State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Trains, Planes, and Automobiles (and Streetcars!).
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 34366
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village

State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by Coyote »

State Street reopening:
After delays caused concern for some neighbors


Mjs5050ss
Home Owners Association
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:42 pm

Re: State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by Mjs5050ss »

Coyote wrote: Tue Dec 05, 2023 6:25 pm State Street reopening:
After delays caused concern for some neighbors


Looks like this is finally open.
https://app.truelook.cloud/dashboard/27 ... 3fa0n7xb9v
ProgKingHughesker
Home Owners Association
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 7:32 pm

Re: State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by ProgKingHughesker »

If they were gonna close it now, why not just go ahead and 4-lane it instead of having this exact same headache again in 10 years?
User avatar
Busguy2010
City Council
Posts: 7329
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by Busguy2010 »

ProgKingHughesker wrote: Fri Dec 15, 2023 7:47 pm If they were gonna close it now, why not just go ahead and 4-lane it instead of having this exact same headache again in 10 years?
That was my exact thought. It was closed such a long time, it made no sense not to do 4. We gotta be able to do better than that.
User avatar
Brad
Photographer
Posts: 1036567
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by Brad »

Busguy2010 wrote: Fri Dec 15, 2023 8:53 pm
ProgKingHughesker wrote: Fri Dec 15, 2023 7:47 pm If they were gonna close it now, why not just go ahead and 4-lane it instead of having this exact same headache again in 10 years?
That was my exact thought. It was closed such a long time, it made no sense not to do 4. We gotta be able to do better than that.
The reason they had to close the entire road was they raised the grade quite a bit and when doing that they had to place a large surcharge across the entire width of the road for a storm sewer pipe. The surcharge takes a while to settle.

Here is a photo I took a couple weeks ago:
881A0237.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
BRoss
IT Director
Posts: 10003379
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: West Central Omaha

Re: State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by BRoss »

ProgKingHughesker wrote: Fri Dec 15, 2023 7:47 pm If they were gonna close it now, why not just go ahead and 4-lane it instead of having this exact same headache again in 10 years?
I think it's mainly about cost. Douglas County has a lot of rural roads that need to be upgraded. 20 years ago, southwest Omaha was mostly (and still has a lot of) two lane roads and turning traffic always caused bad backups. I think they learned that suburban areas need to be at least three lanes to alleviate that problem and make it more manageable until the funds come to make it four lanes. And they still have a lot of two lanes roads that need to be addressed in NW Omaha.

Four lane divided roads tend to be much more expensive than a three lane stretch such as what they did here. There's no curbs, no median (or essentially two separate parallel streets) - just one stretch of asphalt. And four lane roads these days often require other additional aspects such as sound walls.

Beyond that, there's also an issue with creating more lane miles that need maintenance. If the capacity is not needed right now, then why build more that needs to be maintained and will likely need to be repaved by time it really is needed?

I would love to see them all widened to four lanes. But I think it does make sense to make sure the arterial roads of upcoming areas are at least three lanes.
Mjs5050ss
Home Owners Association
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:42 pm

Re: State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by Mjs5050ss »

BRoss wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2023 12:12 pm
ProgKingHughesker wrote: Fri Dec 15, 2023 7:47 pm If they were gonna close it now, why not just go ahead and 4-lane it instead of having this exact same headache again in 10 years?
I think it's mainly about cost. Douglas County has a lot of rural roads that need to be upgraded. 20 years ago, southwest Omaha was mostly (and still has a lot of) two lane roads and turning traffic always caused bad backups. I think they learned that suburban areas need to be at least three lanes to alleviate that problem and make it more manageable until the funds come to make it four lanes. And they still have a lot of two lanes roads that need to be addressed in NW Omaha.

Four lane divided roads tend to be much more expensive than a three lane stretch such as what they did here. There's no curbs, no median (or essentially two separate parallel streets) - just one stretch of asphalt. And four lane roads these days often require other additional aspects such as sound walls.

Beyond that, there's also an issue with creating more lane miles that need maintenance. If the capacity is not needed right now, then why build more that needs to be maintained and will likely need to be repaved by time it really is needed?

I would love to see them all widened to four lanes. But I think it does make sense to make sure the arterial roads of upcoming areas are at least three lanes.
I always assumed it was with the hopes that it would be the city's problem by the time they needed to be 4 lanes.
User avatar
Renovator2559
Human Relations
Posts: 952
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 2:48 pm
Location: Midtown Omaha

Re: State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by Renovator2559 »

Expensive 4 lane streets to serve a few cars and encourage more subsidized housing sprawl? What needs to happen is to have better zoning and no more culdesacs that cause too much funneling of traffic on few exit points and design these neighborhoods to be more walkable suburbs and have their own local services without having to make every arrand trip a road congesting experience! It's sad to see how Omaha incurs plenty of debt from these low tax paying culdesacs, who are unable to pay their full share of road maintenance.

This subsidizatiom isn't sustainable. Fix the traffic generating and funneling problem, rather than patching a temp fix that only costs plenty to maintain with long ugly bars of expensive traffic lights!
Home sweet, home...Omaha!
User avatar
Brad
Photographer
Posts: 1036567
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by Brad »

Renovator2559 wrote: Wed Dec 20, 2023 7:53 pm What needs to happen is to have better zoning and no more culdesacs that cause too much funneling of traffic on few exit point
You are lumping a bunch of items in to Zoning that have nothing to do with zoning.

cul-de-sacs are not part of zoning.
Many of the metro municipalities do try to minimize cul-de-sacs.
One local municipality leader actually makes fun of cul-de-sac at public meetings.

As far as the "Few Exit Points", Only 3 per mile between the main intersections on main roads, that's what's allowed. Again, that's not zoning. I also believe that was an agreed upon number between several city, county, and state departments, it has noting to do with developers building cul-de-sacs instead of connections to the main road.
almighty_tuna
City Council
Posts: 106377
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:34 pm
Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado

Re: State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by almighty_tuna »

One could say that right now Brad is running a...zone defense.
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
Posts: 110964
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Re: State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by nebugeater »

almighty_tuna wrote: Thu Dec 21, 2023 8:22 am One could say that right now Brad is running a...zone defense.
That often happens when someone calls an audible.
For the record  NEBUGEATER does not equal BUGEATER    !!!!!!!
User avatar
BRoss
IT Director
Posts: 10003379
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: West Central Omaha

Re: State Street (147th St to 153rd St)

Post by BRoss »

Brad wrote: Thu Dec 21, 2023 8:15 am As far as the "Few Exit Points", Only 3 per mile between the main intersections on main roads, that's what's allowed. Again, that's not zoning. I also believe that was an agreed upon number between several city, county, and state departments
Yeah, they don't like full movement intersections closer than a quarter mile apart. Having them closer causes traffic flow issues.