Let's continue this in the correct thread. There are certain aspects of each scenario that I like and dislike. I have never been a fan of the 24th ORBT idea, because making it ORBT would eliminate a lot of stops. I'd be more in favor of adding better amenities and 10 minute frequency than making it BRT.ita wrote: Mon Mar 14, 2022 2:32 pmAgreed, and like I said you are grading each component of each scenario. I would like to see some mix of the scenarios, ultimately, in addition to the shared items.Busguy2010 wrote: Mon Mar 14, 2022 12:49 pmI 100% agree. Just so everyone knows, this was discussed in the METRO thread:I also think Scenario B looks the best. In my personal opinion, we should look mostly toward improving our existing routes through amenities and frequency, and I think Scenario B does the best job of that.ita wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 1:27 pm Here is OMetro's handout outlining each scenario. It has a lot more information than what I posted above:
Scenario Overview
Here's the link to the survey:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PLZXCC2
What do you all think about each scenario?
I encourage everyone to take the survey, takes about 5 minutes.
Ideas I like: having mid-day Route 92 trips, adding a 144th street route, 15 minute all day frequency on 3,4,13,15,30, restoring service to pre-COVID levels, improving stops, service to Southport and Gretna.
Not a fan of: ORBT on 24th, ORBT for 13th/Bellevue, Park & Ride for North Omaha, the North Omaha "micro transit" zone, Fort street express route, extending Route 92 to Valley.
The others I'm indifferent about. Feel free to ask me why I feel the way I do about any of these.

