Actually, the more I see the the MoO being built the more I see how much better the actual product is turning out, compared to the initial rendersHighWinds wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 9:15 pmFair point, these glass towers may age badly. Today their the new, hip thing that every "modern" city has just got to get their hands on, and tomorrow, like brutalist towers from the sixties, they are simply dated remnants of a distant time.Louie wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:14 pmI kind of agree on this. Don’t get me wrong, MoO is gonna be a great addition to the skyline and we’re lucky to get it. But FNBO has more classic architecture tones to it. One of my favorite skyscrapers is the Wells Fargo Center in Minneapolis and FNBO has aspects of that in it.iamjacobm wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:02 pmTo each their own and I by no means hate MoO's architecture, but I actually think MoO's design will look more dated in 30 years than FNBO. I think there is going to be an eventual boredom to the blue glass towers we have seen the past decade. People will think it looks very 2010s kind of like people think Woodmen looks very 60s. FNBO with the very attractive and well proportined massing, difference in materials, and thoughtful lines I think will age really well.HighWinds wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:45 am
I little over a year ago, I made a post comparing the renderings of MoOT's facade to one of my favorite modern skyscrapers, 1144 Fifteenth in Denver.
I'm proud to say now that this tower lives up to all my expectations and looks great. Really helps bring Omaha into the 21st century with that glass.
Always thought FNBT looked more late 80s/90s when compared to other regional buildings of the era.
Also 100% agree with the comments on the FNBT. It's still my favorite tower in Omaha, and probably the local region too! I love that Wells Fargo-style design, and the facade looks great! Just think it looks more like 90s tower than a 2000s one. Mutual is definitely a 20s skyscraper, even if does end up aging poorly, like iamjacobm mentioned.
FNBO tower is like the hybrid sandwich design bringing the Woodmen angular lines with the curve intricacies of Mutual of Omaha tower.
The curved steps of the glass reflecting light give echoes to the curved FNBO tower glass panes.
The terraces create actual shadow play and depth and the steps shift light hour-by-hour giving a texture that evolves.
I see people parked all the time taking pictures of the MoO tower and people that will literally sit and admire what is being built and take pictures.
At least Omaha is not full of Woodmen towers, one of our peer cities has nothing but a "woodmen" towers filled skyline.
The MoO is showing how much of a better design it is vs Devon tower's plain glassy look, MoO will age well.

Still I am glad people are appreciating the decorative feel of traditional architecture and we can expect more traditional elements in the future.
We are seeing pushback from locals on Noddle's companies stale corporate designs and allowing other more traditional architecture firms to build Millwork Commons.
Yes to historical photo exhibits and historical Omaha pieces, a big no to talentless ugly toddler "art" scribbles called modern art and contemporary "art". There is a reason that I and many others that visit the Joslyn and other Museums, would rather speed through or skip the post modern "art" section. Yes there are a few exceptions but most of the toddler "art" scribbles are an insult to actual classical artists with talent.Doctor Fate wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 5:53 pm Whatever goes here could have a contemporary and modern art museum at the base, maybe some decorative arts and a history of photography exhibit. Things that wouldn’t be parallel to what Joslyn has. Mutual offices, some residential, and a rooftop restaurant and bar could make up the rest.














