They committed 2 errors of "journalism": 1) as you mentioned, exclusion aka "all the news fit to print" and 2)failing to balance their panel insight, or simply failed to reach those with alternate ideas other than to push the urban planning angle.nebport5 wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 6:06 pmOr maybe they cherry-picked and edited(left out) additional quotes from the interviews for the angle of the story.OverlookedFarm wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 5:26 pm If they could have interviewed one more "planner" they may have gotten some real traction, balance and substance.
Flatwater gunna flatwater though.
Onwards....
The topic at hand is the one that has vexed omaha for ages: A big city trying to be small and a small city trying to be big a the same time.
Couple of things:
1. Conflicting opinions coming from the city officials about how much the city wants its citizens to rely on cars. Which is it, city?
A) City Parking Manager Adeponu says that they city doesnt want omahans dependent on their cards forever.
B) City Streetcar Director Jensen says that the city doesn't want Omahans to abandon their cars
2. Chasing to build garages into funzones where the city can collect revenue is their goal, they are effectively driving the sprawl the wish to curtail. Again, a guy like me does not care for the "entertainment" districts which are subpar and do not offer anything unique or entertaining. I would have to drink massive amounts of smoked old fashions to make this worth it. And, I still have to drive home. Again, Massive structures can realistically gain the revenue they model for by being high volume and 24-7 activity.
3. Out of towners who day trip here from rural communities (lets be real, a major target) Do they feel the value, or is it a grift and/or the inconvenience.
4. Garrett makes a valid point about density and balance. But, I will tell you (again, anal me) I won't park my cars far off in a sketch area unattended. I've been lucky enough to use a secured employee parking badge of the few times I go downtown in recent years.
Again, this is a puff piece to push the city, doesn't change my opinion that the city is just chasing revenue stream in the parking industry. Afterall, you really have to have a professional certification to work in city parking? Wow. That tells me everything I need to know......