As a society, people have decided that news should be free. There are some positives to the free dissemination of information, but overall, we are worse off for it. Take a look at the comments section of any OWH story on facebook and half the comments are essentially, "NO! I will not pay to read this article OWH. I will not subscribe just to get the news. Make it freeee!"Omaha Cowboy wrote: Thu Apr 15, 2021 8:42 pmI still disagree somewhat with what you’re saying here, but certainly not entirely. Because what you’re saying about the direction journalism regionally is going..is true..and it’s unfortunate..Garrett wrote: Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:26 amNot anymore. News is online, 24/7, nationalized, and more and more opinion based. It's changing. Unless you're a New York Times level national publication, you're suffering. The OWH is just going through what almost every single print publication is going through. When a significant portion of the population of Nebraska and Iowa are getting their news from Fox News... well...Omaha Cowboy wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 11:20 amI think there is enough readers. And if you give them high quality content and raise the bar, they’ll crave it once again. The W-H basically serves the State of Nebraska and half of Iowa. There was a time back 15, 20, 30+ years ago, The Omaha W-H did investigative journalism at a much higher and more frequent level than the simple info pieces we’re used to reading today. When you cut staff and resources, that’s what you get..damonhynes wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:05 amIf there were 100K readers who demanded old-school journalism, they maybe they'd extend the effort to do some digging. But there aren't.Omaha Cowboy wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 8:20 pmNow this would require some actual investigative journalism.. That ship sailed sometime around the last W-H ownership change and downsizing layoff escapade...
Ciao..LiO...Peace
It's chicken/egg--are the media promulgating a narrative, or has the public attention-span and curiousity decreased to the point of irredeemability? You know my stance--it's both.
It’s not a reader population issue imo.. Raise the bar/standard...
Ciao..LiO...Peace
But I’ll still say- Just because the news is on line, does not mean a regional newspaper, for example, cannot continue to provide true, investigative journalism..If they actually committed to providing it- even just once per month..The W-H was never a NY Times level paper in the first place..but go back, 10, 15, 20 and 30 years ago, a mid major level paper like the W-H was providing a more frequent, and a decent level of actual investigative journalism.. But you cut personnel and resources, and you get what we have today- 99% informational only articles and no real in-depth insight. Raise the bar though, and people will still crave it..
I was shocked last summer, the W-H actually had an in depth, investigative journalistic piece regarding the spring/summer unrest in Omaha after the George Floyd death and the shooting death locally during looting of James Scurlock. It was a great piece, well written, well received and a shockingly pleasant surprise. But, that was likely a one off. We’re lucky in Omaha if the W-H provides that type of quality and depth of coverage 2 times a year these days..
Yes, times are changing. But I think people’s desire for quality, in depth local journalism still stands..and if a newspaper is committed to providing it, readers will clamor for more of it. Again, raise the bar.. But cutting staff, resources and lowering the bar- well, you get ground chuck most of the time and people think it’s USDA Prime.. The dumbing down continues...
Ciao..LiO...Peace
That mentality is the culmination of the digital era where everything is immediate and generally without cost. But, unless you are big enough to monetize enough online ad revenue, you are sacrificing quality. You are having interns write stories that used to be written by real news people. You are parroting articles from wire services. Everything is moving to TV and podcasts that push a political slant and spin. We are becoming dumber and more easily manipulated for it.
There is no such thing as a truly free meal and people don't seem to care what they are digesting from these free news services. At this point, I wouldn't subscribe to OWH either. They don't put much out there that makes it worthwhile, but it's all just a self perpetuating cycle where we are now being wound up by the same few media services.

