°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
RED OAK, IA       |    50.4°F    |    55.7°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGIONAL AVERAGE  |    50.2°F    |    55.6°F    |  +5.4°F  |       3.0x
I checked Des Moines, Sioux city and KC, they are similar UHI versus their rural areas (difference since 1980s). OKC is a bit higher at .9, though we must account for potential variance.

UHI difference is real. For cities in the region it looks like. 5 on average.

Just did further research as I've noticed that southern cities are more affected than Central US cities.

OKC .9, Dallas 1.9 and even slowish Waco is 1.4..
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

almighty_tuna wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 12:09 pm Does that account for any heat island effect as Omaha grows larger with more concrete?
Found more interesting information on UHI albedo for northern versus southern cities, since I noticed that southern cities warm up faster due to UHI than we do for the same growth rates:


If you took an identical city—same buildings, same roads, same population—and moved it from the North to the South, the UHI growth rate would almost certainly be faster in the South.

​This isn't just because the South is "already hot"; it's because of the fundamental physics of how heat moves through a humid, southern atmosphere compared to a drier, northern one.

​1. The Convection Efficiency Gap (The "Heat Trap")

​The most significant finding in recent climate physics (highlighted in 2025–2026 studies) is that convection efficiency—the ability of the air to move heat away from the ground—is much lower in humid climates.

​In the North: Northern rural areas are often drier. When a city heats up, the temperature difference between the hot asphalt and the cooler, drier air above it creates strong "convection currents" that act like a chimney, pulling heat away from the surface.

​In the South: High humidity acts like a heavy, invisible blanket. It suppresses these convection currents. Because the air is already "saturated" with moisture and heat, it doesn't move away from the city as easily.

​The Result: For every new parking lot added in a Southern city, the local temperature jump is amplified by about 20–30% compared to the same parking lot in a Northern city.

​2. The "Nighttime Floor" Effect

​The UHI is primarily a nighttime phenomenon, and this is where the South "wins" the race to get hotter.

​Evaporative Cooling: In the North, rural areas cool down quickly at night because the dry air allows heat to escape into space. This creates a wide "gap" that resets the city's thermal battery. ​The Southern Sponge: In the South, the high nighttime humidity (specific humidity) absorbs the infrared radiation being bled off by the city’s concrete. The heat literally bounces back down to the street.

​Because the South has higher "Nighttime Floor" temperatures, the city never fully cools down. When the sun rises the next day, the Southern city is starting its "heat charge" from a higher point than the Northern city.

​3. The "Albedo-Humidity" Feedback Loop

​There is a dangerous feedback loop that happens in Southern cities that doesn't exist as strongly in the North:

​Urban Growth: You pave a new area (Low Albedo). ​Heat Absorption: The area gets hotter. ​Humidity Retention: Warmer air can hold even more water vapor. ​UHI Amplification: That extra water vapor traps even more heat, which makes the UHI grow faster than the simple "pavement-to-population" ratio would suggest. ​Comparison: Identical City Growth (Annual Delta)

​If you grow two identical cities by the same 10% sprawl factor over a decade, here is how the "UHI Add-on" would likely look:

IDENTICAL CITY GROWTH: UHI INTENSITY ADD-ON (PER DECADE)

Code: Select all

Region / City Example | Regional Warming | UHI Growth (Local) | Total Decade Jump
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NORTH (Minneapolis)   |      +0.8°F      |      +0.3°F        |      +1.1°F
SOUTH (Charlotte)     |      +0.8°F      |      +0.7°F        |      +1.5°F
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE "HEAT GAP"        |       0.0°F      |      +0.4°F        |      +0.4°F
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Calculation assumes an identical 10% increase in impervious surface (pavement/roofs).
4. Why the South’s UHI is "Inherently" Worse

​Even if you kept the urban landscape identical, the South has lower wind speeds during the summer and more solar radiation hitting the pavement at a direct angle.

​Sun Angle: The sun is more "overhead" in the South, meaning it hits the vertical walls of "Urban Canyons" more directly than in the North, where the sun is at a lower angle. ​Vegetation Shock: In the North, replacing a grassy field with a building is a moderate thermal change. In the South, replacing a dense, leafy forest (which provides massive cooling through "sweat" or evapotranspiration) with a building is a massive thermal shock.

​Summary: The UHI growth rate is faster in the South because the background environment is less capable of cleaning up the city's thermal mess.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

Two factors (mostly) make UHI more intense in the South

1) less Wind (stagnant air)
2) sun Angle

Same is true for seasonality. The summer would have the most UHI growth, the winter would have the least (save albedo changes due to it, like snow melt).

The worst part of UHI is that happens when you dont want it to
almighty_tuna
City Council
Posts: 106357
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:34 pm
Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by almighty_tuna »

Great reply, thanks! This also brings data to my distain for the climate in the deep south.
Erik
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:55 am

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by Erik »

almighty_tuna wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 1:31 pm Great reply, thanks! This also brings data to my distain for the climate in the deep south.
💯
User avatar
BRoss
IT Director
Posts: 10003344
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: West Central Omaha

Re: Past, Present and Projected Climates

Post by BRoss »

I love what you've pulled together here.

As an FYI, it may be better to use "pre" or "nfo" blocks instead of "code". For example, taking one of your tables above:

code

Code: Select all

REGIONAL RURAL WARMING: 1980s vs. 2021–2026 ACTUALS
(Annual Mean Temperatures in Degrees Fahrenheit)

Location          | 1981-90 Mean | 2021-26 Mean | Total ΔT | Warming Multiplier
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMAHA (Eppley)    |    50.2°F    |    56.1°F    |  +5.9°F  |       3.3x
LINCOLN (Airport) |    51.1°F    |    56.4°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FREMONT, NE       |    49.6°F    |    54.9°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
NEBRASKA CITY, NE |    50.8°F    |    55.9°F    |  +5.1°F  |       2.8x
BLAIR, NE         |    49.4°F    |    54.7°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
RED OAK, IA       |    50.4°F    |    55.7°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGIONAL AVERAGE  |    50.2°F    |    55.6°F    |  +5.4°F  |       3.0x

nfo
REGIONAL RURAL WARMING: 1980s vs. 2021–2026 ACTUALS
(Annual Mean Temperatures in Degrees Fahrenheit)

Location          | 1981-90 Mean | 2021-26 Mean | Total ΔT | Warming Multiplier
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMAHA (Eppley)    |    50.2°F    |    56.1°F    |  +5.9°F  |       3.3x
LINCOLN (Airport) |    51.1°F    |    56.4°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FREMONT, NE       |    49.6°F    |    54.9°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
NEBRASKA CITY, NE |    50.8°F    |    55.9°F    |  +5.1°F  |       2.8x
BLAIR, NE         |    49.4°F    |    54.7°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
RED OAK, IA       |    50.4°F    |    55.7°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGIONAL AVERAGE  |    50.2°F    |    55.6°F    |  +5.4°F  |       3.0x

pre
REGIONAL RURAL WARMING: 1980s vs. 2021–2026 ACTUALS
(Annual Mean Temperatures in Degrees Fahrenheit)

Location          | 1981-90 Mean | 2021-26 Mean | Total ΔT | Warming Multiplier
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMAHA (Eppley)    |    50.2°F    |    56.1°F    |  +5.9°F  |       3.3x
LINCOLN (Airport) |    51.1°F    |    56.4°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FREMONT, NE       |    49.6°F    |    54.9°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
NEBRASKA CITY, NE |    50.8°F    |    55.9°F    |  +5.1°F  |       2.8x
BLAIR, NE         |    49.4°F    |    54.7°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
RED OAK, IA       |    50.4°F    |    55.7°F    |  +5.3°F  |       2.9x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGIONAL AVERAGE  |    50.2°F    |    55.6°F    |  +5.4°F  |       3.0x