Union Pacific Center

Downtown, Midtown, and all parts east of 72nd.
eomaha
County Board
Posts: 4176
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:29 am
Location: West Omaha

Union Pacific Center

Post by eomaha »

However you feel about the UP Center... I think most would agree... the atrium is very cool. I stopped by to check it out yesterday.

All photos: http://www.eomaha.com/gallery/buildings/10" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Image

Image

Image
edsas
Human Relations
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 9:47 pm
Location: La Vista

Union Pacific Center

Post by edsas »

That is one mighty fine looking building. My disappointed over the height faded sometime near when the cladding took shape. The interior shots just reinforce what an amazing building this is.

Thanks for the pictures. :)
StreetsOfOmaha
City Council
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm

Union Pacific Center

Post by StreetsOfOmaha »

Thanks for the photos, Jeff!

I actually didn't even realize it was open, having been out of the loop for a couple weeks.

I'll have to make it down there to see it.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
futrecndvlpr
Home Owners Association
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 2:07 pm

Union Pacific Center

Post by futrecndvlpr »

I have had a chance over the past couple of days to eat, work and mill around in the new building and if I had to use one simple word to describe it I would have to go with "awesome."

The cafeteria is pretty darn nice, it is safe to say that it can meet everyone's tastes. I found myself wandering around aimlessly trying to figure out exactly what I wanted for a short period of time.

The video screen is now up and functioning, it is definately worth checking out. I believe it is one of the largest in the nation/world!

Also worth noting is the heating/cooling system. Instead of having several large vents on each floor, there are smaller vents located in the floor at each workspace that the user can control.

Further down the road (my department moves in August) I hope to get some pictures from the 18th floor looking down. It is quit an amazing building.
StreetsOfOmaha
City Council
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm

Union Pacific Center

Post by StreetsOfOmaha »

I was in the building a couple weeks ago, and I have to say I wasn't all that impressed. I mean, of couse it is a massive building, they used great building materials, and the video scree is totally cool. I just wish the ground level, including the outside of the building, had more active uses. I didn't get a chance to go into the cafeteria, but that does sound really nice.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
jays25ks
Home Owners Association
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: West Omaha

Union Pacific Center

Post by jays25ks »

I was wondering if anyone knows what building was at the site of UPC?
User avatar
Coyote
City Council
Posts: 34366
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Aksarben Village

Union Pacific Center

Post by Coyote »

Between 15th and 14th streets on Douglas
were the Rialto Theatre and the Town Theatre
DTO Luv
City Council
Posts: 9644
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 4:22 pm

Union Pacific Center

Post by DTO Luv »

Nothing on that block will be missed. I have visited UP a couple of times and have likend it to a spaceship. What it lacks in height it makes up for in appeal. I would like to eat in the restaurant one of these days. I wish First National had a restaurant like Tower 5 in the Woodmen.
DTO
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10809
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Union Pacific Center!  An Inside Look

Post by iamjacobm »

Just to add to the wild and strange night in Omaha. UP's sign 19 stories up catches fire.

http://www.wowt.com/home/headlines/Fire ... 45591.html
Fourteenth Street between Dodge and Douglas remains closed Wednesday morning after an electric sign atop the Union Pacific Building in downtown Omaha caught fire.

Firefighters had to battle the flames 19 floors up, but only needed fire extinguishers to do so in a matter of minutes. No word yet on what sparked the flames.
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 11627
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by skinzfan23 »

It looks like they finally replace the sign. It still wasn't up there last week so they must have installed it recently.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10809
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by iamjacobm »

Saw Lund is marketing a little over 200k SF of space in this building for lease.
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 4685
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by Garrett »

iamjacobm wrote: Wed Jul 17, 2024 4:39 pm Saw Lund is marketing a little over 200k SF of space in this building for lease.
Interesting. If the multiple office to residential conversion rumors are true, that’s a lot of ready to go high quality space for potential office relocations.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
Brad
Photographer
Posts: 1036533
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by Brad »

iamjacobm wrote: Wed Jul 17, 2024 4:39 pm Saw Lund is marketing a little over 200k SF of space in this building for lease.
Wasn't that long ago they they were making workspaces smaller to fit more employees in that building...
NEDodger
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1356
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:19 am

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by NEDodger »

I know they have a very nice space for it now in Council Bluffs, but I will never understand the museum not being here with all of the seeming wasted space on the ground floor. Especially with a Company Store there, too….
User avatar
Brad
Photographer
Posts: 1036533
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by Brad »

NEDodger wrote: Thu Jul 18, 2024 9:31 am I know they have a very nice space for it now in Council Bluffs, but I will never understand the museum not being here with all of the seeming wasted space on the ground floor. Especially with a Company Store there, too….
We've had this conversation in the Museum thread before, but I still completely disagree with it being in the HQ. In today's corporate climate, it only takes one wrong change in leadership and everything could be gone. I'm glad the museum is its own entity, with its own building, with its own Board of Directors.
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 11627
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by skinzfan23 »

I am glad that it is in a beautiful building in CB as well. Perfect spot for it.
nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2795
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: 68102

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by nebport5 »

Brad wrote: Thu Jul 18, 2024 9:51 am
NEDodger wrote: Thu Jul 18, 2024 9:31 am I know they have a very nice space for it now in Council Bluffs, but I will never understand the museum not being here with all of the seeming wasted space on the ground floor. Especially with a Company Store there, too….
We've had this conversation in the Museum thread before, but I still completely disagree with it being in the HQ. In today's corporate climate, it only takes one wrong change in leadership and everything could be gone. I'm glad the museum is its own entity, with its own building, with its own Board of Directors.
I've always thought it would be cool if they had a train museum on this side with actual trains like Kenefick and The Home Plate display but expanded and under one roof. Maybe something like The Illinois Railway Museum but all U.P.
NEDodger
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1356
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:19 am

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by NEDodger »

Brad wrote: Thu Jul 18, 2024 9:51 am
NEDodger wrote: Thu Jul 18, 2024 9:31 am I know they have a very nice space for it now in Council Bluffs, but I will never understand the museum not being here with all of the seeming wasted space on the ground floor. Especially with a Company Store there, too….
We've had this conversation in the Museum thread before, but I still completely disagree with it being in the HQ. In today's corporate climate, it only takes one wrong change in leadership and everything could be gone. I'm glad the museum is its own entity, with its own building, with its own Board of Directors.
Yeah, that’s true
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 4685
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by Garrett »

Saw a thread on reddit with a screenshot from a Wikipedia article that claimed that UP was originally supposed to be 50 stories tall. Any veracity to that claim? Or even renderings?
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
User avatar
Brad
Photographer
Posts: 1036533
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by Brad »

Garrett wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 7:02 am Saw a thread on reddit with a screenshot from a Wikipedia article that claimed that UP was originally supposed to be 50 stories tall. Any veracity to that claim? Or even renderings?
I always heard the design was changed after the 9/11 attacks.
jomaha9
Home Owners Association
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:34 pm

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by jomaha9 »

I worked at UP for 11 years and asked this question. I was told by someone internally that the building was originally supposed to be 26 floors, but they revised it to 19 due to costs. The atrium that is the main feature of the building was a key element and the floor count was a lower priority.
User avatar
HighWinds
Home Owners Association
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat May 04, 2024 4:25 pm
Location: Midtown

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by HighWinds »

Brad wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 7:07 am
Garrett wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 7:02 am Saw a thread on reddit with a screenshot from a Wikipedia article that claimed that UP was originally supposed to be 50 stories tall. Any veracity to that claim? Or even renderings?
I always heard the design was changed after the 9/11 attacks.
That's what I heard as well. "It was supposed to be tall, but after 9/11 the height was revised."
User avatar
Linkin5
County Board
Posts: 4879
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:59 pm

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by Linkin5 »

I distinctly remember when the design was revealed UP stated that the large floor plates were best for their work model. I assumed that had something to do with having entire departments located on the same floor and closer to each other.

During that time a lot of people also speculated that tall buildings weren’t going to be built anymore, which obviously didn’t happen, especially in NYC. If I had to guess, I would bet that this is someone’s opinion that other people ran with.
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 11627
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by skinzfan23 »

I agree, I heard it was reduced. I don't think I ever heard 50 stories though, I think, like mentioned above, it was supposed to be 20-30 stories.
User avatar
HighWinds
Home Owners Association
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat May 04, 2024 4:25 pm
Location: Midtown

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by HighWinds »

Linkin5 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:10 am I distinctly remember when the design was revealed UP stated that the large floor plates were best for their work model. I assumed that had something to do with having entire departments located on the same floor and closer to each other.

During that time a lot of people also speculated that tall buildings weren’t going to be built anymore, which obviously didn’t happen, especially in NYC. If I had to guess, I would bet that this is someone’s opinion that other people ran with.
Agreed. Saw the Wikipedia article, but I feel like I've heard that "50 stories" elsewhere. Could've been reddit :lol:
WBR_Tom
Home Owners Association
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2016 12:02 pm
Location: Papillion, Omaha, and Everything in Between

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by WBR_Tom »

If it was intended to be 50, that had to be in an early internal planning phase. I did a quick keyword search of the OWH archives and the first mention of the height of the then-proposed building came in March 2001:

"A U.P. official said at a City Planning Board meeting in December that the building could be 20 to 35 stories high."

Then another article in May 2004 before it opened says this:

"U.P. officials decided the building would be wide rather than tall in order to fit whole departments on single floors. The atrium means those in the center of the building aren't shorted on sunlight."

So most of what's been posted here seems to be more or less right. It was potentially going to be taller (35 stories), but they went wide instead of tall to fit departments on single floors (or at least, that's the reason they gave publicly -- who knows if other stuff went into the decision behind closed doors).
User avatar
HighWinds
Home Owners Association
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat May 04, 2024 4:25 pm
Location: Midtown

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by HighWinds »

WBR_Tom wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 10:15 am If it was intended to be 50, that had to be in an early internal planning phase. I did a quick keyword search of the OWH archives and the first mention of the height of the then-proposed building came in March 2001:

"A U.P. official said at a City Planning Board meeting in December that the building could be 20 to 35 stories high."

Then another article in May 2004 before it opened says this:

"U.P. officials decided the building would be wide rather than tall in order to fit whole departments on single floors. The atrium means those in the center of the building aren't shorted on sunlight."

So most of what's been posted here seems to be more or less right. It was potentially going to be taller (35 stories), but they went wide instead of tall to fit departments on single floors (or at least, that's the reason they gave publicly -- who knows if other stuff went into the decision behind closed doors).
Nice post! Adds to the whole idea that the "50 story" statement is a rumor that people ran with, either from a random person or an internal UP employee.
nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2795
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: 68102

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by nebport5 »

I think the potential for 35 stories was only in the early planning stages. Once they actually announced it officially, it was to be 25 stories.

This from a November 1st article in the World Herald:

U.P. Plans 25 - Story Building


Sadly I probably have an early rendering on an old floppy or zip but...alas how quickly technology becomes antiquated.


Now I do also recall in this era there being rumors of Kiewit building a 50 story tower.
User avatar
Linkin5
County Board
Posts: 4879
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:59 pm

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by Linkin5 »

I remember stargazer (founder of eomaha) had written a letter to UP urging them to build taller, and posted a copy of it either here or on the chamber forum. UP obviously weren’t swayed by it, but it provided a lot of good points.

This was such a fun time in development, we had the arena and FNB tower recently finished, UP moving back home after relocating to St. Louis, and a lot of other smaller projects. I didn’t think we’d ever see something that massive happen again until this recent run we’re on (which turns out is way bigger).
Cermak
Planning Board
Posts: 2328
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2018 1:02 pm

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by Cermak »

Linkin5 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 3:36 pm I remember stargazer (founder of eomaha) had written a letter to UP urging them to build taller, and posted a copy of it either here or on the chamber forum. UP obviously weren’t swayed by it, but it provided a lot of good points.

This was such a fun time in development, we had the arena and FNB tower recently finished, UP moving back home after relocating to St. Louis, and a lot of other smaller projects. I didn’t think we’d ever see something that massive happen again until this recent run we’re on (which turns out is way bigger).
That was a good period for downtown, it was probably about 20 years ago.
User avatar
skinzfan23
City Council
Posts: 11627
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:26 am
Location: Omaha/Bellevue

Re: Union Pacific Center

Post by skinzfan23 »

Cermak wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 4:54 pm

That was a good period for downtown, it was probably about 20 years ago.
That was the start of eomahaforums as most of us know it. That is when I got really interested in all the projects that the metro had going on and I am really excited that we have continually kept growing and adding new, amazing things especially in the past 2 years or so.