Cities smaller than Omaha ...

Omababe · Post by **Omababe** » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:47 am

You guys love lists like this.

This came as inbox filler this morning.

Yes, yes, yes, yes, I know that most of the metro areas below are actually larger than that of Omaha.

...

Ten US cities which you don't think of as being smaller than Omaha, but are.

Source: 2010 US Census.

1. Miami
2. Minneapolis
3. Cleveland
4. New Orleans
5. Honolulu
6. St. Louis
7. Pittsburgh
8. Cincinnati
9. Saint Paul
10. Salt Lake City

RNcyanide · Post by **RNcyanide** » Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:53 pm

How is it then that they were able to pull in so much business development? I could see Miami and Honolulu with tourism, but what about Pittsburgh, Minneapolis and St. Louis?

guitarguy · Post by **guitarguy** » Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:14 pm

If you look up the MSA statistics of these cities you'll find that each of them exceeds 2-3 million people.. What sounds more attractive to you.. 900k potential customers or 2-3 million potential customers?

RNcyanide · Post by **RNcyanide** » Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:21 pm

I guess that's true... If only Council Bluffs would grow faster...

TitosBuritoBarn · Post by **TitosBuritoBarn** » Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:38 pm

Cleveland, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, and Cincinnati are all pretty stagnant as far as bringing in business development.

This is fun to look at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Me ... ical_Areas

nativeomahan · Post by **nativeomahan** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:05 pm

Yeah, another way of comparison: Metro Omaha is smaller than all of the following metro areas...
Worcester, MA
Bridgeport-Stamford, CT
Fresno, CA
Tulsa, OK
Tucson, AZ
Grand Rapids, MI
Rochester, NY
Birmingham, AL
Raleigh, NC
Hartford, CT
Providence, RI