Big E wrote:Ben wrote:Felt very "concrete jungle" with little character
Please expand.
First off, let me premise this by I'm all in favor of this stadium, and making the best environment possible to watch college baseball. I'm not one of those bitter that Rosenblatt's gone folks, nor did I want them to build attractions like a ferris wheel in the outfield to please the Royals.
I love the modern glass / brick look of the outside, but very little of that was carried inside (besides the glass fronts to the suites).
I don't know, it was just a feeling. No brick, no ivy, no quirky field dimensions, everything's painted that awful beige color I think of when I think of suburban heck. The concession stands / restrooms in the outfield are just rectangular cement block. Rosenblatt was known for that awful blue paint. You may have hated the color, but you knew it was the 'Blatt the second you saw it on TV. There just doesn't seem to be that sort of defining characteristic inside this stadium.
Maybe it'll just take time to establish TD traditions.... Maybe it'll be different on a warm summer day with 20k+ people in there. On a cool Tuesday night, with 4300 fans though, the place just felt a little sterile, and empty. I'm glad Creighton's playing there, but they're going to struggle with the same sort of "lost in a sea of seats" problem that the Royals had in Rosenblatt, probably even worse once the "lets go check out the new ballpark" crowd dissipates.