Omaha's Annexation Plans

joeglow · Post by **joeglow** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:05 pm

Big E wrote:I think when I initially proposed the hypothetical a couple years ago I said don't change the way property is assessed unless it is built new or changes ownership. It would literally take a generation or two before all properties changed hands and were on the new system, but it would certainly steer development in the meantime. I think the overall effect on home values away from the city center would actually be positive, as it would essentially limit the likelihood of building more. And unless/until we do something about multiple school districts, there's ALWAYS going to be demand for the far flung 'burbs and their separate school coffers.

While some of that may happen, I would wager you would simply see people migrating to Sarpy County. Not a good end result for Omaha.

Big E · Post by **Big E** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:13 pm

Toll roads. $10/day to get to your job.

The overall goal is to lower property taxes across the board. I think in time the service/cost ratio would be attractive enough to attract home buyers and businesses to Omaha.

In the meantime, I'd like to see some Omaha employers start boycotting some of their out of town employees, too.

Post by **nebugeater** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:29 pm

To Quote you from another thread

For |expletive|'s sake, really?

Big E wrote:Toll roads. $10/day to get to your job.

The overall goal is to lower property taxes across the board. I think in time the service/cost ratio would be attractive enough to attract home buyers and businesses to Omaha.

In the meantime, I'd like to see some Omaha employers start boycotting some of their out of town employees, too.

Big E · Post by **Big E** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:42 pm

Obviously joking about the toll roads. That's what the smiley is for. (I'd actually be totally for the toll roads, but know there's exactly zero chance of it ever happening.)

Second statement is feasible, although again I don't see it ever happening.

Third is obviously a snarky comment.

I swear to god some of the egos on this board are more sensitive than a wet vaj.

Post by **nebugeater** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:45 pm

Big E wrote:Obviously joking about the toll roads. That's what the smiley is for. (I'd actually be totally for the toll roads, but know there's exactly zero chance of it ever happening.)

Second statement is feasible, although again I don't see it ever happening.

Third is obviously a snarky comment.

I swear to god some of the egos on this board are more sensitive than a wet vaj.

Then I guess you need to quit checking the mirror! :mrgreen:

cdub · Post by **cdub** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:30 am

TechnicalDisaster wrote:
cdub wrote:
TechnicalDisaster wrote:It's time for a City and County Merger into a single city. Save money by combining the municipalities. This would allow Omaha to stop the suburban sprawl beyond its borders. Combine the school districts into a single entity to reduce overlap in administrations. Combine the suburban SID Levy's into a single debt and make the fee dependent on how far away from the city center your subdivision is. Every 5-10 years you can adjust the scale.
Not that this would be a poor idea, but. If the problem is, 'the suburban sprawl beyond its borders' the solution should be eliminate the negative of sprawl, not expand the borders to accommodate it.

Its like saying that drunk driving is a problem, so solve it by upping the .08 so fewer would technically be drunk driving?
The merger isn't expanding Omaha's borders to accommodate growth, the merger expands Omaha's borders so they can control the growth. What happens on the other side of 180th and Pacific is none of Omaha's business.* The county has different standards for home construction and neighborhood amenities. Merge the two, and Omaha can make the rules.

*Omaha has a limited ability to collect fees and make rules in the 3 mile radius around the city, but the state legislature has recently put an end to that practice as of 2013.

Spoken like someone who doesn't understand the process. Omaha controls every bit of that new growth. Omaha allows it via provision of sewer and then controls its form via subdivision and zoning. The only thing the new rule does is end the collection of wheel tax, not change the other control.

TechnicalDisaster · Post by **TechnicalDisaster** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:59 am

cdub wrote: Spoken like someone who doesn't understand the process. Omaha controls every bit of that new growth. Omaha allows it via provision of sewer and then controls its form via subdivision and zoning. The only thing the new rule does is end the collection of wheel tax, not change the other control.

From the Douglas County website:

http://www.douglascounty-ne.gov/envserv ... and-zoning

Planning and ZoningThis division provides planning and zoning administration and assistance to the Douglas County planning and zoning jurisdiction. The County’s jurisdictional limit begins three miles outside of the current City of Omaha city limits and one mile outside the incorporated city limits of Valley, Bennington, and Waterloo, respectively.

A Comprehensive Land Use Development Plan, which is required by State Statute, is the visionary document that serves as the basis for land use planning in the County and was update in 2006. Planning assistance includes interpretation of zoning, subdivision, and floodplain regulations for the purposes of promoting and maintaining the health, safety, and general welfare of the residents that reside in the County’s jurisdiction.

This division administers the Planning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment, (volunteer boards appointed by the County Board of Commissioners to hearing planning and zoning issues and appeals).

Land use applications for zoning changes, special use permit, and subdivisions are first considered at a public hearing by the Planning Commission and then a recommendation is made on the applications to the County Board. The County Board conducts a public hearing and renders a decision.

The Zoning Board of Adjustment considers applications at public hearings for requested variances to the zoning regulations and appeals of decisions by administrative staff.

Can you show me how Omaha controls zoning for Douglas County?

DTO Luv · Post by **DTO Luv** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:05 pm

I know there is a "planning boundary" of some sort that extends Omaha's say in development so far from the edges of it's borders. I think it's 3 miles, so most SIDs would fall under this rule.

cdub · Post by **cdub** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:14 pm

TechnicalDisaster wrote:
cdub wrote: Spoken like someone who doesn't understand the process. Omaha controls every bit of that new growth. Omaha allows it via provision of sewer and then controls its form via subdivision and zoning. The only thing the new rule does is end the collection of wheel tax, not change the other control.
From the Douglas County website:

http://www.douglascounty-ne.gov/envserv ... and-zoning

Planning and ZoningThis division provides planning and zoning administration and assistance to the Douglas County planning and zoning jurisdiction. The County’s jurisdictional limit begins three miles outside of the current City of Omaha city limits and one mile outside the incorporated city limits of Valley, Bennington, and Waterloo, respectively.

A Comprehensive Land Use Development Plan, which is required by State Statute, is the visionary document that serves as the basis for land use planning in the County and was update in 2006. Planning assistance includes interpretation of zoning, subdivision, and floodplain regulations for the purposes of promoting and maintaining the health, safety, and general welfare of the residents that reside in the County’s jurisdiction.

This division administers the Planning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment, (volunteer boards appointed by the County Board of Commissioners to hearing planning and zoning issues and appeals).

Land use applications for zoning changes, special use permit, and subdivisions are first considered at a public hearing by the Planning Commission and then a recommendation is made on the applications to the County Board. The County Board conducts a public hearing and renders a decision.

The Zoning Board of Adjustment considers applications at public hearings for requested variances to the zoning regulations and appeals of decisions by administrative staff.

Can you show me how Omaha controls zoning for Douglas County?

Omaha doesn't. However that was not the original point. The original point was to control growth and development, none of which is happening in that area. If you are extremely concerned about a couple of 20 acre lots and a few out buildings though then forgive me as your point would stand.

TechnicalDisaster · Post by **TechnicalDisaster** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:17 pm

cdub wrote: Omaha doesn't. However that was not the original point. The original point was to control growth and development, none of which is happening in that area. If you are extremely concerned about a couple of 20 acre lots and a few out buildings though then forgive me as your point would stand.

Jeez, did I upset you off somehow? You seem kind of bent for no reason.

Which area do you believe their is no growth in? 180th and Pacific? Swing by my place tonight and I'll show you how the county allows for non-existant sidewalks connecting neighborhing subdivisions - making it impossible to walk or bike around here. I can also dig up my home inspection report and show you where my house doesn't meet City code but does meets County code (I'm missing an extra ground wire from my natural gas line in the furnace room). Their might be some hand shaking between the city and county, but it isn't capturing everything about how subdivisions and homes are built.

cdub · Post by **cdub** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:22 pm

TechnicalDisaster wrote:
cdub wrote: Omaha doesn't. However that was not the original point. The original point was to control growth and development, none of which is happening in that area. If you are extremely concerned about a couple of 20 acre lots and a few out buildings though then forgive me as your point would stand.
Jeez, did I upset you off somehow? You seem kind of bent for no reason.

Which area do you believe their is no growth in? 180th and Pacific? Swing by my place tonight and I'll show you how the county allows for non-existant sidewalks connecting neighborhing subdivisions - making it impossible to walk or bike around here. I can also dig up my home inspection report and show you where my house doesn't meet City code but does meets County code (I'm missing an extra ground wire from my natural gas line in the furnace room). Their might be some hand shaking between the city and county, but it isn't capturing everything about how subdivisions and homes are built.

I am not upset, but I also don't like arguments based upon fiction. Building permits are issued by Omaha for properties within the Omaha jurisdiction, which 180/Pacific is within today. The only way your house wasn't built to Omaha code was if it was built before it was in Omaha's jurisdiction. Frankly, if you are in a typical subdivision, as opposed to some large lot thing, you are and were in Omaha's jurisdiction, meaning the home was built under an Omaha permit and frankly there should be sidewalks in as well as they would have been required. Sometimes the City falls down on making sure they get in though and you may also have disconnections if there are vacant lots as sidewalks only generally go in when a lot is built upon.

Uffda · Post by **Uffda** » Fri May 27, 2011 7:16 am

Most of the neighborhoods are in far west Omaha -- Banyan Hills, Hawthorne, Autumn Ridge, Pacific Meadows second addition, Oakbrook Meadows and Oakbrook Meadows 2, Pacific Hollow and Le Beau West.

You'll find two more neighborhoods over toward Crown Point. They are Glenbrook and Wynnewood.

http://www.wowt.com/home/headlines/Mayo ... 02569.html

Well looks like I am going to end up in the city. My subdivision is about 78th & Sorensen and been around since mid 70s.

The only thing I hope is that the HOA will still pay for clearing snow of streets as I live on a steep dead end street that gets cleared very well right now.

bluecollartechworker · Fri May 27, 2011 8:39 pm

Count me in! I move into Omaha next week.

Erik · Post by **Erik** » Sat May 28, 2011 1:20 pm

I'm being annexed too. I got the package and I'm already getting ready for the tax reductions and the city next election.

I knew the city estimates during the 2000s were too high because we rarely annexed any neighborhoods. The US Census was going by our regular annexation habits under Daub where he would annex about the same amount of people as there were new neighborhoods.

For example: There were about 55,000 people living in the non-city suburbs in Douglas County in 1990. That number was reduced to about 50,000 in 2000. I'm not sure what Fahey and Stuttle were thinking because you have to annex to grow. Anyway our non-city suburbs in Douglas county grew from 50,000 in 2000 to 108,000 in 2010. Sarpy county saw an approximate increase in non-city suburbs that douglas county did.

I expect to see Omaha, Bellevue, Papillion, La Vista, Gretna and Springfield to all exceed the growth rates of their counties during the 2010s as they take the sea of non-city suburbs that are in existence right now.

Greg S · Post by **Greg S** » Sat May 28, 2011 5:56 pm

I'm bummed we did not make it. I'm in Stone Park and we have a Omaha library and community center next door and we did not make it. Hopefully we're in the 2nd wave they referenced. I think it's odd that the city has a community center and library outside the city limits (part of the Saddlebrook complex with OPS).

Greg

Uffda · Post by **Uffda** » Sat May 28, 2011 7:03 pm

Well I found out that the HOA would still be responsible for my street and a couple of others... sigh of relief.... BUT the common areas of the development would become city property and they would be responsible for mowing.... hmmm might have to get a bigger mower.

They sent out a letter saying my taxes would go down about $600/yr but they included a $300/yr garbage fee - which I SID picked up last year so I havent had to pay for garbage so I guess a 300 difference now

StreetsOfOmaha · Post by **StreetsOfOmaha** » Mon May 30, 2011 11:36 am

Aww, disappointing. I thought this was going to be some sort of comprehensive infill plan to add 7,000 more residents within existing city limits. But, as usual, we're just extending the belt; I'm not saying that's bad. Indeed it's an important means by which to control development and keep tax money in the city. The thread title just got me excited, and then I was let down.

OmahaJaysCU · Post by **OmahaJaysCU** » Mon May 30, 2011 5:50 pm

A good number of these do seem to be surrounded by the city limits already...

Uffda · Post by **Uffda** » Mon May 30, 2011 7:28 pm

Article with map

http://omaha.com/article/20110528/NEWS01/705289844

skinzfan23 · Post by **skinzfan23** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:16 pm

The World Herald wrote:

City annexes nine neighborhoods

The Omaha City Council unanimously signed off Tuesday on annexing nine neighborhoods with more than 7,000 residents across west and northwest Omaha

http://www.omaha.com/article/20110719/N ... ghborhoods

iamjacobm · Post by **iamjacobm** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:20 pm

It makes total sense. The neighborhoods I recognize from that list are all already surrounded by the city.

Uffda · Post by **Uffda** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:32 pm

well i guess i am part of the city at the end of august.

this part won't change as my SID already contracts and pays Deffenbaugh

will be part of Deffenbaugh's garbage collection routes, allowing people to cancel their contracted trash service.

DeWalt · Post by **DeWalt** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:08 am

iamjacobm wrote:It makes total sense. The neighborhoods I recognize from that list are all already surrounded by the city.

Exactly. This is something that should have been done years ago.

Fromaha · Post by **Fromaha** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:27 am

With over 100,000 more people in Douglas County than in the Omaha City limits, I find it hard to believe that they could only annex 7K people. Seems like city officials are not doing what they ought to be on this front.

almighty_tuna · Post by **almighty_tuna** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:32 am

Fromaha wrote:With over 100,000 more people in Douglas County than in the Omaha City limits, I find it hard to believe that they could only annex 7K people. Seems like city officials are not doing what they ought to be on this front.

Just because there are people yet to be annexed doesn't mean that it's a smart idea to just go out and lay siege to other developments. It has a lot more to do with assumed debt and cost of providing services to annexed areas and such than just 'hey, lets make Weeping Willow Hollow Brook Shire Pointe part of Omaha so we have 50,000 more people"

S33 · Post by **S33** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:32 am

Fromaha wrote:With over 100,000 more people in Douglas County than in the Omaha City limits, I find it hard to believe that they could only annex 7K people. Seems like city officials are not doing what they ought to be on this front.

They only annex residential areas which encompass business tax receipts to make it worth while. So yeah, they could annex more, but taxes would skyrocket.

Fromaha · Post by **Fromaha** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:15 pm

Just because there are people yet to be annexed doesn't mean that it's a smart idea to just go out and lay siege to other developments. It has a lot more to do with assumed debt and cost of providing services to annexed areas and such than just 'hey, lets make Weeping Willow Hollow Brook Shire Pointe part of Omaha so we have 50,000 more people"

Of course is has to do with debt. Thanks for that breaking news. I don't advocate annexing just to raise the population.

They only annex residential areas which encompass business tax receipts to make it worth while. So yeah, they could annex more, but taxes would skyrocket.

My point was, that I don't believe that city officials have looked closely enough at all areas that could be annexed - which could ultimately LOWER taxes.

Uffda · Post by **Uffda** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:42 pm

S33 wrote: They only annex residential areas which encompass business tax receipts to make it worth while. So yeah, they could annex more, but taxes would skyrocket.

I think that is more prevalent out in West Omaha or what becomes west O. My neighborhood being annexed doesn't have any businesses in it.

almighty_tuna · Post by **almighty_tuna** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:36 pm

Fromaha wrote:
Just because there are people yet to be annexed doesn't mean that it's a smart idea to just go out and lay siege to other developments. It has a lot more to do with assumed debt and cost of providing services to annexed areas and such than just 'hey, lets make Weeping Willow Hollow Brook Shire Pointe part of Omaha so we have 50,000 more people"
Of course is has to do with debt. Thanks for that breaking news. I don't advocate annexing just to raise the population.

Then spend your time clarifying your statements instead of being a dick. :roll:

Fromaha · Post by **Fromaha** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 3:33 pm

Then spend your time clarifying your statements instead of being a dick.

Maybe I'll spend my time making you a jump-to-conclusions mat, tough guy.

S33 · Post by **S33** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 3:42 pm

almighty_tuna · Post by **almighty_tuna** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:04 pm

Fromaha wrote:
Then spend your time clarifying your statements instead of being a dick.

Maybe I'll spend my time making you a jump-to-conclusions mat, tough guy.

whatevs. moving on, kids...we annexed 7,000 people.

cdub · Post by **cdub** » Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:38 am

There is plenty of looking going on. Even these aren't big money deals but the City wanted to clean up some. I'm not sure how Suttle is going to keep annexing in future phases as he's indicated. Without changing the way you count, most possible annexations out there just don't add up without spreading services thinner or increasing costs beyond the additional revenue.

Homes on 10k lots never pay the bills and a lot of commercial has already been annexed in those same general areas.

Greg S · Post by **Greg S** » Mon Aug 01, 2011 9:04 am

cdub wrote:There is plenty of looking going on. Even these aren't big money deals but the City wanted to clean up some. I'm not sure how Suttle is going to keep annexing in future phases as he's indicated. Without changing the way you count, most possible annexations out there just don't add up without spreading services thinner or increasing costs beyond the additional revenue.

Homes on 10k lots never pay the bills and a lot of commercial has already been annexed in those same general areas.

There are still several substantial subdivisions in NW Omaha that are close to being annex ready. One already has a Omaha public library and rec center.

Greg

cdub · Post by **cdub** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:24 am

Greg S wrote:
cdub wrote:There is plenty of looking going on. Even these aren't big money deals but the City wanted to clean up some. I'm not sure how Suttle is going to keep annexing in future phases as he's indicated. Without changing the way you count, most possible annexations out there just don't add up without spreading services thinner or increasing costs beyond the additional revenue.

Homes on 10k lots never pay the bills and a lot of commercial has already been annexed in those same general areas.

There are still several substantial subdivisions in NW Omaha that are close to being annex ready. One already has a Omaha public library and rec center.

Greg

Depends on what you call annex ready. If they've stretched out their debt or taken on more, they may not be. There is no way to look at an SID and know unless you see the numbers. Also, Omaha can offer services outside the city in a number of instances and once there it really makes little difference how soon the area is annexed.

Greg S · Post by **Greg S** » Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:00 am

I spoke with someone on my SID board and they stated our SID has very low debt numbers. He seemed to indicate those in the SID's that directly boarder us were nearing the range that would make the whole area attractive to the city....

The guys from Grow Omaha were on KFAB stated there were more annexations to come that would benefit Omaha. Seems there's a backlog because we had slowed so much on the annexation front.

Greg

joeglow · Post by **joeglow** » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:07 am

Greg S wrote:I spoke with someone on my SID board and they stated our SID has very low debt numbers. He seemed to indicate those in the SID's that directly boarder us were nearing the range that would make the whole area attractive to the city....

The guys from Grow Omaha were on KFAB stated there were more annexations to come that would benefit Omaha. Seems there's a backlog because we had slowed so much on the annexation front.

Greg

As much as I hate conspiracy theories, I really do think politics enter into it. Look at it as a form of gerry-mandering. Why would a democratic controlled government want to add 10-20k mostly right-leaning people?

NOTE: I am not commenting on one side or the other. I would see the right doing the same thing if things were reversed.

S33 · Post by **S33** » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:25 am

Doubt it. I don't think left/right partisan politics have that much of an influence in Omaha, at least in this aspect.

joeglow · Post by **joeglow** » Thu Aug 04, 2011 3:33 pm

S33 wrote:Doubt it. I don't think left/right partisan politics have that much of an influence in Omaha, at least in this aspect.

I certainly hope that would be true.

Coyote · Post by **Coyote** » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:45 pm

Their back:
Southeast of 156th Street and West Maple Road, Seven Pines, Highland Park and adjacent area.
East of 156th Street and Rolling Ridge Road, Walnut Lake.
Northwest of 132nd and Fort Streets, Standing Bear.
Northeast of 147th Street and West Maple Road, Hillsborough Plaza.
Southwest of 132nd and Fort Streets, Pegasus.
Northwest of 156th and “Q” Streets, Lakeview Heights and Chimney Ridge.
Northeast of 156th Street and West Dodge Road, Pepperwood.
Southwest of 144th and “F” Streets, The Colonies and adjacent area.