Here is a picture from the World Herald:



CorrectBrad wrote:That's the one by the North Entrance, correct? Not the small one by the Elephants that I haven't seen them use yet?

From the World Herald: "The Adventure Trails and Conservation Academy will both open June 30, more than a month ahead of schedule."Greg S wrote:Anybody know if the area around the new amphitheater is open yet? On the website it says June 2017. I'm speaking of the kid's adventure trail and such.
Greg
skinzfan23 wrote:From the World Herald: "The Adventure Trails and Conservation Academy will both open June 30, more than a month ahead of schedule."Greg S wrote:Anybody know if the area around the new amphitheater is open yet? On the website it says June 2017. I'm speaking of the kid's adventure trail and such.
Greg



TLGJames wrote:The bird show was kind of a huge letdown. There is no way I would actually pay money for that.
The zoo seems to be misfiring on all cylinders lately. heck the new kids area has hardly any animals. What a waste of space.
Wow, I didn't notice that, you would think they would put netting in there at least, especially with it being 3 stories in the air.OmahaOmaha wrote:Looking at that third picture, that doesn't look too safe with the safety railings on those platforms. Looks like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
"The children's area wasn't meant to have a ton of animals"skinzfan23 wrote:I don't think I would say that they are misfiring on all cylinders. They just opened the largest project in zoo history in the African Grasslands last year. They also are in the construction phase for the next big project. The children's area wasn't meant to have a ton of animals. They moved the prairie dogs there along with some monkeys I believe, but the intention is to have an interactive area where kids can play and their parents not having to worry about them. The zoo has made leaps and bounds in the past decade and continues to do so. So much to the point that I am rethinking visiting the zoo in Milwaukee this summer when I am there because it may be a let down compared to Omaha's. Our zoo is consistently ranked as one of the best in the world and by moving the animals into outdoor exhibits that more closely resemble their natural surroundings, the zoo is very forward thinking.
Look again and closer this time. There is netting tightly fit in all,the open areas. Can't tell if it is wire or some rope type but sure looks safe to me. Much better then hand rails only.OmahaOmaha wrote:Looking at that third picture, that doesn't look too safe with the safety railings on those platforms. Looks like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
The complex will be replaced and the area repurposed. I suggest reading the master plan.TLGJames wrote:"The children's area wasn't meant to have a ton of animals"skinzfan23 wrote:I don't think I would say that they are misfiring on all cylinders. They just opened the largest project in zoo history in the African Grasslands last year. They also are in the construction phase for the next big project. The children's area wasn't meant to have a ton of animals. They moved the prairie dogs there along with some monkeys I believe, but the intention is to have an interactive area where kids can play and their parents not having to worry about them. The zoo has made leaps and bounds in the past decade and continues to do so. So much to the point that I am rethinking visiting the zoo in Milwaukee this summer when I am there because it may be a let down compared to Omaha's. Our zoo is consistently ranked as one of the best in the world and by moving the animals into outdoor exhibits that more closely resemble their natural surroundings, the zoo is very forward thinking.
What the |expletive| is my membership for? I don't pay money to see children running around, I pay to see animals.
The entire zoo in the last few years has just been microtransactioning the heck out of everything. Stingray touch tank, the return of the camel rides(at the expense of shrinking the Avairy), the continuous price increase of the skyfari, giraffe feedings.
I'm not sure how anyone doesn't think the Africa area is a total disaster for the amount of time and money they put into it. The entire south part looks like it was designed by an idiot. Tiny viewing areas. The elephant area forces people to stand on the bushes if they want more than a 2 foot area to look at them. The only well designed areas is the lion area, and the giraffe area which is virtually the same, with the exception of the microtransaction feedings. The small part of the africa area with the meercats is so small and pointless it's laughable.
That isn't even mentioning the fact that having elephants in Nebraska is stupid. I don't care how big of an indoor enclosure you can build for the, you're taking an animal that walks miles a day and putting them into a dome.
I thought the Zoo was good until I went to the Miami zoo. They actually embrace the climate there and have the appropriate animals outside.
The fact that they wasted a single dollar on that |expletive| while their cat complex is literally an embarrassment is sad.
I agree with the fact that the zoo shouldn't just be animals in cages, so why do you think it's a good idea to store elephants in an indoor facility in the frigid midwest for months?The complex will be replaced and the area repurposed. I suggest reading the master plan.
Zoos should not just be animals in a cage. They are getting kids involved and interested...investing in the future. Your remarks resemble those of someone who is short sighted and uniformed. I hope that isnt the case, because I would guess your sentiments differ almost completely from nearly every other person that has seen the new exhibits.
I guess your eyes are much better than mine. I can only see one small section that has netting. The rest of the sections look wide open to me.nebugeater wrote:Look again and closer this time. There is netting tightly fit in all,the open areas. Can't tell if it is wire or some rope type but sure looks safe to me. Much better then hand rails only.OmahaOmaha wrote:Looking at that third picture, that doesn't look too safe with the safety railings on those platforms. Looks like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
OmahaOmaha wrote:I guess your eyes are much better than mine. I can only see one small section that has netting. The rest of the sections look wide open to me.nebugeater wrote:Look again and closer this time. There is netting tightly fit in all,the open areas. Can't tell if it is wire or some rope type but sure looks safe to me. Much better then hand rails only.OmahaOmaha wrote:Looking at that third picture, that doesn't look too safe with the safety railings on those platforms. Looks like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
skinzfan23 wrote:Haven't had the time to go in the last month but I am sure my kids will love it too.
Greg S wrote:skinzfan23 wrote:Haven't had the time to go in the last month but I am sure my kids will love it too.
We have been twice now. When we were there Sunday they mentioned they were opening up an hour early this week for Zoo members. We went at 8AM on the 4th. My boys love where you can feed the birds in the discovery area. It only costs a buck.
We can all debate about the changes at the zoo, but with the zoo already hitting one million visits already this year, I think that's the key number on whether it's been successful or not.
Greg
But people don't really go to the zoo in the winter.TLGJames wrote: My entire point is the zoo should embrace the fact that we're a cold weather state and build the zoo around that. Forget elephants, and build awesome enclosures for animals that can survive an entire season. Cougars, Siberian tigers, river otters, sea otters, snow leopards, bears, wolverines, artic foxes, etc.
I call bull on this one. Sure the numbers are not as high but there are a Lot of people that go in the colder month. Our family hardly ever goes in the summer. Crowds are not as large but there are plenty of people there. Animals are more active in the outdoor exhibits for the most part hen it is cooler.Omaha_corn_burner wrote:But people don't really go to the zoo in the winter.TLGJames wrote: My entire point is the zoo should embrace the fact that we're a cold weather state and build the zoo around that. Forget elephants, and build awesome enclosures for animals that can survive an entire season. Cougars, Siberian tigers, river otters, sea otters, snow leopards, bears, wolverines, artic foxes, etc.
Late September and October are my favorite times to go to the Zoo.nebugeater wrote:I call bull on this one. Sure the numbers are not as high but there are a Lot of people that go in the colder month. Our family hardly ever goes in the summer. Crowds are not as large but there are plenty of people there. Animals are more active in the outdoor exhibits for the most part hen it is cooler.Omaha_corn_burner wrote:But people don't really go to the zoo in the winter.TLGJames wrote: My entire point is the zoo should embrace the fact that we're a cold weather state and build the zoo around that. Forget elephants, and build awesome enclosures for animals that can survive an entire season. Cougars, Siberian tigers, river otters, sea otters, snow leopards, bears, wolverines, artic foxes, etc.

Brad wrote:Late September and October are my favorite times to go to the Zoo.nebugeater wrote:I call bull on this one. Sure the numbers are not as high but there are a Lot of people that go in the colder month. Our family hardly ever goes in the summer. Crowds are not as large but there are plenty of people there. Animals are more active in the outdoor exhibits for the most part hen it is cooler.Omaha_corn_burner wrote:But people don't really go to the zoo in the winter.TLGJames wrote: My entire point is the zoo should embrace the fact that we're a cold weather state and build the zoo around that. Forget elephants, and build awesome enclosures for animals that can survive an entire season. Cougars, Siberian tigers, river otters, sea otters, snow leopards, bears, wolverines, artic foxes, etc.

Not with the newer south part of the Africa area, it's literally a ghost town in the winter.nebugeater wrote:Brad wrote:Late September and October are my favorite times to go to the Zoo.nebugeater wrote:I call bull on this one. Sure the numbers are not as high but there are a Lot of people that go in the colder month. Our family hardly ever goes in the summer. Crowds are not as large but there are plenty of people there. Animals are more active in the outdoor exhibits for the most part hen it is cooler.Omaha_corn_burner wrote:But people don't really go to the zoo in the winter.TLGJames wrote: My entire point is the zoo should embrace the fact that we're a cold weather state and build the zoo around that. Forget elephants, and build awesome enclosures for animals that can survive an entire season. Cougars, Siberian tigers, river otters, sea otters, snow leopards, bears, wolverines, artic foxes, etc.
One of the best days at the zoo our family has had was a few years ago on Christmas Eve. Plenty of people... About 30 Deg.... Light snow was falling part of the time we were there. Saw a lot both inside and out and ended the day in the Imax.

The zoo just had their 2,000,000th visitor yesterday.skinzfan23 wrote:Just saw on Facebook that the zoo welcomed their 1,000,000th visitor for the year today. Last year, it was on July 3rd. So basically they are on pace to beat last year's attendance record of 2,046,171.