A lot of your comments could start with "in an ideal world."
Go back a few years to when then mayor Hal Daub proposed the full service Marriot Hotel. After Mayor Fahey was elected, Daub took a seat on the MECA board. Marriot, the preferred brand of Daub and MECA officials, was scrapped by Fahey for an undersized and underwhelming Hilton. When Suttle went for the expansion of the Hilton, this was clearly the time for MECA to work with the city on, not only the size of the expansion, but the quality and possible re-flagging of the brand to satisfy MECA’s contention that there aren’t enough rooms connected at the quality they want. This would have easily satisfied all of MECA’s criteria in the RFQ issued for the Pinnacle / Swanson site and been a fantastic partnership using public financing to achieve MECA’s goal of a certain number of rooms connected to the arena at the quality they are seeking.
Yes picking the Hilton over the Marriot was basically a dick measuring contest that cost the city another high rise, but to complain about the physical size of the hotel is misplaced. The hotel is now 600 rooms by a wide margin the largest in Nebraska and Iowa. Remember the city still owns this one so we as tax payers paid for the expansion not a private developer like the proposed hotel on the P/S site. Instead we are looking at 950 hotel rooms directly across the street, but us as tax payers are only on the hook for 600 of the rooms. Seems like a wise move to get a developer in the game instead of the city paying for everything.
A second instance of MECA’s (and to some extent the city’s) poor mismanagement of the surrounding land is not having the Royals as a tenant in TD Ameritrade Park. This was a beautiful opportunity at 60 more nights a year of activity in North Downtown that would have benefited every party involved particularly the Royals with increased attendance and MECA (!!) with thousands of more visitors to their properties annually. The increased visitation would drive demand for more services and entertainment in North Downtown and make development of the MECA parking lots, including the Pinnacle site, much more ripe for dense, urban development. Developing two new stadiums in Omaha at one time made absolutely no sense.
I would of been nice, but there was really no way to make it happen. MECA couldn't meet the needs of the NCAA and the Royals/Storm Chasers in the same DT ball park. Sure it would of been great for the area, but the Royals wanted their own place to make their own rules and they own stadium. Sarpy Country jumped at the opportunity, I don't blame MECA for choosing the CWS over AAA baseball any of us would have done the same.
Lastly, the submittals for the Pinnacle / Swanson site, while admirable, are just a shadow of what the potential is for that site and it is really disappointing that not one proposal went out on a limb and included the lots in between the Hilton and TD Ameritrade Park. Sure, the market may not be ready for some infill (retail anyone??), but that is primarily due to the mismanagement explained above. I would have like to see 11th street reintroduced through the Pinnacle / Swanson site creating much more valuable land for any developer with the creation of four hard corners and maximizing the potential and viability of the site. Think about this, one of the busiest tourist intersections in the state is located on 11th and Howard. This is master planning 101 and a shocking failure by MECA and the developers to not incorporate such a feature on the site.
They didn't go out on a limb because the RFP didn't include that land, it would of been foolish to create a plan for land that isn't available. Be patient that lot will get developed eventually, one step at a time though. This P/S development will create the demand for other lots to be developed. Also while 11th and Howard is a key intersection 11th isn't a through street so master planning 101 actually dictates to create vibrant corners where people actually use the corner. 10th and Capitol is a much more logical location for this development to be located since that is the "entrance" to North Downtown.
Rather than a hotel on that site, TD Ameritrade should be building their headquarters on it instead of out west (another chance for public, private cooperation). After all they did sign a sponsorship deal for the new ballpark. Such a development would go a long way in creating an amazing corridor for 10th street that could include a development every bit as good as KC’s P&L District which would include the major stakeholders in Omaha creating a futuristic retail area (think Berkshire portfolio companies like M&M’s Time Square store) that would welcome CWS (college world series HOF ?) and Berkshire Visitors alike and in turn create a robust convention center demand for MECA.
TD didn't want to build downtown. Would I have preferred it? Yes, but downtown isn't right for every company just like a downtown loft isn't right for every family. So what id TD put their name on the stadium. Do you proposed that CenturyLink move their HQ to Omaha because they have the naming rights?
I totally agree with your ideas, but your accusations of no accountability are a bit misguided in my opinion. Downtown Omaha is a process, not a single act.[/quote]