labguy wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 1:46 pm
I don't think anything is broken with the current model, however Clarkson Regional Health Services (I think they're now called Clarkson Institute) wants out of the deal that happened when University Hospital and Clarkson Hospital merged in 1997.
Most large, academic-medical centers are owned exclusively by their respective universities. We have a dual-owner model only because what is now Nebraska Medicine was formed from a merger of two health systems.
I guess the question is, if you want to keep the dual-owner model, who would you get to purchase CRHS's 50% stake? Some private equity firm?
Nebraska Medicine is going completely scorched earth on the University system calling it a state take-over, but it's really a case of one owner wanting out and the other owner having first right of refusal.
I have a handful of questions (and I'm in the healthcare biz and very familiar with the local players) about this proposed transaction:
-What will become of Clarkson? Will they still run their Allied Health college, or will this get folded into UNMC? Will they become purely a philanthropic organization, with no actual operations besides giving away their large sum of money? If so, have they provided any guidance as to what they'd give to/fund, besides Project Health?
-The statement about AMCs almost exclusively being owned by their respective universities is just flat out wrong (not faulting labguy, the regents said this as well). One of the examples cited by the regents is U of Minn, and their hospital is a JV (similar to Nebraska Med) with M Health Fairview. Wake Forest Univ Hospital is owned by Advocate Health. There are also a handful of AMCs that are under the "NY Presbyterian" umbrella in NY. Heck, even here in Omaha, Creighton Univ Med Center is owned by CommonSpirit. And that's just off the top of my head, I'm nearly certain there are others...
-I think the question is less about maintaining a dual-owner model, and more about the functional independence of the hospital, outside of the control of the board of regents. It is 100% possible to make this work with buying out Clarkson IF safeguards (independent board, guaranteed funding, separate legal entities) are put in place, and those guarantees don't appear to have been spelled out yet.
I 100% agree, bringing in another party (whether PE or another hospital group like HCA/Trinity/CommonSpirit)to buyout Clarkson would be the worst option.... We just don't have enough info about how the state would pay for this transaction, nor how it would continue to function independently to be able to support it yet...