Letter to NCAA

Downtown, Midtown, and all parts east of 72nd.
User avatar
agibson95
Home Owners Association
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 6:45 am

Letter to NCAA

Post by agibson95 »

It was reported on Channel 5 this morning that 2 council members sent letters to the NCAA about a rumored letter the NCAA sent the mayors office. It basically said that they heard a rumor there was a 3-5 year extension possibility and that the NCAA didnt have a preferance over downtown and keeping Rosenblatt. The mayors office wouldn't let them read it and they were mad. WAA WAA WAA. They wanted to know what the letter said and wanted to contact the NCAA directly. My whole take on this is that the NCAA will just read 'Please take the CWS away from Omaha, our leaders are fighting and are too stupid to wait for the NCAA to publicly release their feelings on the whole thing.'

They showed the letter on the news, but I couldnt read the whole thing.
User avatar
thenewguy
County Board
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:50 am
Location: Council Bluffs

Letter to NCAA

Post by thenewguy »

give me a break... Some people never cease to amaze me.
Go Cubs Go
User avatar
guitarguy
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1296
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:39 am

Letter to NCAA

Post by guitarguy »

gosh this is aggravating sounds like the city council cant hold their wad lol
Bugeater
Library Board
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:50 am
Location: Omaha

Letter to NCAA

Post by Bugeater »

I don't think the Mayor wants the extension, probably because if we have time to think about it we'll realize it's not worth it. He seems determined to get the downtown ballpark done, right now, no matter the costs involved. I can't help but be suspicious with all the secrecy going on.
User avatar
nebugeater
City Council
Posts: 110994
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 11:07 pm
Location: Gretna NE

Letter to NCAA

Post by nebugeater »

Bugeater wrote:I don't think the Mayor wants the extension, probably because if we have time to think about it we'll realize it's not worth it. He seems determined to get the downtown ballpark done, right now, no matter the costs involved. I can't help but be suspicious with all the secrecy going on.
... all that and if it is not done now it will not have his name tied to it! :mrgreen:
User avatar
Omababe
Planning Board
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:47 pm

Re: Letter to NCAA

Post by Omababe »

agibson95 wrote:It was reported on Channel 5
Channel 5?

The report I heard, which I admit I semi agree with, is that the Powers That Be have not been straightforward with the dissemination of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
and that the NCAA didnt have a preferance over downtown and keeping Rosenblatt.
I still have seen or heard nothing, directly attributable to the NCAA, that demands or even "strongly suggests" a new stadium in North Downtown as any kind of deal-breaker for keeping the CWS in Omaha.
They wanted to know what the letter said and wanted to contact the NCAA directly.
My hunch is that they are not the only ones who have gone directly to the NCAA. I'm sure the Save The Blatt gang have at least attempted to start a direct dialog with NCAA.
My whole take on this is that the NCAA will just read 'Please take the CWS away from Omaha,
Unless the Mayor and the other Powers That Be are severely derelict, they have been involved in ongoing two-way discussions with NCAA, and both of them (hisonner and NCAA) are on the same page. That's what I think the bottom line is.
User avatar
OmahaJaysCU
Planning Board
Posts: 2191
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 11:00 pm

Re: Letter to NCAA

Post by OmahaJaysCU »

Omababe wrote:
and that the NCAA didnt have a preferance over downtown and keeping Rosenblatt.
I still have seen or heard nothing, directly attributable to the NCAA, that demands or even "strongly suggests" a new stadium in North Downtown as any kind of deal-breaker for keeping the CWS in Omaha.
They never flat out said downtown, but they basically implied it. Where else in the city can you build a stadium within a walking distance from a majority of the city's hotel rooms and the city's largest concentration of bars and restaurants? They never said it, nor will they, but that is what they mean.

There are numerous articles about this 50 or so pages ago, but honestly, it isn't worth looking through all this bs bickering, which I will admit I have been a part of, to find.
j4nu
Home Owners Association
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 10:27 pm
Location: Old Market

Letter to NCAA

Post by j4nu »

I tend to agree and in my mind it comes down to two things:

-We can modify the Blatt and probably get a 5 year deal but no more. The NCAA has probably opened the door for negotiations for a longer deal based on the Mayor's willingness to take the facilities to the next level as described above. In this case, both scenarios are true, it's just the Mayor is trying to be more long term vision oriented.

-The downtown location while not expressly requested by the NCAA is probably the only site in the city that meets the needs required for the extended contracts we are seeking.

I think that everyone will probably feel alot better about the decision once the details are released. The unknowns are the big culprits right now.
User avatar
thenewguy
County Board
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:50 am
Location: Council Bluffs

Letter to NCAA

Post by thenewguy »

...and they present it to the NCAA tomorrow. So, we won't have to wait too long. And look at Rosenblatt now compared to even 10-15 years ago. How much does Rosenblatt really resemble its former self? Different stands, different boards, different vendors, etc. Me thinks the stadium people are trying to save is not quite the stadium they thought they are trying to save. So if they built downtown and it nets about the same price to the public, big deal: consider it an evolutionary step, just like the changes made to Rosenblatt every few years. Like the old saying goes, you can only slap so much lipstick on a pig...
Go Cubs Go
User avatar
Linkin5
County Board
Posts: 4895
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2004 1:59 am

Letter to NCAA

Post by Linkin5 »

thenewguy wrote:...and they present it to the NCAA tomorrow. So, we won't have to wait too long. And look at Rosenblatt now compared to even 10-15 years ago. How much does Rosenblatt really resemble its former self? Different stands, different boards, different vendors, etc. Me thinks the stadium people are trying to save is not quite the stadium they thought they are trying to save. So if they built downtown and it nets about the same price to the public, big deal: consider it an evolutionary step, just like the changes made to Rosenblatt every few years. Like the old saying goes, you can only slap so much lipstick on a pig...
Are these plans going to be public today?
User avatar
Asten
Human Relations
Posts: 689
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:25 pm
Yahoo Messenger: [email protected]
Location: Physically: Chicagoland. Historically: Omaha

Letter to NCAA

Post by Asten »

Linkin5 wrote:
thenewguy wrote:...and they present it to the NCAA tomorrow. So, we won't have to wait too long. And look at Rosenblatt now compared to even 10-15 years ago. How much does Rosenblatt really resemble its former self? Different stands, different boards, different vendors, etc. Me thinks the stadium people are trying to save is not quite the stadium they thought they are trying to save. So if they built downtown and it nets about the same price to the public, big deal: consider it an evolutionary step, just like the changes made to Rosenblatt every few years. Like the old saying goes, you can only slap so much lipstick on a pig...
Are these plans going to be public today?
Wednesday 2/27 at 2pm.

http://www.omahastadium.com
User avatar
Brad
Photographer
Posts: 1036638
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 12:03 am
Location: Omaha, NE

Letter to NCAA

Post by Brad »

This thread is really getting mixed up with the Ballpark thread. Lets continue the discussion over there.

Thanks.