The Duo (222 S 15 ST) formerly Central Park Plaza

Downtown, Midtown, and all parts east of 72nd.

Moderators: nebugeater, Omaha Cowboy, Brad, BRoss

User avatar
Dundeemaha
Human Relations
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 11:41 am
Location: Country Club

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Dundeemaha »

The key to whether this project is exciting or completely neutral to me as ita said is ground level retail on the parking garage. Such a huge section of real estate made useless in its current configuration.
User avatar
Busguy2010
City Council
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Busguy2010 »

I like the new look. But I don't know how, why, or how it could possibly be worth it to reclad the whole building like that. I like the idea of building in the open space between the current buildings, and I like the thought of adding retail space along 16th. The block from Douglas to Farnam is a complete dead zone.

At this time, this doesn't really feel like a plan to me, just an idea. So I will sit back and wait for more concrete confirmation of a plan like this.
ita
County Board
Posts: 4735
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 4:11 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by ita »

Busguy2010 wrote: Thu Jun 17, 2021 10:00 am I like the new look. But I don't know how, why, or how it could possibly be worth it to reclad the whole building like that. I like the idea of building in the open space between the current buildings, and I like the thought of adding retail space along 16th. The block from Douglas to Farnam is a complete dead zone.

At this time, this doesn't really feel like a plan to me, just an idea. So I will sit back and wait for more concrete confirmation of a plan like this.
That's a good point. While I like the design of the fill in, the Parkfair Mall demolition for another parking structure, doesn't sit right with me.

Maybe instead of taking down Parkfair Mall parking garage, only replacing it with another garage and filling in the two towers, they keep the current twin towers, do a slight face lift on them, and build a mid rise 10 story with a few levels of parking? I wonder if it would be similar investment compared to what we see now as their plans. Make it residential on the finished floors and ground floor retail to help 16th Street out, particularly on the corner of 16th and Farnam. That's my alternative plan.
User avatar
Busguy2010
City Council
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Busguy2010 »

It seems like a relatively simple proposition to tear down the old garage and build a new garage with a full building on top that is approximately the same height as the others. It would be a pretty big building in itself. I like that idea even more than building in the space between them.
ita
County Board
Posts: 4735
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 4:11 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by ita »

Busguy2010 wrote: Thu Jun 17, 2021 10:28 am It seems like a relatively simple proposition to tear down the old garage and build a new garage with a full building on top that is approximately the same height as the others. It would be a pretty big building in itself. I like that idea even more than building in the space between them.
I just sent a message to City Ventures about my proposition. It could be like the building just announced for the parking lot in Blackstone. The City should not be OK with more freestanding parking garages in downtown.
LetsBeReal22
New to the Neighborhood
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2021 10:47 am

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by LetsBeReal22 »

ita wrote: Thu Jun 17, 2021 10:13 am Maybe instead of taking down Parkfair Mall parking garage, only replacing it with another garage and filling in the two towers, they keep the current twin towers, do a slight face lift on them, and build a mid rise 10 story with a few levels of parking? I wonder if it would be similar investment compared to what we see now as their plans. Make it residential on the finished floors and ground floor retail to help 16th Street out, particularly on the corner of 16th and Farnam. That's my alternative plan.
Seems like a no brainer. That space behind the towers is pretty large too.
GLASSHOLE23
New to the Neighborhood
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:09 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by GLASSHOLE23 »

Love me some glass. Hopefully I'll get the opportunity to build this.
Vitruvius
Home Owners Association
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2019 11:11 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Vitruvius »

Somedude wrote: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:44 am Looks like the building owners are floating around a face lift. Scope of work right is for a new skin, infilling and adding SF in between the two buildings and demo the existing parking garage and building one with 600 Stalls.

Image
I don't care for this. Filling in the middle and adding that observation deck makes it very weighty and visually oppressive. It does look too similar to the UP building. Although the UP building has a lighter feel.
One interesting aspect of the original towers is the sliver of vertical space where they nearly touch. That sliver and space helps give some openness and verticality that is completely missing in the face-lift idea.
Is the face-lift idea intended to cover the existing face or replace it completely?
I think it would be helpful to add some type of extension to the tops of each tower to hide those caps and increase the sense of height, uninterrupted. Maybe vertical elements (in bronze or copper) added to the present facade between the slim windows the entire lengths and then follow thru straight up. Doing so would give some surface dimension/relief in addition to adding height, add maybe 30 feet to the tops. The tops of the towers at present look unfinished and ungraceful. Street level could be more inviting too. And.... maybe doing something interesting on the backside, the 16th Street side, to extend the towers or add some interesting residential with some street level for a grocery, deli, coffeeshop, barber, UPS store, etc.
Cermak
Planning Board
Posts: 2317
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2018 1:02 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Cermak »

The Central Park plaza in its present form doesn’t bother me that much, I really don’t mind how it looks now, it’s a typical early-mid 80’s office building. So I’m hesitant if they start messing with it and somehow it doesn’t turn out good . This ones a tough call. The remodel does look somewhat similar to the U.P. Headquarters.
nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2745
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: 68102

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by nebport5 »

Vitruvius wrote: Thu Nov 18, 2021 4:56 pm
Somedude wrote: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:44 am Looks like the building owners are floating around a face lift. Scope of work right is for a new skin, infilling and adding SF in between the two buildings and demo the existing parking garage and building one with 600 Stalls.

Image
I don't care for this. Filling in the middle and adding that observation deck makes it very weighty and visually oppressive.
If you're old enough, it makes me think of the overbearing mother from the Pink Floyd The Wall film.
Vitruvius wrote: Thu Nov 18, 2021 4:56 pm It does look too similar to the UP building. Although the UP building has a lighter feel.
One interesting aspect of the original towers is the sliver of vertical space where they nearly touch. That sliver and space helps give some openness and verticality that is completely missing in the face-lift idea.
100%!!
Vitruvius wrote: Thu Nov 18, 2021 4:56 pm Is the face-lift idea intended to cover the existing face or replace it completely?
I think it would be helpful to add some type of extension to the tops of each tower to hide those caps and increase the sense of height, uninterrupted. Maybe vertical elements (in bronze or copper) added to the present facade between the slim windows the entire lengths and then follow thru straight up. Doing so would give some surface dimension/relief in addition to adding height, add maybe 30 feet to the tops. The tops of the towers at present look unfinished and ungraceful. Street level could be more inviting too. And.... maybe doing something interesting on the backside, the 16th Street side, to extend the towers or add some interesting residential with some street level for a grocery, deli, coffeeshop, barber, UPS store, etc.

The "upgrade" does indeed looks like, Jan's insecurity to her big U.P. sister, Marsha.


I might feel differently about a better rendering but until, why destroy skyline density and texture/color unlike any that's likely to come in favor of more austere glass?
Last edited by nebport5 on Fri Nov 19, 2021 8:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Omaha Cowboy
The Don
Posts: 1013707
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:31 am
Location: West Omaha

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Omaha Cowboy »

Yeah, I pretty much agree with the recent sentiment here..

There hasn’t been any talk since they announced the “freshening” of buildings 1 year ago. Perhaps we’ll get an update and a better looking rendering…

Ciao..LiO…Peace
Go Cowboys!
TransitOriented
Library Board
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 8:55 am

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by TransitOriented »

Somedude wrote: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:44 am Looks like the building owners are floating around a face lift. Scope of work right is for a new skin, infilling and adding SF in between the two buildings and demo the existing parking garage and building one with 600 Stalls.

Image
This looks fantastic!
ita
County Board
Posts: 4735
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 4:11 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by ita »

It looks like the planning board is reviewing the TIF submission for December's meeting. Docs should be posted sometime next week.
Vitruvius
Home Owners Association
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2019 11:11 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Vitruvius »

TransitOriented wrote: Fri Nov 19, 2021 9:51 am
Somedude wrote: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:44 am Looks like the building owners are floating around a face lift. Scope of work right is for a new skin, infilling and adding SF in between the two buildings and demo the existing parking garage and building one with 600 Stalls.

Image
This looks fantastic!
And that's the polite response when old friends get a bad face-lift.
guy4omaha
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1275
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: The Big O

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by guy4omaha »

I have always wanted to like the Central Park Plaza but always come back to an opinion of it is just yuck. So given that low bar to beat, for me at least, I like this update proposal much better.
My old signature got too old. So old it was getting almost as old me as me. Yeah, it was up there in years.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10797
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by iamjacobm »

TIF request shows a different rendering from the above. They want to fill in the middle of the two existing towers wth 80k sf of space.

https://planning.cityofomaha.org/images ... ber/07.pdf
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 4626
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Garrett »

Oh wait that’s way different than what I expected. Not changing the cladding at all to match the addition? Interesting
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
Louie
County Board
Posts: 4889
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:23 pm
Location: Dundee

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Louie »

Garrett wrote: Wed Nov 24, 2021 2:10 pm Oh wait that’s way different than what I expected. Not changing the cladding at all to match the addition? Interesting
I think its a pleasant surprise.
User avatar
Garrett
County Board
Posts: 4626
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Garrett »

Louie wrote: Wed Nov 24, 2021 2:13 pm
Garrett wrote: Wed Nov 24, 2021 2:10 pm Oh wait that’s way different than what I expected. Not changing the cladding at all to match the addition? Interesting
I think its a pleasant surprise.
I'll need to see higher quality renderings but I keep switching back and forth on whether I love it or hate it. Currently leaning into the like it range, but we'll see. It could be a good contrast that makes the addition look like a separate building and adds an illusion of increased density.
OMA-->CHI-->NYC
ita
County Board
Posts: 4735
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 4:11 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by ita »

Garrett wrote: Wed Nov 24, 2021 2:17 pm
Louie wrote: Wed Nov 24, 2021 2:13 pm
Garrett wrote: Wed Nov 24, 2021 2:10 pm Oh wait that’s way different than what I expected. Not changing the cladding at all to match the addition? Interesting
I think its a pleasant surprise.
I'll need to see higher quality renderings but I keep switching back and forth on whether I love it or hate it. Currently leaning into the like it range, but we'll see. It could be a good contrast that makes the addition look like a separate building and adds an illusion of increased density.
It does seem like it's a separate building which makes it seem like we are getting another high rise in that area. I look it looks fine.

I do find it interesting that this submission does not include the parking garage. I wonder if they have future plans for that side of the block. I am crossing my fingers they are planning to build on top of the garage or something like that.
NEDodger
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1338
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:19 am

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by NEDodger »

I like this look more than the previous all-glass one. Agreed that it gives the appearance of multiple buildings and I like the uniqueness of that.
buildomaha
Human Relations
Posts: 700
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 7:06 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by buildomaha »

That is a great surprise. I love the creation of contrast between the addition and the existing buildings!
#gohawks
Bob from Omaha
Planning Board
Posts: 3079
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Bob from Omaha »

$104,000,000 to buy the complex and add 80,000 square feet? Man that seems pricey. Better them than me. On the other hand, it is something. I'm not as fond of the look as others have posted but I also don't think it's ugly.
mgoett
Home Owners Association
Posts: 152
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2016 10:45 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by mgoett »

It would be cool if they built the middle up more
nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2745
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: 68102

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by nebport5 »

mgoett wrote: Wed Nov 24, 2021 8:45 pm It would be cool if they built the middle up more
Aesthetically I agree but that could be moot if something taller gets built in front of it.
GetUrban
Planning Board
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Omaha

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by GetUrban »

I like the scaled-back version more than the earlier re-cladding version, which I felt was a little overdone. The benefit to the users of the building was harder to justify with the cost of re-cladding the whole thing. Aesthetically, I’ve never been a fan of the original building. Even with something new coming on the Dale Clark site, you’ll still be able to see the CPP building from the street running in front of it, but maybe it will no longer be a major contributor to the DTO signature photo shot, which is fine.
He said "They are some big, ugly red brick buildings"
...and then they were gone.
User avatar
Omaha Cowboy
The Don
Posts: 1013707
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:31 am
Location: West Omaha

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Omaha Cowboy »

GetUrban wrote: Fri Nov 26, 2021 8:35 am I like the scaled-back version more than the earlier re-cladding version, which I felt was a little overdone. The benefit to the users of the building was harder to justify with the cost of re-cladding the whole thing. Aesthetically, I’ve never been a fan of the original building. Even with something new coming on the Dale Clark site, you’ll still be able to see the CPP building from the street running in front of it, but maybe it will no longer be a major contributor to the DTO signature photo shot, which is fine.
I agree..

It pretty much stays with the original “integrity” of the 1982 development…

Ciao..LiO…Peace
Go Cowboys!
User avatar
Busguy2010
City Council
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: North Central Omaha

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Busguy2010 »

I like this new call better. It will be a nice contrast and a huge money saver.
Athomsfere
Planning Board
Posts: 2298
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:03 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Athomsfere »

Oh yes, I like this much, much more!
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10797
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by iamjacobm »

OWH details.

Image

https://omaha.com/business/local/105-mi ... er_OWHnews
Now another business tower — stretching 17 stories and covered in glass — is to be wedged between the original two buildings that make up Central Park Plaza at 15th and Douglas Streets.

The new addition will rise a couple of floors higher than the towers on either side and will link them all together, in effect creating a unified structure with larger floor plates that the owner believes will attract more tenants.

The overall office complex will grow about 80,000 square feet to about 570,000 square feet. In addition, systems and existing building space are to be updated. New landscaping and sidewalk features would surround the complex. At least one street-level retailer will be added, along with an upper-floor lounge.

The complex will be renamed: the Apex.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10797
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by iamjacobm »

For the height obsessed let's make a few assumptions on "adding a couple of floors"

Per wiki the current buildings are 16 stories and 213 feet tall. If we take couple at face value and assume that the two additional floors will have the same height as the existing ones this new building will be 240 feet (rounded up) making it the 11th tallest in the city just barely past the Doubletree.

Obviously more nuance to the final plans, but that is in the ballpark likely. Hopefully, some rumors come true and push this building back down the height rankings though!

EDIT: Reading comprehension. The article says 17 floors duh, maybe more like ~227 to 230 feet just nudging out the Orpheum Tower.
User avatar
Omaha Cowboy
The Don
Posts: 1013707
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:31 am
Location: West Omaha

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Omaha Cowboy »

Well..

I’ll take it. I had heard through the “Cryptic Rumor Department” this 3rd tower addition would stretch a couple of stories higher..but I had to keep it to myself..

Hopefully this proposed announcement will be the first of several as we hope to see our skyline truly rise and expand…

Ciao..LiO…Peace
Go Cowboys!
nebport5
Planning Board
Posts: 2745
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: 68102

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by nebport5 »

I personally don't mind the red bricks(it provides contrasting color and texture from the majority of it surroundings) however, for those who despise them, it looks from these latest rendering that the plan may be to paint them a charcoal/grey color? In the context of the white and glass of the new addition I think this could turn out to be quite a nice face lift. The fourth pic in the Herald article looks particularly sleek. Hard to tell from renderings but I like this much more than earlier ones. Either way it's a good development that I hope can also one day pull off the proposed addition for the west side of the building for the benefit of 16th St.
Cermak
Planning Board
Posts: 2317
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2018 1:02 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Cermak »

Gotta like it when a building gets taller.
User avatar
iamjacobm
City Council
Posts: 10797
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:52 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by iamjacobm »

nebport5 wrote: Mon Nov 29, 2021 7:52 pm I personally don't mind the red bricks(it provides contrasting color and texture from the majority of it surroundings) however, for those who despise them, it looks from these latest rendering that the plan may be to paint them a charcoal/grey color? In the context of the white and glass of the new addition I think this could turn out to be quite a nice face lift. The fourth pic in the Herald article looks particularly sleek. Hard to tell from renderings but I like this much more than earlier ones. Either way it's a good development that I hope can also one day pull off the proposed addition for the west side of the building for the benefit of 16th St.
I think the rendering is just desaturating the colors of everything except for the new portion. I bet they stay red.
NEDodger
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1338
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:19 am

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by NEDodger »

iamjacobm wrote: Mon Nov 29, 2021 9:08 pm
nebport5 wrote: Mon Nov 29, 2021 7:52 pm I personally don't mind the red bricks(it provides contrasting color and texture from the majority of it surroundings) however, for those who despise them, it looks from these latest rendering that the plan may be to paint them a charcoal/grey color? In the context of the white and glass of the new addition I think this could turn out to be quite a nice face lift. The fourth pic in the Herald article looks particularly sleek. Hard to tell from renderings but I like this much more than earlier ones. Either way it's a good development that I hope can also one day pull off the proposed addition for the west side of the building for the benefit of 16th St.
I think the rendering is just desaturating the colors of everything except for the new portion. I bet they stay red.

I'm not sure about that. I originally agreed with you when looking at the photo above, but if you go to the fourth picture in the article where it shows a closeup/people on the ground.....it looks like they are in fact changing the color of the bricked portion to a charcoal.
ita
County Board
Posts: 4735
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 4:11 pm

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by ita »

Pulled from the article:
Plans for the third tower include a 16th-floor bar, lounge and events space that, at times, may be open to the public, he said. A fitness room will be added, and the street level is to feature a two-story central lobby with gathering and meeting spaces for tenants.
blackrock
New to the Neighborhood
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2019 3:51 am
Location: West Omaha

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by blackrock »

NEDodger wrote: Mon Nov 29, 2021 9:20 pm
iamjacobm wrote: Mon Nov 29, 2021 9:08 pm
nebport5 wrote: Mon Nov 29, 2021 7:52 pm I personally don't mind the red bricks(it provides contrasting color and texture from the majority of it surroundings) however, for those who despise them, it looks from these latest rendering that the plan may be to paint them a charcoal/grey color? In the context of the white and glass of the new addition I think this could turn out to be quite a nice face lift. The fourth pic in the Herald article looks particularly sleek. Hard to tell from renderings but I like this much more than earlier ones. Either way it's a good development that I hope can also one day pull off the proposed addition for the west side of the building for the benefit of 16th St.
I think the rendering is just desaturating the colors of everything except for the new portion. I bet they stay red.

I'm not sure about that. I originally agreed with you when looking at the photo above, but if you go to the fourth picture in the article where it shows a closeup/people on the ground.....it looks like they are in fact changing the color of the bricked portion to a charcoal.
I hope they keep the red brick. Painting the old Kiewit hq turned out okay I suppose, but leave the brick alone on the twins. I think it could look good with the new glass if it turns out close to the renderings.
User avatar
zedmib
Home Owners Association
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:50 am

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by zedmib »

I think Nebport5 is on to something when talking about "The Apex" getting " blocked out" by whatever is built on the library site. If they can't be the signature building at the end of the mall they might as well maximize the sites rentable space. I like the look.
To Growth! When do we get a Supertall! :mrgreen:
Zed
Doctor Fate
Parks & Recreation
Posts: 1272
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:31 pm
Location: DC Metro

Re: Central Park Plaza

Post by Doctor Fate »

So is the Apex considered an addition to Central Park Plaza or a new/separate structure altogether (albeit connected to the twins)?