Human Relations
Posts: 797
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:59 am
The World Herald just did a story on the cancelled panda exhbit. I personally am glad that they didn't go through with it. Pandas cost a lot, I'm glad their using the money to update other areas of the zoo.
#Save(TheBaseandSidesof)TheUglyGrainSilos2025
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:19 am
Big surprise - the Chinese wanted to jack around and kill a deal that would have helped U.S. exports.
$55 million for ONE animal species? No thanks.
$55 million for ONE animal species? No thanks.
County Board
Posts: 4622
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 2:52 am
Location: Land o Lakes, FL
Article in the Sunday paper
http://dataomaha.com/bigstory/story/106 ... -of-pandas
A six-year pursuit between 2001 and 2007 put the Henry Doorly Zoo & Aquarium alone at the top of the list to receive a pair of giant pandas from China.
Everything was in place. An exhibit had been designed, planned for just east of the Lied Jungle, and about $55 million was committed by the zoo’s benefactors.
Chinese diplomats and scientists visited the zoo, Nebraska politicians visited China, money was sent to support giant pandas in the wild, and all kinds of concessions were made to keep Chinese panda power players appeased.
Then the deal fell apart...
http://dataomaha.com/bigstory/story/106 ... -of-pandas
Panda pursuit is history
When Chinese tried to scuttle Nebraska trade deal in 2007, Omaha zoo abruptly ended its panda quest.
Omaha seemed so close to getting pandas.When Chinese tried to scuttle Nebraska trade deal in 2007, Omaha zoo abruptly ended its panda quest.
A six-year pursuit between 2001 and 2007 put the Henry Doorly Zoo & Aquarium alone at the top of the list to receive a pair of giant pandas from China.
Everything was in place. An exhibit had been designed, planned for just east of the Lied Jungle, and about $55 million was committed by the zoo’s benefactors.
Chinese diplomats and scientists visited the zoo, Nebraska politicians visited China, money was sent to support giant pandas in the wild, and all kinds of concessions were made to keep Chinese panda power players appeased.
Then the deal fell apart...
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1897
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:45 pm
Location: Omaha Metro Area
Panda displays rarely are a long term profit center for zoos as the buzz wears off long before the investment is recouped. In this story, we see Omaha getting played by the Chinese. This was in the era of us getting played by BMW and Mercedes.
Fortunately, as new city leaders emerge, we seem to be losing the "Gee, won't it be great if X loves us?" and replacing it with "Gee, glad to see you come, we are willing to help you once the deal is signed".
Dumping the Pandas was the right call.
Fortunately, as new city leaders emerge, we seem to be losing the "Gee, won't it be great if X loves us?" and replacing it with "Gee, glad to see you come, we are willing to help you once the deal is signed".
Dumping the Pandas was the right call.
Library Board
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:55 pm
Location: Harvey Oaks
My recollection is that our zoo would have the ability and facilities to grow enough bamboo for a pair of pandas, but the lease agreement would have required them to purchase bamboo directly from China. Anyone else remember hearing something like that?
Home Owners Association
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:48 am
The WH article indicated that the plan at the time was to purchase bamboo grown in the south, Mississippi, I think.zippy wrote:My recollection is that our zoo would have the ability and facilities to grow enough bamboo for a pair of pandas, but the lease agreement would have required them to purchase bamboo directly from China. Anyone else remember hearing something like that?
City Council
Posts: 34365
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 5:18 pm
Yahoo Messenger: jestcoyote
Location: Aksarben Village
Here's what China's panda diplomacy program ending in the US may mean
Soon, there will be no more pandas left in the United States. CNN's David Culver explains how this relates to diplomatic ties between China and the US.
Soon, there will be no more pandas left in the United States. CNN's David Culver explains how this relates to diplomatic ties between China and the US.
County Board
Posts: 4715
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:29 am
Location: New York City
Welp, good thing that didn’t happen I guess
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
Planning Board
Posts: 2524
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:51 pm
I saw the ones at the Smithsonian National Zoo in DC back in like 2015. It was nothing to do backflips over. Honestly, I found the Red Pandas cooler. 
County Board
Posts: 4760
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm
More pandas will be coming to the U.S., China's president signals
I think it would be cool if Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo got some in this possible next allotment of pandas. It could have it's own space; maybe where the cat complex used to be. I could make a joke about the governor probably banning them as they may be spies, but I won't.hinese President Xi Jinping signaled that China will send new pandas to the United States, calling them "envoys of friendship between the Chinese and American peoples."
"We are ready to continue our cooperation with the United States on panda conservation, and do our best to meet the wishes of the Californians so as to deepen the friendly ties between our two peoples," Xi said Wednesday during a dinner speech with business leaders.
The gesture came at the end of a day in which Xi and President Biden held their first face to face meeting in a year and pledged to try to reduce tensions. Xi did not share additional details on when or where pandas might be provided but appeared to suggest the next pair of pandas are most likely to come to California, probably San Diego.
The bears have long been the symbol of the U.S.-China friendship since Beijing gifted a pair of pandas to the National Zoo in Washington in 1972, ahead of the normalization of bilateral relations. Later, Beijing loaned the pandas to other U.S. zoos, with proceeds going back to panda conservation programs.
City Council
Posts: 106398
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:34 pm
Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado
IIRC, the HDZ, since back in the Doc days, was not ever going to get pandas because they essentially are renting the animals, conservation efforts directly benefit China b/c all offspring, etc, must be shipped back, and the exhibit would operate at a fairly significant loss as well. Too many rules, not enough benefit to the zoo in pretty much any arena other than bragging rights.
Crazy that pandas are diplomatic leverage.
Crazy that pandas are diplomatic leverage.
County Board
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:23 pm
Location: Dundee
Yeah, I see no benefit in getting pandas at HDZ.almighty_tuna wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 3:40 pm IIRC, the HDZ, since back in the Doc days, was not ever going to get pandas because they essentially are renting the animals, conservation efforts directly benefit China b/c all offspring, etc, must be shipped back, and the exhibit would operate at a fairly significant loss as well. Too many rules, not enough benefit to the zoo in pretty much any arena other than bragging rights.
Crazy that pandas are diplomatic leverage.
County Board
Posts: 4760
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm
That makes sense. Too bad, having the only pandas in the midwest could boost visitors even higher. Oh well.almighty_tuna wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 3:40 pm IIRC, the HDZ, since back in the Doc days, was not ever going to get pandas because they essentially are renting the animals, conservation efforts directly benefit China b/c all offspring, etc, must be shipped back, and the exhibit would operate at a fairly significant loss as well. Too many rules, not enough benefit to the zoo in pretty much any arena other than bragging rights.
Crazy that pandas are diplomatic leverage.
City Council
Posts: 106398
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:34 pm
Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado
Yeah, probably, but also to the detriment of the other exhibits at HDZ. Not in terms of exhibit viewership, but available resources to expand and maintain them.ita wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 4:05 pmThat makes sense. Too bad, having the only pandas in the midwest could boost visitors even higher. Oh well.almighty_tuna wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 3:40 pm IIRC, the HDZ, since back in the Doc days, was not ever going to get pandas because they essentially are renting the animals, conservation efforts directly benefit China b/c all offspring, etc, must be shipped back, and the exhibit would operate at a fairly significant loss as well. Too many rules, not enough benefit to the zoo in pretty much any arena other than bragging rights.
Crazy that pandas are diplomatic leverage.
County Board
Posts: 4760
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:11 pm
Another good point.almighty_tuna wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 4:39 pmYeah, probably, but also to the detriment of the other exhibits at HDZ. Not in terms of exhibit viewership, but available resources to expand and maintain them.ita wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 4:05 pmThat makes sense. Too bad, having the only pandas in the midwest could boost visitors even higher. Oh well.almighty_tuna wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 3:40 pm IIRC, the HDZ, since back in the Doc days, was not ever going to get pandas because they essentially are renting the animals, conservation efforts directly benefit China b/c all offspring, etc, must be shipped back, and the exhibit would operate at a fairly significant loss as well. Too many rules, not enough benefit to the zoo in pretty much any arena other than bragging rights.
Crazy that pandas are diplomatic leverage.