Possibly not even before retirement.djc311 wrote: Wed Apr 08, 2026 10:08 am It's going to be huge! Like nothing ever seen before! The most amazing, best big thing.
Honestly, at least there's something beyond dirt being shuffled around. I think our youngest will be out of high school (hasn't started yet) by the time this place is ready to visit. LOL
The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Moderators: nebugeater, Omaha Cowboy, Brad, BRoss
-
WiinterU
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2025 8:55 pm
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Quayle did Bright Eyes
-
Garrett
- County Board
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
- Location: New York City
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
I see we're back to our semi-annual kvetching about the speed of Crossroads development
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
-
djc311
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 10:44 pm
- Location: Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
It does surprise me how slow this entire process has taken.Garrett wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 10:10 am I see we're back to our semi-annual kvetching about the speed of Crossroads development
A ton of the earth work had been completed awhile back, so you would think things were fairly ready to go.
You see these other developments go from farmland to vertical in a couple of months and it just makes me wonder. The new UNMC medical facility going up at Gretna Landing has 4 elevator towers up already (3-4 stories, each) and a fair amount of structural steel in place. And it's going to be a fairly large building. Sure, different budgets and developers, but IMO the technical design work that has to go into a bowling alley structure but I'm not an architectural engineer.
-
Dusty
- Human Relations
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:53 pm
- Location: Central Florida
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
I think everyone is forgetting they are building 2 floors of underground garage first. Once this is done, the vertical parts will go fast. Well....faster. lol
The town center is mostly one-story buildings. I can't imagine it will take long to get this center block developed.
The town center is mostly one-story buildings. I can't imagine it will take long to get this center block developed.
Omaha's Transit Future starts now. Let's make the change!
Omaha Transit Network
Omaha Transit Network
-
djc311
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 10:44 pm
- Location: Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
I'm guessing no one can answer this, but why can't they build different portions simultaneously like they did with Village Pointe, Shadow Lake, etc? The development should be spread out enough to accommodate this concept. Although I haven't heard of any other signed tenants outside of the bowling alley / movie theater combo (and of course the parking garage).Dusty wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:22 am I think everyone is forgetting they are building 2 floors of underground garage first. Once this is done, the vertical parts will go fast. Well....faster. lol
The town center is mostly one-story buildings. I can't imagine it will take long to get this center block developed.
-
Garrett
- County Board
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
- Location: New York City
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Resource constraints, most likely. How many construction crews can you hire at once? How much material can you get?djc311 wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 12:17 pmI'm guessing no one can answer this, but why can't they build different portions simultaneously like they did with Village Pointe, Shadow Lake, etc? The development should be spread out enough to accommodate this concept. Although I haven't heard of any other signed tenants outside of the bowling alley / movie theater combo (and of course the parking garage).Dusty wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:22 am I think everyone is forgetting they are building 2 floors of underground garage first. Once this is done, the vertical parts will go fast. Well....faster. lol
The town center is mostly one-story buildings. I can't imagine it will take long to get this center block developed.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
-
Busguy2010
- City Council
- Posts: 7276
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
- Location: North Central Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
The project is indefensible at this point. After all the droning about every inadequacy in these plans over the years, kinda hard to justify excitement about it now. Nobody born before 2032 will have any memory about "how cool 'The Crossroads' was". It missed an entire generation. Kids have been born, grown up, and moved away without ever personally knowing anything about this site, other than that nothing happened. I really don't care to defend it for the fact a little bit of progress is finally starting to show, or how hard it is to build a parking garage below ground. All these things have happened elsewhere in no time. What happened to the other 15.5 years? The ship sailed. Maybe my kid's kids will have some cool stories about it.djc311 wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:00 amIt does surprise me how slow this entire process has taken.Garrett wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 10:10 am I see we're back to our semi-annual kvetching about the speed of Crossroads development
A ton of the earth work had been completed awhile back, so you would think things were fairly ready to go.
You see these other developments go from farmland to vertical in a couple of months and it just makes me wonder. The new UNMC medical facility going up at Gretna Landing has 4 elevator towers up already (3-4 stories, each) and a fair amount of structural steel in place. And it's going to be a fairly large building. Sure, different budgets and developers, but IMO the technical design work that has to go into a bowling alley structure but I'm not an architectural engineer.
-
Dusty
- Human Relations
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:53 pm
- Location: Central Florida
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Last I heard phase 1 would be completed together. This would include 3 of the blocks: Entertainment Center, Town Square, and Apartment Complex along Cass St. I don't see why they would have to wait to open them together. Each one of these has their own parking garage. In theory, they could complete one of the block developments and open it to the public.djc311 wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 12:17 pmI'm guessing no one can answer this, but why can't they build different portions simultaneously like they did with Village Pointe, Shadow Lake, etc? The development should be spread out enough to accommodate this concept. Although I haven't heard of any other signed tenants outside of the bowling alley / movie theater combo (and of course the parking garage).Dusty wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:22 am I think everyone is forgetting they are building 2 floors of underground garage first. Once this is done, the vertical parts will go fast. Well....faster. lol
The town center is mostly one-story buildings. I can't imagine it will take long to get this center block developed.
The town center will have multiple tenants. Makes you wonder if they are still sourcing tenants to fill all the spots.
Omaha's Transit Future starts now. Let's make the change!
Omaha Transit Network
Omaha Transit Network
-
Omaha Cowboy
- The Don
- Posts: 1013708
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:31 am
- Location: West Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Construction has begun..
From the Grow Omaha market update from yesterday-
“It's been a long time coming, but construction has gone vertical at the Crossroads development northwest of 72nd & Dodge Street. The first building going up is a 90,000 sq. ft. indoor entertainment attraction to be called Gamescape by Cinemark. Salt Lake City-based Woodbury Corporation is now leading development of the $850 million mixed-use development. Work has also started on an underground parking garage.”…
Ciao..LiO…Peace
From the Grow Omaha market update from yesterday-
“It's been a long time coming, but construction has gone vertical at the Crossroads development northwest of 72nd & Dodge Street. The first building going up is a 90,000 sq. ft. indoor entertainment attraction to be called Gamescape by Cinemark. Salt Lake City-based Woodbury Corporation is now leading development of the $850 million mixed-use development. Work has also started on an underground parking garage.”…
Ciao..LiO…Peace
Go Cowboys!
-
HskrFanMike
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1319
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:40 pm
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
In fairness, when all anyone sees are piles of dirt and the 40 year old marquee with half of the incandescent bulbs burned out, it does look like an abandoned property. (And why haven't they upgraded that sign at 72nd and Dodge to digital?)
-
NEDodger
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:19 am
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Or just tear it out until the new development has open stores. It’s completely irrelevant at this point.HskrFanMike wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 10:14 pm In fairness, when all anyone sees are piles of dirt and the 40 year old marquee with half of the incandescent bulbs burned out, it does look like an abandoned property. (And why haven't they upgraded that sign at 72nd and Dodge to digital?)
-
nebport5
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2761
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
- Location: 68102
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
I believe Grow Omaha said something about having to navigate some legal hurdles that has complicated updating the signage.NEDodger wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:30 amOr just tear it out until the new development has open stores. It’s completely irrelevant at this point.HskrFanMike wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 10:14 pm In fairness, when all anyone sees are piles of dirt and the 40 year old marquee with half of the incandescent bulbs burned out, it does look like an abandoned property. (And why haven't they upgraded that sign at 72nd and Dodge to digital?)
-
djc311
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 10:44 pm
- Location: Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Interesting because the only tenant there is Target and I don't think they even advertise on it. It looks awful.nebport5 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:36 amI believe Grow Omaha said something about having to navigate some legal hurdles that has complicated updating the signage.NEDodger wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:30 amOr just tear it out until the new development has open stores. It’s completely irrelevant at this point.HskrFanMike wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 10:14 pm In fairness, when all anyone sees are piles of dirt and the 40 year old marquee with half of the incandescent bulbs burned out, it does look like an abandoned property. (And why haven't they upgraded that sign at 72nd and Dodge to digital?)
It's a nice accessory to the mega-library across the street. Seriously, it's like they want that corner to be a dud.
-
nebport5
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2761
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
- Location: 68102
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
IIRC Target owns their space but not the sign.djc311 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 12:55 pmInteresting because the only tenant there is Target and I don't think they even advertise on it. It looks awful.nebport5 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:36 amI believe Grow Omaha said something about having to navigate some legal hurdles that has complicated updating the signage.NEDodger wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:30 amOr just tear it out until the new development has open stores. It’s completely irrelevant at this point.HskrFanMike wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 10:14 pm In fairness, when all anyone sees are piles of dirt and the 40 year old marquee with half of the incandescent bulbs burned out, it does look like an abandoned property. (And why haven't they upgraded that sign at 72nd and Dodge to digital?)
It's a nice accessory to the mega-library across the street. Seriously, it's like they want that corner to be a dud.
-
S.O.Boy
- Human Relations
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:42 pm
- Location: Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
I think you are right because I find it difficult to believe Target would let it get so bad.nebport5 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 1:09 pmIIRC Target owns their space but not the sign.djc311 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 12:55 pmInteresting because the only tenant there is Target and I don't think they even advertise on it. It looks awful.nebport5 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:36 amI believe Grow Omaha said something about having to navigate some legal hurdles that has complicated updating the signage.NEDodger wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:30 amOr just tear it out until the new development has open stores. It’s completely irrelevant at this point.HskrFanMike wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 10:14 pm In fairness, when all anyone sees are piles of dirt and the 40 year old marquee with half of the incandescent bulbs burned out, it does look like an abandoned property. (And why haven't they upgraded that sign at 72nd and Dodge to digital?)
It's a nice accessory to the mega-library across the street. Seriously, it's like they want that corner to be a dud.
-
GenX
- Parks & Recreation
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2016 8:16 pm
- Location: Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
According to the planning board website, Target owns everything but the far SE corner where the sign is.nebport5 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 1:09 pmIIRC Target owns their space but not the sign.djc311 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 12:55 pmInteresting because the only tenant there is Target and I don't think they even advertise on it. It looks awful.nebport5 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:36 amI believe Grow Omaha said something about having to navigate some legal hurdles that has complicated updating the signage.NEDodger wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:30 amOr just tear it out until the new development has open stores. It’s completely irrelevant at this point.HskrFanMike wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 10:14 pm In fairness, when all anyone sees are piles of dirt and the 40 year old marquee with half of the incandescent bulbs burned out, it does look like an abandoned property. (And why haven't they upgraded that sign at 72nd and Dodge to digital?)
It's a nice accessory to the mega-library across the street. Seriously, it's like they want that corner to be a dud.
-
Busguy2010
- City Council
- Posts: 7276
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
- Location: North Central Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
It was a comically narrow sliver of property that connects "Crossroads" to the corner where the sign is. You'd see that Target really isn't "Crossroads", its all on its own. The sign has its own address.GenX wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 7:39 pmAccording to the planning board website, Target owns everything but the far SE corner where the sign is.nebport5 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 1:09 pmIIRC Target owns their space but not the sign.djc311 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 12:55 pmInteresting because the only tenant there is Target and I don't think they even advertise on it. It looks awful.nebport5 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:36 amI believe Grow Omaha said something about having to navigate some legal hurdles that has complicated updating the signage.NEDodger wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:30 amOr just tear it out until the new development has open stores. It’s completely irrelevant at this point.HskrFanMike wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 10:14 pm In fairness, when all anyone sees are piles of dirt and the 40 year old marquee with half of the incandescent bulbs burned out, it does look like an abandoned property. (And why haven't they upgraded that sign at 72nd and Dodge to digital?)
It's a nice accessory to the mega-library across the street. Seriously, it's like they want that corner to be a dud.
-
WiinterU
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2025 8:55 pm
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)

Here's an aerial view of Crossroads Mall in 1988. It doesn't show the marquee, as it was cropped out.
Quayle did Bright Eyes
-
WiinterU
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2025 8:55 pm
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Quayle did Bright Eyes
-
Busguy2010
- City Council
- Posts: 7276
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
- Location: North Central Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Given hindsight, letting that land go to Target has to be on the short list of O-mistakes.
-
almighty_tuna
- City Council
- Posts: 106356
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:34 pm
- Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
What, and lament the opportunity for another corner gas station and car wash? I'll take the Target.Busguy2010 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 9:45 pm Given hindsight, letting that land go to Target has to be on the short list of O-mistakes.
-
Busguy2010
- City Council
- Posts: 7276
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
- Location: North Central Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Well sure, there would be that option too. There's also the option of another Swivel, Clove, 72nd & Farnam, etc, etc. I always forget Target is even there and drive by it every day. Because even by Target metrics, its not, or at least in the beginning, isnt even a full on Target. So, for as long as its been there, and Walmart down the street, I hardly ever gave it a thought.almighty_tuna wrote: Mon Apr 13, 2026 9:20 amWhat, and lament the opportunity for another corner gas station and car wash? I'll take the Target.Busguy2010 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 9:45 pm Given hindsight, letting that land go to Target has to be on the short list of O-mistakes.
Its always been a major thorn in the side of development plans, which you can easily attribute not having anything worthwhile here for going on 20 years to. On top of that, as long as Target cares to stay, itll only ever be a single use box store with a large surface parking lot, which has been argued by many as a major, giant undersell compared to the aspirations we did have for our most important intersection.
Its Target, not a Megasaver at least, but we are stuck with that. Its always kinda sucked considering had we just waited a couple years on it, Target might have built somewhere more appropriate like where the current Hobby Lobby is or somewhere not the front doorstep of the city. Thats a prime parcel of real estate for which we are with Target til death do us part. Id say its pretty clear who got the smokin deal on that one.
-
nebport5
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2761
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
- Location: 68102
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
I thought Target was supposed re-model the front with an integrated Ulta store? Maybe they're waiting for some portion of Crossroads to be shop-able.Busguy2010 wrote: Mon Apr 13, 2026 2:45 pmWell sure, there would be that option too. There's also the option of another Swivel, Clove, 72nd & Farnam, etc, etc. I always forget Target is even there and drive by it every day. Because even by Target metrics, its not, or at least in the beginning, isnt even a full on Target. So, for as long as its been there, and Walmart down the street, I hardly ever gave it a thought.almighty_tuna wrote: Mon Apr 13, 2026 9:20 amWhat, and lament the opportunity for another corner gas station and car wash? I'll take the Target.Busguy2010 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 9:45 pm Given hindsight, letting that land go to Target has to be on the short list of O-mistakes.
Its always been a major thorn in the side of development plans, which you can easily attribute not having anything worthwhile here for going on 20 years to. On top of that, as long as Target cares to stay, itll only ever be a single use box store with a large surface parking lot, which has been argued by many as a major, giant undersell compared to the aspirations we did have for our most important intersection.
Its Target, not a Megasaver at least, but we are stuck with that. Its always kinda sucked considering had we just waited a couple years on it, Target might have built somewhere more appropriate like where the current Hobby Lobby is or somewhere not the front doorstep of the city. Thats a prime parcel of real estate for which we are with Target til death do us part. Id say its pretty clear who got the smokin deal on that one.
-
WiinterU
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2025 8:55 pm
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
When they put up the new sign in 1985, they didn't get the rights to put up an entirely new sign. They claimed that it wasn't a new sign after NDOT filed a complaint. It was finally settled in 1998, thirteen years later, when the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled in favor of the developers. I don't even think that sign looked good by 1998.
Quayle did Bright Eyes
-
Dusty
- Human Relations
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:53 pm
- Location: Central Florida
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
As for the sign, just tear it down. Even if it was modernized it would still look out of place.
We need to stop blaming Target for development mishaps. It did not affect Crossroads on development plans. It was a major improvement to bring them in as a main anchor.
My biggest beef with Crossroads is the lack of density. This was our chance to bring in an urban vibe to the neighborhood. That would have given the developer some influence to talk Target into rebuilding an urban Target on the current surface lot. The size of current parking is nearly identical to the store size. They could reopen the parking garage while they built the new store. Just picture a store like IKEA in Kansas City. 1 floor for receiving/warehouse, 1-2 floors of parking, and 1-2 floors of store. If you want to add a few floors for apartments, go for it. Of course, only Target would have the power to make that decision.
We need to stop blaming Target for development mishaps. It did not affect Crossroads on development plans. It was a major improvement to bring them in as a main anchor.
My biggest beef with Crossroads is the lack of density. This was our chance to bring in an urban vibe to the neighborhood. That would have given the developer some influence to talk Target into rebuilding an urban Target on the current surface lot. The size of current parking is nearly identical to the store size. They could reopen the parking garage while they built the new store. Just picture a store like IKEA in Kansas City. 1 floor for receiving/warehouse, 1-2 floors of parking, and 1-2 floors of store. If you want to add a few floors for apartments, go for it. Of course, only Target would have the power to make that decision.
Omaha's Transit Future starts now. Let's make the change!
Omaha Transit Network
Omaha Transit Network
-
djc311
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 10:44 pm
- Location: Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
When this is all said and done (in 10-20 years) it will likely not be worth the wait. The only good thing that stuck around from the old Crossroads is Target.Dusty wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 6:55 am As for the sign, just tear it down. Even if it was modernized it would still look out of place.
We need to stop blaming Target for development mishaps. It did not affect Crossroads on development plans. It was a major improvement to bring them in as a main anchor.
My biggest beef with Crossroads is the lack of density. This was our chance to bring in an urban vibe to the neighborhood. That would have given the developer some influence to talk Target into rebuilding an urban Target on the current surface lot. The size of current parking is nearly identical to the store size. They could reopen the parking garage while they built the new store. Just picture a store like IKEA in Kansas City. 1 floor for receiving/warehouse, 1-2 floors of parking, and 1-2 floors of store. If you want to add a few floors for apartments, go for it. Of course, only Target would have the power to make that decision.
The fact there was an argument over the sign almost 30 years ago goes to show this corner has been nothing more than a headache for the past 30-40 years. Seriously... a sign ended up in Nebraska Supreme Court? Dumb.
-
BH58
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2024 2:57 pm
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
As far as tearing the sign down, unless the laws have changed and I'm not aware,that's not the best option. Sign permits are grandfathered. Tearing down the old sign could to lead to a lengthy permit process to get a new permit in place.
-
Busguy2010
- City Council
- Posts: 7276
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
- Location: North Central Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
No. I just dont shop at Target. In fact, I just drove by it last night to go to that Walmart like I always do. Having that Target there was never a boon for Crossroads. Might be a nice option to have in the area for some. The point is its just Target, it never helped the mall - like I'm sure was part of the reason for throwing in the towel and allowing it - and for the last almost 20 years has been a roadblock every step of the way. It would be better if it didn't happen back when it did, and id be willing to bet had the Target not been there, we'd have been done talking about the new development here years ago. Thats why I said its up there, at least in my eyes, as one pretty big "Gosh darn it (fingersnap)... ah, well". I'm sure if the city would have imagined the mall would be gone so soon after, and we'd be looking at a dirt pit for this long, the overall sentiment would be "pff, F Target".
-
Dusty
- Human Relations
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:53 pm
- Location: Central Florida
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Noticed Woodbury updated some renderings on their website. The buildings that would face Dodge St appear taller, but that all could change as they reveal future phases.
https://live-woodburycorp3.pantheonsite ... rossroads/
https://live-woodburycorp3.pantheonsite ... rossroads/
Omaha's Transit Future starts now. Let's make the change!
Omaha Transit Network
Omaha Transit Network
-
WiinterU
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2025 8:55 pm
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
The sign didn't get approval from the Nebraska Department of Roads, the predecessor of NDOT, so they sued the developers. NDOR claimed that the sign was in violation of the Federal Highway Beautification Act of 1965. It was allowed to stay under a grandfather clause. However, when the sign was rebuilt in 1985, NDOR claimed that the sign was entirely different. NDOR was worried that the new sign could jeopardize the state's highway funds, as the sign was located on Highway 6, also known as Dodge Street. It went all the way up to the Nebraska Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of the developers.djc311 wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 7:53 amWhen this is all said and done (in 10-20 years) it will likely not be worth the wait. The only good thing that stuck around from the old Crossroads is Target.Dusty wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 6:55 am As for the sign, just tear it down. Even if it was modernized it would still look out of place.
We need to stop blaming Target for development mishaps. It did not affect Crossroads on development plans. It was a major improvement to bring them in as a main anchor.
My biggest beef with Crossroads is the lack of density. This was our chance to bring in an urban vibe to the neighborhood. That would have given the developer some influence to talk Target into rebuilding an urban Target on the current surface lot. The size of current parking is nearly identical to the store size. They could reopen the parking garage while they built the new store. Just picture a store like IKEA in Kansas City. 1 floor for receiving/warehouse, 1-2 floors of parking, and 1-2 floors of store. If you want to add a few floors for apartments, go for it. Of course, only Target would have the power to make that decision.
The fact there was an argument over the sign almost 30 years ago goes to show this corner has been nothing more than a headache for the past 30-40 years. Seriously... a sign ended up in Nebraska Supreme Court? Dumb.
Quayle did Bright Eyes
-
Athomsfere
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:03 pm
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Still smells like disappointment to me.Dusty wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 7:47 pm Noticed Woodbury updated some renderings on their website. The buildings that would face Dodge St appear taller, but that all could change as they reveal future phases.
https://live-woodburycorp3.pantheonsite ... rossroads/
-
Brad
- Photographer
- Posts: 1036471
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
- Location: Omaha, NE
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
MCL Update video:

Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
-
nativeomahan
- County Board
- Posts: 5982
- Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:46 pm
- Location: Omaha and Puerto Vallarta
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Not sure what anyone has against Target (leaving arguments about the corporation’s politics aside) being located where it is. For many many years now it has been the ONLY business operating at the Crossroads. They took a chance when nobody else was willing to. They are essentially the only mid city Target located in Omaha, and as such they serve a huge geographic and socio-economic segment of the metro, it also happens to be the Target I shop at, and it is seemingly always busy.Busguy2010 wrote: Mon Apr 13, 2026 2:45 pmWell sure, there would be that option too. There's also the option of another Swivel, Clove, 72nd & Farnam, etc, etc. I always forget Target is even there and drive by it every day. Because even by Target metrics, its not, or at least in the beginning, isnt even a full on Target. So, for as long as its been there, and Walmart down the street, I hardly ever gave it a thought.almighty_tuna wrote: Mon Apr 13, 2026 9:20 amWhat, and lament the opportunity for another corner gas station and car wash? I'll take the Target.Busguy2010 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 9:45 pm Given hindsight, letting that land go to Target has to be on the short list of O-mistakes.
Its always been a major thorn in the side of development plans, which you can easily attribute not having anything worthwhile here for going on 20 years to. On top of that, as long as Target cares to stay, itll only ever be a single use box store with a large surface parking lot, which has been argued by many as a major, giant undersell compared to the aspirations we did have for our most important intersection.
Its Target, not a Megasaver at least, but we are stuck with that. Its always kinda sucked considering had we just waited a couple years on it, Target might have built somewhere more appropriate like where the current Hobby Lobby is or somewhere not the front doorstep of the city. Thats a prime parcel of real estate for which we are with Target til death do us part. Id say its pretty clear who got the smokin deal on that one.
-
Linkin5
- County Board
- Posts: 4864
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:59 pm
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
I think the primary complaint about the Target here is that it potentially won’t fit in with the rest of the development.
-
nebport5
- Planning Board
- Posts: 2761
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
- Location: 68102
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
How so? We don't know yet what other retailers will be included. Or are you referring specifically to the building and the parking lot alignment?Linkin5 wrote: Sat Apr 25, 2026 2:37 pm I think the primary complaint about the Target here is that it potentially won’t fit in with the rest of the development.
-
Busguy2010
- City Council
- Posts: 7276
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
- Location: North Central Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Not that its Target alone, but any big box with a big flat parkng lot never fit any of the plans put forth. Whatever plans have been put forth have always had to work around it. Technically, Target (or that big box store on the corner) isn’t part of The Crossroads.
If that building were never there, I feel we could have had a more ambitious and cohesive look for the corner. But as you have it, what you're looking at is what you get, for 20, 50, 100 years
If that building were never there, I feel we could have had a more ambitious and cohesive look for the corner. But as you have it, what you're looking at is what you get, for 20, 50, 100 years
-
Garrett
- County Board
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
- Location: New York City
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Once the rest of the redevelopment is done, I could see Woodbury offering to build Target a new store on their existing parking lot that could have more frontage on Dodge as part of a mixed use development, and then redeveloping their existing store.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
-
Busguy2010
- City Council
- Posts: 7276
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
- Location: North Central Omaha
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
In a perfect world.Garrett wrote: Sun Apr 26, 2026 9:59 am Once the rest of the redevelopment is done, I could see Woodbury offering to build Target a new store on their existing parking lot that could have more frontage on Dodge as part of a mixed use development, and then redeveloping their existing store.
-
meliketrains
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2024 9:33 am
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
I know it's always in vogue to complain about Crossroads, but I am personally attached to the area doing well as I live right across from it. It is essentially my front yard, and while this area in general needs an ungodly amount of work to get it pedestrian safe, I had remained cautiously optimistic that with the YIMBY direction many American cities seemed to be headed (including peer cities like St. Paul and KC!), that transit-focused, dense, multi-use developments would have been prioritized. Instead, what I see is a large entertainment complex like The Amazing Pizza Machine (???) and a bunch of single story glammed up strip mall development, with maybe some apartments to help ease the wound. All this on top of the 13 years we waited on seeing anything.
Maybe I will be pleasantly surprised and proven wrong, and I very much hope that is the case, but as it stands now, this is looking to be another Village Pointe. Multiple parking garages and a massive surface parking lot means this area is just another nu-mall that people drive to.
Keep in mind that the City still does not have a response to the rapidly growing problem that is the Dodge buildup between 72nd and 144th. The stretch from 84th to 90th and the stretch from the overpass to 144th are particularly bad with near standstill bumper to bumper traffic during rush hour. This is the consequence of the last three decades of car-centric development. Many will recall that the entire overpass was the "solution" to the exact same problem we have now, all in the exact same spot. All it did was delay the inevitable. You start adding destinations for hundreds if not thousands of vehicles without providing alternative means of transportation (cough, LIGHT RAIL, cough), you end up with another shitty overpass and a Dodge St that somehow becomes even more dangerous, segregating, and malignant than it already is.
Maybe I will be pleasantly surprised and proven wrong, and I very much hope that is the case, but as it stands now, this is looking to be another Village Pointe. Multiple parking garages and a massive surface parking lot means this area is just another nu-mall that people drive to.
Keep in mind that the City still does not have a response to the rapidly growing problem that is the Dodge buildup between 72nd and 144th. The stretch from 84th to 90th and the stretch from the overpass to 144th are particularly bad with near standstill bumper to bumper traffic during rush hour. This is the consequence of the last three decades of car-centric development. Many will recall that the entire overpass was the "solution" to the exact same problem we have now, all in the exact same spot. All it did was delay the inevitable. You start adding destinations for hundreds if not thousands of vehicles without providing alternative means of transportation (cough, LIGHT RAIL, cough), you end up with another shitty overpass and a Dodge St that somehow becomes even more dangerous, segregating, and malignant than it already is.
-
Greg S
- City Council
- Posts: 8910
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:46 am
Re: The Crossroads (72 & Dodge)
Having the Police and Fire Center land here tells me they've not been successful in getting private development (whether it be housing, retail or office) to fill this development. Can't believe we've waited over 15 years on this to take off and this is what is landing there.
