Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Downtown, Midtown, and all parts east of 72nd.
Louie
County Board
Posts: 4968
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:23 pm
Location: Dundee

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by Louie »

That is the uglies box out of all the ugly boxes. I hate White Lotus.
InTheRoom
Home Owners Association
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue May 17, 2022 2:52 pm

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by InTheRoom »

Ugly, but on brand. Worst developer in town. The 'thing' they created in Lincoln was unfathomably unattractive... this might be worse.
Image
User avatar
nativeomahan
County Board
Posts: 6029
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Omaha and Puerto Vallarta

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by nativeomahan »

InTheRoom wrote: Sat Oct 31, 2026 12:34 pm Ugly, but on brand. Worst developer in town. The 'thing' they created in Lincoln was unfathomably unattractive... this might be worse.
Image
Is that a minimum security prison, per chance?
User avatar
nativeomahan
County Board
Posts: 6029
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Omaha and Puerto Vallarta

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by nativeomahan »

Garrett wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 9:22 pm
Edit: Scrolled all the way through the doc and got to a rendering of their Phase I 100 unit apartment building and ohhhhhhhh my god

Image
I would be utterly embarrassed and shamed for attaching my name to such a utilitarian piece of rubbish.
GenX
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1252
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Omaha

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by GenX »

Maybe they should change their name to White Elephant…
djc311
Planning Board
Posts: 2176
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:44 am
Location: Omaha

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by djc311 »

It’s legit a total P O S - the fact this is even on the table is ridick. I’d rather see a 10 year old build something out of LEGOs than see this |expletive| be built.
User avatar
thenewguy
County Board
Posts: 4428
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:50 am
Location: Council Bluffs

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by thenewguy »

"hey white lotus, we have one of the most prime spots in Omaha ready for development, whatcha got?"

-"well, we were thinking of copying the same design of every 5 over 1 built in Omaha in the last 15 years, and make the city wait another decade to get it"

"sounds good to us!"

this is an absolute joke. I pray to God this does not get built, it does not fit in with the CBD of downtown at all, and would go down as one of the biggest misses in Omaha development history.
Go Cubs Go
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
Posts: 111064
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 11:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by nebugeater »

almighty_tuna wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 10:47 pm what a sh1tshow. if this was food, it would be a gluten free, low salt entree at a nursing home. how embarrassing and a massive waste of space.
My dad is in a nursing home, and the food there far exceeds this.
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!
User avatar
Renovator2559
Human Relations
Posts: 969
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 7:48 pm
Location: Midtown Omaha

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by Renovator2559 »

Can we just drop White Lotus and cancel their plans, I have not liked any of their renderings at all. It almost seams that white lotus is a scamming company.
Home sweet, home...Omaha!
djc311
Planning Board
Posts: 2176
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:44 am
Location: Omaha

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by djc311 »

Renovator2559 wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 3:56 pm Can we just drop White Lotus and cancel their plans, I have not liked any of their renderings at all. It almost seams that white lotus is a scamming company.
I agree - they're like those that took Covid dollars.... probably have about 20 shell companies just moving money around.
Hawkeye
Library Board
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by Hawkeye »

nativeomahan wrote: Sun Nov 01, 2026 7:34 pm
Garrett wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 9:22 pm
Edit: Scrolled all the way through the doc and got to a rendering of their Phase I 100 unit apartment building and ohhhhhhhh my god

Image
I would be utterly embarrassed and shamed for attaching my name to such a utilitarian piece of rubbish.
Holy heck that's absurdly awful. Some of you know that Ol' Hawkeye worked in commercial real estate development back in the day. Back then, we would have been absolutely HUMILIATED beyond belief to submit something like this to a municipality for consideration...and furthermore would have been eviscerated by the local trade press and competitors, making it very difficult to even get a foot in the door for any future development opportunities. WL is absolute trash in every conceivable way and should be utterly ashamed of this. How they even stay in business is beyond comprehension.
"In Heaven there is no beer. That's why we drink it here." -Plato (Probably. No one is really sure.)
buildomaha
Human Relations
Posts: 709
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 12:06 am

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by buildomaha »

I wonder if the current litigation between WL and the city is forcing the city to allow them to slide on…well every aspect that was promised in this project. If not, then the city needs to put its foot down and trigger contract clauses that allow the land to be taken back. heck, reimbursed WL for the minimal infrastructure work done so far and cut them dry.
#gohawks
User avatar
Brad
Photographer
Posts: 1036702
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 12:03 am
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by Brad »

Anyone know what happened at Planning Board today?
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 11:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by iamjacobm »

Brad wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2026 4:35 am Anyone know what happened at Planning Board today?
Planning Board rep starts at around 1:07 and developer starts at about 1:12:30 into the video below. There are a lot of potential opinions to be drawn from the comments made during the meeting, but probably the most pertinent IMO is a city rep explicitly said that litigation with the developer is still ongoing.

TIF is approved to move forward.

nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2889
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: 68102

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by nebport5 »

iamjacobm wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2026 5:35 am
Brad wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2026 4:35 am Anyone know what happened at Planning Board today?
Planning Board rep starts at around 1:07 and developer starts at about 1:12:30 into the video below. There are a lot of potential opinions to be drawn from the comments made during the meeting, but probably the most pertinent IMO is a city rep explicitly said that litigation with the developer is still ongoing.

TIF is approved to move forward.

To piggyback off of this...

-In spite of the ongoing litigation, the notice of default has been withdrawn from the city.

-The plan is to resume hopefully in the spring of '27 to finish infrastructure.

-A question in regard to potential partners was responded to by pointing out the numerous stop and starts to the project.

-On the potential for grocery component, Arun(White Lotus), said he doesn't think there can be two regardless of where a store eventually ends up. 65% of downtown residents apparently drive to the CB Hy-Vee. (Not me). He also said that the city and its planners may determine the best place for downtown grocery, but they(White Lotus) are obviously biased for the Civic site and partly because of the proximity of the 480 on/off ramps. Arun believes getting a customer base beyond just downtown is important for a 25k sq ft grocer to survive. He added that Hy-Vee was reluctant to cannibalize their own store across the river.


So at this point there aren't likely to be much if any commitments in the way of retail and especially grocery. Of the 6 phases of this project, grocery would be the last. I think that's telling. I think Arun has a point about a full service store needing a broader customer base as well as the convenience to 480. That said, I don't feel confident there will be a grocery store here by phase six or 2032.

As a downtown resident, I will say again I'd prefer to have two smaller stores(with accessible hours) vs one big "full service" store. Two of the right small stores could actually compliment each other and you may have people shopping at both regularly. Best case scenario, nothing is likely to be up and running before the streetcar. With that in mind something like a Natural Grocer's/Vitamin Cottage could take the old Wholner's space and be fed by the streetcar. Meanwhile, if the Trader Joe's ever happened downtown it would obviously draw from well beyond. Personally I'm rooting for a Whole Foods Daily Shop which is typically between 7k and 14k sq ft. That 9k sq ft space going into the second level of the Duo apartments would be perfect for a WFDS and I also don't think it would conflict much with the public market.
"It's just a rendering."
User avatar
thenewguy
County Board
Posts: 4428
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:50 am
Location: Council Bluffs

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by thenewguy »

i mean, why are they not courting Aldi? That's a perfect sized store and does a great job with seasonal flavors. That would easily fit in the base of any garbage design white lotus comes up with and would be worthwhile for residents in the area
Go Cubs Go
djc311
Planning Board
Posts: 2176
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:44 am
Location: Omaha

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by djc311 »

W T F are they still involved. This is absurd. I would have thought a new mayor would have killed this agreement.

We have Noddle, Yates (yuck), Lockwood Development, Lerner... so many other options. None of them wanted to take this on?

I'd be shocked if they have anything vertical before 2030.
nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2889
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: 68102

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by nebport5 »

One note about the design. WL used the same documents for the TIFF application. So with this project essentially restarting the designs are not particularly finalized, which Arun alluded to as the next step during the meeting. He did also show another conceptual rendering that while not spectacular, perhaps may not be perceived as heinous as the above rendering.
"It's just a rendering."
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 4753
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:29 am
Location: New York City

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by Garrett »

nebport5 wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2026 3:27 pm One note about the design. WL used the same documents for the TIFF application. So with this project essentially restarting the designs are not particularly finalized, which Arun alluded to as the next step during the meeting. He did also show another conceptual rendering that while not spectacular, perhaps may not be perceived as heinous as the above rendering.
From 1:17 in the video

Image
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2889
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: 68102

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by nebport5 »

Garrett wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2026 3:34 pm
nebport5 wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2026 3:27 pm One note about the design. WL used the same documents for the TIFF application. So with this project essentially restarting the designs are not particularly finalized, which Arun alluded to as the next step during the meeting. He did also show another conceptual rendering that while not spectacular, perhaps may not be perceived as heinous as the above rendering.
From 1:17 in the video

Image
Thanks, I was trying to screen shot it but it wasn't coming out well.
"It's just a rendering."
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 4753
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:29 am
Location: New York City

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by Garrett »

I'm also fairly certain it's just an AI rendering because there's a lot that doesn't make sense in it.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
ita
County Board
Posts: 4773
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by ita »

I would encourage all interested in this project to watch the Omaha Planning Board's review of this item to see how one can answer a question without actually answering the question.
Last edited by ita on Thu Nov 05, 2026 4:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ita
County Board
Posts: 4773
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by ita »

Garrett wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2026 4:38 pm I'm also fairly certain it's just an AI rendering because there's a lot that doesn't make sense in it.
Yes sir. Their phase one apartment building is not even in this rendering.
User avatar
remline
Library Board
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:38 pm

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by remline »

The cited statistic was interesting about 65% of the people within 1.5 miles of the civic site going to the Hy-Vee in Council Bluffs.

I'm not quite up to speed on these things: why was the notice of default withdrawn?
User avatar
Linkin5
County Board
Posts: 4914
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2004 1:59 am

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by Linkin5 »

This is insanity do not let them develop this lot City of Omaha!
ita
County Board
Posts: 4773
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by ita »

I think this is a good time to start contacting your city council representative to take a closer look at what's happening. The fact that none of the renderings are matching is red flag enough.
djc311
Planning Board
Posts: 2176
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:44 am
Location: Omaha

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by djc311 »

The fact the city not long ago told these clowns to take a hike, then the developer sued (over God knows what considering they hadn't developed diddly), and now the city is like "OK, we'll go with you". It's like a scene out of Tommy Boy.

I'm telling you, I'd prefer to give my 7 year old grandson LEGOs to build something on that lot before WL. Surprised that dude can tie his own shoes.
User avatar
mcarch
Library Board
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: Elkhorn

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by mcarch »

If that is what is going to be built - that is a waste of real estate - not to mention a pig w/the worst lipstick ever. I would rather have this site sit vacant until a GOOD plan is put forth instead of building subpar buildings that will later be expensive to demolish to make way for something better - or yet, not having the opportunity to have something better because we put up something like this.
mcarch
User avatar
thenewguy
County Board
Posts: 4428
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:50 am
Location: Council Bluffs

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by thenewguy »

mcarch wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2026 2:10 am If that is what is going to be built - that is a waste of real estate - not to mention a pig w/the worst lipstick ever. I would rather have this site sit vacant until a GOOD plan is put forth instead of building subpar buildings that will later be expensive to demolish to make way for something better - or yet, not having the opportunity to have something better because we put up something like this.
while i think we all agree with your sentiment, it would seem that the city thinks they can't do any better than this (for some reason) and just want to say that they got SOMETHING done, whereas they should indeed just wait for something/anything better.
Go Cubs Go
Flyer14
Home Owners Association
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2021 5:14 pm

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by Flyer14 »

ita wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2026 4:45 pm I would encourage all interested in this project to watch the Omaha Planning Board's review of this item to see how one can answer a question without actually answering the question.
It was almost impressive how much was said but at the same time nothing spoken had any value.
ita
County Board
Posts: 4773
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by ita »

thenewguy wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2026 11:21 am
mcarch wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2026 2:10 am If that is what is going to be built - that is a waste of real estate - not to mention a pig w/the worst lipstick ever. I would rather have this site sit vacant until a GOOD plan is put forth instead of building subpar buildings that will later be expensive to demolish to make way for something better - or yet, not having the opportunity to have something better because we put up something like this.
while i think we all agree with your sentiment, it would seem that the city thinks they can't do any better than this (for some reason) and just want to say that they got SOMETHING done, whereas they should indeed just wait for something/anything better.
I do not think the City has that mind set. In fact, they were actively pursuing other options last year as the construction thresholds were not being met by White Lotus. At this point however, considering what is happening or not happening with the litigation, I do not think the City wants to be in a position where they appear to be delaying the project. In regards to the TIF application, if it meets all the criteria, such as appropriate use for zoning and master planning, financials are appropriate, than the TIF committee, planning or city council have no reason to deny it. That is the crux of White Lotus's position in litigation; they argue the City was doing things to prevent the project from moving forward, so any missed construction deadlines are because the City not the developer. With the City withdrawing the notice of default, I think this TIF application resubmission is the developer knowing they are in a stronger position to go forward, even if they do not actually have plans to go beyond phase 1 at this point. Just my thoughts.
Hawkeye
Library Board
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul

Re: Civic Square (former Civic Auditorium)

Post by Hawkeye »

Garrett wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2026 3:34 pm
nebport5 wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2026 3:27 pm One note about the design. WL used the same documents for the TIFF application. So with this project essentially restarting the designs are not particularly finalized, which Arun alluded to as the next step during the meeting. He did also show another conceptual rendering that while not spectacular, perhaps may not be perceived as heinous as the above rendering.
From 1:17 in the video

Image
Oh thank goodness.....more nondescript low-rise square boxes. Ol' Hawkeye was very worried we wouldn't get more of those in one of the most prime spots in downtown. But never fear...the bang-up crew at White Lotus comes through and saves the day!
"In Heaven there is no beer. That's why we drink it here." -Plato (Probably. No one is really sure.)